/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58189071
Everything except the price appreciation so who fucking cares?

>>58189078
Would you prefer LINK to be at $10,000 but be a scam?

>>58189086
Yes without question

>>58189092
oh, right. me too, probably.

>>58189078
We don’t care about the price. LINK is the best investment there is if you still don’t understand then you’ll know when Chainlink will powers everything.
Go gamble on the shitcoin casino.

The people of this planet hate the central banks and their CBDC idea. Don't say you weren't warned if you're hunted down and killed by an angry population if you own LINK. Better get rid of it now and never mention you were part of the enslavement of humanity.

>>58189086
I'd just rather that fat cunt stop endlessly dumping. Their warchest is either needlessly gargantuous or they are bleeding so much into a blackhole. It needs to stop for a few years.

>>58189340
Fuck vaxcattle niggers, fuck fudders and fuck kikes

>>58189371

>>58189459
Do you understand how order books and liquidity work you dumb fuck? Congrats on showing how the Chainlink team quite craftily dumped those tokens without pushing price down. However it is inescapable that the price has been suppressed. Why do you think most holders think that link underperformed last bull? It's going to underperform again. We would have been $100 already without those constant dumps, fucking retard

>>58189078
guess why that is

>>58189483
>Why do you think most holders think that link underperformed last bull?
Because >>58189522

>>58189534
ITS A CONSPIRACY THE ELITES DUMPO THEIR BITCORNS TO SURPRESS THE STINKY LINKIES!!!

Fucking retard

>>58189071
Too late, the bullrun will be over by then, you need to at least try and sell the top this time, not hodl to 2026 bc of anticipated adoption..

this post is financial advice.

>>58189545
You can look up the timing on that tweet and chart yourself, you know.
You're the retard for denying objective reality.

>>58189483
also, see >>58189459
same conversation tomorrow, or are you busy over easter?

>>58189071
>just 2 more years marines
>>58189086
It is a scam, they scammed investors by promising a working product and 7 years later half of the things described in the whitepaper aren't even being worked on. They have 4 services running in production (data feeds, VRF, automation and proof of reserve), except those are 100% centralized. Everything else is either a proof of concept of at best a beta test. Staking is a fucking joke because it doesn't really secure anything (but I'm sure we'll get v1 staking soon, except Ari admitted that they aren't even in the implementation phase for that yet, he's literally trying to figure out the theoretical foundations), functions is a joke (service limits of 10s and 30KB kek), FSS, DECO, town crier, mixicles - not even a public PoC available. Fucking joke of a company.

>>58189585
>utility token
that was easy

>>58189585
>muh fundamentals

>>58189562
7 hours after the tweet dropped someone dumped a bit of bitcorn? so fucking what lmao. You're literally a schitzophrenic if you believe the 2 are related somehow.

>>58189086
Yes?

>>58189522
So why the fuck would you buy link

>>58189914
its an unironic schizo playing guessing games

>>58189127
>we
I hold link too but you’re a fucking retard

>>58189071

Banks are boring, play GRAVITY with me

>>58189071

Bank chain is good? Are you sure anon?

>>58189933

Go bed son...

>>58189941

Ok, Ill go with your wife

>>58189585
You seemed so knowledgeable until you threw mixicles in there.

>>58189914
You shouldn’t.
But if you do, it’ll probably be for the same reason bitcoin whales keep suppressing it.

Screw all jeet fudders, here's a song for yall.

https://app.suno.ai/song/354bdbe7-240e-4a1e-b961-52628ca2a61f

>>58189483
>Why do you think most holders think that link underperformed last bull?
most of the holders can do basic maths and see that link didnt underperform last cycle
it even outperformed eth by a 6x thats solid by anyones standard
oh wait you meant to imply people here only bought after the summer of defi, lol kekfuddie

>>58189340
Well the angry population hasn’t done anything about the bankers or politicians so they won’t do anything

>>58189071
>ChainLINK will be used an infrastructure for the CDBC/bank chain
thank you for providing zero proof for this, continue on scamming please

>>58190714
the link to swift literally saying they will use chainlink as the backend to their connector has been posted repeatedly here anon

Token not needed

>>58189092
>>58189118
I love /biz/

reminder swift is just exploring and this new thing with cdbcs have nothing to do with chainlink or they would have mentioned it in the report

>>58189071
it's all fucking true
every. last. word.

