/biz/ - Business & Finance

Friendly reminder - 33 days until you are once again rugged on another CCIP “release”

>>57745535
just I M A G I N E once it's actually live

>>57745535
Not live yet. This isn’t a ur 10th grade science project

>>57745558
you're right, the high school project actually exists

2020
Eth $300
Link $20

2024
Eth $3,200
Link $19

>>57745535
The essence of good fud is that it is based on a kernel of truth. Anyone can easily look at the CCIP explorer and see that the Dune dashboard data is not accurate. It's just bad fud.

This wallet alone has done 150 mainnet transactions in the last 24 hours and it paid for all of them in LINK: https://ccip.chain.link/address/0xe1c14b9f065dead2e89ee35382f8bd42bdb87a04

>>57745650
wtf she always looked like this?

>>57745650
>and it paid for all of them in LINK
And what does this mean in terms of price action? Did LINK get burned? Did someone buy LINK on the open market? Are LINK investors getting compensated?

>>57745729
>And what does this mean in terms of price action?
Nothing
>Did LINK get burned?
No
>Did someone buy LINK on the open market?
No
>Are LINK investors getting compensated?
No

As all can see, the token is not needed.

Adem I hope you’re training for our street fight. I’ll be there in August. Once I find you I will give you 3 minutes to prepare out of the tad bit of honor I have left for you.

>>57745535
>People still talking about this ancient 2017 ICO shitcoin in 2024...

ngmi

>>57745634
>he didn't buy in 2018 or earlier
kek, most of us on /biz/ got a 100x return or better. I left some to run and moved the rest to other coins. The only reason to seethe is because you are a retard who bought late

>>57745983
Though I admire the resilience of the Link marines, at one point we gotta talk about lost opportunity cost. How many more years do you want to hold when the value doesn't really go up while other stuff keeps rising? You'd feel pretty stupid still repeating this in ten years, "But in 2018 it went up a lot!!!"

>>57745924
>street fight
Whenever you see this term used you know its a massive beta on the other end

>>57746336
Link was like 50% of my portfolio and now it's like 5%. It's been bleeding against btc and eth since 2020. You'd have to be insane to have significant exposure to it. It's a good project on paper and has good fundamentals but it's performance has been dog shit. I've already accrued more opportunity cost than I can handle. My only regret is not pivoting to other coins sooner. Far more bullish on btc and eth with the approval of ETFs and the burn feature.

>>57745983
OG linkies were screeching 1k EOY for years. According to the memes it was suppose to be a top 3 coin. Saying it was a good investment if you got out early just proves the anon's point, that it's been a sub par investment overall.

Are you ready?
Chainlink is going to do something very special this evening.
You’ll say you saw it coming.

Never lose yourself frens
Screencap this

>>57746922
>It's been bleeding against btc and eth since 2020
this is just incorrect though
if you bought link between late 2019 and mid 2021 then yes you are down vs eth
but since mid 2021 it has been ranging

>>57746969
>if you bought link between late 2019 and mid 2021 then yes you are down vs eth
yes which was my point with, "Saying it was a good investment if you got out early just proves the anon's point, that it's been a sub par investment overall".

If you would chose to invest in link during the latter 80% of its history then you came out worse than if you would have just invested into btc or eth. "It was only profitable for the minority of very early investors" condemns link, not exonerates it. Especially considering it was suppose to be a paradigm changing coin according to og linkers.

>but since mid 2021 it has been ranging
Are we looking at the same graph? It's been crabbing since 2022 with a slight uptick the past month or two. Horrible opportunity cost like other anon said.

>>57747033
???
if it's crabbing vs eth or btc then it isn't a terrible investment... it's holding its value and it's neutral...
again there is a 18 month window where it was a bad buy

nearly all of the anger you see is actually from early buyers who did not sell during that 18 month spike vs btc and eth

as to whether it's a paradigm changing project, well that's still too early to tell. it looks very promising though

>>57747133
it's been in a decline/crab since 2021 or 2020 (depending on whether you're looking at btc or eth). So it hasn't been raging like you said. The relevant question at hand was the opportunity cost of holding link post 2020/2021. Was there better plays than link? Certainly. So there was an opportunity cost.

>as to whether it's a paradigm changing project, well that's still too early to tell. it looks very promising though
This loops back around to opportunity cost. If you want to bag hold for 10 years then go ahead. But most people want to make money quickly as possible. I do think link will have it's day in the sun, but we're on the eve of the next big cycle and there are FAR more bullish charts out there. Link's is very underwhelming.

>>57745551
I'm gonna
IMAGOOOOOOOON

>>57745634
Fucking brutal. The opportunity cost even for fags bragging about getting in early (they didn't) is TREMENDOUS

>>57745729
Someone paid for the transaction in SmellyBoogerPepeInu coin and CLL took it and gave them LINK to perform the transaction.

I wish I was joking.

>>57745535
>Tokenization
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1762600319211507936

When you here that word being thrown around by every faggot assed talking head like they do with "Muh AI" it will be to late to grab a bag.

>>57747249
>it's been in a decline/crab since 2021 or 2020 (depending on whether you're looking at btc or eth). So it hasn't been raging like you said
???
look at the chart though
it's eth price is higher now than any point since early 2022???

>>57746922
>OG linkies were screeching 1k EOY for years. According to the memes it was suppose to be a top 3 coin. Saying it was a good investment if you got out early just proves the anon's point, that it's been a sub par investment overall.
>fell for the 1K EOY memes
did you also think it was have a 4 quadrillion market cap or whatever that meme was? Just admit you are a retard, meanwhile most of /biz/ bought a 10 million market cap coin that ended up shooting into the top 10

>>57747336
i find it funny that they always invited him on to talk mainly about bitcoin and sometimes theyll talk about defi for a second if one of the roasties wants to sound like they're up to speed on what's going on. he's a great person to talk to about bitcoin but you'd think they'd talk to him about link. it's like having vitalik on and not talking to him about ethereum or hoskinson on and not talking to him about cardano. it's just so weird to me that they don't give a fuck about link even if they have sergey there lmao.

>>57747598
Then why him out of an entire roster?

>>57747515
>>57747598
>>57747631
LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

LPL POOLS CLOSED

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

BUY LPL STAY BASED AND FUCKING KIDDO CHUDDIE PILLED

SEEETHE NEW FAG YOU MISSED OUT POOLS CLOSED HA HA HA

>>57747631
Chainlink pays Bloomberg for the spot. Well actually, you pay for it, just like you do employee vacations

To bring it full circle here…if it feels like you’re missing this bullrun, well, its because you are

The year is 2030:
>btc $750,000
>eth $35,000
>Link $20
>link cucks: i i i dont care, i boughted ico, h h hehhhh p pa pa pools closed

>>57747515
-->>>57748161

>>57746942
So, it's happening tonight?

>>57747824
whats this fucking based lpl chuddie kiddo shit???

>>57747598
why wouldn't you talk about bitcoin with satoshi nakamoto though? that's his biggest project, link is a side-hustle

>>57748586
yeah i saw that and you are right that's what they are bunch of idiots throwing money at a useless coin because they are bored they call other people cucks but they are the real ones getting scammed by the company behind it its actually so pathetic what they are willing to do for 1% profits"