/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58437971
Meh
First two are ok

>>58437971
6/10

>ICP
Bro literally just take one glance at the chart.

>>58437971
>Strategy is to DCA and hold long term. Thoughts?
kek maybe the fact that it's over?? why would you even consider buying a dying/dead asset?

>>58437971
also
>hold long term
99% of altcoins will get massacred long term. At least take some profit after a significant gain.

>>58437971
>BTC
Yes, but don't go too heavy unless you've already got lots of capital
>LINK
Yes, likely long term big winner
>RNDR
Yes, should do solid multiples if we enter a bullish market again
>ICP
Eh, questionable. It clearly bottomed out but I don't think it has much of a future
>ONDO
This is basically a scam. Could still pump, but the rest of your choices are at least somewhat fundamentally sound.

>>58438987
>he thinks erc20 shitcoins are more useful than the only stand alone full stack capable blockchain in existence.
Ngmi

>>58437971
No SSNC? Ngmi faggot, kys

>>58438997
I've worked in web3 for 3 years now and I promise you there will be no "1 blockchain to rule them all" and anyone promising you that is selling you a lie.

>>58437971
Drop link get $truf
I mean truf has ACTUAL chance to grow, link it's just a stable coin

>>58437971
>long term
Stick to BTC only.

>>58439029
>inb4 boomers tell you to get LTC
kek

>>58438987
Ondo became this year LUNC huh

>>58439008
“Worked in web3” you mean you sold shitcoins while your “dapps” were hosted on aws. Nobody cares about your opinion. It’s just like the “my friend is a software engineer and he hates btc” fud. Also I never said icp will be the only blockchain, what I am saying is that it’s the most advanced and useful blockchain in existence and it’s not even close.

>>58437971
dont get ICP, you gon get priced out.

>>58439023
no shit, token is almost zero, of course it can grow, what there left to do after it hits bottom

>>58439148
>those boomers you mention in this room with us?

>>58439154
>priced out
>shit already rugged
tfym?

>>58439153
get his ass

>>58439023
I would drop link just cuz its dirty by all the pajeets that shill it daily.

>>58439157
BOOMERS

>>58438953
If you didn't know, that was because sam manipulated the market.

https://cryptoleaks.info/case-no-1

>>58437971
Link itself and everything related to it it's fucking dying on freefall don't listen to this.

lololol hearing people say Link is a good longterm investment when its missed multiple bull runs is laughable, someone sell me on it cause i dont think anyone made money on it recently

>>58437971
9/11

>>58439008
there is no web3 except for icp

>>58438987
Yeah I’m still most apprehensive about ICP and ONDO. I listed them in order of confidence. ICP seems undervalued to me and I liked the ONDO narrative. With just BTC, LINK, and RNDR I can see myself maybe getting a 4x over the next bull run but that’s pretty much it. I wanted to diversify into one or two more solid coins that I can get possibly get large returns from. At the same time, I’m too risk adverse to trade meme coins. Any recs on up and coming alts I can bet part of my funds on?

>>58439315
I checked the chart and saw it made better returns than BTC when BTC went up. That's why I bought some this time around.
I sold all my crypto though except for some memecoins and other L2s that are so expensive to get back that I may as well see if they eventually do something.

>>58439943
The game has changed a lot, most of the good upcoming stuff is probably going to launch to insane valuations. Still, I'd keep an eye on Zksync, the development ramp they have even before a token exists is insane. If you want to gamble a bit more, look at protocols launching around Solana, and older L1s sub $1B mcap that have underperformed but are still in active development. Some Chainlink tangential projects might do well as well, like Space and Time, but again my guess is the good ones launch at bloated valuations.

>>58437971
The first one is good but the others should be swapped out for ETH, AVAX and SOL.

>>58437971
Not bad for a pf filled with big mcaps, but if you are looking out for wife changing money, then you might also want to look out for Hydro Online

>>58438987
Great analysis, but I think RNDR should only do around 10x maximum

>>58440953
If this project can pull off what it's doing at the moment, then it might turn out to be among the winners in this cycle because of its real life utility

>>58439306
I'm really glad I didn't buy this

>>58437971
LINK? Sold off that shit, now saving up for RIO, PYTH and SUPRA during the TGE

Looks like the email thing didn’t get ride of the shitcoin jeets

>>58437971
lame ass holding-meta portfolio, don't you know by now that the new meta is buying pinksale launches and selling them (ratio decreasing price-time per the inverse-square-law) for a profit?

>>58440021
>>58440032
ok what about
>btc
>eth
>link
>rndr
I took a look at Zksync and it seems promising, so I might grab some when that drops. At the moment there aren't really any other alts I have strong conviction for, so Im thinking of occasionally taking some risks and getting smaller bags of promising projects as they launch while having a main portfolio of btc, eth, link, and rndr. Im pretty sure id get similar returns from avax so no point in spreading myself thin I think. And sol seems overvalued to me at the moment
>>58440953
>>58441053
Ill look into this
>>58442000
Im not a good trader. Even a 4x with my portfolio would beat the stock market many times over so its better than nothing at least

>>58442121
SOL still has lots of development happening and a ton of funding, I think it'll do well.