>>58189905
>ke random dumps

>>58192074
They referred and linked to the CCIP paper in the new report.

oh yes linkies we are so fucking back, we are mooning so hard right now

>>58189071
>yes yes ser you buy link you triple mone yes great investion yes yes

get the fuck outta here, poojet, no amount of tokens on satoshisync BTCFi can swing me to buy some shitty rasheedcoin

>>58189905
Its funny how you think any of us are going to sell. I suppose the main reason you’re here is to prevent newfags from buying though.

>>58192231
did you even read the report? there was no mention of CCIP. Dont be delusional and say connector = ccip

>>58192300
This description and link is the CCIP thing.

>>58192300
>>58192578

>>58189905
The problem is it tends to happen nearly every time.

>>58192589
laughing boy >>58192300 will no doubt claim that because 'CCIP' isn't mentioned that there's no way the document is referring to it in your pic. Clearly they must be referring to some other blockchain interoperability solution which does exactly what they've been working on with Chainlink except it's called something else and no one knows what it could be. Defo not Link though kek

>>58189905
Its all true and people here have wisened up to the blatant manipulation, that you are so hellbent on dismissing. Fuck off niggerkike.

Not selling. Pool's closed.

>>58192677
It's a hyperlink that leads straight here: https://www.swift.com/news-events/press-releases/swift-unlocks-potential-tokenisation-successful-blockchain-experiments

>>58189071
CCIP is already priced in. Chainlink will never generate the fees required to support the market cap delusional linkies believe will happen in the future. Should have sold at $50. Also, ICP makes Chainlink obsolete.

>>58192710
>>58192300
>It's a hyperlink that leads straight here: https://www.swift.com/news-events/press-releases/swift-unlocks-potential-tokenisation-successful-blockchain-experiments

>>58189585
You need to think of DECO more as a delivery vehicle and not the actual identity itself. Chainlink is valuable because it is the connection and banks will plug in, but there are a whole separate set of regulatory concerns that go into compliance which currently costs the banks a lot of money and are a huge liability/hassle. Chainlink doesn't want to bother dealing with the risk. That's why a company like Everest is ahead of the curve, we are moving to a model where your actual identity (biometrics and related things that are much harder to fake than a gov document) will be needed to fit within financial risk profiles for an economy running on a blockchain. So there will be a separate identity layer run by an entity who assumes all the risk and turns compliance into a profitable thing for banks and corporations instead of a money sink.

It also allows the user to actually own their own data as well, but that's a separate topic.

>>58192875
>Chainlink will never generate the fees required to support the market cap
Unlike XRP and Ada, right anon?

>>58189071
Great, so in the bear market link will get some usage wherein the bags bought OTC will be used and move into circulation once they are given to NOps as payment who will then dump it. Im going to sell the bull and buy in the bear and this news will not affect it nor will it price me out. Ill get more link than I have now with such a play.

>>58189086
Yes of course are you fucknig stupid? We're literally all in it for the money not the tech

>>58192628
a) so your investment thesis is: you hold something that literally cannot increase in price?

b) why are tons of other alts able to moon daily despite btc having a red day? Why is your coin so limp

>>58192875
(you)

>>58189118
anon you sonnuvabitch

>>58193292
no clue who that is, is that part of the new conspiracy?

>>58193292
found your twitter

>>58193277
>why are tons of other alts able to moon daily despite btc having a red day?
No alt would pump if BTC had a red moment every time they pumped or had big news.

