/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>59039435
Don't know what state street is, and frankly I don't care to learn. I will STATE however that I will never sell or unstake my link and there is nothing the fuddies can do about it. Have fun protesting in the STREETS when I am a billionaire in 2 weeks. :)

>>59039449
Its a small bank (14th in USA) with US$3.7 trillion under management and US$40.0 trillion under custody and administration in 2023

historic market inefficiency

>>59039449
Same here but I want to STATE that fudders will be in the STREET(s) of Mumbai SHITTING in the STREET

>>59039474
>I currently have reason to believe the Chainlink price market is fraudulent. So, in order to protect investors from this fraudulent market, I've decided to restrict investors' withdrawals until further notice.

>>59039435
based

And how does that affect the price of Link? Exactly.

>>59039544
Short term or long term?

>>59039435
>Taurus the sign of the BVLL
>Linkies will be cucking all other crypto investors this run causing absolute SEETHE

thought the vcs bought this project out already

>>59039556
Fellow Price cuck here, please tell me long term since short term is fucked all around.

>>59039435
kekfuddies in disarray lolol
wonder what the state street fud will be?
will it be as good as the ANZ fud....
>B...b...but they were already partnered with them!
i honestly felt like having that one framed i kek'd so hard

>>59039654
price cuck here, interesting thoughts but all i can think is…uhm…price?

im so sleepy, anyone else sleepy? lets go to sleep together

Nice. Chainlink is winning bigly.

>>59039829
Hell yeah it is let me just check the price…

>>59039460
they are big in crypto though which is important
https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/custody-giant-state-street-expands-crypto-services-new-partnership-2024-08-20/
>Aug 20 (Reuters) - State Street (STT.N), opens new tab is partnering with Swiss crypto company Taurus to offer new digital asset services, including turning real-world assets into tradeable tokens, to tap growing institutional demand for such investments, the U.S. financial services provider told Reuters.
>As cryptocurrencies have spread in the financial system through regulated products including futures and exchange-traded funds, they are drawing more interest from institutions seeking ways to hedge inflation and diversify portfolios.
just how imagine how dirty these fights are behind closed doors, the main thing though is that chainlink seems to have swift onboard. nothing compares to that, if they can pull it off..

>>59039895
indeed it was must checked. the price. I check them everywhere and all I'm reminded of is link. While out shopping today I asked the sales clerk to check the price and they didnt understand. "The price of what, sir?" It's ma'am I replied. And at a McDonalds when I finished my order they told me the price, but I told them to check again. They repeated the same price, but was it really the actual price? It wasn't, I shook my head and gave my wife's son his nuggets. "Just check the price", I muttered as I drove off to meet my beloved adem.

One day the price will move.
Today is not that day.

>>59040127
the price is moving. Down, I'm afraid. I would know because I checked it.

>>59040127
No reasoning as to why?

>>59039435
https://cryptobriefing.com/taurus-chainlink-partnership-advances/

Deutsche Bank as well.

>>59039435
https://cryptonews.com/news/chainlink-and-credit-suisse-backed-taurus-unite-to-bolster-institutional-tokenized-asset-adoption/

>>59040209
Because the system they are implementing isn't up and running yet. It is very early days.
When it is up and running, we'll see what happens.
The financial industry doesn't change overnight.

>>59040209
Because none of these partners actually use CCIP. CLL announces a new CCIP partner every day and has for the past 6 months yet transactions have declined month over month for the same time period.
>>59040458
hundreds of partners "live". yet transactions continue to decline.

funny, innit?

>>59040482
retard these guys are still a long way off public mainnet
look at the anz announcement, they are going to do private -> private, which isn't going to show publicly anyway
there has been an uptick in ccip usage though of late. follow the value transferred and not transaction count (cll were spamming messages as part of testing for a long period)

>>59039435
Doesn’t matter nothing matters until Sergey the stops dumping. He still has 380 million chainlink to dump

>>59040501
>these guys are still a long way off public mainnet
they went public april 24th, shill.
>look at the anz announcement, they are going to do private -> private, which isn't going to show publicly anyway
The anz announcement was explicitly about "exploring" more possibilities. Like the last time they partnered with ANZ, a year ago, this will result in zero transactions.
>there has been an uptick in ccip usage though of late
No, there literally hasn't. Look at the dune transactions. Transactions are down 6 months in a row.

