/biz/ - Business & Finance

That's cool and all, but...price?
Oh, and...chart?

>>59408049
try nice fuddie we have burgers here

Genuinly think Chainlink will be #1 in mc end of this bullrun with atleast $4000 per LINK

>>59408146
This will unironically happen, but the global economy will collapse two weeks later.

>>59408043
It's called Project Diamond because it's gonna take as long as a diamond to form naturally

>>59408043
okay but the token doesn't do anything, infact it seems completely unrelated to the project itself

>>59408158
Yeah seems on brand with the past 7 years of my LINK holding experience kek

WHATS THIS FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS SHIT????

>>59408158
>>59408192

No they will actually roll out the global digital ID instead and we will be forced to take some vaccine or we won’t be able to cash out or participate in society.

I know this is how we will get fucked. I can feel it in my balls.

>>59408222
why dont you just take the vaccine anon

>>59408043
happy to see coinbase is using xrpl

>>59408263
he doesn't want to die due to unrelated sudden organ failure

Bullish for Hedera, Ripple, and Stellar!

>>59408158
>collapsing global economy to curb link
Kek. I love PTSD’d linkmarines.

>>59408290
More like collapsing link to fuck over normies FOMOing at the top. If link actually flips bitshit, any marine that doesn't sell everything they aren't okay hodling to a 99% loss deserves no sympathy.(If this scenario plays out I will still keep maybe 10% of my holdings in the staking pool)

>>59408043
Translation:
>we are giving away free link to coinbase

Keep the donations coming in linkies

question: if institutions are buying,
why the need to shill to retail?
kek
no thanks

>>59408273
lol source?

>>59408326
That's what's always put me off about chainlink, the aggressive shilling to retail.

Also how you know it's a midwit trap, midwits are not savy like retards and high iqs. They don't pick up on these red flags, and they never learn

>>59408370
Well yeah, they're trapping midwits with

>it's a fee based model

High iqs see Chainlink Labs making money keeping all the fees for themselves and selling tokens to retail and understand theyre not committed to the model they sold in the white paper.

>>59408322
>>59408326
>>59408370
>>59408392
Absolute back to back fuddie seethe.
You love to see it.

>muh don't listen to the critics, they be jealous n shiiet
absolute nigger tier scam

It's funny how simultaneously, Chainlink is shilling too much to retail, and not shilling enough to retail. Spending too much money (big workforce, HR Roasties), and not spending enough money (office space). Not making enough money (muh CCIP), and scamming bagholders out of revenue (they are holding back hundreds of millions in price feed money!!).

>>59408558
Kek, whatever they're paying these "advocates" (probably the same as jannies) it's too much

>>59408326
Who is shilling to retail here? Coinbase institutional made the fucking tweet.

>>59408580
Schrödinger's Shitcoin, it's everything at once, as long as that thing is bad.

>>59408583
it's an advert (hint: it didn't come free)

>>59408590
you realize it's coinbase paying link for their services right? you don't possibly think sergey paid coinbase for a tweet when he can just go to australia or hong kong and have their market makers drool over a speech of his?

>>59408598
> you don't possibly think sergey paid coinbase for a tweet
yes, i do

>>59408043
I just checked what this project diamond is and its basically some experimental thing by coinbase where they try to make institutions pay coinbase so they create a stablecoin for them.
Who even asked for this? We don't need even more stablecoins. Everyone and their mother has a stablecoin now, 90% of them are just straight up unused. And I have no idea what the fuck "chainlink standard" is even supposed to mean in that context.
Wtf is "unlock utility and unify liqudity" even mean? Also this none of this has ANYTHING to do with chainlink TOKEN, so you baggies are still not getting shit.
No wonder normal people think crypto is a scam. It honestly kind of is.

>>59408598
Chainlink model is giving away free tokens, see:
>build
>scale
>price feeds
>HR roasties
>advocates

Now I'm sure coinbase is paying, can't wait to see the money flow into the dune dashboards !!

>>59408580
>Not making enough money (muh CCIP), and scamming bagholders out of revenue


No. They're getting revenue for price feeds, and giving link from the premint to nodes in exchange. We've been over this scam a million times already.

>>59408263

>>59408616
ok? what happens when there are no free tokens then? they pay up. free trial over.

