/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Bitcoin
Based
>Quant
Cringe. Did you just fart on me?

>>58367614
op i think you might be...you know...

>>58367614
>he fell for the uk treasury's scam

Johannes Vermeer painted 34 paintings.
I've only painted five.

Why are his paintings worth so much more than mine when mine are so much rarer than his?

>>58367786
I've painted 0, therefore...

>>58367614
>Quant
Literally never heard of it and I've been trading crypto since 2018.

>>58367614
Who? That's your problem.

>>58367614
test

>>58367786

Can I see your paintings Anon?

>>58368159
No, I was lying about the paintings to try to make a point that it's not (only) the rarity or scarcity of Bitcoin that determines its price.
More of a parable or metaphor than a flat-out lie. But I apologize for misleading you if you believed that I have five paintings to show.

The point I was trying to illustrate through my lie was:
Suggesting that Quant's value should be determined by its scarcity relative to Bitcoin is silly.
Bitcoin forks (BSV, BCH, etc) are equally as scarce as BTC, that use nearly identical code as BTC, that are worth a lot less.
Scarcity is not the only factor.

>>58368375

I don't get it...

>>58368714
stick to average costing into bitcoin for 10 years, ok

>>58367614
I believe Quant will handle the interoperability for the next banking system after the collapse. Just imagine something as scare as Bitcoin but has utility, not a currency but a digital asset. Aave is also a scarce digital asset. Pic related.

>>58367614
Quant just provides a blockchain ledger for institutional transactions who use cloud-based software. It's 7 poor man's LINK and highly likely a grift like ADA

>>58369775
> its shitcoins all the way down

>>58368375
how can i trust anything you say now what if that whole post is a lie

>>58367895
was shilled here quite a bit ~2019. I entered at ~$3 thanks to this board and exited at ~$312 last cycle. So clearly that was an oversight on your part.

>>58367614
That's a good question anon. I'm still holding a small bag. I like the chart, I like the team/project, and this thing can pump hard. I'm anticipating we see $1-2k this cycle. If it picks up steam even $3k doesn't seem out of the question. Not a very normie friendly project, but at least it's not an outright VC scam for us to get dumped on.

>>58367786
lol awesome

>>58369576

Im scared.

>>58367614
There is only one (You). You are worth as much as bitcoin market cap.

>>58367614
Did you eat breakfast this morning?

>>58367614
because the market doesn't work that way, but it's not worth trying to explain to you how things should be done to make money in this world. Be content with this gem ($LRDS)

>>58373141
i tell you why LRDS is not a fucking gem
>web3games

>>58373141
nigga saying lrds gem like theres not enough biztards shilling that shit