/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>59318647
Approximately 1 week and 6 days.

Not gonna happen, XRP has first mover advantage and retards think banking = XRP, regardless of the truth.

>>59318697
>brooo because the crypto retail market thinks XRP is going to be used it doesn't matter that every major financial institution across the globe is currently building products with LINK! It's just gonna happen, bro!

>>59318697
Kek

>>59318647
IMAGINE STILL BEING A STINKY LINKY IN DENIAL


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>market wakes up
kek

>>59318697
kek baggies

>>59318647

>>59318657
Rolling to see if true

Pajeet link? Yeah, I'm m buying.

>>59318647
Not gonna happen. You are right on fundamentales but XRP holders are literal mongoloids. They will never understand LINK, because It IS too complex. Accept that LINK can only pump from usage. Retail will never buy in en mass.

>>59318812
This image just proves OP is right and you’re a cult of retards lol

>>59318647
Chainlink will dump

>>59318697
>12 years
>nothing to show for it but a $2 shitcoin it took 100k btc to achieve

>>59318647
you sound like a bipolar stepmother screeching at her stepson that her biological daughter is a princess CEO surgeon president and that he's just a loser

Get someone else to buy your $30+ bags linkie

>>59318647
Can link tokenize on its layer 1? Can i send link wallet to wallet for near 0 fees? Can link issue a stablecoin?

>>59319348
yeah but consider this >>59318812

>>59320826
Thanks for proving my point kek

>>59320816
>Can link tokenize on its layer 1?
No
> Can i send link wallet to wallet for near 0 fees?
Depends on the blockchain
> Can link issue a stablecoin?
No

but many, many, many other blockchains can have those functionalities and none of those are what Chainlink intended to do in the first place. Chainlink is for handling functionality and computation that the blockchains can't do themselves.

Can your blockchain:

> Receive API data in a secure manner that does not compromise the blockchain?
> Can it communicate with and send messages in a secure manner to other blockchains?
> Generate random numbers that can't be maliciously exploited?
> Manage or compute private data without exposing it to the rest of its blockchain network?
> Run cron jobs?

If not, chances are your blockchain is gonna want to get in line for the Chainlink SCALE program.

>>59319342
Unfortunately true. All pertinent Link related information has been publicly available for years.

link more like dink

im a dish washer and ive held link for 6 years please kill me

>>59318647
the question is, if retail still doesn't understand, what could possibly make them understand?

>>59322162
Ripplets will never understand because they've gone full schizo about their coin in the absence of evidence instead of just bailing on crypto as their Quant cousins did. Something drastic like Garlinghouse dying suddenly might demoralize XRP holders, but its just as likely to galvanize their support for their dead coin.

>>59322073
how will we ever recover linkbros

>>59318647
Link has serious issues with their tokenomics. First they get paid in anything, not link. And no they don't use those funds to buy link, they just dilute. Then they have a monopoly as contract owner and get funds from clients and unload tokens to nodes in exchange. They also keep all the funds received in eth for ccip in a contract and unload link. Also they lied about regulations to not distribute rewards to holders. Their staking is limited and they offer a very low return when it wouldn't cost them anything to offer 10% for instance, since it's all coming from dilution.

Basically it seems that they are doing all that's in their power to NOT transfer value to token holders.

XRP hasn't got great tokenomics but at least they actively try to pump the price.

Based

>>59322242
THE hammerheads of biz

>>59323165
Bot confirmed. Didn't notice the samefagging.

>>59323176
Why would I reply to your second post, retard?

>>59318812
I love the seething this image generates

These chainlink threads are becoming sadder by the day

>>59318647
the only thing I am worried about anon is pic related.
>Just because a product is better doesn't mean it wins.

>>59321677
1. Yes, the XRPL can receive API data securely. It uses WebSocket API for persistent, secure connections, allowing real-time data monitoring without compromising blockchain integrity. Additionally, the XRPL employs public-key cryptography for transaction authorization, ensuring secure interactions

2. Yes, the XRPL can securely communicate with other blockchains. The recent partnership with Axelar Foundation enables seamless interoperability across 55+ connected blockchains12. This integration allows for:
Secure cross-chain exchanges of multiple payload types
General Message Passing (GMP) for executing function calls on smart contracts across connected networks
Transfer of XRP and XRPL-issued tokens to other chains, and vice versa

