/biz/ - Business & Finance

I think I will buy some more RLC

>>57934274
AI vaporware is doing 10000xs everywhere

This piece of shit cant even do anything. Its over gilles. Shouldnt have spent all the dev funnds on le supertranny deluxe

>>57934308
Think again, before you get thrown into endless despair. You should rather buy AGIX & FET... Yes they've pumped by a magnitude of about 20 already, but don't worry. It's called SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

>>57934346
But I don't like doing degen swaps, I like steady growth into something that holds its value over longer periods :(

>>57934370
>I like steady growth into something that holds its value over longer periods
If you mean holding the same value for MONTHS without moving 1 inch then sure, RLC is the right coin for you. The tripple top was just confirmed on BTC, therefore I'm pretty sure we're going back down to a stable 1$ my fren

>>57934389
Feel free to check the 1 year chart.

>>57935663
The monthly with double bottom is bullish

>>57935663
The only thing is see is 7 years of empty promises and crab market. When are the worker pools coming anon? When will anyone use this coin? Can I join and provide my computing power? Empty partnerships, 0 use cases, morphs into whatever the current trend is. Why do you think it's de-ranking bull run after bull run? Why doesn't it gain ranks, instead of losing them? Did you look at the RLC/ETH chart or the RLC/BTC chart? What about those two charts? Can you explain that anon? You made Gilles rich while holding something with a opportunity risk. If you just held ETH or BTC or LINK or anything else you'd already be rich beyond your wildest dreams... Yet you're stuck on this project, aren't you anon?

>>57935758
great coin to trade tho. just don't baghold. when it goes up from $1 to $4 you sell. then you buy back when its at $1 the next cycle.

>>57935758
Show me the 7 years of crab? Go buy some meme coins.

>>57935758
Also, you can tell this anon holds like one crypto at a time and panic sells. I have a diversified portfolio of crypto unlike you moonshoot faggots.

>>57935758
This is a crab and probably what you own.

>>57936368
Right there you stupid fuck. Do you even realize that if the coin goes x20 from here you still paid the opportunity cost of holding it? You could've held BTC and you'd have far more money than if you held RLC. THE OPPORTUNITY COST IS VERY HIGH, while also the project literally does NOTHING. Imagine only being up x12.42 in 7 years, while BTC is up by probably more than x30, while being the safest hold imaginable. This presumes a current price of 4.35$ and an average buy in price of 0.35$ per RLC. And on top of that you have NO CLUE if it's going to go up. So you held something that CLEARLY made less gains than BTC did, look at the RLC/BTC chart, while you also held something that you had NO CLUE if it'll ever recover. You guys are really lucky that the AI narrative and DePIN narrative hit this bull run, without that you'd never reach 4$ EVER. Because as I've already stated a few times, this coin has 0 products, therefore 0 value, because Fedak has been milking money, instead of releasing the public worker pools which were promised on the ICO white paper 7 years ago and yet you monkeys still hold and defend this digital dog manure because you married your own bags. DOGE has more use cases, since I can actually buy stuff in the real world, because people accept a dog meme coin and use it, but no one knows about your Really Lame Coin (Ticket: RLC). NO ONE GIVES A FUCK, THE ONLY REASON YOU'RE PUMPING IS BECAUSE OF THE AI / DEPIN narrative. ACCEPT IT, YOU HOLD USELESS DIGITAL DOG MANURE OIL.

>>57936482
Ups forgot to post picture

>>57936392
Here you go, pic related

>>57936368
Of course you do and that's probably the reason why you already made 4 posts in this thread. You're furiously defending a less than 5% allocation in your portfolio? Aren't you anon? Am I right?

>>57936482
Only if you bought high like a retard. Bought low it's pretty much the same as Bitcoin plus the occasional opportunity to sell spikes. Granted, other projects have performed better but it could have been worse.

100x

Any helpful anons available here to help?

>>57937947
See >>57925317

>>57936340
>>57936509
God that chart looks so good. Just went all in, price predictions EOY?

>>57938301
It looks good because the Bitcoin chart looks good lol

>>57938526
Sike faggot

>>57934308
Hmm i think ill also grab some more now.

>>57937768
My literal case, that I tried to showcase in my previous comment was buying at 0.35$ and selling right now. Even if you did that you'd still be sad. Are you stupid, look at the RLC/ETH and RLC/BTC chart. Don't you understand the basic concept of opportunity cost.

