/biz/ - Business & Finance

Yes, cup and handle is real. World biggest cup and handle.

We shoot straight to 10$

No but it's great long term

I believe in ~$85 by Q3 of 2019

>>6169474

100 eoy

>2018 eoy $10
>2019 $100-$300
>2020 $1K+

>>6169599
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>6169402
We going double uranium son

Phoneposting in work so forgive me, but you’re telling me that if I hodl a mere 2k of for 3-5 years, there’s a good chance that it will be worth somewhere around a 1Mil?

I know that chainlink will change everything but I have no clue about numbers or market cap or anything like that, so you’d make my day if someone were to confirm my wet dreams are actually true.

>>6169402
>Is it true that LINK has the projected value of $500 by 2020?

>>6169862
all you are going to find is confirmation bias in this thread. Invest what you can afford to lose

>>6169995
You’re probably right. I don’t know why I asked. I think I just need someone to tell me everything will be okay one day. Sorry for the pointless thread lads

>>6169599
$100 eoy seems far fetched but might even be an understatement.

>>6170141
Dont think its an understatement. People never would have realised 1k eth by end 2017 yet it happened. Fully expect link to do the same

Sergey speaks to me in my lucid dreams, I can’t understand him but he soothes me in my panic. sometimes AssBlaster is with him in the form of Denis Reynolds with his shirt off.

>>6169532
to the moon, sir

$100 EOY 2017

>>6170603
*2018, sorry. I forgot to update my copypasta

>>6170603
>Negate
I think your id just nullified everything your post claimed

We'll be over $1000/LINK by 2020 easily. $500 by EOY 2019. $100 EOY 2018.

>>6170654
nice just sold 100k

>>6170752

based on what?

>>6170853

decentralized oracle, smartcontracts, nodes

>>6170853
almost EVERY info on earth will go trough chainlink in future

all banks, big companies, small companies and so on will be using chainlink in future.

>>6170885
This thing will not have a trillion dollar market cap brainlets

>>6170853

The growth of the crypto market, partnerships, milestones happening this year, the fact that all next gen Ethereum dApps made late 2018/throughout 2019 will end up using Chainlink tech through zeppelin_os, and the fact that SWIFT DLT projects will be coming online in 2020.

LINK will become a top 5 coin and remain pinned there.

>>6170945

So?

You people really fucked up by not accumulating during december but buying now is still a good option.

>>6171015
1 +1 = ??

>>6170885
>it solves the oracle problem

>>6169402
Link is setting up to be THE key to mainstream smart contracts.
A $500 billion market cap is extremely plausible in such a scenario.

>>6169402
Sometimes I get chills thinking about this coin's future. Crypti will crash guaranteed, but a few will hold value simply due to how useful they are, and money will consolidate into them.
I strongly believe ChainLink is one of the few coins with a solid, long term (as in 100+ years) future in our basic infrastructure.

>>6171090

Yup. There's a network effect to what they're doing and being one of the first and positioning themselves like they have makes LINK a clear winner. If Chainlinks become the agreed upon way to map data in/out of blockchains, which seems likely with the zeppelin_os partnership, let alone any potential SWIFT partnership, then LINK will go on to become like the internet of the blockchain. Imagine monetizing every HTTP request. That's fucking unreal man.

>>6170752
>We'll be over $1000/LINK by 2020 easily. $500 by EOY 2019. $100 EOY 2018.

This is next level shilling

>>6171041
I bought in november and I regret it. I could've bought literally any random shitcoin in the top 100 and I would've earned more money by now

>>6171083
>$500 billion market cap

That's only like $50 bucks worth though

>>6171308
What?

>>6171257

Nah. 100x this year is easy considering how early into things and how under the radar it is. Then its just a 5x, and a 2x. Entirely plausible growth curve in this game.

>>6169532
If LINK actually doesn't form a handle and instead does that, then I will shill the term "chad singularity" so often that it will actually become a wide spread term used by professional investors in cryptocurrency by the end of this year.

>>6171282
I also initially bought in november but bought more in december and have been making nice gains during last week or so

How far back should charts go for TA on alts?

Considering going all in (poorfag who owns 1.4k Link) dumping REQ, ADA and XLM,
Probably only end up getting about 2.5k link in total, worth it?

>>6171198
I'm not even in it for the money. Even though I have 5k LINK it feels like nothing. I just want main net and developer docs so I can start writing oracles. The technology is so goddamn cool. I'm going to have a github with thousands of stars and hundreds of forks writing frameworks for this network.