>>59408598
>coinbase is paying link
Surely this substantial increase in volume would be apparent in the umm... chart?

>>59408633
>what happens when there are no free tokens then
scam is up, thanks for playing
maybe you'll have a merger with BBBYQ general, untill the jannies clean you up

>>59408633
Yeah yeah yeah, we know, this time they will fulfil their promise!

>>59408580
>>59408588
>>59408583
>muh they don't shill to retail
They do nothing but shill to retail, it it the most shilled shitcoin of all

>>59408146
>4000
they said this last bull run too btw

>>59408717
Damn you are right, adjusted target is 8000 now

>>59408724
you need to factor in coiled spring. 1 LINK being $1,200,040 is not out of the question by 2026.

>>59408643
why would it impact the chart before the payment abstraction layer is finished? it needs to be converted to link and it will in q1 2025 after the current audit is finished.
>>59408645
link board
>>59408652
show me something in either whitepaper that has not been delivered on. everything in there has progress made on it.
>>59408661
idiot they shill to devs, not retail. devs and apps are the ones using the token so they do as much education content as they can. why would they care about people that don't code and would leave their tokens on a cex?

>>59408580
kek exactly

>>59408661
>6pbtid
triggered

>>59408734
>why would it impact the chart before the payment abstraction layer is finished?
Ask the current rank 3 crypto by market cap.

>>59408222
Checked and I agree, I don't have much link but the other coins I have will be in the same system. We can get rich but we need to play a long.

>>59408737
ok 1 token has a smear campaign and media blackouts while the other gets national tv interviews half hour interviews

>>59408222
Checked.
My balls have been singing a similar song, to the tune of
>will they want all these coins to exist in a one-world currency CBDC society and how will they ensure our compliance if not by crashing the global economy by hyping up crypto and rugging it with regulations or saylor or all the jewish institutions selling at once causing a huge domino effect worldwide before our saviour flies down on his pale white horse offering us salvation, not without a small caveat—brain chip?

>>59408751
>Chainlink isn't marketed to retail

Take it up with your fellow fuddie over here >>59408661

>>59408757
how did you read any of what i typed and come to the conclusion that i am a fuddie

>>59408734
economics 2.0
super linear staking
reputation system
slashing mechanism
deco
should I go on, retard?

>>59408768
The implication that payment abstraction is needed for news to impact the price

>>59408771
>economics 2.0
>super linear staking
>reputation system
>slashing mechanism
Nothing in the entire top 15 has anything like this.

>>59408771
literally every single thing you mentioned has progress made on it. hell deco even released you can use the sandbox right now it's live to the public.

most of that list you typed are smaller features to specific updates. we are on staking v0.2 and you are mad that features in v2.0 aren't out yet. do you realize how insane you sound? literally the only thing stopping economics 2.0 from being a thing is the payment abstraction layer WHICH IS IN AUDIT AS WE SPEAK.

In this timeline memes beat utility. Don't forget it

>>59408734
Retard. Fee based model, with staking creating scarcity, the essence of the tokenomics in the white paper. Not delivered, quite the opposite actually.

Always been the same issue. No value transfered to the token. This can only occur if somehow using the chainlink services result in more tokens being bought up (on open market) or more tokens being locked up (staking). Only thing Chainlink does is unlock more tokens, which is LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE of giving the token value

>b-but they will do it in the future

Which brings us back to anons point

>surely this time they will fulfil their promise!

Now go cry in a corner advoshit

>>59408783
we have long established that news will never pump link because of certain people who hate either us or sergey or both. even if it did the party would end before the real fun starts. hence we need to play the game fair and have the token price raise entirely by usage. yes it's cringe we are the only ones that have to play by these rules but those are the cards at hand.

>>59408793
>b-but they will do it in the future

No one believes this anymore

>>59408793
I'm actually mad that not even staking 1.0 is out
imagine unironically defending the absence of staking 7 years after ICO

>>59408802
>>59408813
>mad that their decade long and generational wealth holding project is taking a decade to complete
sad. why so impatient?

