/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57881908
kys linkchud

Holy fucking meds TA fags are clinically insane

>>57881908
>Remember organized campaigns exist on here because they hate you AND the perpetrators are EVIL
It's just bored linkies with nothing better to do.
Meds, take them.

I think Chainlink is a cool project

>>57881908
>lower lows
>lower highs

How is this good?

Previous threads about the long term TA for LINK/BTC that were deleted for some reason. All on topic and crypto related

Pt 2
>>/biz/thread/57481114#p57492391

Pt 1
>>/biz/thread/57050740#p57051105

Many alts in general look great right now vs. BTC. AVAX and SOL I've noticed specifically.

>>57881908
Hello "totally organic /s" guy.

>>57881920
>>57881922
>>57881945
>>57881982

Keep crying my dick is so hard I may have to go see a doctor.

I've explained in detail many times why the chart is absolutely incredible. A FLAWLESS representation of long term accumulation which is clearly available for all to see.

Visually stunning actually.

>>57881908
Sergeys organised efforts to dump on baggies sounds pretty evil

>>57882028
When would the pattern you're looking for be invalidated then? Because right now it's just lower lows and lower highs?

>>57882028
It adamed but it didn't eve. The pattern is only real when it completes and breaks out of the range. Which it did, on a different chart that is more accurate than linkbtc. Fucking nulinker retard

>>57881920
>>57881922
>>57881982
>>57882101
>>57882023

Demons

most old big coins that didn't pumped hard yet looks like this and are into accumulation, faggot. This doesn't mean that link is unique or some shit, kys faggot who discovered Ta yesterday KYS KYS KYS KYS

>>57881908
double top. yikes. cya at .0002

>>57882050

I would look at

>>57881993

Look at it this way.

LINK/BTC has a rising trend and accumulation period from 2018 which eventually culminated into a parabolic blow off top in August of 2020. It then proceeded to bleed drastically vs BTC until it found a new floor and range where it began to consolidate from approximately Jan of 2022.

Then over a 2 year period from that point it a new accumulation range began which has taken form in that gorgeous ADAM & EVE formation I am referring to today.

>>57882117
>simple logic and the most obvious answer to the question being the right one = bad
I'm sorry it's not what you want to hear faggot
If you want to entertain your schizo delusions go reminisce on old 42 spam threads. It's just pathetic at this point

>>57882101

None of that makes any sense and nobody will ever get back the few moments it took to read it.

You legitimately said nothing coherent. We are on the handle portion of the "Cup"

>>57882142
>most old big coins that didn't pumped hard

Holy ESL. In any case, no in fact many older alts DO NOT look like this at all and as I've repeated many times its a perfect representation of an obscure but KNOWN accumulation pattern.

Its likely the product of high frequency trading since it is over such a long period of time and at a similarity to a textbook example that is difficult to produce without using an algo.

>>57882188
>We are on the handle portion of the "Cup"
A quick glance at your picture shows the handle forms on the top of the accumulation range
Way to expose your own retardation and bullish bias.
I'll reiterate, you're using the WRONG CHART if you're looking for confirmation of that pattern right now.
Am I going to tell you which one? No. You've spent a month google image searching chart patterns how about you actually start learning instead of hope trading

>>57882117

They really are. I used to think it was ignorance but that is a cover evil uses.

The whole phrase "Never attribute to malice what ignorance can explain" is actually not true.

Its more often actually evil intentions driving these things especially when profit and greed are on the line.

>>57882162
Ok so when do we break out fren

>>57882222

These things are never EXACTLY perfect. At best candle formations match up maybe at 65-70% of a textbook example.

However the LINK/BTC one is closer to 85-90% which is truly amazing.

I just happen to notice it because I look at a lot of charts on varying time frames AND have seen dozens of different types of formations in my years of research.

I was actually dumbfounded because of how exact it looks.

>>57882268

Idk but MANY alts are looking so good right now. Absolutely primed to make a move against BTC in coming months

Here's a couple more

>>57882169
Almighty God, Who delivered Your people from the bondage of the adversary, and through Your Son cast down Satan like lightning, deliver me also from every influence of unclean spirits. Command Satan to depart far from me by the power of Your only begotten Son. Rescue me from demonic imaginings and darkness. Fill me with the light of the Holy Spirit that I may be guarded against all snares of crafty demons. Grant that an angel will always go before me and lead me to the path of righteousness all the days of my life, to the honor of Your glorious Name, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, now and forever. Amen.

>>57882240
“We do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”

>>57882289

>>57882273
>However the LINK/BTC one is closer to 85-90% which is truly amazing.
It's not even fucking close anon. Seek help

>>57882313

Why lie? Either way all lurkers and anyone else can see for themselves in the image on the tagged post

Refer to

>>57881993

A V shape into a Cup & Handle 2 years in the making.

>>57882273
>reddit spacing
Kys faggot at least, at least post a screenshot of the link/eth chart that looks like a textbook adam & eve and stop being a fucking faggot piece of shit that thinks he discovered some magic shit
>also go back to pleddit

>>57882309
Oh no I have enraged the biblefag. Notice I never told you to sell, moron. I do however delight at your pain under the weight of your bags.
Regardless my qualm was with OP and his shit TA

>>57882289
Where do you think we reach, brother?

>>57882309

Incredibly Based and Christpilled friend

>>57882331
>Why lie?
I should be asking you that.
Can you answer this?
Did it break out of the range?
If no, then there is no confirmed handle.
If yes, look at the chart again and rethink your answer.

>>57882334
>at least post a screenshot of the link/eth chart

It doesn't look like an Adam & Eve vs. ETH nor does it need to. Just against BTC which is fantastic. It means it will appreciate against BTC

>>57882345

Idk friend its a bit too early to tell and I'm not one for price predictions as things will still be volatile as go up in the long term.

All I can say is many large cap alts look great right now and the future is bright.

>>57882355

I said the Handle is in the making. One generally prefers to accumulate before break outs. The chart looks so on point that the risk/reward ratio here is about as good as it gets.

Of course nothing is certain as in speculation for everything but it rarely gets more obvious than this chart.

>>57882381
The Adam and eve on linkbtc isn't confirmed though. At that point it can still break down. What makes you certain it will break out? What's your invalidation point?

>>57882381
of course it does
>also go back

>>57882336
I never once addressed you directly. However, I can now infer that you are changing your ID in this thread. How poetic, fitting, and typical...by merely invoking His words...in a frothy, haste-filled anger: you have exposed yourself, demon. Now, hear my prayer and His Words:

Our Lord, mighty in power. I call upon you to banish the demons that torment my brothers here. In the name of Jesus Christ, Your beloved Son, I command these malicious spirits to flee from our home. I stand firm in my faith, with the full armor of God, shielded by Your divine protection and grace.

>>57882348
Amen, my brother.

>>57882443

I'm already accumulated in top alts for reasons beyond TA. However a lot of Fundamental Analysis is coming to fruition is also matching up with TA.

Then you have BTC ETFs which took effect and the halving in the near future.

Its likely alt season is soon upon as profits flow from BTC and it retraces and consolidates in a range for awhile.

>>57882454

I get you are just doing your job and being ridiculous intentionally but the LINK/ETH chart obviously looks nothing like the LINK/BTC chart.