These advocates are really getting worse and worse everyday. Scraping the bottle of the barrel, I guess.

>>59040482
>hundreds of partners "live"
They're not "live" at all, retard.
Are you genuinely that retarded that you think the world's biggest financial institutions just flip a switch and move to another system overnight?
Go buy a dog coin, you absolute spastic.

>>59040536
these guys = banks, institutions
look at transcation volume not transaction count retard. you didn't understand what i wrote

>>59040552
CCIP went live in July of 2023. Entered public access in April 2024. This was 3 years after it being late, 3 years after you were told over and over again it would be the standard.

130 projects are live. With most going live within the past 6 months (since public). Transactions are down each and every single month since it went "public".

With all of these "live" customers, 99% of the transactions come from the same 4 addresses as it did 6 months ago.

There are no financial institutions. Are you so retarded that you think a protocol that is 3 years late, underdelivers on its promises, and fails to capture defi is going to somehow magically capture tradfi? Please explain this logic to me, I'd love to hear it.

>>59040552
Are you going to completely breeze over the fact that your retarded nigger ass thought it wasn't even publicly available yet? How are you not addressing that?

>look at transaction VOLUME!

Holy fuck lmao, you are actually a low IQ nigger.

>>59039654
>I I I owned le fud bro!!!

It just doesn’t hit when price is this cucked tho kid

Remember last week they were ecstactic to hit $12

Also, your leader fatboy panic sold another 18mil today

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59040577
You're genuinely too fucking stupid to get it. Public access is fuck all to do with institutional adoption.
The institutional systems aren't running yet. When they start running, you'll know.

>>59040572
Man you guys always dangle the next carrot, trynig to lure in newfags. Why cant you admit that LINK is a fucking grift scam like all the other 'building the future of finance' tokens. promises that never get fulfilled. The promises and nothing has added value to its token. 7 years of this gaslighting.

>>59040582
You replied to the wrong guy, retard.
You replied to me twice, and you got dumber every time.

>>59040587
>it's gonna happen, i swear!
>even though it is a complete dud in the water and you can only transfer a handful of BUILD projects
>even though transactions are falling month after month after adding partners month after month
>its gonna happen, i swear this time!

Let me guess, you hold a lot of chainlink tokens

>>59040602
Listen up, retard.
I'm ever selling.

>>59040606
Yeah don't sell LINK, and miss an entire bullrun because you got pysop'd. Absolute retard.

Nobody in crypto takes more L’s than the cult

Hilarious how they virtue signaled themselves out of memes when their investment is a literal meme

Your god is a 25 yr old obese tranny

>>59040614
>please sell your Link! I love you! i'd do anything for you!

>>59040606
>i know i cant refute anything you're saying
>but im never selling!
>take that!

What makes you think I want you to sell? Selling would be wise, and I know for a fact your IQ is in the 2 digits. I look forward to making fun of you for the next 2 years until Sergey runs out of tokens to dump.

>>59040614
>Muh bullrun
lol, fuck off fuddie.

https://x.com/taurus_hq/status/1841448041305321587

>Together, we are solving 3 key challenges in the tokenized asset space: security, data, and asset mobility.

https://www.taurushq.com/blog/taurus-and-chainlink-join-forces-to-advance-institutional-tokenized-asset-adoption/?utm_content=196875717&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-1003712069110202369

>>59040620
Don't sell your LINK. You'll need it in mid-2025 when you're back, crying about your hubris. Mark my words.

>>59040622
Seethe more fuddie.

>>59040595
what is wrong about what i wrote?

>>59040623
woahhhh another partner?! that must be causing a massive surge of fees. how many fees is this generating, exactly?

wait, its not like the other 130 "partners" that aren't actually using it, is it? that would be embarassing.

>>59040627
>SAAAR, THA HUBRIS SAAR
You can smell the curry stench coming off of every word you typed.

>>59040630
Your entire argument that CCIP is still gaining steam relies on it not being available to the public, which it is, and you've done zero to address that. Not only is it live, they've added 100's of partners since it went public, and transactions have gone one direction.

Wanna guess what direction that is?

>>59040631
haha fees and price, have they even been checking?!? we got em.

>>59040632
Ah classic, when faced with objective reality, resort to curry jokes. Guess it's easier to attack character than addressing Chainlink's undelivered promises.

>Never selling
Enjoy that $35 top. Most of us are in crypto for more than a 3x. But hey, some people just set the bar low LMAO.