>>59408783
nothing in the entire top 15 had similar WPs to LINK, either, what's your point? the retard I'm responding to claimed that Chainlink has delivered on their WPs, when they clearly haven't
let me guess, you're also a retard

>>59408820
>it was always a 20 year hold
it wasn't

>chainlink advocate shilling intensifies
I hope they do pay you as much as the jannies, or even better, in chainlink,
KEK

>>59408043
List Galaxis then I’ll rejoin

>>59408810
>we have long established that news will never pump link
This is complete nonsense. Link is always trying to pump after news.

>>59408823
>nothing in the entire top 15 had similar WPs to LINK, either, what's your point?
That Link is somehow the only coin that needs a whole list of features before it can pump, but shit like Ripple and ADA don't need anything, not even basic adoption.
How is that in any way difficult for you to understand.

>>59408315
>dude just sell the most valuable asset on the planet for fiat
You still don’t TRULY get it

>>59408854
he specifically asked about the white paper you illiterate nigger

>>59408315
in this scenario why would you not just borrow usdc against your link? if it does flip bitshit then literally the sky is the limit so why would you ever sell.
>>59408854
yes. trying to. why doesn't it? because of certain people tanking the price of btc. who? i have no clue. hence why i said we have to play by the rules and only get price up via adoption because there are people out there that hate link pumps.

>>59408874
The argument is Link doesn't pump because it "gives away tokens" as long as those features aren't in place.

>>59408885
>yes. trying to. why doesn't it?
You know why.

>>59408885
>if chainshit flips bitshit
how delusional are you? It's a literal ERC
you literally have to buy ETH in order to do anything with it
THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE PROPER STAKING OUT 7 YEARS AFTER THE ICO
this board has destroyed your brain

>>59408886
that's not my argument, you literally cannot read, I'm talking about unfulfilled WP promises
keep trying to m

>>59408864
There will probably be a few years where fiat is still the go to. I will cash out 90% at $5,000 per coin… fuck endless bitches of multiple races till my dick falls off then stake the last 1,000 link at $81,000 for the new system.

>>59408890
HE MENTIONED IT FLIPPING BUTTCOIN FIRST

>>59408896
AND YOU MENTIONED STAKING V 2.0 WHEN IT'S NOT EVEN ON STAKING V.1
EAT SHIT AVOCADO

>>59408893
>that's not my argument
That's the only argument.

>>59408900
>chainshit has fulfilled all of their WP promises
>no they haven't
>REEEEEEEEEE WHAT ABOUT ADAs WP REEEEE
the absolute state of shitlink paid shilling

Dare I say,
Overpromise and underdeliver?
Pools closed and some linkies dit some stinkies in it eww
Its not payment abstraction btw, its payment subtracted from your wallet to some stinking HR roastie sippin on that vegan seed oil latte.

>>59408903
The only reason anyone would bring up these things, is because muh price. Even in this specific argument, just read up in the convo.

>>59408903
Wow you are absolutely DESTROYING linkies with FACTS and LOGIC and 9PBTID can we bring up the chart of your seretonin and dopamine levels please

>>59408912
>NOOOOO I HAVE TO MOVE THE GOALPOSTS TO AN ENTIRE DIFFERENT SUBJECT SO I CANNOT CONCEDE THAT CHAINLINK HAS NOT DELIVERED SHIT ACCORDING TO THEIR WPs REEEEEEE

>>59408916
buy teh chainlank coin sirs, many moons, GAWD protocol, muh salsa salami DUUUDDE

>>59408625
It has been a long established fud point that Chainlink has no (or too little) revenue. Especially when it comes to CCIP, which fuddies like to pretend is Chainlink's only product. The "they are using uncirculating tokens to pay nops" is a relatively new fud angle, for which I can actually partly take credit for.

>>59408661
>it it the most shilled shitcoin of all
Yeah definitely. Remember that time when Elon tweeted about it? And used its acronym to found a new government agency? Or that time when Chainlink bought a Superbowl commercial? Which F1 team are they sponsoring again? Weren't there a few soccer clubs with Chainlink on their jerseys? It's crazy how much shilling to retail Chainlink has been doing!

>>59408918
>11pbtid
Absolutely crying

>>59408820
It is taking a long time, so in the meantime we have to trust them. But somehow all the opportunities they have to show good faith towards holders they don't fulfil their engagement:

>Fees, they're getting them from price feeds and also other service. NONE I used to buy link.
>staking. Some weird limit in return and number of stakers
>build. Nothing distributed.
>inflation. Is still manual so no user can benefit from it.