>>57882470

You are doing God's work friend. Praise Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

>>57882222
quads no one checked, this entire thread is bots creating noise

>>57882520
>>57882520

Why would any check those obvious lies regardless of digits?

frozen piss levels of delusion - the thread

>>57882553

You know its the truth. Intentionally lying damns your soul friend. No one wants that for you.

>>57882573
Alright you got me. I admit Stink is not even on the same level as icy pee. It's much worse and has been an absolute cancer on /biz/ ever since the beginning of bear market 2018.

>>57881908
>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882573
cope

>>57881908
>btc goes from $40k to $68k in a month
>link goes from $18 to $20 back to $18
fuck this is boring as hell. when the motherfuck is ccip coming out, they're on like month 9 of beta.

>>57882640

Appreciate the bump and collection of important posts

>>57882663
>fuck this is boring as hell

This is how money is made. You don't chase pumps you prep prior to them and then watch and wait. People chase trends because its exciting and addictive. For most its a losing strategy but a few can do it well. Its better to find future winners and let money come to you.

Ride the tiger.

>>57881922
>>57882117
>obsessing every single day for 5+ years over non-existent patterns in something designed to be unpredictable is insane
>you must be a demon for questioning my logic
lmao

>>57881945
>Meds, take them.

>>57882716
>obsessing every single day for 5+ years over non-existent patterns in something designed to be unpredictable

This pattern wasn't even heavily noticeable until maybe like 6 months ago at most. I only made threads about since December.

See that is where you are wrong though. When people or groups with vast resources accumulate an asset its actually incredibly noticeable on long time frames. As I said its a product of HFT.

You aren't making even remotely sound arguments. Everyone can see there are organized campaigns telling people direct lies.

Just the fact you claim this TA has been going on for 5 years is a direct lie and you KNOW it is.

Liars are in fact demons and possessed by evil.

>>57881908
>Remember organized campaigns exist on here because they hate you AND the perpetrators are EVIL
It's one of my favorite indicators. When I see the threads start popping up I build a long position. Works 100% of the time.

>>57882716
Never addressed you directly either. Another demon exposes themselves merely by coming across His Glorious Words and feeling compelled to lash out in wickedness. Lashing out and identifying with demonry by crying out in anger, despite allegedly being none of the sort, and while not being directly communicated with.

Demons...like a moth, you are drawn to expose yourself when The Light has appeared. Oh wicked ones, hear me now:

Dear Father,

Please cast the devil out of these posters, we beg of You. We thank You and praise Your holy name for You have not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind (2 Timothy 1:7). We know that You are not the author of confusion, but of peace (1 Corinthians 14:33).

We claim Your promise, Father, that if we resist the devil, he will flee from us (James 4:7). We thank You for giving us the power to cast out demons in Your name. Father, we rebuke Satan’s power; and, we rebuke the power of any and all evil influences over this household, this people, and this situation. Evil is not welcome here. It must be cast out into the pit of hell.

Guard our bodies, minds, hearts, souls, spirits and emotions from any and all evil influence and temptation. We thank You for making a way of escape for us in every temptation in order that we may stand firm in the way of right (1 Corinthians 10:13).

We bind Satan’s power against us. We bind his power against this household in the name of Jesus.

>>57882870
>It's one of my favorite indicators. When I see the threads start popping up I build a long position. Works 100% of the time.

It can be risky on leverage because short term volatility but its definitely one of a few indicators I'd use in tandem for sure.

>>57882923

>>57882923
>Never addressed you directly either. Another demon exposes themselves merely by coming across His Glorious Words and feeling compelled to lash out in wickedness. Lashing out and identifying with demonry by crying out in anger, despite allegedly being none of the sort, and while not being directly communicated with.
>Demons...like a moth, you are drawn to expose yourself when The Light has appeared. Oh wicked ones, hear me now:

Absolutely on point brother.

>>57882923
>Dear Father,
>Please cast the devil out of these posters, we beg of You. We thank You and praise Your holy name for You have not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind (2 Timothy 1:7). We know that You are not the author of confusion, but of peace (1 Corinthians 14:33).
>We claim Your promise, Father, that if we resist the devil, he will flee from us (James 4:7). We thank You for giving us the power to cast out demons in Your name. Father, we rebuke Satan’s power; and, we rebuke the power of any and all evil influences over this household, this people, and this situation. Evil is not welcome here. It must be cast out into the pit of hell.
>Guard our bodies, minds, hearts, souls, spirits and emotions from any and all evil influence and temptation. We thank You for making a way of escape for us in every temptation in order that we may stand firm in the way of right (1 Corinthians 10:13).
>We bind Satan’s power against us. We bind his power against this household in the name of Jesus.
In Jesus Christ's name we pray!

"For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them."

Matthew 18:20

And here we are friend in this thread together.

>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331

Some posts about the LINK/BTC TA and some other alts for those just joining the thread

>>57881908
>>57881993
That looks more like a reverse head and shoulders as the head is lower than the shoulders

>>57882663
It's back at $20 now, not much consolation

>>57883123

No its definitely a V shape into a rounded Cup and looks nothing like a reverse head and shoulders.

>>57883156
on the daily it does

>>57883175

The chart I posted is on the Monthly time frame. You weight longer time frames much heavier that shorter ones when developing strategies.

I haven't looked at the Daily in a while but either way a reverse head and shoulders wouldn't be a bad thing however you did say in your previous reply that the chart I posted looks like a reverse head and shoulders and that is definitely incorrect.

>>57883094
Lord grant you strength, wisdom, and courage brother.

Lord, may Your light assist him in dispelling darkness and Your love assist him in casting out fear.

>>57883251

Your prayers on my behalf are greatly appreciated brother and I will be doing returning them for you during my nightly prayer.

Its a shame more do not know the power of earnest requests through prayer when one has humility and veneration in their heart for Lord Jesus Christ

>>57883122
>>57883122

Bump

>>57881908
Checked!
Everyone would benefit from avoiding this place.
It's best to occasionally look at the chart than to get your mindset affected by the negative energy here.

The key to success is a positive mindset with gratitude for what we already have.
By focusing on what we already have we can get more of it.

If we focus on the negative we will get more of it instead.

>>57883393
>Everyone would benefit from avoiding this place.

I would disagree. Sure have a life but there is legitimate information here to be found.

Simply be the positive influence here you wish to see and it will grow

>>57883393
You also checked a post that didn't have digits and you have a name so you are probably a bot

>>57883415
There is nothing left to be found here other than exposition to mind attack and negative accidents of wealth.
The sooner the laggards realize this and move on to a more positive place, the better it will be for them.

Your posts and threads will get removed if you try to be a positive influence.
This is what this place has become.

>>57883431
bzzzt.... Incorrect request.
Not checked!

4chan died the day it was heavily infiltrated by monsters.
Anonymity only works with a healthy space with a filter to only let those with a similar mindset in.
Having the ability to recognize a persistent pseudo identity is the only solution to filter some of these attacks with a provable track record.
Something that should resonate with you if you care about definitive truth.

>>57883567

>Give up, do nothing, and allow evil to flourish and take over all of the spaces you occupy!

So you are just a shill maybe still a bot the AI is getting relatively advanced these days.

>>57883122

BUMP

>>57882311
Thoughts on ROSE?

>>57883805

I'm not familiar with the fundamentals nor have I looked at the technicals for it either. I may take a look at the chart at least

>>57883615
Are you manifesting the belief that you need to do something to keep /biz/ alive and that someone needs /biz/?
Why not move the traffic to a more neutral place that has not been corrupted by evil if you spend your time here?
Why not create the alternative?