>>59040643
>classic, when faced with objective reality, resort to curry jokes. Guess it's easier to attack character than addressing Chainlink's undelivered promises.

>>59040647
Reminder: advocates are paid per post. Which is why they will quickly take the argument into anything other than technicals.

>>59040643
they should check the price right now. $35 dollars is such chump change, I trust you man you seem like a smart guy I bet its gonna be that too. saved that image too bro if you dont mind, we gotta remind these chumps of the prices and fees.

>>59039621
Kek. I think some of the fuddies would be into that tho. They do talk about cucking an awful lot

>>59040652
>Saar, the technicals saar, you must remember the technicals.

>>59040637
no...?
i said
1) you won't see anything on public mainnet from banks. it will all be testnet or private -> private like with anz announcement this week
2) that volume is increasing on public mainnets. this is public information. the transaction count is a red herring as cll was sending lots of messages as testing. volume is a better metric, eg
https://defillama.com/bridges

>>59040627
>i don't want you to sell your Link that's why i come on here every day and act really salty and hurt and tell you not to sell your Link
sounds good - i have no plans to, chapati-face.
is everyone in india as thick as this one, i wonder? bet he's in a shitty office in mumbai with 20 other brownoids who look just like him, all wearing fucking cheap shirts open at the collar and covering their desks and monitors with tacky trinkets, their heads bobbing about in a comical fashion as they desperately try to earn enough to impress their smelly fat wives who live on a rubbish tip 5 miles away on the train

>>59040663
Confronted by facts, baggies are basically a single step above slinging their own shit to avoid facing reality.

Keep replying, I want as many people to see this as possible.

>>59040669
haha and did that dumb advocate even check the price...or the fees! probably not. you got em bro. (saving this image too if you dont mind haha).

>>59040666
Brutal curry beat-down.

>>59039449
Your 401k just got tokenized

>>59040666
Checked Satan. Sounds like you’ve got a vivid imagination! But honestly, I'm here to discuss Chainlink. If you think those partnerships mean anything, you might want to check their track record. Hype is nice, but without production level, it's just hopium circle jerking. Nobody is paid, you sound delusional. Maybe consider why so many of us are skeptical about a project that keeps promising but delivers so little.

>>59039990
> chainlink seems to have swift onboard. nothing compares to that
DTCC >>> Swift
if you don't think so you have zero understanding or how our world really works

>>59040587
you may not know when they start running
they may already be running an experimental but production capacity

>>59040761
>santa claus is way stronger than the easter bunny!

this is literally what you sound like

>>59040775
He clearly is. A huge fat man is stronger than a bunny. Are you stupid?

>>59040414
>>59040432
Great digging anon
https://www.taurushq.com/blog/deutsche-bank-and-taurus-sign-a-global-partnership/

I think this does prove that chainlink is doing a good job of entrenching itself as the RWA/tokenized asset access point of choice for large financial institutions and banks.

I maintain that news won't pump the price anymore. Long term building, results, and ultimately heavy mainnet usage may though. And if/when it does, then this news will look obvious in hindsight that link was bound to go up.

But even with that said, I remain a little bit skeptical of any major price action. I hope I'm massively wrong and we take the fuck off but I can't shake the fear that link is stuck, based on how long it's been performing miserably with respect to speculative piles of shit, meme tokens, etc.

>>59040775
another retard...

DTCC literally holds every original birth certificate of EVERY US CITIZEN which backs the FEDERAL DEBT
and you want to compare that to Swift, lol.

also >>59040780 takes an orthogonal approach to the proof but also gets it done

QED

>>59040761
well i'll take either one kek
but swift is global, 11k banks, have a hand in half the world's cross-border payments
why is dtcc better than that?

>DTCC literally holds every original birth certificate of EVERY US CITIZEN which backs the FEDERAL DEBT
and you want to compare that to Swift, lol.
There is no way you believe that. Literally shat that tin-foil hat conspiracy out of your asshole didn't ya, buddy?

>>59041172
you can compare them to willy wonkas chocolate factory, they both do the same amount of transacting using the link token.

>>59039683
why do glowniggers even bother with this gay meme?