>>58193474
>red moment
the fuck does that mean

you realize information on alts is public right? Go to coingecko on any "red moment" for btc and there are thousands of coins absolutely mooning

in before
>but muhhhhh serious project

yeah so serious it has twink who calls himself a god as the mascot lmfao... also no products after 7 years

>>58193506
>big link news
>bitcoin dumps

>big random altcoin news
>bitcoin doesn't dump

Random alts get to pump, link doesn't.

>>58193080
>Unlike XRP and Ada
So you think it will 3x. That's reasonable. The typical Linkie thinks it will be needed for a gorillion daily transactions and 100x is fud.

token not needed

>>58193579
So you actually think xrp and cardano generate enough fees to “support their market cap”.
That’s hilarious

>>58193594
No. I don't and I never said I did. I said I could see Link with a similar market cap as those two but not the trillion dollar market cap most Linkies believe will happen. If Link were to 3x it would have a similar market cap to XRP. That's a reasonable assumption. If you want to take a chance on a 3x coin that doesn't seem to pump and has been living off the same CCIP hype for years (its already priced in) then good luck. I personally don't think its worth the missed opportunity cost.

>>58193690
>Link has to justify its MC with revenue
>but useless shitcoins with higher MCs don't

gj anon

>>58193969
>Link has to justify its MC with revenue
In the long term, all chains will have to justify their MC with revenue.
>but useless shitcoins with higher MCs don't
In the short term, Link has to justify its market cap in comparison with other chains. The market obviously believes Link is a bigger shitcoin than ADA or XRP, hence its smaller MC.

>>58194011
>In the long term, all chains will have to justify their MC with revenue.
XRP and ADA are both older than Link

>international jew banking system will share profits with an unregistered security headed by a russian
this all sounds extremely plausible

>>58189340
Haven't seen this one before. Very inventive.

>>58189071

Token not needed.
Kek baggies!

>>58189948
its funny because its the same guy in every thread always gives himself away by adding mixicles, that's why link threads are so boring now its literally the same 3-4 autists fudding their own bags forever and switching id's to play mindgames with the people dumb enough to entertain them

>>58194011
>>58194091
the whole market is a clown market right now, dogcoins still live in the top 15 by marketcap and have actually pumped more than dumped so far this cycle, and the only thing making money so far is utter blatant scams/rugpulls on solana. so anyone doing critical analysis on the market right now at this present state is absolutely wasting their time.

eventually tradfi and real players will enter, and when they do the crypto market will likely bifurcate like traditional stocks and penny stocks, where the gamblers stay sectioned off in the small pond. for now the entire crypto market is just an offshoot of what penny stocks are to the stock market.

>>58195360
The shill threads are also made by the same guy. The autist makes bait threads with the sole intention of arguing with fudders.
The majority of every link thread is literally just the same two autistic losers samefagging and arguing with eachother over and over again.

>>58195360
I am curious how staking will work though. I can imagine how it will work for some services, but some seem like they'll be very difficult to (meaningfully) secure with staking. I hope we'll see some of the lower hanging fruit rolled up in the next iteration

>>58195398
It's so weird seeing fuddies screeching about muh ccip, muh revenue, etc. when clearly none of that shit matters even a little bit.

>>58189071
yep. all that's left to do is shitpost and fud for fun. the future is already written

>>58192105
>>58192628
>>58193474

It looks like it actually happened today too around 9:40 AM EST

>>58189340
they won't do shit and are enslaved already
if anything they will fight like rabid dogs FOR the enslavement of humanity

>>58195641
Good golly I’m so excited for you crazy kids.

>>58189483
He doesn't understand what wash trading is.

>>58189071
so how low is buttcoin going now? is the final dump near?

>>58195398
>>58195622
Tell that to
>>58189071
>>58189127
Half of you are arguing that Link's use case and fundamentals will cause it to moon. The other half say fundamentals don't matter because even shit coins will moon in this market. Its a weird cope. I'm saying the use case is way overstated and its no more likely to moon than any other coin. I think its less likely since its been shilled to death for the last 6 years and has horrible price action. Maybe that is because Sergey betrays or maybe its because no one believes the CCIP hype anymore.