3. no not native
4. all transactions and data on the xrpl are public by design, its a public chain.
5. we could use link for that

but it can do the 3 link can not. like you just mentioned

oh no linksisters
turns out
token not sneeded afterall

>>59323686
But here's the thing, as a developer I can play it safe and use Chainlink for all those functionalities (API calling, data privacy, cross chain messaging) and deploy on whatever blockchains are supported. EVM chains, I don't need to modify my code beyond my deployment contract where I change the chain ID. Otherwise, it's the same contract to generate an NFT (aka tokenize) or create a stablecoin. If I want cheaper fees, I can go deploy to a L2 or Polygon or what have you. More importantly, I'm using Chainlink price feeds to secure my stablecoin or DeFi app to prevent against oracle attacks.

Chainlink is a computational layer for blockchains. It's meant to do everything a blockchain cannot.

Also, the privacy component, once the tools are publicly out for a year or two from then, there's going to be a massive market that wouldn't exist without it. With privacy tools to verify a person's ability to pay back a loan, you can create undercollateralized loans with DeFi, a trillion dollar industry finally entering Web3.

>>59323875
You are arguing with the biggest bagholders in crypto, your time is being wasted.

These guys have had years longer than link with worse price action and WITHOUT the constant stream of positive news that link has had and they just broke even.

>>59318647

No. XRP is a better advertised product. It offers a superior product to BTC, a superior pedigree (used to be #2 crypto is a big seller,) plenty of volume for people to buy into, better connections, an underdog story with tons of possible momentum for recovery and improvement, and none of the bad press that Chainlink has generated for itself over the years. These are the kinds of things that mainstream stock market investors look for, so buying XRP is a no-brainer. The only thing it's really "missing" is modularity, which ETH already has a monopoly on anyway.

Maybe you could debate that Chainlink is a better product within the same niche as XRP and, in some ways, it probably is. But, this is where Linkies get it wrong. They don't understand that the year is 1999, and that what they're doing is the equivalent of trying to convince people that Windows 95 sucks, and that their Linux kernel is the next big thing... That nobody will "adopt" Windows (already happened, look at mcap and partnerships)... that Linux is the "better" product (even though normies can't use it or tell you what it's for)... That Microsoft is a "scam" company (I would never contest this today, but who cares? Windows 95 is not a "share" of Microsoft, and it's a good product.) Of course, you can debate linkies, and bring up the parenthesized points over and over again, but they don't care. They will always miss the forest for the trees because they are a pretty autistic group. And by the way, none of this is to suggest that Link cannot, or will not pump. TONS of people today use Linux; Link pumped hard previously. But those facts will only add fuel to their convictions. They despise us, because consumer behavior re: XRP "doesn't make sense" to them. They are tech-geeks, spending all day arguing performance specs in their basement, while the customers buy something else.

But I'm posting in a Linky cope thread, so this post will get zero replies/ only "it's a scam" responses.

>>59324024
It doesn't do anything, provide me with transactions as proof that any big players are using it

>>59324033

You are completely proving my point with your low-effort reply. Your head is full of years of smug self-justification.

>It doesn't do anything
Read the third sentence of my post you buffoon.

>provide me with transactions as proof that any big players are using it
I don't have to. SBI has been using it for years, and the story of the week is that Blackrock is creating an XRP ETF. They are literally the biggest player in the game, in all sectors. You would have to be an idiot not to see why XRP is running.

>>59323941
>they just broke even
that sounds pretty good, it's pure profit from here. meanwhile, inferior projects have to contend with table scraps

>>59324116
>Read the third sentence of my post you buffoon.
I'm not reading your shill essay

>>59324116
>You would have to be an idiot not to see why XRP is running.

I agree, because it's being dragged up by BTC, like all other shit coins

Let me know when you have any proof that it's more than that

>>59324489
i guess if you aren't int it for the money, then link could be a better investment for you

Best i can do is 350

>>59324497
It's no different

>>59324116
>SBI has been using xrp for years
lmao no they haven't.

Guess what they have been using though

Why are people debating between the two when they serve different functions? Why not just invest in both? If both are as central to the future economy, surely they will both pump eventually?

I think a lot of this is just impatience. If/when BTC, tokens, etc become the adopted standard for financial transactions, and blockchain/ledger networks become the dominant standard for services, then we are all laughing to the bank.

