/biz/ - Business & Finance

Why would I buy blackberry when I could buy LEAPs on literally any non shit tier cybersecurity stock?

Better yet why would I buy blackberry when I could buy TSM? You being a janny at an F100 company means fuck all. PANW was literally the favoured pick for cybersecurity and dumped 30% on ER and basically guaranteed a 5x on LEAPs since mama nancy got in.

>tendies

You have to go back

>>57994099
because this one is being shorted, it's bound for a squeeze and only valued low because boomers still think it's a phone company, once they catch on, this easily quadruples in price

>>57994110
you realize that was a 4chan term before wallstreetbets right? i dont even use reddit

>>57994110
>Uses Reddit spacing
>Says to go back
You really can't make this shit up
>>57994060
This actually looks pretty decent. I'll be sure to send some hookers and blow your way when my contracts expire

>>57994549
thanks brother. remember to buy shares too, calls won't pump the price. I'm in 5:1 shares-contracts, have about 2k $4 4/5 calls

>>57994060
I bough BB a long time ago. And i am very down. So down, in fact, that there's no point even selling it.
So I'm gonna hold on to it until it does something crazy.

>>57994605
i should mention there's no major institutions (vanguard, blackrock) jewing this stock yet. all it takes is one good earnings/news article for the boomers to realize blackberry is a cybersecurity company now, and a GOOD one - for those funds to pump the fuck out of this

>>57994060
why not squeeze AMC again, its down to $4

>>57994658
young people aren't watching movies in theaters anymore. i guess there could be a nice short squeeze but no long term growth, unlike BB

also have you tried the apple vision pro? call me a cuck for buying it all you want but after watching a few movies on it, i wouldnt even want to go to a movie theater again anyways unless it was with friends

bb was heavily shorted in 2021 didnt pop as hard didnt crash as hard its a very stagnant stock but ive been looking at it

would prob do stocks instead of contracts

>>57994667
>cuck for buying it
I don't know what it is. I don't go to movie theaters - those seats are disgusting and never cleaned. I watch movies on a 65" tv, which I also use as my computer monitor.

>>57994699
id only do contracts up to $4 (what i bought) because there's a big gap from 3.25 > 4.10. after that im taking profits and rolling back into shares until $6 minimum

>>57994764
i never go either. that's my point. you don't know what the vision pro is? but same, got a 77" OLED tv recently, shits great

>Stock dilution
https://www.reddit.com/r/BB_Stock/comments/1bdxflb/over_175k_bb_shares_purchased_by_insiders_over/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2019/01/30/the-hidden-signal-in-delayed-earnings-announcements/?sh=590465c45750

>desperate /wsb/ rejects in bbstock (who also got pushed out of /wsb/ come to shill to /biz/
https://www.reddit.com/r/BB_Stock/comments/1be7b2v/correct_me_if_im_wrong_but_it_seems_that/

>some retard who thought earnings was today and tried to save face
https://www.reddit.com/r/BB_Stock/comments/1bcax98/loaded_up_before_earnings/

The products are bbm, a wireguard vpn, kali linux, and an indian call/ scam center pretending to be social engineers

Short the fuck out of this stock or long time bagholders and c-levels will drop the world on you

>>57994099
This
cybersecurity is a service where customers will only get the best. Thats why $S had a fine earnings per share but they have no chance in hell of keeping up with Palo Alto's growth and eventual monopoly on the market.

>>57994794
>you don't know what the vision pro is?
No. I got too many hobbies as it is. I cant, and don't try, to keep up with all the new gadgets. Many are hyped and fade. I remember when the Segway to pumped endlessly as the "the thing" that will change life as we know it, and nothing happened. It dieded before it was born. If the goggles are worth anything I'll look into in a year or two, maybe.

WRT AMC, I was not thinking anyone liked it, just at a low price it might be squeezable. Last time they force sale only, which is fine one the squeeze sqozed.

>>57994413
>squeeze
squeeze deez nuts you fuckin dongus. The squeeze play right now is MSTR not your dogshit dino meme stock

>>57994801
>>some retard who thought earnings was today and tried to save face
he literally didn't

and even if he did you're expecting redditors to not be retarded?

>muh stock dilution
they're giving shares as bonuses, not diluting, every major company does that including the one I'm at now, whose stock is up 15% this year btw

>>57994837
even if blackberry ONLY captures the car tech market, they're still worth double what they are now.

also you're grossly underestimating how good cylance is, I've had dinner with blackberry execs because my last company paid them so much. trust me. they did not see concerned about losing business at all

>>57994874
you came here to shill a piece of shit.

>>57994990
explain why its shit using words other than:
>muh dilution
>redditors talking about it
>CRWD better

>>57995096
I'm not going to read what you wrote
you started an OP shilling a stock as a GME pump
Then you flipped a switch and talked about how it has actual value. You are 2 faced and fake.

>>57994060
yeah why don't you make yet another reddit bagholder cult general thread everyday for the next 10 years, join the growing list of them here.

interesting thread

>>57995146
yes its going to pump because it has actual value and is close to gapping up once it hits 3.25, dumbass. learn to read

>>57995155
you don't have to take anything i say to heart, im only posting this here because i want you poors to succeed too