>>6171308
>500b/1b = 50
Great job with that math anon

>>6171518
I'll help you

>>6169402
$500 is retarded, you'll be lucky if it hits $400. This is a $300 coin if you wanted to value it fairly, don't buy any higher than that or you'll lose a lot of money..

>>6171648
Req uses link so I cant tell you to sell it
If you have made gains with xlm and ada consolidating into LINK might be a good idea
Cant predict the future though

>>6171781
Im ok with any of those scenarios

>>6171648
keep XLM

>>6171648
Keep your REQ. Dump ADA abd XLM for sure. Then put your link in an off-exchange wallet. Backup the keys on paper. Uninstall blockfolio, and check back with us in a year.

You'll either have money to buy a house or the entire crypto market imploded with no survivors.

>>6171781
$300 is pretty absurd too. Short term, at least. I don't expect higher than $200 eoy, but conservatively I'm thinking more like $80-150. A pretty big range, but it's a lot more honest.

>>6171688

Same. I'm squatting 25k, but honestly just want the tech in my hands. I've been wanting to dive more into blockchain development, and oracles map well with my kind of development so my mind has been racing thinking of what oracles I want to want to write. Its going to be like an arms race of developers trying to become the authority for data as soon as mainnet launches. Plebs have no idea what's about to happen.

>>6170099
the day you die is the day everything will be ok. the sweet release of death is all you have to look forward to.

>>6171688
Well if LINK has any chance of succeeding it's going to be because of people like you. Thank you.

>>6171781
If LINK hits $125 I will have 1 million dollars worth of assets. I'm ok with this. Fuck, if it hits $5 I will have $40,000 and I'm still ok with that. We are so jaded to these massive gains that sometimes you need to step back and realize anytime you can more than quadruple your money in less than 10 years, you're doing fucking amazing. Compare the gains LINK has had in the past month to the stock market. It's fucking ridiculous.

Why would the price rise if 350 millions links are set to be handed out for free to businesses?

Why would the price rise if Sergey has 350 millions ready to dump at his discretion?

Linkies can't answer any of this questions.

>>6172001
Honestly I lost most of my anxiety when i realized that death was sweet release....much happier now

>>6172166
>Why would the price rise if 350 millions links are set to be handed out for free to businesses?
These tokens will be distributed gradually and won't make it to exchanges
>Why would the price rise if Sergey has 350 millions ready to dump at his discretion?
Why the fuck would he do that?
>Linkies can't answer any of this questions.
Wrong

>>6171385

Can people post more of those "under the radar" conspiracy memes of it being a generic name and boring white paper. We were never meant to know :^)

If chainlink ever does gain traction mainstream it will surely approach the chad singularity.

>>6172280
If you had 350m links and knew the project was going to fail would you dump them? Answer honest sir.

People talking about SWIFT a lot, while I agree it's huge I do think people underestimate the magnitude of zeppelin_os partnership. I estimate dapps build using zeppelin will be responsible for most of the traffic on the network.

>>6172453
I would if I wasn't in the public eye.

>>6172304
I took a screencap of AssBlaster's post the other day. It makes me wet everytime I look at it.

>>6171688
I would really love to hear more about this. Do you have a private contact address or can you just tell us about the kind of modules this will support

>>6172304

Its honestly one of the worst branded projects in crypto.

Company name/website: smartcontract
Network name: Chainlink
Token name: LINK
Blog: none
Twitter updates: none
Press coverage: little to none

If you're not on /biz/, or around on reddit the few times a Chainlink post does well there, you don't know about LINK unless you're one of their partners. Once they get their marketing hire on board and someone's updating Twitter even once a week, we'll start to see the price explode.

>>6169532
I'm proud to have supplied to paint skills for the virgin edit. Will spread this far and wide

>>6172608
I was in that thread too >>6000000
My claim to fame was getting the Oy Vey get

>>6171946
I've seen you post before and you got me quite interested. I'm a pleb when it comes to programming but cryptocurrency really reinvigorated my interest. Could you expand a bit further on what you think will happen once mainnet launches?

>>6172608
That's some /x/ tier speculation but God damn does it make me hard. Pls Sergey I just want to buy a modest middle class home and a new car for my wife pls

I’ll take my $1000 per LINK before summer thanks