/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58303232
What are the chances of this happening?

>>58303340
In five years or so? High

>>58303340
Within 18 months

>>58303232
Yeah dude, smart people aren't buying Link but us /biz/ folks are. Case closed!

>>58303340
0%
Link will never be above 25$.

also have this talk today, probably just same slides but it's in hong kong which is moving early on web3

>>58303364
Chart states 2025, not 5 years bucko.

>>58303232
>its the fudders that are paid!

t. Community Advocate

>>58303232
ok but price
ok but price
ok but price
OKAY BUT PRICE
OKAY BUT PRICE
OKAY BUT PRICE
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>58303232
>checks price
oh... I'm thinking linkies are either misunderstanding the implications of this, or the tokenomic impact on price of it, or both.

What are the tokenomic assets referred to? Why do they have to be tokenized? Why will the free market have no other choice but to bid up the price of LINK as a result? I expect linkies to not be able to answer basic questions like this in a satisfying fashion that actually checks out, or else their token wouldn't be the same price as it was many years ago. Yes markets are pretty inefficient but they're not THAT inefficient to overlook your supposed god protocol if it did actually all check out like you say. It's up to you fags to explain this since Sergey does not want to (presumably because the SEC will fuck him and his company for it or something. Why aren't swift and bank employees bidding up the price themselves?

>>58303340
literally 100%

>>58303632
solves the lambo problem

Yep, must be those pesky bulgarians holding people from buying link and not the woeful price action.

>>58303632
>Why aren't swift and bank employees bidding up the price themselves?
the problem with this site is that many aren't dumb but just haven't been in the real world

>>58303632
>What are the tokenomic assets referred to?
anything that is an asset now. stocks, derivatives, real estate, cars, etc
>Why do they have to be tokenized?
for automated and secure smart contract transfers of ownership. triple entry accounting.
>Why will the free market have no other choice but to bid up the price of LINK as a result?
because link is the fee for data to be supplied to these contracts.
>Why aren't swift and bank employees bidding up the price themselves?
otc sales do not move price. think about the grayscale vid a few weeks back and how little serg's dumps actually affect link's price. binance has facilitated these otc transfers.

>>58303232
So why does the price never go up? why dont people frunt run it?

>>58303955
>>58303632
>believing in efficient market theory

>>58303939
>muh OTC won’t effect price
Unless the institutions buying OTC for a discount lose faith in the future of the token and start selling chunks for multiples of their cost average :)

>>58303955
>frunt run
Esl detected

>>58303955
this >>58303977. retail is enamored with what twitter crypto says or is slot machining shitcoins. there are only 42k wallets with 1 or more link in them. it's basically a gigantic project hiding in plain sight. early access filled up in just under 6 hours for a reason.

>>58303955
have you been told to buy it by anyone yet?
most investors don't even understand btc let alone smart contracts, let alone anything chainlink is doing
the market needs to be told to buy it

>>58303977
I literally stated that markets are inefficient. There's still no accounting for Stink's relative stagnation even when taking that into account.

>for automated and secure smart contract transfers of ownership. triple entry accounting.
There is no demand for this, it isn't very additive. Smart contracts have been used for what since ethereum launched, a bunch of casino shitcoins that don't matter. Just seems like tranny middleman shit pursuing the "don't ask questions, put everything on blockchain just because okay" mantra. In comparison the value proposition for bitcoin is very simple and intuitive, and you have actual institutions buying it rather than just talking about it like they are giving encouraging headpats to a child's science project.

>because link is the fee for data to be supplied to these contracts.
Does it HAVE TO BE the fee? Why not use literally anything else? Again it seems engineered just so some tranny middlemen can take a piece for themselves from the transaction of other parties who were not so organically demanding to have this service.

>otc sales do not move price.
Maybe not directly in the very short term, but they still have effect all other things remaining the same.

>>58304079
>Does it HAVE TO BE the fee? Why not use literally anything else?
this is where i have to wonder if you're being le ironic 4d fudder or genuine, because this has been gone over thousands of times here over the past 7 years (admittedly not much the last 2-3 or so where fud is the rule of the day)

>>58303232
I sold my LINK for Apu, never looking back

>>58303955
>So why does the price never go up?
Because every time some hype happens for Link, Bitcoin shits itself.

>>58304007
You got a better spelling of it?

>>58303632
Why are you even trying with this fud? Shitcoins pump over nothing but for some reason SWIFT collaborating with Chainlink is a nothingburger?

>>58303395
>>58303527
>>58303551
>>58303632
>>58303791
>>58304079
>>58304129
>FUD cucks seething at seeing this thread again
POOL'S
CLOSED

does anyone have that thread of trader claiming that chainlink labs was working with whales to suppress the price. probably a year or two back which everyone called fud
the idea was that they were doing this to keep under the radar and not worry customers with high price volatility
whatever you want to say, it is odd with the link/btc price action and the dumps when there's news

please just sell your chainlink and buy memecoins on solana or base or bsc. PLEASE. token not needed. THE CHART. eric schmidt's yacht. PLEASE I'M BEGGING YOU JUST BUY MEMECOINS. YOU'RE MISSING OUT! UNSTAKE YOUR CHAINLINK (TICKER: LINK), SELL IT ALL, BRIDGE IT TO SOLANA, AND BUY MEMECOINS. DON'T YOU WANT TO MAKE MONEY? DO YOU WANT TO BE LEFT BEHIND AGAIN? IMAGINE ALL THE 10X AND 100X MEMECOINS YOU COULD BUY INSTEAD OF HOLDING AND STAKING YOUR CHAINLINK

PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF G-D JUST SELL. YOUR. CHAINLINK.

SELL.

YOUR.

CHAINLINK.

>>58303232
There are black people out there that have 1,000+ stacks

>>58304338
I refuse to believe it

>>58304028
https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#pageTab=holders&tab=tab-holders&pageSize=100&holders=5000

theres 500k+ wallets with 1 link in them

>>58304331

>>58304428
95% of those wallets would be test wallets owned by CLL. They probably just move those tokens around occasionally as part of test cases or to make adoption numbers look better. It’s all a load of shit really, no better than Hedera claiming that they can do a million transactions per second when their metric is simply nothing more than transferring 1 token back and forth repeatedly.

>>58303232
That's a cool screen shot OP
>checks price
Oh! Oh... LOL! Let me guess "innit 4 da tech"

I'M IN IT FOR THE TECH!

>>58304079
>another dude figures out Link is a solution desperately searching for a problem

/thread

>>58304428
Lmfao love it when they get caught in a lie. TRUTH>TRUST


>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude EARLY means anytime before December!!!!!

>>58303232
This makes sense blackrock did the same thing with bitcoin

>>58304860
the problem will be the great reset

hopefully link will be ready at that time...

singularity. the god candle

>>58303232
it was confirmed 7 years ago

>>58304248
i'm willing to grant that the pool is closed
BUT
..............price :}

>>58303340
There’s no actual reason for the price to go up that high

>>58305099
I seriously hope you fucking die

>>58305099
checked…
quadrillions must flow btw

>>58305099
>he says this in the same industry where literally everything has their value derived from pure speculation and hype

>>58306187
yes, the 2 things that link does not have and will never have ever :}

>>58303232
Kek at the weak attempt at damage control unfortunately the damage is done there is no hope for link

>>58303232
cmon man link is already dead as hell, what's even the point of investing in that shit anymore or anything related to it in any way shape or form?
for real, investing on decentralized coins and trading with dextools is 1000 times more efficient and profitable