/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57615791
the more they fud the stronger the spring

>>57615796
The fud fucking sucks right now.

>>57615814
>The fud fucking sucks right now.
indeed they are just talking about cucks and dumps, bunch of weirdos.

>>57615791
feels like something is about to happen.

>>57615791
They washed out everyone except for the turbo autists who were literally never going to be washed out.

can someone explain to me the Indian meme and chain link?

It's literally underperforming the market right now.

I’m telling you the RWA narrative will drive the price well beyond 100. Even during bear market LINK stayed strong after initial dump. Don’t let (them) price you out

>>57615904
After btfo everyone since last year. Yet still top gainer

>>57615791
The crypto asset space is strongly correlated and it got so big that that is correlated with stocks now.

>>57615913
What?

>>57615904
>It's literally underperforming the market right now.
It's literally overperforming the market right now.

>>57615896
it was a "coincidence", and we dont believe in coincidences, wherein someone who self identified as TexasBlockchain was shorting link for the past 2 years when we were range bound between $5 - $8. This led to the discovery that the portfolio manager at a Texas college had an internship at Steel Parot, Eric Schmidts company. So it was reasonable to conclude that the people in charge of managing LINK suppression were the people working for the guy who invented the Hiding Strategy at Google.
as this anon correct points out >>57615892
only individuals who may not even realize their super powers are the only ones left. Hiding strategy ends at some point, we know that and we will still be here when that happens. FIND A BEAUTIFUL WOMEN AND MAKE LOTS OF BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN

>>57615791
>dumps the most
>pumps the least
>token isn't even needed
>literally just a json parser
what the FUCK were we thinking bros? I feel so retarded and wish I had held ETH instead like the oldfags had warned us about

>pumps the most
>dumps the least
>token is even needed
>literally a json parser
what the FUCK were we thinking bros? I feel so retarded and wish I had bought more instead like the oldfags had told us about

>>57615912
How convenient for you to pick a specific and arbitrary starting point. Two can play this game, I could tell you to zoom in or out.

>>57615942
No, it's not. See pic related.

>>57616022
>No, it's not. See pic related.
You are literally picking a specific and arbitrary starting point. Two can play this game, I could tell you to zoom in or out.

>>57616057
Fuck you.

>>57615791
Link hit $20 nearly a week ago and COMPLETELY flatlined since then.
Even as the entire fucking market kept trending up in a huge way.

There's no way in hell someone isn't doing this deliberately.

>>57616067
I mean look at this shit

>>57616110
>I mean look at this shit
this is probably the reason its going to underperform this bull run unless Sergey can somehow fuck em' up
>inb4 its Sergey
doubt it

>>57616110
Chainlink is leading the market once again. LINK pumps, flatlines and then the rest of the market pumps.

Chainlink (Ticker: LINK) has been preparing for this moment his entire life. There's no stopping him now.

>>57615791
and yet you still won't hear a peep about it outside this board. really makes ya think.

this is /our_time/

>>57615791
>bitcoin almost back to ATH
>chainlink still down 70%
>strong
..yeah...uhh...

i cant believe i put my life saving into a fucking json parser scam

It is BEYOND over

It literqlly can't even keep up with btc. There's no point to holding a shitcoin if it can't even gain sats

>>57615791
But not as fast as SUPRA and DIA?

>>57616057


2020:
Link: $20
Btc: 11,000

2024:
Link: $20
Btc: $52,000

>>57619592
Imagine if you were just a few years earlier. What were you doing in 2017, anon? Jerking off?

>>57619592
why the fuck are you showing me your buy in retard

yes chainlink is strong of late
went from rank 22 to 11

>>57619592
Baggies will seethe
>>57619625
>>57619708
>what is opportunity cost
You have had literslly 0 growth from being in crypto for the last 4 years while all the normies got ahead of you with dog coins. Absolutely Brutal

>>57619959
Post folio brownoid. Come on

>once link crashes to $3 i will FINALLY have SEX
>these baggies don't know how bad I'm going to ruin their lives
Kek look at this seething nigger.

LINK will underperform. There, I said the truth that linkers dont wanna hear

>>57615791
Because it's going to be like one of the big 5 that survived the dotcom bubble by surviving the crypto nuclear holocaust, and it not only will survive but it will mog the shit out everyone. even those staking 1k suicide stacks are going to live a happy life. it's ridiculous how valuable this asset will be. honestly i'd be scared if I owned a lot of link, you're gonna be on a new money watch list.

>>57620154
if you have 5k+ link you will get chased by hitmen every second of your life>>57620154

>>57616698
STOP FEMINIZING LINK

>>57620154
Delusional

>>57619625
So you should have sold link for btc and eth in 2020. Link is struggling to get out of the depression range against btc and most projects consistently underperform against btc.at this point there is practically no fiference in long term gains between holding btc or eth or chainlink.

>>57616022
Wow now pick the 2020 top as a starting point, never saw anyone do that yet

>>57620464
Then btc is down 18% and chainlink is down 61% if we're comparing tops to current prices.