Truthfully I wish I had a better answer for you, but this isn't 2017 or even 2020. The old days of being able to get in early on highly promising things are basically gone. I think for a new entrant their best bet is to look at a longer time horizon and make sound investments. Frankly if I was going to give myself advice as a new entrant I'd probably advise BTC, ETH, LINK with 70-80% of portfolio and then maybe to get involved in EigenLayer/restaking shit because it's a new bastion of the space.

>>58442136
That's unfortunate. I'll look into restaking as well. Any particular reason you didn't include render?

>>58437971
A poor one in the absence of a DePIN asset. Be smart on this anon

>>58437971
You don't have DePIN related gem? FIL should've been there. Can't wait for peaq to go live on mainnet though as a well crafted DePIN hub.

>>58439153
OK, what innovations are currently running on the more advanced blockchain in existence?

>>58438987
ONDO is the glaringly obvious play if we actually get an "RWA narrative" that spreads to normies.
Previously burned normies will be skeptical, so things like ONDO being the major allocators to BUIDL will show legitimacy.

>>58437971
new to crypto and you're buying ICP. kek.

you should be a little conservative and gain the necessary experience before making any big moves.
if you own a blog, you can earn from Hydro without ads.

>>58442251
>>58442360
Is render not depin?

>>58442392
For one it’s the only blockchain that can host dapps completely on chain.
>Inb4 but muh I don’t want that

>>58442251
Render's straight-up DePIN, bro. Kinda bummed that a quantum-resistant blockchain project like QANplatform ain't in the mix.

>>58439943
I dca into RNDR for AI narrative and Beam for gaming (could do also ImmutableX). I will wait for memes like WIF to drop further and allocate a smaller amount in there as well. That's mostly it, maybe I add something into some new promising lower cap but not much else

>RWA vaporware
>IoT garbo
>No $LRDS
>No $APU
Incredibly shit portfolio. Do better.

>>58437971
LINK and ICP need to go. I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel for those 2. Get into more AI tokens; since you already have RNDR, diversify into other areas like Data marketplace or launchpads for AI projects

>>58437971
>long term
Cycle top just passed. Wait until $30k bitcoin before accumulating any long term holds.

>>58437971

RNDR and ONDO are good plays this cycle, but make sure to unload them fast. BTC is good long term (obviously). LINK and ICP are scams, do not buy it

>>58437971
You forgot to ponder on whether or not to buy some $ORBS

>>58443947
>diversify into other areas
Don't just chat shit. Name the goddamn tokens!

>>58438987
Everything correct apart from calling LINK a longterm winner. It's over afaik

>>58443994
For Data marketplaces, OCEAN and NAI are solid choices.
For launchpads, ChainGPT is a good one(awaiting token launch).

>>58443975
See how your pic looks useless and shitty, that's how the token is also very useless

>>58444071
Ocean is well known. The other one seems to be functional in your bedroom only

>>58442553
I see it as AI, Depin and RWA
Don't even know which one fits it the most.

>>58437971
Solid bags indeed, but consider adding DUA so you can stake it on the DeFi terminal and earn NAI tokens. It's a better option than just holding.

>>58444204
Lol
You could easily scroll through X to see the top tier decentralized data marketplaces; Nuklai is easily top 3 and its not number 3 on that list

>>58437971
RNDR is a solid hold. You can also explore other DePIN gems like BLXM and KREST, or perhaps wait for the launch of Peaq coin later this year. The home for DePINs is right here.

>>58437971
Nice one. Now wait for Supra TGE and add some then WAGMI.

>>58437971
who still buys LINK? jus get PYTH or wait for SUPRA tge.

>>58437971
You dont have any AAST, NGMI

>>58437971
Add PEAQ to the list, about to drop on CoinList. Thanks me later, Anon.

>>58439168
I'll straight up drop Link and hop on the token dTelecom migrated from Arbitrum to join its ecosystem.

>>58437971
replace ICP with NAI and LINK with DOT.

>>58437971
>Link, Icp...... kek...
Hydro has a better chance at succes than these two shitty coins.
especially ICP

>>58437971
Instead of LINK buy QAN

>>58437971
Nice list but I think you are missing NAI

>>58443958
LINK will be great someday

>>58452348
I'm holding some and I think it should be a good buy

>>58437971
Missing ocean and fun otherwise not bad for a newbie

>>58437971
take away ICP and add Hydro and you're set to go..

>>58453433
It's not even launched yet, only publishers can use it for now, so why should anyone replace it with another project?

>>58452457
Well, I don't see that happening in this bull market

>>58453518
The idea that we can monetize with it without displaying ads on our website is one reason why I'm considering it since Adsense is messing up with my website

>>58437971
>>ONDO
I dunno if it's just me, but this whole thing feels sus, why not just ditch it for some Al altcoins like Ocean/Nai/Fet
I'm kinda cool with the rest.

>>58452457
Go get a life anon, DIA and SUPRA have edged LINK off the space.

>>58441059
Smartfag, now keep and eye on SUPRA. You miss the TGE, you lose.

>>58437971
These assets are blue-chip with immense potentials. To achieve a balanced portfolio, consider adding RWA tokens like NXRA, RIO, and DUA. Don't miss out on this opportunity again.