Instead of holding BITCOIN, which made MORE GAINS and IS THE SAFEST INVESTMENT IN THE SPACE, you held RLC which made LESS THAN BITCOIN and is FAR MORE DANGEROUS OF A HOLD THEN BITCOIN.

RLC DERANKED HARD, BITCOIN IS STILL #1 and you're trying to make the case that it's ok. If RLC held it's top 100 position, then it would've been ok.

But I guess it's hard to understand if you're a monkey

>>57939101
Except buying at $0.35 7 years ago WAS buying RIDICULOUSLY high like a retard in SATS. Is that so hard to understand?
I agree it should have been better tho and theres huge opportunity cost vs some other alts or if you bought at a high sats price. But you could say that about 99.9% of projects. Most lost even more. RLC was comparatively OK even though the risk hasn't been worth holding it. But like I said, you can also sell the obvious sats spikes and outperform Bitcoin by doing that.

>>57939554
Yes, I agree 100% with you on that. I guess we both had an argument and we now came to an agreement?

Good for us both

but I just don't think this argument of yours is valid
>Bought low it's pretty much the same as Bitcoin
No matter how low you bought (ALMOST), compared to bitcoin it's literally trash. BECAUSE OF THE FACT that IT'S NOT SAFE and BITCOIN IS. Why hold something that you're not sure will have a price action closely correlated to BTC... While being at least 20x more risky. The risk / reward is not worth it at all.


And now for my reveal, this is a FUD thread. I hold RLC and I do this all the time in order for paper hands to sell. FUCK YOU, FUCK ME. Look at the names of my pictures, which monkey FUDs a coin with names like that?

If you see someone FUD with NAMED RLC memes, it's me. I hold RLC, I've been making FUD campaigns FOR A LONG TIME. In this thread I FUD in another thread I don't FUD

>>57939101
Most people with money in crypto hold both eth and btc. Youre fucking retard and a one coiner.

>>57939743
Read my above comment, the actual retard is you, because you can't even read an obvious bluff. I hold 20k RLC kek, GET REKT SON

RLC is shit and you should sell !!!

>>57939737
Cool he's prentending to be retard, im sure he's not actually retarded. Pic totally not related.

>>57939101
>>57939554
>>57939737
>>57939743
>>57939758
>>57939743
>>57939794
RLC IS A PIECE OF SHIT SELL NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>57939794
165x305 pic... Where's my magnifying glass

>>57939811
SELL, IT'S ALL OVER

>>57939737
>but I just don't think this argument of yours is valid
>Bought low it's pretty much the same as Bitcoin
>No matter how low you bought (ALMOST), compared to bitcoin it's literally trash. BECAUSE OF THE FACT that IT'S NOT SAFE and BITCOIN IS. Why hold something that you're not sure will have a price action closely correlated to BTC... While being at least 20x more risky. The risk / reward is not worth it at all.
Yeah, okay. I mean it HAS BEEN pretty much the same as Bitcoin price-wise in hindsight. Don't go all in, I guess. Or do I don't care.

And now for my reveal, this is a FUD thread. I hold RLC and I do this all the time in order for paper hands to sell. FUCK YOU, FUCK ME. Look at the names of my pictures, which monkey FUDs a coin with names like that?
No shit. And when you're shilling, I'm fudding. I'm just bored. Fuck both of us. Not simultaneously, preferably.

>>57939823
>>57939818
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

And here's my next reveal: I'm every single person in this thread except you, anon.
.
.
.
Or maybe I am you.
.
.
.
Wake up

>>57934274
OIL

>>57939923
>>57939947
It's over. Can't even hold 4.30

It shouldn't have ended like this

>>57939825
>>57940064
>>57940128

My meme lines tell me it's fine.

>>57940128
now that the dust has settled ...
what went wrong?

>>57939818
Only a newfag wouldn't know that pic that's the point.

>>57940189
Piece of shit couldnt even hit $5 before dumping its over how embarrassing

>>57940418
Went from 2.9$ (bottom of the dump) back up to 4.8$ I guess

Glad I bought this shit at 20c

>>57943588
Wait... You didn't sell last bull run on the mega pump? Sucks to be you anon