You keep dodging the question about when the pattern would be invalidated

>>57881908
Damn this thread really rustled the fuddsters, usually I just laugh at TA but the fact that it gets this much attention makes me believe

>>57882454
looks like we fell through the support level
much lower imo

>>57884432
IGNORE THEM BRO THEY'RE NO LPL POOLER SEETHING

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS POOLS CLOSED L SEETHE

ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL ENJOY EARLY ACCESS BUILD DROPS AND SEC APPROVE REVENUE SHARING STAY BASED AND FUCKING LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED BASED

LPL POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

>>57884463
>>57884463
whats this FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO SHIT???

>>57884463
based lpl chuddie kiddo poster how you doing based kiddo pools closed awww miss out shucks!

>>57884463
>early access build drops
>revenue sharing with sec approval
Where can I buy LPL?

>>57884463
LOL bro you totally D E S T R O Y E D that no LPL pooler LMAO LOL E V E N

>>57884439
>>57884439

Why are you people lying so much. He posted a chart that isn't even an Adam & Eve formation on the LINK/ETH pairing and you are saying it fell through a support level that doesn't exist because you are both just making up spam nonsense.

How aren't you ashamed for just writing bold faced lies? Its unreal

>>57884432

Its kind of ridiculous how degenerate these people are. Its why I say they are literally captured by evil. They wouldn't go to these lengths otherwise. The love of money has driven their thoughts and behavior to the depths of hell.

>>57884463
>>57884491
>>57884506
>>57884519
>>57884558

More spam which is used to drive people from the thread and take focus off the topic at hand which is the amazing alt charts I posted here

>57881993
>57882028
>57882162
>57882273
>57882289
>57882311
>57882331

Meant to actually tag the posts

>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331

You're still not saying when the invalidation point is and acting like the patterns already confirmed, makes it hard to take you seriously.

>>57884629

Because there isn't one for me. This pattern is additional confirmation coupled with FA. Its a monthly chart. Its easy to wick down, you dance around as if its invalidated and then returns to the point where its in play within the same month or quickly within the next. I have only price points where I will sell my holdings for profit as I only put funds behind projects that are serious and undervalued not solely based on TA.

If you are anyone else doesn't like that answer sell or don't buy.

>>57884791

Trading and investing is more art than science/math

>>57884791
So no invalidation point? You just know it HAS to go up haha

>>57881908
let me start with a well deserved bump op
i remember your earlier threads and the level of attacks against you proof you are on to something
like i said before keep up the good work brother and with the existence of the archives even the corrupted jannies cant stop it from being spread


now on to this thread, this is the first time i see them using the religion consensus cracking bots on /biz/ how odd that they think that would work here of all places
oh well good to see the glowies are still completely and utterly clueless as to what this place is, they just never learn

>>57884937
>>57884937

Invalidation points are for short term leverage traders looking for quick plays based solely on TA.

I won't be giving you one that I'd use if I was trading this play in that manner.

>>57884938
>like i said before keep up the good work brother and with the existence of the archives even the corrupted jannies cant stop it from being spread

Appreciated. Yes the internet is a glorious thing for that reason

>>57884938
>now on to this thread, this is the first time i see them using the religion consensus cracking bots on /biz/ how odd that they think that would work here of all places
>oh well good to see the glowies are still completely and utterly clueless as to what this place is, they just never learn

I assuming you are referring to these posts

>>57883393
>>57883567

Reality is definitely stranger than fiction.

>>57885103
>Reality is definitely stranger than fiction.
yeah its getting really weird nowadays
i mean any anon with even half a functioning brain can see the bots they are testing out and failing at
i was really surprised to see that roman mural spamming thing happen here
do they truly not comprehend that we are /pol/ and dont care about their points of conflict
but on the other hand we must be THE board where the jannies themselves try their absolute hardest to destroy their own board and with it their own relevance lol
oh wel sic transit gloria mundi i will just await the creation of the new /biz/ that requires proof of funds to be allowed to post, some technical adept anon will make it i am sure

>>57885180
fucked up there, meant to say we ARENT pol

>>57885180
>i will just await the creation of the new /biz/ that requires proof of funds to be allowed to post, some technical adept anon will make it i am sure

This probably does need to happen. Or at least some aspect that prevents bots

>>57885103
based thread, anon. keep up the good work. patience is the name of the game.

>t. 2017 linkie

>>57881908
>An extremely inflationary and unneeded token doesn't follow the lines I drew against a store of value coin
wow who would have thought

>>57885262

Its like you didn't read anything I posted and just vomiting nonsense out of your mouth.

It has a hard cap at 1 Billion and the inflation has actually been quite mild when matched against other large MCAP alts in the top 20. There are charts floating around here that show inflation comparisons.

>>57885372

started vomiting*

>>57885372
let me know when you find a chart showing neededness comparisons lmao

genuine question here, since there is no invalidation according to you, at what point would you admit you were wrong, and consequently, an evil son of a bitch spreading false hopium and carrot dangling demoralized anons for 6 months?

>>57881908
>EVIL
this

>>57885504
you're
>EVIL
hth

>>57885504
>6 months

I have only posted this chart and thread since December. I noticed it forming for probably 6 months ago.

I've been rather transparent in saying that if you don't like my assessment then sell or don't buy.

That being said the blatant push I've seen on here to KNOWINGLY lead people in the wrong direction for greed is evil.

I didn't say there was no invalidation. I said I won't be posting it as weapon. Its incredibly easy for large players to affect pricing in the short term to make things appear invalidated and then wick the price back to where it needs to be for the formation to still be in play.

1 or 2 months is a long time to to spread fake FUD that something is invalidated but not long in the scheme of investing and speculating on assets.

Whoever has the resources to paint that Adam & Eve formation over 2 years with high frequency trading certainly has them to temporary drop the pricing as well.

Of course they have their timelines to meet too and will eventually mark the price up and let retail take over to distribute on to them.

>>57882635
it has been a cancer but it's objectively better than icp, and i say it as a linky who swung on icp and slashed my stack by 15% in 2021, one of the retards who got in icp at 600 and sold at 100.

Why would the LINK/BTC pair matter? LINK exists to tokenize real world assets and connect bank private chains through CCIP. Its only connection they have is that when BTC makes big moves, arbitrage bots end up dumping LINK along with every other crypto.

>>57885568

>>57885568
You posted it yesterday you liar. Historically alt-coins never ever reach back to ATH against BTC

>>57885693

Why wouldn't it matter is the better question? Based on the charts, it appears that a handful of alts will out perform BTC. Regardless of any real world fundamental value projects provide the asset class is still nascent and speculation on TA tends to drive the liquidity flowing in and out.

Eventually that will come to an end

>>57885706
you are telling me you never heard of dogecoin

>>57885706
>You posted it yesterday you liar.


Yesterday fits within the time frame of since December my guy as in I've been discussing it on here for about 3 months total.

>>57885706
>Historically alt-coins never ever reach back to ATH against BTC

That is true they usually don't why does that matter? If they appreciate in value against BTC they will appreciate in USD especially if BTC is also gaining against USD.

And there are always exceptions to the rule.