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE POOLS CLOSED LPL FUCKING SEETHE

>>58196541
Want the ultimate truth? The link token is extremely overvalued as well as 99% of every other crypto project.

The “anons” that claim to be bullish on link are advocates that were paid to try to force a sentiment on social media.

Try finding a single smart person that is bullish on link after 2022. It’s just not possible, most people bullish on link right now are
>advocates, which get paid a hefty salary by the chainlink team. So they don’t really care if link moons or not
>retards

Even the OG insider assblaster said the singularity would be a wick to $50 and were already far past that.

These people that say bitcoin dumps when link is about to moon conveniently leave out the token circulating supply increase during these times.

Yes, Sergey is “suppressing” the price of the token if you want to call it that way.

In his eyes, he was the one that made the token go up in value so he probably has no qualms about dumping millions.

Chainlink is a good investment if you can invest tens of millions in it, otherwise it’s just not as it’ll top out at $26 or so at the next peak.

>>58196649
How much do you get paid to post this little fish?

>>58189086
Disappointing how many "Yes" replies there are here. What a shit board. Nobody even cares about the future of finance, they just want to get theirs and fuck off. Shame on all of you.

>>58189086
no

Also sirgay is probably satoshi

Im already rich. Decentralizing finance to weaken governments is my priority. Im not anti government, just anti big government

also moot sucks dwarf cock

>>58196652
>These people that say bitcoin dumps when link is about to moon conveniently leave out the token circulating supply increase during these times.
What mean?

>>58196983
He means he’s full of Shit and he made that up

>>58196996
But is it true though? Is the chainlink team dumping link tokens whenever the price is going up?

>>58196652
the person who wrote this post likely has more link than any person reading it who arrived post 2020 will ever be able to accumulate

>>58196541
link will moon eventually, but its not going to be predictable because if it were it wouldn't happen. market makers will frontrun tradfi entering the market because there is always insiders, and speculation will price out anyone who thinks they can catch the pump. until then yes its a casino with zero fundamentals, simple as

>>58197081
No. Circulating supply has been unchanged for months at a time with consistent btc nose-diving-link-pump-killing dumps within the interim, anyone spending any amount of time in the space has already seen this. Anyone at this point denying it is intentional lying or retarded.

>>58197111
>the person who wrote this post likely has more link than any person reading it who arrived post 2020 will ever be able to accumulate
meds
>link will moon eventually, but its not going to be predictable because if it were it wouldn't happen. market makers will frontrun tradfi entering the market because there is always insiders, and speculation will price out anyone who thinks they can catch the pump. until then yes its a casino with zero fundamentals, simple as
cope
>No. Circulating supply has been unchanged for months at a time with consistent btc nose-diving-link-pump-killing dumps within the interim, anyone spending any amount of time in the space has already seen this. Anyone at this point denying it is intentional lying or retarded.
seethe

>>58196652
DR;NS
Nice try though

>>58197125
Where can you see the circulating supply change? You keep saying it’s not true but are providing no evidence whatsoever

Are advocates really doing damage control in this board? I always thought it was just a conspiracy theory desu

>>58189086
you ask that as if LINK isn't an $18.80 scam

>>58197249
Token unlocks are tracked here and should be outlined in the white paper as well as the official TG. (I nevee bothered to check because idgaf and every time someone mentions a link wallet sending tokens to binance the price has no noticeable change.
Circulating supply can be found on cmc and the like.
There are both paid advocates (in link) and paid fudders (in rupee and dinar) and just garden variety retards who pretend to be either of the above or sometimes even both in the same thread.

>>58196541
>its been shilled to death for the last 6 years
big fat retard detected
Link always got fudded way more than it got shilled. Pic very related.

>>58196652
>Try finding a single smart person that is bullish on link after 2022.
So what are you even doing here?