>>59324553
>Why not just invest in both?
xrpl is a chain among many, and the banks don't want to use it.
Chainlink on the other hand is pretty much the only credible oracle in existence, and the banks can't get enough of it.

>>59324553
people have been wasting their time and money on a particular project for almost a decade, it's now part of their identity. you could say that this is sad and that they are wasting their life, but it's just what it is. when they hear that another project does the same and is more successful, then they have to justify to themselves why they are holding on to their inferior version. it's peak retail behavior

>>59324483
>>59324489

>I'm not reading your shill essay
>Let me know when you have any proof that it's more than that
>I'm not reading your shill essay
>Let me know when you have any proof that it's more than that
>I'm not reading your shill essay
>Let me know when you have any proof that it's more than that
>I'm not reading your shill essay
>Let me know when you have any proof that it's more than that

HOLY COPE. Linkfaggots on suicide watch. You are completely obsessed with an alleged numismatic-non-currency that you can't even explain the function of to a normie investor in five words or less.

>>59324116
>my schizo made up headcanon is true,
Meanwhile >>59324540
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF MINDBROKEN XRPTARDS

>>59324565
I'm pretty sure that XRP is getting adoption, and the lawsuits are at least keeping it on the radar which means it will sell like crazy when the final decisions come in. Otherwise, my understanding is that HBAR is clearly superior and Stellar may also be superior.

>>59324571
Yep, lol

>>59324640
>I'm pretty sure that XRP is getting adoption
Is that what your female intuition is telling you?

>>59324650
not a lot of tx's/s but the live explorer shows around 100-120 tx's in each block. I heard elsewhere that HBAR is on 2tx's/s lol. I dont know if youre a stinky linkie or not but im not FUDding it.

>>59324659
XRP adoption:
>transactions

Link adoption:
>all the biggest financial institutions in the world gearing up to integrate it

>>59324659
>>59324669
Also here are your xrp transactions bro.

Chainlink nodes have roughly double the annual revenue according to Dune which doesn't even work right.

>>59324669
youre not listeining to me are you, lol

>>59324669
>gearing up
lol, any day now

>>59324676
Why would XRP have mass adoption if it is in the middle of fighting a court case? LINK doesn't have this issue and its still stinky. You have the attention span of a goldfish. Crypto is not near to the universal adoption that it will have. Normies know BTC and DOGE, some guys know XRP, ETH, ADA, and that's about it. We are ridiculously early to the game. Besides, what even is your point? I started this by saying that both networks serve different functions. Are you trying to say that XLM and HBAR are better or something? I don't understand. Are you a retard?

>>59324688
That's all crypto has right now.

>>59324676
kek what a shitcoin

>>59324702
Why didn't it have any mass adoption in the eight years before the court case?

>Are you trying to say that XLM and HBAR are better or something?
You know you're in a link thread right? Why bring up xlm or hbar?

>>59324704
it's all that link has. slides of "gearing up" happening, for 7 years counting

>>59324726
No, it's all crypto has.
No crypto in existence has broad institutional adoption.

>>59324734
therefore it only makes sense to invest in the market leaders. you can find them by looking at the chart. if you aren't in it to make money, link is a fine choice though

>>59324766
>it doesn't make sense to invest in the coin that has the best adoption potential by far

lmao

>>59324804
when you go to your favorite market cap ranking site to look at link, you will find a hidden feature: you can scroll up

>>59324826
>BUT CURRENT PRICE

We were talking about adoption.

>>59324832
factoring in the publicly available information including the possibility of widespread adoption, the market believes that chainlink is not very important. if you are interested in the technology, it could be a fine project to give money to however

>>59324868
the market:
>chainlink is not important

Swift:
>we are going live with chainlink next year

lol
You perfectly illustrated what's wrong with the market right now.
And on top of that, this market thinks ADA for instance is indeed very important.
Double lol

>>59324897
>the market in which i'm trying to make a profit is wrong, so my strategy is to do the thing that doesn't make a profit in this market
investing can be a fun hobby, but don't put all your money into it, it's not going to end well

>>59324868
I will spoonfeed some newfags so that they don't fall for this literal scam.
XRP is a memecoin LARPing as an utility project. No bank uses It. The XRPL makes only $1.4k in fees per day, compared to Ethereum's $2-5 million per day. It's a ghost chain. Some institutions trialed the XRPL years ago because they were paid by Ripple, but they all decided on not using It because it was too expensive. Botton line, no one uses the XRPL for X border settlements and no one will. Nostro Vostro is not needed when using CCIP, in case you didn't know. The concept of a bridge currency is obsolete in a world with atomic DvP, stablecoins, CDBCs, and tokenized assets. Even if ODL were used (It won't), ODL transactions are demand neutral (you buy XRPL, send It, and sell It) so it doesn't affect the price (this argument was literally made by Ripple in the court case).