>>57885757
>to drive the liquidity flowing in and out.

heavily drive the liquidity flowing in and out*

>>57885706
Thats because 99% of alts are dead shitcoin ponzis. They get one pump and the founders take the money and run. Imagine if SWIFT goes live with a product using Link. Everything will change.

>>57881908
Are you the same TA fag who kept posting about "a textbook adam and eve pattern" a few weeks ago only to disappear once LINK started dumping like it always does? Get it into your brain, TA is literally astrology

>>57885887

As I said I've been posting it since December. If you actually read the threads which I've made 3 now I said it would be incredibly volatile in the short term still as this formation is on the Monthly time frame. Its great as its heavily weighted and long time frame accumulations tend to produce more drastic results on the uptrend of the move. However, because its on a longer time frame its more difficult to predict when things will take off exactly.

The price is about the same now as it was when I made the threads in the past. Maybe 10% in both directions the others times I have made it which is absolutely nothing in the scheme of things.

>>57885887
>TA is literally astrology

If you are a truly objective person when looking at the charts its more like probability.

Just popping in to say thank you OP. I was surprised by just how vicious the fud was getting and how bizarrely disconnected from reality it was recently too... But 999 "missed the bull run" spam threads doesn't change the fact that link is one of the best performing coins over the last year. I don't think any real holder is going to be convinced to sell but it's still a good thing you're doing here fighting the darkness. The way these bots nonsensically seethe at your straightforward posts is something to behold. So yeah. Thanks again and good luck everyone real who reads this

>>57885956
>However, because its on a longer time frame its more difficult to predict when things will take off exactly.
Nice, so you'll keep making these threads forever and the "inevitable" rally will be just a few weeks away. Just 2 more weeks and I promise it'll happen, the stars never lie!

>>57885980

Based and Godspeed friend

>>57885980
>But 999 "missed the bull run" spam threads

For anyone who has been here long enough they realize its organized and manufactured. I suspect most of those threads aren't to convince long term holders anymore but to deter new /biz/ users from accumulating or doing further research.

If you look at pic rel you will find that we are just now having an increase in posts on /biz/ and likely users that we haven't seen in awhile.

>>57885962
For every historical example of a TA pattern being a good predictor of a trend (in any timescale), I can show you at least one historical example of the very same pattern not being followed by what it supposedly predicts. No, markets are not efficient, but any liquid market is a chaotic system and TA is simply way too simple a tool to be used for reliably predict price movements.

>>57886026

I said MORE difficult not impossible. I'd have to go through lower time frames to get more of an estimation.

>>57886061
>I can show you at least one historical example of the very same pattern not being followed by what it supposedly predicts.

That is literally probability. Lmao

However based on a multitude of factors INCLUDING the stellar Adam & Eve formation over 2 years, we have developments like CCIP, additional projects and companies showing interest in LINK, BTC making great gains from the ETF, the halving etc

Sometimes simple is actually better than complex. TA can even be self fulfilling prophecy by speculators as well.

Again you don't get candles painted over 2 years on the Monthly in such a perfect formation which you can see in tagged post below without HFT. It doesn't just happen on accident.

>>57881993

>>57884463

CHECKED BASED AND LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED ANON

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

BUY LPL THE ONLY OFFICIAL WAY TO STEAK YOUR LINKIES

WHICH NODES WILL YOU STAKE WITH WITHOUT LPL LOL???

HOW WILL YOU BRIBE NODES TO STEAK YOUR LINK WITHOUT LPL???

NOW THE POOLS CLOSED AND ALL THE BASED KIDDOS ARE CHUDDIE

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED LPL

HUH?

LPL

HUH???

I just glanced through the thread but I can full heartedly say that OP must be onto some serious shit if it got absolutely raided like this. I’m never selling any Link but I suggest lurkers read the entire thread thoroughly.

>>57886142

Here are some key points I made

>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101

>>57881908
everybody knows it is inorganic.
they showed us at the two last smartcons with the price action during the main talk.

the price performance is still poor.

and none of us with big stacks really want to swing the range because we don't want to be left behind looking for some rope.
so we range, wait for it to break out, listen to lies about how it has broken out, and get frustrated, while we and our families get older and our knees creak a little more.
and while we wait there's always the chance that it never actually materialises. shills would make you believe it's a foregone conclusion but we wouldn't be the first princes who didn't actually become kings.

>>57886194

More subtle concern FUD leading into demoralization FUD. Its really obvious my guy. People who have actually given up don't tell the world. They just wallow in their own despair or take action and move to another asset.

I get you have your job to do though

>>57886194
>the price performance is still poor.

Compared to what? The average investor would absolutely kill for even 100% APR in a year.

>>57882050
the 'meh logic' would say that the longer it stays ranging and 'accumulation occurs' then the greater distance at take off.
could be what happens. but there's no guarantee.

it's like the girl who always flirts with you at the cafe, texts you in the evening, sometimes even at night with a picture of her in lingerie, and everybody who knows her knows she's a good girl, and one day you think you'll get her out and it will be great, but each weekend there's always another reason why you both can't.

>>57886244
>it's like the girl who always flirts with you at the cafe, texts you in the evening, sometimes even at night with a picture of her in lingerie, and everybody who knows her knows she's a good girl, and one day you think you'll get her out and it will be great, but each weekend there's always another reason why you both can't.

No its actually not like that at all. Lmao

I feel like instead of paying for paid fudding of LINK it would of been more effective just to literally do nothing since then discussion of LINK would of died off naturally. Paid fudders literally are proof that power composite operators have a stake in keep link sentiment negative.

>>57885956
>read up if you want to learn how to say it's ranging with btc in thousands of words across three or four threads

or you could just say
>it's ranging
we go with btc

>>57886366
>>57886366

Why lie about what I'm saying when you clearly know its not? Its disgusting. You are disgusting.

I'm saying many key large MCAP alts are primed to move against BTC because of ranging that has taken place over multiple years.

>>57886241
ok.
anon says that people who have given up don't tell the world.
that clearly isn't the case.
but anyway, i haven't given up. as i said, had you read it, 'we wait for it to break out' but 'while we wait there's always the chance that it never actually materialises' . No fud in there, just the reality of the situation.
as for my job, not fudding or shilling, just a guy who works and won't swing so i wait.

>>57886299

I've had this thought myself. Unfortunately it must be effective to some degree as the posters aren't doing it for free. The money being spent on them must be worth the value.

>>57886287
and why is it not like that anon?

>>57886413

Assuming you are not a shill you are obviously demoralized.

In which either case, shill or defeated your opinion shouldn't be valued heavily.

If anything you are just sliding the thread away from the collection of posts I tagged.

This has happened in the past as well. Muddy the thread with nonsense so others have a more difficult time to find the pertinent info.

>>57886193
>>57886193

Key points I made within the thread. Easy access for those just joining.

I'd browse through all of them especially the ones with images.

>>57886399
if you're the op, not sure why you're saying i'm disgusting. not even sure what you're saying i'm lying about.
i'm saying it's ranging.
you're saying it's ranging.
we both agree that it's likely to go up after / because of the ranging.
i'm simply adding a caveat.
what's the caveat?
that it might not go up after the ranging.

not every prince becomes a king.

if i had to choose i think it will go up, especially in USD, just because of bitcoin, but as for sats, yeah, i think it will too eventually, but this isn't my first rodeo and it might be another year or three before it does. and i'm simply willing to acknowledge that it might not.