>>58196541
>The other half say fundamentals don't matter because even shit coins will moon in this market
Why are you using the future tense? Fundamentals haven’t mattered in many years, and the biggest shitcoins have been mooning the hardest.
You seem confused.

>>58193009
I often wonder if 1 ID = 1 Link is true lol. Everest seems to be climbing in price lately which is good.

>>58193690
I only need link at $200 to be financially free.

>>58196898
this HAS to be bait
I refuse to believe this post is genuine

>>58196652
I remember this pasta

>>58198610
>>58198744
>>58198803
>>58198836
ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND FUCKING CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

LPL POOLS CLOSED FUCKING SEETHE

>>58196541
If fundamentals actually mattered, Link would've pumped to (gasp) Quant price levels ages ago.
Because its fundamentals RIGHT NOW are god-tier compared to literally all of crypto except maybe BTC and ETH.

But because you're cattle, those fundamentals must be shit because "price no go up".

>>58189086
kek obviously, why do I care about an infrastructure that is going to enslave the goyim anyway? we're all in it for the gains, the fact they keep building with the stagnant shitty price and sergey's dad having a sports car shows how some anon needs to step up and snipe the fat faggot then run to mexico.

>>58190318
It did underperform stop being this dense, most fudders here have colonel tier stacks, so this twitter type of shilling for a top 15mc project on fucking /biz/ shows you're just an idiot.
And yes we all know it underperformed because of the dumps as anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together would notice instantly...

>>58199348
>it underperformed because of the dumps
Because of the Bitcoin dumps, yes.

>>58197274
big one I sold. Glad I did. now looking to top up on other oracles like PYTH and waiting on new ones like SupraOracles.

>>58196898
>Nobody even cares about the future of finance,
>why does anyone care about price
These two things are the same idiot. It doesnt work as the future of finance if it fails as an investment. People only invest if they think it will return them money. Otherwise, the project dies. If you love the tech or whatever other reason you care about link for, then you NEED the price to go up rapidly and consistently or your dreams of future of finance die.

>>58196983
It means he thinks LINK token dumps make Bitcoin crash

>>58199377
>be sergey
>dump link for btc
>dump btc for usd
>both dump at the same time
anon it's a lot easier to believe that a project dumped and didn't moon because your own eyes see the founder dump tokens, than it is to believe that btc dumps right before link pumps.
Sure both can happen, but the 2nd one is just a hell of a lot harder to believe than the first.

>>58199539
>>be sergey
>>dump link for btc
>>dump btc for usd
>>both dump at the same time
Link would have to dump first.
And if enough Link is being sold to dump Bitcoin, it would have to dump HARD and Bitcoin would have to pump.

In short, you're a barely functional retard.

>>58195666
Those digits, that post... yeah, make your own conclusions people. These linkies really do stink like sulfur.

>>58199555
define HARD
nice trips btw

>>58199377
>it’s bitcoins fault that I’m not rich yet!
Grow up you cuck
>>58199956
Kek rekt
>inb4 you should have bought at atl

>>58196898
>e of finance, they just want to get theirs and fuck of
Its been 7 years.

>>58199539
>dump link, then dump btc
>both dump at the same time

pick one

>>58189483
>i speak for all Link holders and your graph is wrong and Grayscale (picrel) are wrong and Swift are wrong and DTCC are wrong and Larry Fink of Blackrock is wrong and you should trust me because i spend so much of my time trying to help you make the financial decision that i want you to make.
Kek, keep going kid it's fun listening to you squeak

there is no warchest. chainlink is converting useless tokens into useful dollars. that's the business

>>58189071
This is just sad now. Please go for a walk, your family is worried about you.

Hey anons. First of all I fucking hate you all faggots, you should all eat shit and die you cancerous fucks.

SECOND;
Attention is the only thing that moves the markets. Attention from whales, small fry, average Joes. Losers, winners, adults, kids. Attention is everything. Shit projects don't keep attention on them for too long unless they have some kind of comical appeal, such as meme coins (DOGE, SHIB, PEPE etc.)