Whereas they have been giving free link for build, they're dumping link for their "operations", they're giving free link to institutions with scale, etc...

We see this pattern, so why we trust them to actually let the money go when the premint is depleted? Will the network even be able to survive if they keep sucking on it dry like this?

>>59408923
>reeeeeeee stop FUDDING aksually that's my FUD huur durr derp
>REEEE IT'S NOT LIKE DOGE THEREFORE IT HASN'T BEEN SHILLED ENOUGH REEEE
mindbroken baggies

>>59408933
Level-headed, totally not mind-broken response, I'm sure.

>>59408938
yes, unlike your passive aggressive "troll" shitposts
seethe, baggie

>>59408932
>>Fees, they're getting them from price feeds and also other service. NONE I used to buy link.
Unlike XRP, am I right?

>>build. Nothing distributed.
Unlike the Flare airdrop, am I right?

>>inflation. Is still manual so no user can benefit from it.
Unlike XRP, am I right?

None of this matters.

>>59408948
>WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SHITCOINS STOP TALKING ABOUT SHITLINK TALK ABOUT XRP AND ADA DUUUUDE
kek

>>59408726
Damn how coiled is that spring

>>59408957
XRP did a cool 5x back to rank 3 just last month. You didn't know?

>>59408932
>Fees
taken in link token, payments not in link token are currently sitting in wallets waiting for payment abstraction layer so that they can be converted to link.
>staking
released december 2022 -> update to v0.2 in december 2023 -> currently december 2024 with no update. yes this begs the question on when is the next update.
>build
update in blog from a month ago says that it's been code ready and the system is done, just waiting on new administration to approve
>inflation
yes this is annoying and i would like clarity.

>they're giving free link to institutions with scale
uhhh anon each scale member is paying 15-20 million dollars. mentioned in an interview by someone working at one of these L2's

>>59408986
guess you should've invested in the superior product....

>>59408991
>....
exactly lmao

>>59408984
imagine the sexual frustration of having your cock in a cuck cage for 7 years and finally being released from the cuck prison

>>59408726
cool, a marketcap of just 1.200.000.000.000.000.000
or 1.2 quintillion

>>59408989
>>inflation
>yes this is annoying
lmao what? Did you miss the update Chainlink gave in September 2017?

>>59409043
Its all pretty clear to me the current supply is about 453,509,553 LINK tokens, or about 45% of the total supply. This means only 55% of the supply left to dilute the current OGs stacks.

>>59408043
Christ Barrett just posted on X that today is a big press day.

>>59408989
>taken in link token, payments not in link token are currently sitting in wallets waiting for payment abstraction layer so that they can be converted to link.

So first oopsie you forgot about the price feed fees that go to... Guess who? Chainlink Labs!

And then re the PA, yes that's what I'm saying, somehow not implemented yet, because it benefits holders, not CL, that's the pattern we're seeing

>build update in blog from a month ago says that it's been code ready and the system is done, just waiting on new administration to approve

somehow not implemented yet, I guess less urgent as that would go to holders, same pattern

>staking
Yes let's take it slow and offer sub 5 percent return because this is value going to holders and not to...


>>inflation
>yes this is annoying and i would like clarity.

Oopsie, not implemented, would benefit other actors and push revenue away from Chainlink Labs. See it yet?

>uhhh anon each scale member is paying 15-20 million dollars.

Ah that's strange, where are these millions going? Wich company benefits from this? Just take a wild guess. I'm sure happy that they get link from the premint in exchange while zero dollar touches the network

But I guess surely we can trust them to do the right thing in the future

>>59408222
This was always the plan. A test of the human spirit. Why do you think (((they))) laid it all out clear as day for anyone with eyes to see?

Knowing where this is all headed, will you go along with the enslavement of humanity for a few shekels? Many have already succumbed (see the intellectual wasteland known as twitter), will you?

>>59409053
>Its all pretty clear to me the current supply is about 453,509,553 LINK tokens, or about 45% of the total supply. This means only 55% of the supply left to dilute the current OGs stacks.
There is currently about 375.000.000 LINK left in Chainlink's uncirculating supply wallets. You can find them here https://chain.link/circulating-supply.. So around 38% of the supply left.