>>57886453
>what you think may happen in the future may not happen

wow anon you're so deep

>>57881908
Now that I skimmed through your threads, I find somewhat funny the fact that the fudders are, right now, rotated to the "btc has outperformed link" or "you would be better off selling link and buying BTC" narrative.

It's almost like somebody KNOWS that the LINK/BTC pair is bound to rocket off to the stratosphere, and want as many of us to chase the shiny dinosaur. Don't you think its a coincidence?

>>57881908
Can anybody give me some price predictions? I'm going to put them into my calculator app and enjoy the dopamine.

>>57886459
as opposed to the OP who's dangling carrots. I get it, scepticism isn't to be entertained here. This is a look everything is ready to fly members club only. Hume can go back to Edinburgh but optimists get their whiskey for free.
whatever anons, my stacks are large enough and i'm never selling.
not trying to get anyone to sell, wish everybody the best.
forums so young it's full of 'gold man, i'm feeling gold man' Johnny come lately types. What about 'talk gold', not feeling gold, but talking gold. whatever.

to be clear to anybody reading this thread, if you have link, i wouldn't sell, it's as good if not better than anything out there.
but do so knowing that the Adam and Eve formation , basically it's been ranging, might not play out to the upside because i don't want anybody to rope because they put themselves in a situation where they think it is definitely going to go up.

>>57886517
10x from previous ath doesn't seem unreasonable so $520

>>57886494
>It's almost like somebody KNOWS that the LINK/BTC pair is bound to rocket off to the stratosphere, and want as many of us to chase the shiny dinosaur. Don't you think its a coincidence?

It could be a function of being able to show recent price action of BTC so they can point at it to cause an emotional reaction (FOMO) of missing out. Of course they are doing so after 7 monthly green candles and overbought RSI on nearly every time frame. It would be a dangerous time to rotate in that direction imo. Unless you are doing incredibly short term leverage trading its generally unwise to chase pumps.

>>57886533
Stop overthinking this, the market doesn't follow logic 99% of the time, you're wasting your time.

>>57886517
>>57886540

I'm not subscribing to any price estimates as the OP. Most people are wildly wrong and its too soon to even consider it. As we start moving one can look at a variety of time frames to see when it appears that momentum is changing and start estimating.

>>57886546

I'd just stop replying to him. Its a ruse to push my the posts of important info that I collect into a single response to get slid towards the center of the thread so its harder to find.

This happened in the other 2 threads I made as well.

Here are some key points I made through out the thread as OP

>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101

>>57886585
there is no ruse.
i'm just at work and have some spare time.
i've seen your threads before. you keep saying the same thing, which basically is 'it is ranging and on a long enough time frame it can only be done like this by high frequency trading but on a short time frame it can go outside it so don't pay attention to short term and focus on long term and it's primed to go up.''
ok. and which linkie doesn't know this? so what exactly are you trying to achieve?
you've made 3 threads in the last month and said the same thing each of the 3 times.
so what's really happening here, are you shilling or am i fudding?

>>57886637
>you've made 3 threads in the last month and said the same thing each of the 3 times.
thats not a lot, every 30min there is a new cuckhold thread, there is not enough hopium threads on this board anymore so they are welcome

they still dont realize that with every unhinged post they make all they are accomplishing is pushing up ops post in the catalog
this doesnt require further discussion the biggest import is op spreading his charting and all he needs for that is the pic in the op and with every post it gets bumped
so keep up the good work fudsisters you are only helping

also op heres a tip put the archive links in the op itself and just point to that for explanations as the thread will be flooded with spam
it must make them seethe uncontrollably that they cant stop you

>>57886637
>which basically is 'it is ranging and on a long enough time frame it can only be done like this by high frequency trading
>>57886637

Again lying and misrepresenting. I'm saying that incredibly specific candle pattern, which cannot be an accident, is developed by HFT which is done by those with vast resources accumulating.

I'm offering a counter narrative based on my research one that is much more probable too because I see 39308539839203 threads on the catalog on a daily basis trying to part people from their money and its morally wrong. They aren't even clever its all emotion based because the FUD has no rational basis anymore through either Fundamental or Technical Analysis. All the data is out in the open now. All they can do to create fear, uncertainty, and doubt. They do so in repetition to wear people down psychologically and emotionally.

>>57886671
>>you've made 3 threads in the last month and said the same thing each of the 3 times.

And honestly it wasn't even in the last month it was more like 3 times in 3 months and some talk of it in a couple threads where I wasn't OP. Approximately 5 times in 3 months with only 3 of those times going in any depth.

>>57886671
>thats not a lot, every 30min there is a new cuckhold thread

Exactly. Lmao Its madness. I don't get how people can honestly bring themselves to continuously post shit like that on a daily basis and get paid for it without wanting to kill themselves.

People become what they they think, say, and feel. Imagine having to type that out multiple times a day or create memes for it. Literally turning themselves into actual cuckholds over time. Lmao

>>57886713
>>57886713

Thanks for the advice will do in the future.

>>57886540
Wow, that's a big number.

>>57886771
>4u

>>57886771

I don't subscribe to price predictions they are often way off base its too early to know as I said in this reply. I.E. you shouldn't take that seriously

>>57886564

>>57886725
OP you make good threads. DESU I can't really understand technical analyses so although I get the idea of what you're saying it's hard to assess how legitimate it is. It's easier if you share a bit about your character so we can tell if it's just schizoposting or you're legit.
Do you have a stable job, and if yes is it white or blue collar?

>>57886809

In no way whatsoever would I EVER share even a single detail of my personal life in this thread.

Take the data I've shared or leave it

>>57886809
>I can't really understand technical analyses so although I get the idea of what you're saying it's hard to assess how legitimate it is.

Perhaps you should do your own research outside of this thread, learn, and come to your own conclusion on what I've proposed.

>>57886798
I require a constant stream of dopamine. If I haven't used my calculator app to multiply two big numbers by each other in a while then the fud starts to work.

Key points of the thread


>>57881993 (You)
>>57882028 (You)
>>57882162 (You)
>>57882273 (You)
>>57882289 (You)
>>57882311 (You)
>>57882331
>>57884791 (You)
>>57884803 (You)
>>57885083 (You)
>>57885372 (You)
>>57885568 (You)
>>57885757 (You)
>>57885794 (You)
>>57885956 (You)
>>57885962 (You)
>>57886042 (You)
>>57886101 (You)

>>57886892
ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

YOU COMPLETELY FUCKED IT ALL UP.

YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BUY LPL NOT SOME SHITCOIN LMAO

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND FUCKING CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

WHICH NODES WILL YOU BRIBE WITHOUT LPL???

WHICH NODES WILL YOU STEAK WITH WITHOUT LPL???

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED CHUDDIE KIDDOS POOLS CLOSED LPL SEETHE

>>57886920
holy based so this is the point of the bread... lpl huh?

>>57886920
WHATS THIS FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO SHIT????

>>57881908
I give up. You are beyond saving, feel free to miss yet another bullrun. Link is the future, amirite?

if the token were needed this thread wouldn't exist
think about it

>>57881908
Yes yes. Cant wait to trade my bitcoin (hardest and scarcist form of money on the planet) for……….. the chainlink tokens, lol

>>57886920
>>57886927
>>57886933
>>57886936
>>57886942
>>57886949

As I said here

>>57886585

A bunch of quick replies when most were much slower all in sudden succession to slide this collection post of all the important information in the thread

>>57886892

>>57881908
>not even log chart
yikes

>>57886544
Thats precisely what im saying. After achieving fuck all during the bear, and not getting a single one of us to sell the bottom, now they have rotated to "go on goy sell your link for BTC, you want the green numbers don't you?" tactics.