>>59041147
Token is not needed rn. Full staking is required for token to do the needful. Fuddies are also correct to point out that gmx etc pay cll directly which goes against the expectations of holders. Of course, full staking will/should change that unless betray. Swift also online within 18 months, so we've got a ways to go before: its over/we're so back

>>59041713
you said it so well bro they need to check these prices and ccip fees and know the token its just a frickin joke. yeah long way we got man, no one cares about this stink crap anyway

>>59039435
its like a dream. its literally like falling asleep in 2017 thinking to yourself, "what if?...". actually no. our wildest dreams could not have foreseen this frequency nor magnitude of partnerships between link and both decentralized and centralized entities.

>but, price?
market inefficiency

>>59039435
another stupid small business that nobody cares about
oh and have you seen the...

chart

price

pic related

>>59041745
>market inefficiency
or maybe you're just wrong
markets are usually not "inefficient" for this long
the fact that link refuses to pump means there is some real factor driving down demand

>>59039485
That was an interesting scene that I liked. Can you say what your personal thoughts were on Burry's decision there, and if you think there are any similarities with Chainlink now?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

>>59040647
Lmao

>>59040209
>>59039895
See >>59039474

>>59041754
>or maybe you're just wrong
Not when Tron, Toncoin, Doge, Ada, Shiba, XRP, Solana, BNB have higher market caps than Link.

>markets are usually not "inefficient" for this long
fucking lol it took 12 years for the stock market to actually price in Amazon for example.

>>59040652
>Reminder: advocates are paid per post
Says the anon with the highest post count itt.
ZERO self awareness.

>>59041754
The market hasn't been speculative since 2021 because everyone realises we're in a massive bubble on the verge of collapse. People don't buy the news anymore. They want to see the product flying off the shelves before they put any money into it.
If the institutional adoption is pulled off in the way it looks like it will, then you will also see FOMO drive the price.

>>59041849
>the market hasn't been speculative since 2021
>almost all the volume in alts has been growing L1s and memecoins
retard

>>59041843
Simple projection, same thing when ass blasted fuddies go on about advokeks swapping ids and spamming

>>59041857
>Pajeet scam bullshit and high-level money laundering.
Sorry, Gupdeep, I'm not selling my LINK for your curry coins.

>>59041849
there are like 7 meme coins in the top 100. the 2 most valuable alts, bnb and sol, literally don't do anything except act as a casino. then you have xrp that just straight up doesn't do anything. we're in a massive bubble because it's all speculation.

>>59042111
the entire top 500 is worthless, none of them shitcoins do anything, at all
crypto as it stands has failed
case in point, your only hope as a link baggie is that actual banks will adopt and buy your erc shittoken

>>59042118
>your only hope as a link baggie is that actual banks will adopt and buy your erc shittoken
That's the hope of literally all of crypto though.

>>59042118
As seen by numerous articles in this thread, they are adopting it.
I agree about the rest of the market being a joke and largely surviving on sunk cost and complex market manipulation, but the entire reason that LINK is so popular here is precisely because it does have genuine institutional backing.
The price of the token hasn't increased because none of these systems are currently "online" at the institutional level.
If/when the tokenisation of RWA's goes mainstream, then expect to see LINK flip everything.

>>59041843
There's a difference. I mention Chainlink adds CCIP partners every month yet transactions have gone down for the same time period, and advocates start immediately trying to derail the conversation by posting jeet memes.
>zero self awareness
Not only are you retarded, but you are projecting

>>59041182
Swift facilitates $150 trillion in transactions per year.

In 2022 the DTTC processed $2.5 quadrillion in transactions.
Either way, you just win.

>>59042142
unless any entity starts utilizing the token instead of performing endless trials, nobody is adopting anything

>>59042124
hence why I stated that crypto is done for, at least in the current iteration

>>59042598
You'll be glad to hear Swift is going live.

>>59042605
>live trials
>trials
did you even read my post before replying?

>>59042608
Anon, LIVE.
Go fucking cope in the corner.

>>59042612
anon, TRIAL
are you legitimately retarded?

>>59040761
Bingo. I don't know much but I know this is a fact. DTCC = 2.5 quadrillion
Swift = 150 trillion
Not even in the same ballpark. Obviously we want both to work, and swift will most likely be first and what gets us over the $100 mark, but $81,000 is entirely reliant on DTCC.

>>59042615
There's no hope for you, time to suck on that shotgun like you've been dreaming about.

