/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>5837207

stinky stinky

Fuck you for tricking innocent people into buying your fagbags. The real moon mission is in iexec/RLC.

they can't suppress the truth. LINK will moon, and moon soon. Once the levy breaks and the volume picks up, its going to be too late for nolinkers. They'll never make it.

>>5837207
I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

>>5837452

I have a pretty huge dick in crypto too. I'm balls deep man.

>>5837363
Holy shit
>Buy muh IEXEC instead of a good project

>>5837516

lulz. and wait until he learns iExec is using LINK. cut out the middle man and make more gains pajeets.

I don't think we can keep him hidden for much longer

We moonin, bros?

>>5838199
Not yet. That's either a huge new support wall or a whale trying to shake out weak hands.

>>5837452
>crypto economics