Only an absolute idiot would sell their LINKs when we are at the bottom of a bull market and the LINK/BTC chart is being painted like that.

Make no mistake anons, they WANT you to part with your linkies. After every single scamwick, Bancor, Nexo, FTX, price suppression, relentless FUD, you have not yielded. Don't do it now. They are absolutely mad and pulling their hairs out. If you want BTC, just get cash and buy it, but don't ever swap your LINK for BTC.

>>57886976
LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND FUCKING CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

LPL POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

>>57887050
whats this FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO SHIT???

>>57887062

Spam to distract from this post

>>57886892


>>57887047

Yes you lay it out well. So many avenues were taken to get our LINK. Literal scams were developed like Celsius and Bancor tried to court LINK holders specifically to get us to stake.

The whole thing is honestly wild.

>>57887047
>They are absolutely mad and pulling their hairs out
kek you really think they give a shit you? I promise you they do not care in the slightest whether random /biz/raelis hold or sell
they'll get whatever tokens we want one way or another, it's just fucking hilarious to laugh at baggies as they get slowly dumped on by the team long after the smart money realized the scam and got out. hold all the way back down to $5 if that's your game, have fun man

>>57887178

>Virtually ZERO FUD threads for MATIC, DOT, ADA, and BNB.

>Including even SOL and AVAX which have solid charts too

>9358298539025930589 LINK FUD threads in the catalog at any given time for years on end.

Idk man it seems like someone cares a little bit. Lmao

>>57887178
You seem pretty hellbent on making us believe the token isnt needed, nigger

Thats a nice ESL word salad but nobody is selling. Nobody is unstaking. You have accomplished NOTHING.

based thread

>>57887178
>I promise you they do not care in the slightest whether random /biz/raelis hold or sell

lmao
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=true&search_text="the+cuckolds+of+crypto"

Any good stock trading games?

>>57886892
>Key points of the thread everyone should view


>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101

Here’s the problem tho, the chart

2020
BTC $11,000
Link $20

2024
BTC $66,000
Link $20.18

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>57887772
So buy something else then

>>57887256
why would AVAX or SOL fud threads exist here? nobody in this board holds any meaningful amounts of these shitcoins
if you really want to see fud about them go to twitter or reddit

>>57887786
why are you so evil anon? why are you even sarcastically suggesting that someone should sell their LINK for something else? Hasn't the OP established thoroughly that this is a purely evil act?
shame on you

I can honestly see some schitzo group of smart multimillionaires fucking with the price all this time just to do this for a laugh. Forget Occam's razor and pick the most fun possibilities. The fact is many of us expected to actually make it 2 or 3 years ago years later of usd inflation to shit and we are still at 20 bucks. The second link hits 200 plus per coin positive energy will return. It actually takes a great mental toll being 7 years early to something while being on the outside. If you were developing it it wouldn't be so hard but just to hold hundreds of thousands of dollars in an investment as a 25-35 year old and constantly ask yourself 'am I right?' is difficult.

>>57881908
get a life schizo

>>57887919
Man if you did hold Avax and Sol you'd actually have something to fud.
If you think delays are bad, then hooooo boy.

>>57887943

What's evil is you suggesting that when you know fully well throughout the thread I did not say that. What's evil is organized FUD campaigns to get people to part with their money and encourage poor rotation choices like a few select alts into BTC which are primed to run against BTC.

The chart has 7 green monthly candles in a row. Its unprecedented and is overbought on nearly all time frames.

>>57888118
don't tell that to me, reddit and twitter are constantly seething at SOL and AVAX

>>57887974
you have to create this fantasy in your head to save your ego from the realization that Link is IOTA 2.0

>>57888075

I'm over the mark per usual.

Zero attempt to even try and argue because as I've said the fundamentals and technicals for LINK are sound as fuck. AVAX and SOL are great projects. Crypto is still young its bound to have network problems over time as its developed.

Reminder to all -- the guy calling everyone evil spazzed out yesterday saying Injective (INJ) was a horrible pick for this cycle and it was le heckin EBILLLLLL to suggest buying it.

24 hour prices:
>INJ +14.9%
>Link +1.9%

>>57887974
>I can honestly see some schitzo group of smart multimillionaires fucking with the price all this time just to do this for a laugh. Forget Occam's razor and pick the most fun possibilities

Yeah that's not the reason why. Its all about greed its rather obvious.

>>57888131
Pic is how twitter responded to that recent outage.

>>57888173

Its bad chart. Its played out. It had a long accumulation phase that culminated in blow off topic. I didn't actually say it was evil in regards to that one just dumb. Its made its parabolic move against BTC and the RSI is drastically overbought on a long term time frame. Of course it will retrace some its 50% reduction in 3 months. It will likely continue bleed over coming months and under perform.

1 day is meaningless. You want to buy during the accumulation phase or before the parabolic expansion obviously not after it.

>>57888128
you're literally begging anons to stay on a depreciating, dying 7 year old alt while everything else is printing gains
it anything you are the truly evil one

>>57888287

Anyone can read the thread and decide that for themselves. Sell, buy, or ignore the thread is up to them. I actually want people to make money.

As I said LINK/BTC has painted a near perfect textbook example of an Adam & Eve formation over the course of 2 years.

Its honestly unreal how good it looks. You buy BEFORE things go up. You don't chase pumps.

>>57881993
Pic rel

The longer the accumulation the more extreme the move when it comes.

I also said AVAX and SOL look really good as well. So does UNI/BTC as well.

>>57888351

Key points in the thread to understand about the TA I've described


>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101

A handful of large MCAP alts looked absolutely primed to run against BTC in the coming months. LINK, AVAX, SOL, and UNI as well.

I'm suggesting you read what I posted and then do your own research outside of this thread about my speculation and come to your own conclusion.

I've seen many threads suggest rotating into BTC and I'm saying you should probably be rotating out of it. 7 green candles on the Monthly time frame for BTC with it being overbought on many time frames while hitting the ATH resistance. Can it go higher? Sure but it would appear that many solid alts are set to out perform it soon.

BUMP

>>57883848
Well, I was talking about the chart. Any thoughts?

I just check and BTC is overbought on the:

MONTHLY
3 WEEK
2 WEEK
1 WEEK
12 DAY
9 DAY
6 DAY
5 DAY
4 DAY
2 DAY
3 DAY
1 DAY

And just below it on the 12 hour. Its pretty below 70 in varying amounts on the common hourly frames.

LMAO WHAT

>>57888619

It doesn't look terrible actually. Not amazing and there are still a lot of days left in the month so its a toss up how the current candle will play out but the RSI is primed. It could be a much worse chart.

A potential little bull flag being painted.

