/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57940584
The 2021 bullrun was really bad, pandemic was kinda still a big deal, the ftx fud etc...
Only a potential 2017 market style could pump this to $500. Big boys and etf incoming would indicate that we are in better shape than the previous cycle.

>>57940707
so basically its a possibility
thats enough for me, ill get some then

>>57940584
Oil

>>57940584
$500 an rlc is a 43.5B market cap.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-cloud-computing-market-expected-111300627.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABCUU_tAaW_AjAJ_Nwea-onAKYUGXD5nBnMTH2j4PApgJkOPnC5JSuLuR-V9zE5QvjQILaBkS666plQC4Ya8Af8-JQEvNQra_txqG7kCpLTiwYUPqZRdGe8zOKEDO-3kEZ0BWZW_eO0i-HoWi27WljIDmc3gjlkqwejYc0_i8Fkv

>>57940849
>$500 an rlc is a 43.5B market cap.
wow thats it? everyone on biz could get rich with this piece of shit then

>>57940858
Maybe read the article next time

>>57940865
so your saying its going to 1000+ instead

>>57940876
1000 ruppies maybe if all the shitskin pajeets on the board buy some and tell their villages about it

>>57940584
Remember anon, the village stack is 87, the suicide stack is 870 and the make it / upload stack is 8700.

One Jillion dollars

it's digital urine which is why they are so obsessed with icp

>>57940584
No, it's going to moon to $1500.

>>57941565
>>57941742
for some reason i believe this partially at least
just bought 4k

>>57941565
cheapest potential make-it stack left

>>57941800
You shouldn't... Want me to tell you a funny story? People say SHIT all the time, especially when it comes to money

I hold 20k RLC and I think the realistic price range is 20$ to 100$. 20$ being the BARE MINUMUM, 100$ being the MAXIMUM. Yea sure we can go 100$+, but the starts would need to align
Stars aligning = worker pools coming out, AGIX and FET holders realizing "oh shit, my coin can't do another x20 anymore. Gotta pump some other small cap AI coin", other good news.

We all want nice stuff, but realistically saying we can't all have nice stuff

>>57941828
Most people have been cashed out HARD out of the make it stack... Used to cost 2610$ (if you say 1 RLC was 0.3$, which was the price for a long time)... But not it's 37410$, which is more than most people can risk to afford on here

>>57941834
that sounds kinda realistic though because we live in a clown world after all and crazier things have happened

>>57941850
What sounds realistic, the 100$+ or the 20-100$ range?

Also, the real problem with iExec is that it has NO AI IN THE NAME, while also the landing page of https://iex.ec/ doesn't have a mention of the AI use case ANYWHERE (but new website is being build as we speak)... Problem is normies are stupid and they pump shit with AI in the name since they CBA to research past the name

>>57941742
RLC TO 1500!!

>>57941800
Here bro, it's for you.

>>57941896
Here bro, it's for you

>>57941871
100+ seems easy if we truly live in a clown world

>>57941926
We live in a clowns world, but the problem is that we're not the main show. As already mentioned, no AI in the name, we're also not a dog meme coin...

aiExec
Really Long Corgi

>>57941964
it not being the main show is the reason why i bought it, and why other people will too probably

yes people will buy the big dogs but they will realize they cant get the same % gains as the undervalued ones

>>57940584
lmaoooo

> founder has no involvement in project
> no one gives a fuck about confidential computing
> team completely fumbled the whole decentralised GPU concept (i.e. they have no intention of building this functionality whilst 10 competitors are doing it and mooning)
> no AI use case
> no use case for anything actually hence why nothing is built on this shit even after handing out grants for 5 years
> everything that anyone ever believed about this project is from marketing the latest hype trend and delivering nothing (Oracles, NFT's, DeFi, DePin, etc)
> no one uses their shitty 'features' because they are actually, genuinely useless, and there are strong competitors in the space who have captured mindshare around the actual logical use case for decentralised computing (i.e. GPU nodes) while iExec keeps going on about 'confidential computing' lmao

thank fuck I bought RNDR at the end of last bull market and forgot about it to recuperate for all the energy wasted on iExec

T. ex bagholder, although i actually made good money on this project but with high opportunity cost

>>57943959
this makes me fomo harder into RLC

>>57944019
> unable to defend FUD

Don't ever change RLC baggies

I remember being stuck in the baggie mindset, sunken cost fallacy, no matter what I read, always convinced myself 'muh AI' or 'muh next thing' was gonna make up for all the pain of holding

In saying that, RLC will probably get a pump during the nvidia convention, but RNDR are speaking at the event and will pump higher, consistent with last 3 yrs lmao

good luck

>>57944063
>admitted to FUDing
weird stuff, anyways not selling

>>57941871
Like some others here, I feel like this bull run will in fact favor le "fundamentals" and "tech". Normies learned that investing in piss & shit memecoins will very likely lose them money, so more and more of them must be researching actual projects to invest in. With any sort of hype around RLC it just might pump high as fuck due to lack of supply and the coming FOMO. Or maybe you are just right and normies see no AI in the name and this piece of shit goes back to sub $1 where it belongs.

>>57944075
FUD can be genuine or fake retard, my FUD is genuine

>>57944144
> people favouring fundamentals this bullrun

anon....

>>57944248
what if they read about the insane scams and start looking for fundamentals though, that point will come eventually

>>57944285
Sounds like you need 1 or 2 more cycles to pay your tuition