/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>59082625
How quickly we went from:
>Link is a utility token.
>Why are you complaining, link is a utility token, you have no equity. Token ownership doesn't imply equity or ownership

Now:
>A cayman island registered company fears SEC regulations over our utility, but don't worry, you all have equity! Don't ask what that means though because no price talk allowed.

Literally, what?

>>59082625
it's so over for linkchuds

If you can’t handle it, sell up and move on instead of whining like little bitches

>>59082655
checked. They spew so much shit its unreal. How they can even talk about muh SEC when they partnered with Fireblocks a couple weeks after they got fined from the feds

>>59082625
guess the shadow link meme became real after all
we memed irresponsible we did

>>59082655
yet another lesson in the dangers of centralized entities

>>59082625
if token is printed all at start then it's automatically a scam. any proof of stake, or token is a scam token not needed. and yes LINK is too.

>>59082625
>trusting anything on biz

>>59082681
chainlink libs hate free speech

they thought they could block their way to making it

>babe, did you see that guy asking questions????
>ohhhhhhhhhhhh I'm gonnnaa blooooooooooooooockkkkk him

>>59082625
Linkcels are gonna rope EOY

>>59082625
>Current US legal state
>Based in the Caymans

So. If they're so hellbent on sucking Uncle Sam's BBC, why didn't they incorporate in the US like Coinbase?

Great crypto tokens don't need tech. Great crypto tech don't need tokens. Which way chainlink man?

>>59082625
Wait. So the token not needed fud is actually true after all this time?

Don’t these advocates realize that’s their bag that will go to shit? Or are they also just as bad as the bad actors they constantly criticize?

>>59082625
link is as frozen as any other altcoin out there, maybe you have to try new bets like AI or IMGNAI

poor take from the defense

Posted this in another thread but why don't fudders ever check the code?
All this fud becomes so pointless when the code is literally open source

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/ccip/blob/4377d9ab5cfd40622a1d2f21ca5527f76d5daabb/contracts/src/v0.8/ccip/onRamp/EVM2EVMOnRamp.sol#L293-L302

Granted, I'm not a smart contract developer, but this is used in the main Router in the ccipSend function (I'm pretty sure that's important to the functionality of CCIP)

So how does this not mean tokens are converted. I'm all ears.

>>59083565
Oh and in case you don't believe this is being used, go ahead and check this
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/ccip/blob/4377d9ab5cfd40622a1d2f21ca5527f76d5daabb/contracts/src/v0.8/ccip/Router.sol#L105-L145

It literally calls forwardFromRouter and that calls, internally, this on ramp forward function which does the aforementioned conversion.

>>59083565
>>59083576
Meanwhile, in reality

>>59083576
>>59083565
Meanwhile, in reality

>discord nufudders get roasted in >>59081997
>"lets just make another thread and try again before the old one has died"
wow, big brain fudcuckery
just sold 100k

Did you saw the chart?

I sawded it

Not good

(Source: the chart)

LINK token usage is obviously subject to change. It's evolution, baby! no refunds. :^)

Lol - fud is largely ignored now and they have to use another ID to generate fake engagement. We're all sitting doing literally nothing, comfy in the pool, and patiently waiting for the inevitable to unfold.
It's quite peaceful at this point. Lovin' it.
Pool closed, no one selling. We win. Too easy.

>>59083906
>heh heh nufudders getting roasted

The chart though.

they shadowforked the .JSON parser

>>59083565
is this production code in use by nodes on mainnet?

>>59084153
Their mental illness runs deep

>>59084153
it's actually insane when you think about. they go on twitter, make fud posts, reply to themselves, reply to a bunch of chainlink posts, come here, repost their twitter post, and then reply to themselves again. this is how they spend their days.

>>59084463
someone should create a bounty for actual proof that someone is paying these homos to fud chainlink 24/7. you could probably get someone to talk for like $10k.

>>59084463
Well yeah, again: they're mentally ill. They are typically negative in their thoughts...only focusing upon the worst case scenario...lashing out and attracting only negativity both mentally as well as physically.

These individuals are merely acting out exactly what they did in irl, which led to them projecting their desperate, egotistical desires on LINK, and then lashing out emotionally when things aren't progressing the way they want it. It's how they act in life, just on full display online. Consistency.

It's quite feminine upon analysis, childish at best. Completely consumed by their inferior grasp of their introverted emotions.

>>59082625
Babenis

>>59083163
No one can fucking do without SUPRA's revolutionary tech

>>59083565
>>59083576

I'll dig into this later but the issue is the current implementation of CCIP has the gas tokens are currently sitting in a contract and aren't actively being converted to Link per call.

I'll go dig into the PriceRegistry contracts to verify >>59083886

>>59087226
following

so to summarize, Chainlink Labs is just hoarding the 10% surcharge for themselves while dangling a "conversion" feature that "can" be used in the future

But in reality they have no plan to use it anytime soon, nor do they give a fuck, and they sent out a 25 year old obese tranny to communicate this

it doesnt seem to be going well

hahahhaha just when you think they can't get any more insufferable

I've never seen a successful company argue with its investors like this. A first of its kind

It boggles my mind why they set out to have this adversarial relationship. I guess this is what happens when you have so many insecure losers in one company

link breaking down to a 5 year low against btc. Nice. Glad CLG is here to post about why we're demanding for asking for build rewards or token usage.