>>59042623
ok, instead of seething go outside

>>59042605
>Swift is going live
>Trial beta version 0.1

Another carrot dangled with built in excuses for why this won't pump the price. Let me guess, the trial, the may or may not happen a year from now, will be private and will result in no transactions or no actual fees.

>>59042608
It basically represents automation of the financial services industry. Due to the amount of money involved, it isn't going to happen overnight, but it's in the process of changing.
It solves a lot of problems that the financial institutions are going to see going forward, mainly in regards to security and data. As people become less competent and more untrustworthy, you need systems in place to remove the human element from the process.
If course it's a slow process, but if it initially goes well and shows its value, it will quickly gain pace.

>>59041836
Amazon wasn't selling their stocks to subsidize giving away shoes and books for free.

>>59042636
Bezos sold billions worth of Amazon stock to fund his own private space adventures.
That's, like, many times worse.

>>59042631
>in the process
>if it initially goes well
>it will quickly gain pace
sounds like it's 10 years away, not to mention that the entire premise seems idiotic to me
thanks, gonna pass

>>59042947
>sounds like it's 10 years away
kek yeah, not like Ripple which is about to explode onto the mainstream finance scene much sooner amirite?

>>59042964
what does that have to do with anything?

>>59042964
>but...RIPPLE!

Nobody is talking about ripple in this thread except for underwater bagholders. Fuck ripple.

>>59042967
>>59042974
Ok boys you got me. So now please post the crypto that is about to unlock mainstream finance before Chainlink so we can all buy that instead.

>>59042981
why are we so fixated on unlocking mainstream finance instead of making money individually?

>>59042981
WTF are you talking about? Is this how you cope or are you having a stroke?

>>59042983
>>59042987
Alright, so we're not big fans of mainstream finance adoption.
So what other big bullish paradigm shifts are going to take place for crypto if not that?

>>59039435
What's the daily CCIP revenue?

>>59043003
>big bullish paradigm shifts
BTC as a hedge in the upcoming global financial meltdown would be my guess, IF BTC stops shitting itself that is
...the entire premise of crypto was kinda like "be your own bank" instead of "wait until broke and fraudulent traditional banks buy our bags!"
it's nonsense

>>59043003
too many questions bro chainlink bad bro just sell bro you're getting scammed bro

>>59043014
>BTC as a hedge in the upcoming global financial meltdown would be my guess, IF BTC stops shitting itself that is
wow
Doesn't sound very bullish if I'm honest. BTC has proven over many years to dump harder than anything on bad geopolitical news.
I'm just going to go with the mainstream finance adoption as the most immediate bullish narrative, if you don't mind.

>>59043022
>mainstream finance adoption
why would anyone desire for the same entities responsible for every crash and meltdown this economy has experienced to become integrated with "your own bank" decentralized crypto, is beyond me
like I said, nonsense

>>59043003
>there has to be a big financial paradigm shift because....THERE JUST HAS TO BE OKAY!
>and my funny money token that isn't needed will surely be the center of it all!
>lets not talk about the fact that 130 projects are live since april and transactions have gone down every month since.

>>59043037
>>there has to be a big financial paradigm shift because....THERE JUST HAS TO BE OKAY!
Oh it's coming.

>>59043039
two more weeks marines!

>>59043043
If you know of a crypto that's closer, hit me up.

>>59043039
imagine unironically believing whatever they choose to announce through mainstream media
imagine being this naive

>>59043054
>announce through mainstream media
speaking of which

>>59043062
all I see here is a cross border banking transferring system performing experiments with digital assets in a decades overdue effort to modernize their 50 year old tech
a stark contrast to what crypto represents all together

>>59043084
cool. and Link holders will get a slice of it. bring it on. who gives a fuck about what crypto 'represents'.

>>59043037
>hangs around Link threads constantly
>keeps abreast of every tiny development
>knows more about the Link project than anything else and is preoccupied full time with it
>doesn't own any
>claims he doesn't want you to sell
>tries to get you to sell
yep. organic.

>>59043035
>>59043084
you need to wake up buddy. Crypto is being used to empower the banking cartel and there's nothing you can do about it. Yeah btc is good for protecting yourself against inflation, but thats about all crypto is good for at this point. The banking cartel is not going anywhere.

>>59043084
wow, that sounds like a pretty big innovation. that's super cool they're doing it methodically instead of rushing out something half baked that could erase quadrillions from the world economy.
bullish as fuck and you know it.

>>59042947
>sounds like it's 10 years away
Might be, but the way the world is going, I very much doubt it will take that long.