Chainlink doesn't have meme appeal, it's a fucking boring ass governance token for a blockchain oracle. HOWEVER y'all just can't stop talking about it.

I don't remember there ever being a time when i came to /biz/ and there wasn't AT LEAST one LINK thread. Be it fud, schizo, cope, or shilling. /biz/ is OBSESSED with LINK. Even the haters can't keep LINK out of their minds. It's become almost as much of a staple schizo coin as XRP. This means that the whales are aware of the attention it is garnering and are suppressing it for a reason. Because they know it has the potential to outperform everything else on the market but the only way it can get close to doing that is if they keep it down for so long, that when one day it inevitably blows up it will go another 1000x from where it is now.

TL;DR: If LINK is so shit and SeRgEy keeps dumping on you, then forget about LINK, SELL IT ALL, stop posting in LINK threads, stop making LINK threads and go find another project to obsess over. BUT YOU WON'T DO THAT NOW WILL YOU?!

>>58189071
YOU WILL CALL ME CRAZY
2026 WE WILL SEE A $26,000.00 USD LINK

THIS IS YOUR WARNING
THIS IS THE NEW RESERVE CURRENCY
THIS IS THE CURRENCY OF THE NEW ECONOMY
THE LINKS OF THE DIGITAL WORLD

BE NOT AFRAID

>>58201077
Checked. Great post, anon.

>>58189943
rekt

>>58201077
>whines about XRP schizo behavior he sees in others
>continues to exemplify it himself by espousing a silly moonboy logic theory
cringe, you wasted your time typing that and probably samefagging: >>58201683

>token dumps have no negative mpact on the price
How can anyone seriously say this with a straight face. It's literally just basic supply and demand.
Just because the USD price is not going down doesn't mean it doesn't have an impact, the token dumps can be responsible for the sideways crab chainlink is famous for.
The dumps are robbing us of our gains, if there wasn't so much dumps maybe the price would actually be going UP instead of sideways. If you pull up the link vs btc/eth you can clearly see its only been trending downwards on the macro level.
Newfags need to learn a valuable lesson about how sats work. Btc is the standard reserve currency for crypto, if your alt is not gaining vs btc it is doing down according to the crypto market.
Measuring against usd is completely irrelevant, literally everything will appreciate against USD forever because it's an infinite supply shitcoin. Eggs, milk, gas, dildos, gravel etc literally everything will go up against usd.
So if new usd is printed every day and your link is staying the same price, in reality you are losing wealth every single day.

>>58202286
Almost every other token in the top 20 has higher inflation than Chainlink. Nobody buys this FUD other than retards

>>58202286
>How can anyone seriously say this with a straight face.
Easy. Just look at the rest of crypto and notice that some of the biggest pumpers have more inflation.

>>58202298
Retarded faggot we've been through this already. L1 coins with blockchains can dump more because they have demand. The reason solana can dump more tokens because there's millions of normies buying the tokens aka casino chips to gamble on meme coins with. Chainlink doesn't have a casino so its tokens don't have any demand to absorb the supply increases.
Normies can't even buy link to stake because POOLS CLOSED LOLOLOL!

>>58202348
>The reason solana can dump more tokens because there's millions of normies buying the tokens
no there isn't lol

>>58202348
Shut up retard

>>58202348
Next time just say Chainlink's problem is too little demand.
Because supply dumping in itself simply cannot be the problem, too many big performers are doing much more of that.

>>58202476
Yes, exactly. Anyways, speaking of demand, isn't it amazing when the Solana bagholders on social media that were stuck with SOL after the collapse of FTX collectively decided to shill their bags instead of FUDing them in order to force exit liquidity??

Damn, isn't it amazing what happens to retail demand when that happens?

You fucking retards got psyop'd into FUDing your bags nonstop, yet complain nonstop about price action, while refusing to sell into the plethora of memecoins that are pumping, and moving on to something more productive in your lives.