>>57888619
>>57888702

Bump

>>57888627

BUMP

>>57888702
Thanks anon, appreciate the thread

>85 pbtid, nearly 50% of all thread replies
>shameless self bumping because real people do not actually engage with his gaslighting bullshit non existent trading patterns
>guise, those selected alts are *PRIMED* to pump guise, not telling you to buy them, but they are about to pump ANY DAY NOW
>guise, only a RETARD would suggest to keep holding BTC, buy my bags nao!
pathetic

>>57889545

>>57888627

>>57889566
things can remain overbought or oversold for indefinite lengths of time you literal shill

>>57888351 (You)

Key points in the thread to understand about the TA I've described


>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101


A handful of large MCAP alts looked absolutely primed to run against BTC in the coming months. LINK, AVAX, SOL, and UNI as well.

I'm suggesting you read what I posted and then do your own research outside of this thread about my speculation and come to your own conclusion.

I've seen many threads suggest rotating into BTC and I'm saying you should probably be rotating out of it. 7 green candles on the Monthly time frame for BTC with it being overbought on many time frames while hitting the ATH resistance. Can it go higher? Sure but it would appear that many solid alts are set to out perform it soon.

I just check and BTC is overbought on the:

MONTHLY
3 WEEK
2 WEEK
1 WEEK
12 DAY
9 DAY
6 DAY
5 DAY
4 DAY
3 DAY
2 DAY
1 DAY

Crazy

>>57889653
you forgot to respond here>>57889588

>>57889588

It can stay overbought longer than expected but when nearly every single time frame from MONTHLY to DAILY is overbought I'd still be cautious as fuck

Its not unreasonable to think a retrace or sideways price action takes place for RSI to cool down a little for the near term time frames.

>>57889717
certainly, but this retracement could very well translate to a -50% dump AFTER it breaches $100k
didn't think of that in your masterful chart interpretations, right?

>>57889717
exhibit A
this asset managed to remain overbought for almost 15 fucking years
amazing, huh?

>>57882023
I’m the guy who started “totally organic” on 4chan almost literally a decade ago now

Damn what a wasted life lel

>>57889859

Crypto is incredibly cyclical. It moves fast. Most of the time when the price is trending up for BTC isn't doesn't move hard UNTIL we are overbought on the MONTHLY. However this time we are at 75 and have already went straight up from like $25,000.

I mean do you really think its just going to go straight up and not stop at all continuing the current pace? Lmao Its not impossible per se but...

>>57889969
oh, and there goes your extensive, in-depth research and analysis regarding muh TA on selected alts PRIMED TO RIP AGAINST BTC
>I mean, do you really think
thanks for playing

>>57889991

>Says absolutely nothing that diminishes my argument in any way.

>Checkmate!

Lmao Discussing this with you is akin to playing chess with a pigeon. You just strut all over the board shitting everywhere while knocking over all pieces and then smugly declare victory

Equally sad and amusing.

I mean do you think? I was trying to elicit your critical thinking faculties. I obviously failed in that regard.

>>57890097
>LMAO *ad homs projections presented with a fake condescending undertone*
nice arguments bro, thanks for conceding that you're a literal paid moron tasked to shill your shitty altcoins on this dead board
>90pbtid
>guise, I'm not a shill I swear!
>guise muh aaar essss aye along with this perfectly formed Cocks n' Balls in Eve's Mouth MEANS that THEY ARE PRIMED TO RIP!!1!
>btw you sold your alts for BTC??? EVIL!!!11

>>57889653

Bump read all the replies in this post

>>57890097
>90 posts by this id

can you stop spamming you flaming faggot?

>>57890167
lmao why did you delete this, shill?

>>57890164
>shill your shitty altcoins on this dead board

Yes I'm paid to shill 4 altcoins within the top 15 by MCAP on /biz/. Do you even read what you write prior to hitting post?

>>57890175
Its my thread. I made it so no

>>57890233
>yes I'm efforposting for 15 hours straight for free guise, I swear I'm not a paid jeet!
KEK

>>57890212

Idk what post you are referring to as its crossed out but I haven't deleted anything. Someone likely reported it

Which one was it? What did it say

>>57890259

Crypto has freed me so I had the time today. I didn't have any other responsibilities or errands besides lifting. I'm very blessed and I show my gratitude to God for it everyday

>>57890274
>huh? derpity derp durrr?
>i dindu nuffin??
>>57890306
>oh btw I'm also a millionaire! thanks to THOSE SELECTED ALTS I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT wink*
bro, your entire retarded thesis has been effectively demolished when you admitted you don't know shit, couple of posts above
suck it up and go lift some more
>MUH RSI GUISE

>>57890306
Hey so-organic /s
Kenis

>>57890333

Well which post was it? As I said I didn't delete anything. Its more much likely someone reported it. Idk what else to tell you there.

>>57890333
>bro, your entire retarded thesis has been effectively demolished when you admitted you don't know shit, couple of posts above

Again why lie or make things up? Everyone can just scroll up and see you aren't telling the truth.

>>57890410
>-lies! the Jew shrieked, shivering and trembling
kek, how much are you getting paid for this?

>>57888351

Key points in the thread to understand about the TA I've described


>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101


A handful of large MCAP alts looked absolutely primed to run against BTC in the coming months. LINK, AVAX, SOL, and UNI as well.

I'm suggesting you read what I posted and then do your own research outside of this thread about my speculation and come to your own conclusion.

I've seen many threads suggest rotating into BTC and I'm saying you should probably be rotating out of it. 7 green candles on the Monthly time frame for BTC with it being overbought on many time frames while hitting the ATH resistance. Can it go higher? Sure but it would appear that many solid alts are set to out perform it soon.

I just check and BTC is overbought on the:

MONTHLY
3 WEEK
2 WEEK
1 WEEK
12 DAY
9 DAY
6 DAY
5 DAY
4 DAY
3 DAY
2 DAY
1 DAY

Also note the absolute seething and anger over the thread. The gaslighting too.

>>57890452

Obviously nothing. I do this because I believe in Jesus Christ of Nazareth and want my fellow brothers and sisters to have insight into the data so they can make better informed decisions.

This thread can't affect the price action of any of those coins I've mentioned. They have millions in daily volume.

No more replies for you its apparent you have no intention to discuss this in good faith.

>>57890474
>The gaslighting too
KEK
your little thread is in reality a perfect demonstration of the "Illusory truth effect"
you're literally repeating your magic mantra while constantly dismissing and deflecting all criticism and every counterpoint that's been made itt
>>57890544
>I'm just a good honest to God human being mate, you got to trust me on this!
forgot something
>Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain
you don't seem like a good Christian to me
catholic?

>>57882162
Once upon a time there lived a poor single mom and her adult son Chudjack. One day, Chudjack’s mother told him to get a job. Chudjack went to the job market and on the way he met a man who wanted to sell his bags. Chudjack asked, “What will you give me in return for my neetbux?” The man answered, “I will give you five magic internet beans!” Chudjack took the magic internet beans and gave the man his neetbux. But when he reached home, Chudjack’s mother was very angry. She said, “You fool! You were supposed to get a job not some fake internet money!” She threw the magic internet beans out of the window. Chudjack was very sad and went to sleep without masterbating.

The next day, when Chudjack woke up in the morning and looked out of the window, he saw that a huge green candle had grown from his magic internet beans! He climbed up the candle and reached Chainlink Labs. There lived a fat giant all by himself. Jack went inside the house and found piles of garbage strewn about.