>>59324704
brainlet question, when do you think true institutional adoption will finally come? both for chainlink and for crypto as a whole?

>>59324897
>next year ok?
>ok not THIS year, but next year
>This year? Sorry meant NEXT year, ok?
>Etc, etc, ET CETERA

>>59324489
>I agree, because it's being dragged up by BTC, like all other shit coins
moron, xrp has done a 4x. link cant hold 20.

>>59324990
That's the best crypto has right now, yes.

>>59324941
Investing is about the future price, not the now price.

See >>59324897

>>59318647
>so what happens when the market finally starts to wake up to the fact that LINK is doing everything XRP wanted to do
...except pump

>>59324969
see >>59324897
>Swift:
>>we are going live with chainlink next year

>>59324967
When confronted with the facts, most baggies will try ignore reality and debate based on price action. What's funniest about XRP baggies is that they are euphoric now that they price is where It was 7 years ago. They've been outperformed by everything.

>>59324941
You hold link.

>>59325052
The majority of "XRP baggies" that post here are just bored link holders. There's a small amount that are genuine, but its the same types of boomers that found 4chan and /pol/ after the qanon stuff, and they just stick to their containment threads because they can't handle information that doesn't confirm their worldview. Linkies are kind of the inverse of that, they spread out wherever and fud their own bags to test their worldview.

>>59318647
It's all so tiresome

>>59325176
Guilty as charged. I'm the one who made a thread the other day fudding Chainlink's relationship with the DTCC kek. I debated that adoption won't matter because of flat fees. I bet some retards actually deserves It. Well, whoever is filtered deserves It.

>>59325636
actually believed It*

>>59325176
>Linkies are kind of the inverse of that, they spread out wherever and fud their own bags to test their worldview.
well put

>>59324967
>Nostro Vostro
ok what the hell is this?
every midwit on X keeps parroting the term, but never explains its.
Same for all the other buzzwords in the XRP shill script

>>59324967
watch out, you're seething bro you're gonna get hit with a meme

>>59325176
there is definitely one devoted retard from their general who claims to hold link (bought very high) and is spamming their latest cringe as a way to feel superior lol

>>59326294
Nostro Vostro is a huge problem for banks. The need to have all this unused cash laying around for the system to work as It currently is. Do some basic googling. XRP fixes this problem vía ODL, so banks will free up billions of $. That's why they are starving for XRP. Once Ripple goes live with Swift (2025), all will understand who the true king is.

>>59326354
Where are you getting that Ripple is going live with Swift?
The only evidence I've seen of this is from XRP anons

>>59326466
Checked. I'm fucking with you. Was planning on fudding you out but you seem upstanding so I changed my mind. No, nigger, of course Swift is not using XRP. They even deleted all the XRP comments under one of their X posts recently. But baggies keep spamming any Swift post mentioning digital assets. It's unreal.

>>59326502
Lmao this nigger is gonna rope when reality sets in

>>59326616
>look mom I made a grating post
>mom? oh yeah no one loves me

kek

>>59326330
I remember the tard you are talking about kek. He holds like 10 different coins. He fell for the ISO 20022 meme. Many such cases.
>>59326616
Notice how XRP baggies like this never respond to the kind of facts I provided. They just promote senseless FOMO, same as any meme(shit)coin pushers. I think I'll be stickin' with my ETH, thanks.

>>59324024
>>59324582

Reporting back in that my "shill essay" convinced over 9000 people reading this thread to buy XRP, and now the price is up well over $2. How about that? When I post, the price goes up 20%, but when you post the price crabs. Now the burden of proof is on you. Prove to me that Link holders are not a bunch of retarded niggerfaggots in love with a concept.

>PS: I won't be reading anything.

>>59324967
Probably one of the single highest IQ replies on the entire board right now. Thanks for coming to my thread, anon, I appreciate you.

Good Lord. I just checked the pool and you'll never guess what?

