/biz/ - Business & Finance

It hasn't even really begun.

>>57787317
>no new aths
Brother, this shit is about to get crazy. Sell when Coinbase is number 1 in the app store (or close to it, too many people know that indicator now) and all of your friends and family are shilling some random alt to you.

Honestly might be near or at a short term top though. Could see a big 30-40% drop before pushing higher.

>>57787371
> >no new aths
That's exactly right. And we predicted that in May of 2021. See picrel and the following posts:
>>57757295
>>57757307
>>57758223
>>57758685
>>57761301

Picrel pic was made just after the April 2021 top of near 65k. We used that pic back then to project forwards in time how strong the next bullrun would be (the one we're just in, or just had). It was a very long term projection since the bear market had just started back then (or so we thought, as it crashed to around 30k and then pumped to 69k which became the true top). But even so, and despite us back then using math based on 65k instead of 69k, we still """predicted""" (more like projected/forecasted) that BTC wouldn't reach a new ATH in the next bullrun (this one). And when adjusting the math so one bases it on the 69k top, the results remain almost the same; still no need ATH. But of course it might pump to 70k or a few thousand above that and it would still be pretty close to the established math (established by Bitcoin itself, by it's price action). But according to the math, we certainly shouldn't get 100k or even 85k.

>>57787348
Bull trap was yesterday fren. I hate to break it to you

>>57787550
That's like an 80-90k even maybe more due to dollar inflation though, so it is a new top just not wild predictions. Even then, Jews love Bitcoin and will make grandma and grandpa baghold their IOUs of Bitcoin, so in reality it can go as high as ((necessary))

>>57787550
check other tweets of the retard that published this chart and is now inactive lmao. he's capo v0.1, basically

>>57787371
The amount of people who think they are about to get insanely rich here and on CT is basically a guaranteed sign this is going to be a hyper aggressive but very short lived pump if it continues from here. Most people are going to walk away in shambles. If major alts (e.g. SOL, AVAX, LINK etc.) even 3x I'm getting the fuck out.

>>57788016
Irrelevant, as the math was manifested by the BTCUSD market itself. It is what it is. If a jew says 2+2=4 it doesn't make that math wrong.

>>57788237
>If major alts (e.g. SOL, AVAX, LINK etc.) even 3x I'm getting the fuck out.
I'm mostly expecting one more aggressive pump to new ATHs then a quick drop. I just don't know if we get a big pullback first. Honestly if I get another 50% up on my portfolio I'm out.

>>57788252
le heckin cherrypicked stat on a sample size of 4. amazing. post short

>>57788252
youre a retard. the "chart math" you propose is not in alignment with the market. the market does not give a fuck about it.

you niggers will never leave this board because youre unable to READ THE ROOM

>>57788278
>le heckin cherrypicked stat on a sample size of 4
>cherrypicked
>sample size of 4
Bitcoin has only had 4 proper "bottom to top" events or "X-ings" as depicted in that pic. And hence there's nothing to "pick" from to begin with. We have only what we have, Bitcoin's four X-ings prior to this most recent ones. There's nothing else to pick.

If you want to invent extra imaginary X-ings then go ahead but it won't have anything to do with reality.

>>57788307
You're a mathlet.
>the market does not give a fuck about it.
The math in question IS the market. If you have a problem with this math, then you have a problem with how the global Bitcoin market traded Bitcoin.

>>57788335
i think that if i guided you further i'd get you to realize that TA in crypto and "math manifest by the BTCUSD market" are no more than vaporing of an idle mind but i don't have time for that so i'm just here to make it known that you're a retard and will NEVER make it

>>57788278
>post short
What part of it might pump several more k is too difficult for you to understand? You probably didn't even read that thread, where anons also said it might pump a bit more. If we short now we might get liquidated. Try to turn on your brain before posting.

Its hard to say.

>>57787550
Yet another arrogant know it all being rekt on the way up.
You're at least the 100th that passes by and your fate will be the same as the previous, because you all think alike, inside the box.
You can do all the maths you want, it's wrong because it's based on the wrong assumptions.

>>57788375
no i didnt read it whole i just see that retarded graph thats being posted here time and time again this week and automatically assume everyone participating is a blithering idiot

>>57787317
literally why
maybe a local top
maybe we go to 40k
but why would the cycle top be in
give me a reason

>>57787317
This could very well be a bulltrap. The last bullrun was just 2 years ago.

>>57788346
screenshotting our conversation and Im going to post it at 70k

see you soon

>>57788417
based
>>57788346
Your math doesn't work because you don't understand all the variables. Your assumptions are wrong to begin with like >>57788389 said.

>>57788411
????

>>57788417
>posting le screenshot at 70k, to say "aha gotcha!"
Meanwhile a in this very thread, in the very post which caused you to go insane: >>57787550 quote: "But of course it might pump to 70k or a few thousand above that"

Zero reading comprehension.

>>57788417
>posting le screenshot at 70k, to say "aha gotcha!"
Meanwhile in this very thread, in the very post which caused you to go insane: >>57787550 quote: "But of course it might pump to 70k or a few thousand above that"

Zero reading comprehension.

>>57787317
after a new ATH nigger

>>57788389
>You can do all the maths you want, it's wrong
Except that particular math is correct. And you're angry (at math lol), which indicates you're very poor. Same goes for all the other easily triggered frothing anons lately who are tearing their hair, out biting their nails, turning red in their faces, absolutely seething, due to seeing bearish posts or bearish charts. They all sound very very poor and desperate for gains.

>>57788609
uhh you're only rich if you want the number to go down!!! capo is rich and he wants number to go down so it must be true. you're never getting an entry, sandeep

>>57788473
there is more $$$ trading moving averages than this stupid metric. do you understand that? can you comprehend that the "undeniable math" you claim to have uncovered actually demonstrates ZERO knowledge about market realities in 2024 and is pure speculation? you quite literally, in this reality, did not (or are incapable) relate any of this maths to hard figures or market movement and expect people to blindly trust the first thing some zoomer finds when they look back at the archives.

grats for having the pattern matching skills of a week old bird.

>>57788609
I've seen bearish posts since 15k and a lot of correct maths on top.
I'm saying your math is wrong because it's correct on the wrong assumptions, therefore it's useless cope.

The top is nowhere near to be seen, you wouldn't understand why or when because you don't understand market cycles (not 4 years bitcoin cycles) .
You like every other rekt retard, just looked back and protected the past onto the future.
That's the wrong assumption on which you'll be rekt.
Time is more important than price, you'll not understand until you're on the short end of the stick on a raging bull market.

>>57787317
This does not affect my gambling addiction kek, NFTs never die and getting the chance to get some at dirt cheap with eesee is more than any of you could fucking expect kek, kys