>>59408943
>seethe, baggie
Haven't you been seething all thread, while being a baggie? Kek

>>59409053
And you expected supply to be fully diluted by now?

>>59409164
Ah yes I pasted the data from 2021. According to this new data we can estimate when the foundation runs out if they continue at this pace:

Based on the given information, we can calculate the amount released into circulation per year and estimate when the maximum supply will be reached.
The supply increased from 453,509,553 in 2021 to 626,849,970.45 in 2024, a span of 3 years.
Amount released per year:
(626,849,970.45 - 453,509,553) / 3 = 57,780,139.15 tokens per year
To calculate when the maximum supply of 1 billion will be reached:
Remaining supply: 1,000,000,000 - 626,849,970.45 = 373,150,029.55 tokens
Time to reach maximum supply:
373,150,029.55 / 57,780,139.15 ≈ 6.46 years
At the current pace, the maximum supply of 1 billion tokens will be reached in approximately 6.46 years from 2024, which would be around mid-2030.

>>59409017
I’d never know what a cock cage is like, much less for seven years.
You sound like a cuck.

>>59409331
You're acting like it matters.
XRP dumped more money than Sergey these past 12 months, and look what they did and what rank they are.

>>59409372
Those 3 letters really swirl around in your linky head dont they. The big difference is that ripple has their escrow has a very clear schedule on when and how much they sell. If sirgay needs feeding, he will just drain another wallet. Its Sirgay Betray, remember?

>>59409423
You literally hold link

>>59409423
>Those 3 letters really swirl around in your linky head dont they.
They should swirl in everyone's head. They're quite literally rank 3 right now, and just had a major pump.
If you want to know what the current market wants, look at XRP. And ADA, XLM, Sui, ...

>very clear schedule on when and how much they sell
Exactly like Link: 7% of total supply per year.

MY LINKIES STAY STINKY

>>59408158
It will collapse before. Sergey pretty much pointed out a failure of the old systems which would enable the new one to emerge, I forgot the exact quote and where he said it, but I think it was a 1 on 1 interview?

literally who?

>>59409348
>sound like
Anon, I'm a Link marine, THE cuckolds of crypto. I'm Sergey's paypig and I love it.

>>59409433
I do and so do you. Can we go back to the content of the post and not the posters holdings?
>>59409448
I hold most except for ADA

Chainlink Labs has been selling its reserve LINK holdings to facilitate ecosystem growth. The circulating supply of LINK grew at an average pace of around 1.4% per month.
This translates to approximately 16.8% per year, which is higher than 7%. However, Chainlink has recently revised its token release schedule to decrease LINK's annual inflation each
calendar year.

Ripple Labs follows a different approach. They locked up 55 billion XRP in escrow accounts and release 1 billion XRP each month. This represents about 1% of the total supply per month or 12% per year. However, not all released tokens are sold. Any unused portion is returned to escrow, effectively reducing the actual amount entering circulation.

imagine being us

>>59409590
Is that…No way

>>59408611
/thread

also any comments about a company "paying link" means they MIGHT be sending money to Chainlink Labs ltd Caymans company

>>59409547
>This translates to approximately 16.8% per year
>Chainlink has recently revised its token release schedule to decrease LINK's annual inflation each
calendar year.
The supply increases by 7% of the total supply per year.
That means the percentage compared to the circulating supply goes down yoy.

>Ripple Labs follows a different approach.
Yes, they dump way more in terms of monetary value.

>>59408923
>duuuuude there's SECRET revenue!!!!
the c-u-c-k cheers on his cult as they scam him

>>59408932
>so in the meantime we have to trust them
I have a bridge to sell you

They block anyone who asks questions at this point

Remember when they advertised build rewards for 2 years and then all of a sudden at the end of this year fat boy happen to mumble something about regulations hahahaha

meanwhile thousands of other coins do airdrops


The liberals of crypto
The laughingstock of crypto

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59409681
>>duuuuude there's SECRET revenue!!!!
That's literally what fudders are saying too: money goes directly to Chainlink but nobody knows how much. Fuddies are saying this is "stealing".