While he was crying, the giant came home. The giant was very fat and looked very gay. Jack was terrified and went and hid inside. The giant cried, “Fee-fi-fo-fum, I smell the stench of a stinky linky. Be he alive, or be he dead, I'll dump 700k tokens on his head!” Then Chudjack screeched, “There is no bagholders in here!” So, the giant ate his food and then went to his room. After raping his pillow the giant took out his sacks of gold coins, counted them and kept them aside. Then he went to sleep. In the night, Chudjack crept out of his hiding place, took one sack of gold coins and climbed down the candle. At home, he gave the coins to his mother. His mother was very happy and they lived well for sometime.

>>57890474

BUMP

Read all the tagged replies in the post that I tagged above first but also go through the whole thread if you can and take note of the responses to my assessment. Of the few legitimate concerns I gave proper answers. Towards the end they just started repeating "you were debunked" without actually doing so.

They do this as a strategy in hopes that people just joining see their post and it deters you from actually going through the information yourself.

After some days, Chudjack once again climbed the candle and went to the giant Sirgay's castle. Chudjack met the gay fat giant’s new wife, Dave and asked for some food. The giant’s wife gave him 3 Mc Chickens. But while Chudjack was eating, the giant came home. “Fee-fi-fo-fum, I smell the stench of a stinky linky. Be he alive, or be he dead, I’ll dump 700k token on his head!” cried the giant.

The giant had a magical frog that could post the same worthless post over and over for 5 years. While the giant slept, Chudjack took the frog and was about to leave. Suddenly, the magic frog cried, “What was that!" His mouth agape. The giant woke up and saw Chudjack with the frog. Furious, he ran after Chudjack. But Chudjack was too fast for him. He ran down the candle and reached home. The giant followed him down. Chudjack quickly ran inside his house and fetched his neetbux. He began to buy more link bags with the neetbux and the candle suddenly collapsed. The giant fell and died.

Chudjack and his mother were now even further in poverty and they lived miserably ever after.

>>57890768
your proper answer was
>well technically it could still go higher but DON'T YOU THINK IT WILL DUMP FIRST?
that was it
I find it a bit lackluster

Again misconstruing the context. BTC could go higher and maybe it could dump but the main point is that the key alts will likely out perform BTC regardless of what it does.

>>57890852
then why would BTC's RSI be relevant?

W6LRX0XX
you are absolutely fucking based. You’re the king of /biz/ today.

>>57890880

Because as I've repeated probably half a dozen times in this thread at least.

It had 7 green candles in a row on the MONTHLY. This is the first time ever.

February alone was nearly a 50% candle

Its reaching its ATH resistance from last cycle

BTC is overbought on nearly a dozen time frames

MONTHLY
3 WEEK
2 WEEK
1 WEEK
12 DAY
9 DAY
6 DAY
5 DAY
4 DAY
3 DAY
2 DAY
1 DAY

There a multitude of factors that are alerting caution in my mind.

>>57890919

Based I like the meme brother thanks

>>57890990
>first time ever omg
well, it's a relatively new asset, things happen, even more so after institutions have been legally allowed to do whatever the fuck they want to the price lol
look up XAU in the late 70s
I obviously don't think it will keep going up forever, just saying that this argument isn't particularly strong imo
>it's reaching ATH
technically it broke ATH, and typically what follows is price discovery to the upside
>overbought on MONTHLY
literally wtf are you talking about, it has happened before multiple times and magnitudes higher than now
pic related, the actual chart

>>57891118

I'm getting tired of repeating myself. I already touched on this.

>>57889969
>Most of the time when the price is trending up for BTC isn't doesn't move hard UNTIL we are overbought on the MONTHLY. However this time we are at 75 and have already went straight up from like $25,000.

We are just now entering overbought on MONTHLY except we already have had massive gains leading into it.

I still think BTC will do will for the rest of the cycle but as I've said throughout the whole thread I would exercise caution with BTC currently in the short term and pay attention to solid alts which appear ready to move.

None of what I'm saying is a stretch in the slightest. Its all perfectly logical.

>>57891228
>massive gains
I think your perception might be a bit fucked
are you really calling a x4 "massive gains"?
dopamine fried

>>57888351

Key points in the thread to understand about the TA I've described


>>57881993
>>57882028
>>57882162
>>57882273
>>57882289
>>57882311
>>57882331
>>57884791
>>57884803
>>57885083
>>57885372
>>57885568
>>57885757
>>57885794
>>57885956
>>57885962
>>57886042
>>57886101


A handful of large MCAP alts looked absolutely primed to run against BTC in the coming months. LINK, AVAX, SOL, and UNI as well.

I'm suggesting you read what I posted and then do your own research outside of this thread about my speculation and come to your own conclusion.

I've seen many threads suggest rotating into BTC and I'm saying you should probably be rotating out of it. 7 green candles on the Monthly time frame for BTC with it being overbought on many time frames while hitting the ATH resistance. Can it go higher? Sure but it would appear that many solid alts are set to out perform it soon.


BTC is on 7 green candles in a row on the MONTHLY. This is the first time ever.

February alone was nearly a 50% candle

Its reaching its ATH resistance from last cycle

BTC is overbought on nearly a dozen time frames

MONTHLY
3 WEEK
2 WEEK
1 WEEK
12 DAY
9 DAY
6 DAY
5 DAY
4 DAY
3 DAY
2 DAY
1 DAY

There a multitude of factors that are alerting caution in my mind.

We are just now entering overbought on MONTHLY except we already have had massive gains leading into it.

I still think BTC will do will for the rest of the cycle but as I've said throughout the whole thread I would exercise caution with BTC currently in the short term and pay attention to solid alts which appear ready to move.

None of what I'm saying is a stretch in the slightest. Its all perfectly logical.

Will BTC bubble explode?

>>57881908
this chart has driven me into utter fucking insanity. i have officially lost my mind due to the constant dumping and fuckery of this chart. im cooked. done.

>>57881908
>the price keeps going down
>what a heckin BEAUTYFUL chart sirs
>btc chart is straight up
>link chart is straight down
>le textbook very good chart sirs I am in tears at the beatyfulness

>>57883094
You are buying a WEF poster child NWO mark of the beast saturnian control grid star of rempham antichrist project while shilling christ...I cant imagine the levels of mental gymnastics you go through.

>>57888281
the chart (Link down, Inj up) is all that matters

>>57888351
>You buy BEFORE things go up.
Ok so I'll buy anything besides Link (it never goes up)

>>57891385
this reads like a guy that has paid subscriptions to Ben Cowen and Capo, and the actual prices keep deviating from what all his research indicated was going to happen.

Instead of acknowledging he may be wrong he just keeps doubling down on his crystal ball

>>57892338
>Ok so I'll buy anything besides Link
you won't you're all in link and demoralized af, pathetic.

Bump, bump biggity bump. This thread makes the fuddies jump (off a building)

Chainlink (ticker: LINK) is going straight to 81k and there is nothing you can do about it

>>57881993
>dude they painted the dick and pussy pattern, and yeah it's bullish!
how did we get to this point?

>>57893739
are all you retarded fudders porn addicted? it wouldn't surprise me since there is definitely a connection between not holding link and being porn addicted

>>57881922
it's fucking ludicrous, like thinking you can predict the lottery numbers by studying the frequency of each numbers appearance

>>57893777
is there another reason they call the pattern Adam & Eve?

>>57893777
checked

>>57887116
LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

YOU DIDNT LISTEN YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED

fuddies are you forgetting to post? keep it up you have bills to pay