>>59326650
>>59326657

>>59324702
>Crypto is not near to the universal adoption that it will have.
It's extremely close. If you keep looking at the ground all you'll see are your feet. Look up. See the world around you. XRP isn't close to being adopted by anyone, that much is true.

>>59327395
>same price as 7 years ago
>gains

>>59318647
Chainlink will dump, meme trend will continue, Notcoin, Dogs, Blum and Boink will be hot

>>59325052
>What's funniest about XRP baggies is that they are euphoric now that they price is where It was 7 years ago. They've been outperformed by everything.

What reality do you retards live in?

LINK is the one to rule them all. Time will tell

TIME settles all arguments

Know what you hold linkmarines.

The price is being suppressed for a reason.

The woman whose name is on the US $100 Dollar Bill is on the board of Chainlink.

Who else can say that? Know what you hold.

>>59327337
Kek

>>59328792
>>59328812
>>59328813
>>59328848
>dopamine getting low
>quick, my copium jpgs!

>>59328848
Kek a literal who. You’re deliciounal

>>59328863
>>59328866

Fucking idiot. I know what I hold.

>>59319342
So you’re saying it’ll be a while before link pumps
>>59324967
Probably true, but doge and others also have no use but you seem smart enough to know how price can go up anyway.
Should I trade my xrp for link? What’s the easiest way to do it if my coins are on ledger

>>59328848
The fact you even have these saved is sad as fuck.

>>59328921
It really is…
>p p please pump muh bags

>>59328921
You nailed it, I'll rather put my skills to test the open challenge feature on Tribally than waste time with that

>>59328915
I think I’ll swap. Seems like a good time for it.

Not so fuckin smug are ya now?

Your hubris was your downfall

And now here you are, on hands and knees, BEGGING for 3% gains, while complete shitcoins like XRP absolutely MOG you

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59329024
Thought?

>>59329390
reread the thread

>>59329436
No you smelly curry nigger

THE Cuckolds of crypto

Holy shit xrp is absolutely RAPING you kid

Bahahahaahahahahahahaha…take it like a man, bitch

>>59329584
reread it

>>59328712
Curious why your chart starts at that point? There's more to the left, you know right? ;)
And anyway, XRP does not compete with LINK. It (in theory only kek) competes with ETH.
So as I said, thanks, but I'm not selling my ETH for your literal scam coin with zero fundamentals but X hype.
>>59327152
Thanks anon.
>>59328915
Nigger I have no idea whether you should buy or sell anything and in what timeframe it's best to do It. I don't have the ability to do that so I stick with good fundamental coins like ETH and hold for a long time. I'm not going for maximum profit.

>>59328813
Surely someone wouldn't fud a token for several years, right?

>>59330278
get mogged

>>59328712
>he cut the chart
LOL LMAO EVEN

>>59330762
Yeah you can't make this shit up kek

Aaaaaaaa i need more time pls

>>59323686
>>59321677
Just checking in if you linktards are ok coping

>>59328848
LOL this did not mean annything when she was hired by ripple, now that she advises chainlink its big boi stuff right?
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/04/ripple-appoints-former-us-treasurer-to-board-amid-sec-fight.html

Cherrypicking muchos

Crypto's Cruel Symphony
In markets cold where dreams lay slain,
The nocoiners writhe in bitter pain,
Their mouths now frothing with pure disdain,
As crypto rockets break every chain.
Missed opportunities like ghosts they see,
Bitcoin's resurrection, a mocking spree,
Each green candle a knife so sharp,
Playing their failure's dissonant harp.
LINK holders, trapped in their own despair,
Watching gains bloom everywhere,
They know the potential, yet paralyzed stand,
As other tokens conquer new land.
"Scam!" they cry with venomous breath,
While profits dance beyond their death,
Their bags of salt, their tears of rage,
Unwritten stories on market's page.
From zero to hero, the crypto tale spins,
While they count their theoretical sins,
Seething and foaming, a pitiful sight,
Missing the rocket's euphoric flight.
The blockchain laughs, a digital jest,
At those who failed its brutal test,
A poem of markets, of chances not taken,
Where dreams of the timid remain forsaken.

>>59318647
I tell people this all the time. If LINK gains the institutional adoption that it seems to have waiting in the wings, then it will represent the beginning of a new paradigm in financial services. The institutional use alone will cause a massive pump and then you will see FOMO from institutions and retail the likes of which has never been seen.