>>59409547
Are you trolling or just really bad at math? You're calculating XRPs emission rate over the total supply (100B) while calculating Chainlink's supply over the circulating supply. Of course the emission number is going to be bigger if you do that. If we look at XRP's CURRENT emission rate (which will have gone down % wise compared to the start, if they dump a consistent 1B per month), it looks like this:

Current circ supply: 57B
Supply added per month: 1B (according to your source)

1/57= 0,0175. Or: 1.75% per month or 21% per year. This is CURRENT. If what you quoted is correct and they started with 55B escrowed and 45B circulating, the number would be even bigger. In any case, the 1% monthly and 12% yearly inflation is utter bullshit for XRP. It's almost double that CURRENTLY when calculated over the circulating supply.

Then there is Chainlink. Chainlink releases 7% of the TOTAL supply per year (1B total, so 70M per year, or 5.8m per month). Which at first would have translated to an emission rate of the circulating supply of:

Circulating supply: 350m
Supply added per month: 5.8m

5.8/350 = 0,0166. Or: 1.66% per month or 19% per year.

So even during Chainlink's highest emission year (lets for the sake of argument say they started this schedule in 2018), they dumped less % wise than XRP is CURRENTLY doing. For comparison, Chainlink's current emission rate is 11% per year due to the supply expanding to 627m.

Are you that ChatGPT XRP cheerleader? You really are way too dumb to be having these discussions.

>>59408043
They're trying to get one last pump before Trump comes in and dumps Putins bags

>>59409547
good points and one of the many shady things about Link is they never published a set inflation schedule

ie we'll sell x amount of coins every month... instead fatboy sells off into every pump, ensuring he stifles investor gains


point 2 - PSA to all newb investors here... whenever your cultcoin leaders' rallying cry becomes "mommy the market isn't fair the other top 3 coins did this..." you know that times are desperate

>>59409720
>they never published a set inflation schedule
They did: 7% of total supply per year.

>>59409681
>>duuuuude there's SECRET revenue!!!!
I didn't come up with that duudeposter, that honor goes to your compatriots.

>>59409590
Context? I have seen so much hopium and breadcrumbs for my linkbags ive become immune to it

>>59408793
Why do you people interact with paid fudders?

>>59409776
Personally I fud in shill threads and shill in fud threads. Board culture, no one is paid.

>>59409693
>Fuddies are saying this is "stealing".

it basically is

not in the legal sense because crypto is so new and it's all a legal gray area, but ethically, to take billions from your investors and then cut them out of revenue is insanity

obviously to a slav like sergey its water right off his back and as a kissinger disciple he has no qualms stepping on anyone to achieve his legacy

but this is why i found the irony of chainlink advocates insinuating they will thrive once regulations come along hilarious... dog you aren't going to be able to pull all this shady shit once there's regulations and you're required to show everyone where the money goes via financial disclosures

>>59409734
>I didn't come up with that duudeposter, that honor goes to your compatriots.

i actually think it was mentioned in a podcast a while back

hold on let me check my screenshot library

emirates bank of dubai

>>59409720
> Link is they never published a set inflation schedule

>>59409806
>duudeposter has a dedicated Chainlink screenshot library
Kek

>>59409868
>aims to
>expected
>anticipated
>similar
>subject to change
but also
>TRUTH > TRUST

if only there was some new technology that could codify these token releases.

here it is... july of this year

https://x.com/ChainLinkGod/status/1817649910906589468

>>59409932
im a idiot. does this mean theyre going back to % based fees instead of fixed?

>>59408043
>>59409839
Based.
> They will all bend the knee
/biz/ predicted this.

>>59408043
The token simply isn't needed.

>>59408043

>Project diamond hands

OH MY REDDIT

>>59409796
>to take billions from your investors and then cut them out of revenue is insanity
So sell.
Instead you don't sell, and complain and cry every single day for years.

Meaning you don't actually believe what you're saying.

>>59408043
Notice of Insufficient Digital Social Points
Citizen Unit #A-594213,
Your wallet balance has fallen below the required threshold for pod entry. Access to your living quarters has been denied.

This system, powered by Chainlink’s Immutable Trust Framework, ensures real-time accountability for all citizens within the Civic Compliance Network™. As a reminder, tampering or bypassing the system constitutes treason under Protocol 12.

To restore entry rights and avoid escalation to Mandatory Correctional Measures, you must complete one of the following tasks within 24 hours:

1. Complete the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Re-Education Module (estimated time: 4 hours).
2. Attend the 'Yas Queen Slay' Presidential Unity Rally (minimum stay: 3 hours; biometric presence verification required).
3. Engage with the Ministry of Health Approved Content Campaign: like, retweet, and bookmark all designated posts (verification will be automatic).