Let me make this clear. You are self-destructive losers. This is why none of you can get women. This is why you hate the world around you.

This behavior is indicative of your very lives and it's frankly very fitting after knowing some of you. You deserve this. Let make this abundantly clear: I can actually handle this price action 110%, but I sincerely doubt you FUDing faggots can without spending every single minute of your day on social media or Telegram, and having the price action of LINK be the center of your very lives. You. Are. Fags.

>>58189086
no i'm just passionate about central bank digital currencies

>>58202544
>Yes, exactly. Anyways, speaking of demand, isn't it amazing when the Solana bagholders on social media that were stuck with SOL after the collapse of FTX collectively decided to shill their bags instead of FUDing them in order to force exit liquidity??
>muh social media shilling moved prices
no it did not

>>58202694
exactly, do people really believe this or is this just like 4d fud narratives? there is no "normies" buying bags in this market, there's whales and insiders dumping on retards who think they're going to get to dump on "normies". yes link might get to participate in the casino narrative with ccip ga, that's not going to be the endgame but it will give link holders an opportunity to dump some during this bull. right now this is setting up to be the weakest cycle yet though, everything pumped too early including scams, there's not going to be a retail phase because its already here, the idiots being conned right now into believing they're going to get theirs. the shell game is at peak, there's nowhere to go with it from here but down.

always remember markets are zero sum and liquidity rules all.

>>58201184
What if I don't want to wait that long? Can it happen a bit faster?

>>58202428
Cope
In order to buy all the hottest meme coins you literally need to buy SOL from the open market.
When does anybody need to buy a link token to do something? The answer is never because the token is not needed.
You need to buy solana like you need to buy poker chips at the casino.
I think anyone who's not a complete retard or a misleading paid advocate can clearly understand this situation.
>>58202476
Both supply and demand are a part of the equation, if the supply was less and the demand was the same, the price would be higher. The current price would be $40 instead of $19 if all those extra tokens were not dumped by Sergey.

>>58202544
It's entirely sergeys fault he's the captain of the ship. You can't blame retail for not wanting to touch the shitty useless price feed token. Normies already know about sergeys endless dumps and the fact that the token is not needed.
It's sergeys fault for releasing so much tokens without figuring out any tokenomic incentive or reason for them to be bought and held. How does releasing a 50m staking pool 5 years too late that you have to hold years in advance for sound? haha oops pools closed!!!!
I guess any normie looking for staking apy can just go buy any pos shitcoin that has unlimited staking.
To quote sergey in some interview
>"I didn't really think about tokenomics too much, it was merely an afterthought" -SN
so here we are 7 years later, still subsidizing a network everyone uses for free and still holding useless tokens that have no purpose.

>>58204846
He knows this, he knows there's zero demand from retail for link when they're buying whatever enables gambling on blockchains. This is why ETH went from $1 to $4000.

>>58189071
>2 years trust the plan
FUCK YOU

>>58189078
Most of us are unironically in it for the technology.

>>58189071
Too late XRP is already the chosen asset. You were wrong. You are all wrong. And Klaus will have zo much vun doomping ze vat bags on ze niggerzzz.

>>58189071
soo... buy xrp??

>>58196652
facts

>>58205555
soo no... buy LPL...? based chuddie kiddos....?

>>58205555

>>58205555
lmao ripplets are going to be so mad

>>58204846
>>58204925
>>58205100

My story with chainlink begins in 2004. Someone told me something on a phone dating Chatline. I feel God will show me a sign when it's time to share my story.

>>58204846
>In order to buy all the hottest meme coins you literally need to buy SOL from the open market.
You can buy them using USDT or BTC from any major cex, retard.
In fact, that’s where most of their volume is.

>>58201790
This for example is someone telling me they agree with me in a very sneaky and backhanded way.

>>58205555
no one cares actually what blockchain it will be based on (hint: it will be a private on anyway)
CCIP is needed on every single scenario
the infrastructure is key