>>59042947
>thanks gonna pass
Watch him stay in the thread for 12 more hours.

>>59043426
>Watch him stay in the thread for 12 more hours
it's important he shares his philanthropical views with us, lest we make investment mistakes. He really should be up for a Sainthood. It can't be easy, carrying our financial wellbeing upon those scrawny brown shoulders

Chainlink is an all or nothing bet. Either you lose it all, or you end up with nothing.

>>59041849
>product

the product is the funding coin

the bait to get people here to buy the product is the "experiment"

>>59041849
>The market hasn't been speculative since 2021
lmfao look how ignorant the cult is

it's like your brain got trapped in a set time period and can't move forward

>>59042111
>>59042598
>>59042630
>>59043037


/thread

>>59042631
>it isn't going to happen overnight

he's getting warmer...


>>59043322
>3 years of exposing "conspiracies" on a dead forum
>down 80%
LOL
does anyone else find it a little funny that 5 years ago most people in crypto were libertarian / anti big corporation

fast foward to now, the Link cult is down on its hands and knees begging for banks to buy their coin

>CCIP daily volume: $500

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59043732
is your keyboard broken? not reading all of that.
>>59043583
actually made me smirk, gj. tell your boss to give you a raise.

>>59043732
>does anyone else find it a little funny that 5 years ago most people in crypto were libertarian / anti big corporation
That was never Chainlink.
You have to be realistic about the way that the world works, which is why I have zero interest in any crypto that doesn't have institutional/establishment support.

>>59043062
the pic that BROKE the fudders and sent them lurching backwards onto their cum-stained gamer chair

>>59043322
checked
for the people who don't get it, that anon probably holds more link than you do. it is organic just not in the sense you're thinking. this forum, and this website in general, is full of mentally ill losers whose primary personality trait is hating other people for liking what they like. the same exact behavior is exhibited on every other board, where people will feign dislike of their own hobbies/interests purely to push normalfags away, because to the average channer (and they're not entirely wrong on this), normalfags ruin everything.

extrapolate this to something they have financial skin in the game with, and this behavior is only going to get worse. but its no different than for example, shazzam posting on /v/, if you honestly think those types hate fromsoft games or whatever they are currently 'fudding' you don't get the board culture.

>>59044386
Kiddo - check that chart
Youre down 80

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59044458
hehheh they need to check those prices and watch themselves those stupid clowns we got em bro

>>59042617
what about the vcs tho?

>>59040587
Can't capture DeFi value, gets btfo by Wormhole and LZ daily.

But they will capture tradfi?

Your the fucking retard here.

>>59045710
Why is it always scammy pajeets and jews that try to shoehorn their scams here? Nobody uses your brown VC rugpull scam.

SWIFT is using Chainlink, as well as Euroclear and the fucking DTCC.

Your VC backed scams only dream of this.

>>59045710
>Your the fucking retard here.

>>59044711
>>59044458
kek fuddies
pool's closed

>>59043062
>Trials
Maybe I’m just esl but doesn’t this imply another test round like in the last announcements? Weren’t multiple banks involved in these tests too?

>>59044221
>the pic that BROKE the fudders

speaking of broken...

January 1st, 2021:
BTC: $29,000
ETH: $730
SOL: $1.50
BNB: $37
LINK: $11.80

Today
BTC: $61,000
ETH: $2,350
SOL: $140
BNB: $550
LINK: $11

>>59047540
hey bro are you that coomer dude from holland haha

>>59047540
literally unaffected by this spam.
try again, tomorrow nothing will change.
btw you should see someone about your crippling pornography addiction.

>>59048243
No im one of his followers tho. I like to repost his stuff bc hes hilarious


And heres the thing…it rattles the FUCK out of you, kid

If you were a guy who got laid, your gf would be like “anon whats wrong”…and you would tell her “its the jerkoff guy again”. But heres the thing… you dont even have that problem


THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>59048457
See my last post. Damn kid…that HAS to sting

See you wish it was another way, but its the other way

You have zero balls, kid. But then again, you’re just a kid, kid

>>59048871
>>59048877
bro stop intimidating me, im indeed a price cuck so lay off the insults fellow price cuck

WE are the price Cuckolds of crypto

>>59044386
i hate link for real tho

I think Adem is going on another weekend coke/amphetamine fuelled fud bender lmao