Failure to comply will result in:

- Revocation of pod entrance rights.
- Deduction of an additional 5 Social Points per hour of delinquency.
- Automatic referral to the Behavioral Adjustment Bureau for corrective action.

>>59410355
Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

>>59410661
You won't have to worry about all that by holding link. It will grant you entry to the citadel. Limited supply after all.

>>59408354
Price, uh, chart, uh price, uh chart

>>59409483
>Sergey pretty much pointed out a failure of the old systems which would enable the new one to emerge
Desu. I remember this. He has obviously insider knowledge

>>59408957
>100 posts by this id seething about Link
Thats a yikes from me sweetie

meanwhile kleros is actually getting real world adoption and chainlink is just vaporware

>>59408611
>Wtf is "unlock utility and unify liqudity" even mean?
using and paying for chainlink services to back their stablecoin project
that phrase is a dead giveaway to the usage of CCIP to ensure the stablecoin is seamlessly operational across multiple blockchains

>>59408839
>b-buh muh avocados, everyone calling me a retarded fag is an avocado!
he says as he tries to maintain a minimum of 6 fud threads in the catalog at all times for no reason at all
I'm looking forward to seeing some of you fags get killed desu

why are fudders so unhinged, cringe and reeking of porn and substance addiction?

Kek the liberals of crypto
Its just a matter of time until address leak :)

>>59409868
>A fucking discord post

This is what linkies consider a crypto guarantee. Says a lot.

>>59408611
Reminds me of the Sygnum NAV bullshit. Most people don't even investigate what is actually entailed in these so called "partnerships".

>>59409590
Another nothingburger, its just a Jason Parsor of this:

https://markets.newyorkfed.org/api/rates/secured/all/latest.json

https://markets.newyorkfed.org/static/docs/markets-api.html#/

Its also funny how you faggots think the payment abstraction is bullish. The LINK tokens will be converted and sold to FIAT to finance more roasties.
Can't wait until January to finally nuke my bags so I never have to enter another thread of fuddies and avocadocucks. Fuck you all you degenerate scum and fuck Chainlink.

>>59409681
>Remember when they advertised build rewards for 2 years and then all of a sudden at the end of this year fat boy happen to mumble something about regulations hahahaha
BUILD was such an obvious carrot on a stick to get midwits to lock up their tokens for two years or however the fuck long it was. you had to be an absolutely bluepilled retard to go along with it.

>>59408146
True (wrong)

>>59413526
Clearly your opinion is more knowledgeable than the DTCC’s, SWIFTS and government central banks.

>>59413714
Shut the fuck up faggot. You post the same shit day in day out but you are by far one of the stupidest cunts on this board. The fact your even identifiable by the shit you post and style should tell you that you spend too much time here.

>>59409707
Trump is buying LINK tho

>>59408326
lol there is an active campaign to fud retail you simpleton

>>59408043
>Pay eth gas fee
>Pay chainshit fee
>Pay other networks gas fee
Wow that was worth it

>>59408043
K

>>59413747
Idk man I’m making quite a lot of money right now.

>>59408049
Check again

>>59408043

>>59408049
please post them for reference? hello? helloooo???

>>59414871
considering the fact that you're a 2020 top buyer, I highly doubt it

>>59415946
shut the fuck up wage slave

>>59408139
>>59414885
>>59415579
Fuck you

>>59408043
Lol just an exchange, literally nothing

>>59416722
>fudgroid seethes uncontrollably and lashes out insulting when LINK pumps
You love to see it

Also, seethe cope and dilate, subhuman
My net worth (99% LINK) is bigger than the wealth of your entire bloodline, ascendants and descendants (lmao no)
How does that make you feel?

Its up only from here on out

>>59416828
>it's just an exchange
>it's just the president and his sons
>it's just 11,000 banks
>it's just the DTCC
>it's just the Brazilian central bank

>>59417065
I hope you never make it you scum of the earth

>>59417265
Get fucked fudgroid you lost, as fudchuds ALWAYS do
>my life will begin when LINK craters
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAH EAT SHIT AND DIE