>>57615791
protected override bool TokenNeeded(Token t)
{
bool o = true;
if (t.ID == Token.ID.Chainlink)
o = false;
return o;
}

>>57620455
what are you on about retard
if you bought 2017/18/19 you are up big against eth or btc
if you look to the future and compare link's marketcap vs eth or btc then there is massive opportunity too

remember that not everyone can handle this market. there are too many fucked up eth holders livign in the past and beating themselves up that they didn't sell to btc in 2017

have to look forward, no point sitting here ruminating

>>57620882
i think i get it. every token but chainlink is needed.
mind=blown

there is BTC, ETH, LINK and then theres shitcoins.

>>57619959
Anons that held btc and eth while chainlink went 20x against them also have tons of lost opportunity cost but you arent desperately spreading that narrative.

>>57620924
The most legitimate projects usually have one cycle where they outperform btc permanently from their ico price but compared to literally any other cycle they never outperform btc past the prior ath ever again and stay in a low range most of the time. I really don't see how this will be different for chainlink now that everyone already recognoses it as a legit crypto company. It's price against btc will likelt never outperform btc to the same level ever again imo.

>$20 VIOLENTLY REJECTED
it's so fucking over... we should have sold earlier, literally getting rugpulled

>>57620044
I'm all in on LPL. seethe

>>57621038
>The most legitimate projects
nigger what are you even talking about there’s no legitimate projects in crypto, everything outside link is either trying to do fringe shit that will only matter when tradfi enters the space due to link, or trying to capitalize in some way on shitcoin casino paradigm.

>>57615791
I always think:
>how much is this going to be worth when they actually release a fully working product with one of their major partners?
we're up 178% YTD and everything is still on testnet.

>>57621177
Ah yes the sour grapes bait-and-switch scam from the horse rimmer. You go little man kek

>>57619625
>>57619708
you're down massively since '20. You could've made but you joined a cult instead. Learning the valuable lesson of never marrying an investment

>>57620154
>>57620179

cringe / gamestop

>>57620674
lmao they refuse to ACKnowledge this

>>57621202
this is actually true, and includes Link, a shitcoin

>>57621311
crypto prices have nothing to do with "product releases"... cmon bro you know that

>>57615791
Because I bought and want more so it won't go down.
Fucking 100 link. I don't think I'd even get a whole link if I were to stake it.
I wish I had 7k link.

>>57621311
Prices rise the most against the market before actual real products drop. We already had this rise. People have known about the partnership with swift and other major banks and data companies since 2019 and major speculation about confirmation since chainlink had it's ico.

>>57621038
you realize we're largely in a scam market right

>>57621383
The releases will actually drive token purchases, you fucking dimwit.
>>57621446
>impotent curry-goblin fuddie.

>>57621202
Even chainlink is an ethereum based erc token. If you think chainlink is legit than so must ethereum. And btc is legit or else crypto wouldn't exist as a gold alternative hedge against inflation. If you don't like the term 'most legitimate' then let's just use the term 'least scammy/least shit coin like' in place. Either way. Each subsequent crypto revolution over the years has been less and less impressive in terms of price action and Chainlink is no different in this regard. If you want to outperform btc you'll gonna have to look elsewhere.

>>57621177
checked based and lpl chuddie kiddo pilled

>>57621563
who are you talking to, you either just got here last cycle or you are fudding for fun

>>57621563
>you’ll gonna have to look elsewhere.
So go look elsewhere. Learn proper English while you’re at it.

>>57615791
>1000 is fud
to
>it hardly lost any value
oh how baggies have fallen

>>57620080
It doesn't matter if it runs the same fractal against BTC. A bunch of 10,000+ LINK holders are going to be able to slough off half their stack for life changing money and just wait the future cycles out.

>>57620674
>>57621371
Why would you compare prices from ath? Did you retards actually buy from top?

>>57621177
Checked, but LINK only blows up in 2024-2025 if LPL copycats spin up, promise to specialize in specific types of data, and demand their Initial Pool Offering be paid in LINK. It becomes a reserve currency, enough attention gets called to it that HQ dumping 100s of millions of tokens won't go uninvestigated, and the supply shock makes it go parabolic. LPL gets to be the best in show for this shitstorm the same way LINK gets to be best in show for Oracles that outperform it during the run.

You should hold both unless you think LINK breaks out for another reason.

>>57623769
Lmao what…hmmm how else can I explain this…ok, picture this: if the coin goes up, you make more money

With that in mind, heres the problem: other coins go up more than Link.

Can someone post the as my wallet grew stinky poem it's been so long since I saw it

>>57624142
Why do you talk like an absolute faggot?

>>57615791
>Tell those stinkers the truth
I can't Dom, they won't like me
>Why does that matter? Those that speak the truth historically are hated in the moment but revered as revolutionists in history
But History is written by the victors?
>That's right now tell those big mac munchers the truth


Web 2.5 needs oracles like it needs centralized cloud (AWS, Azure, etc.). True web 3.0 doesn't need oracle intermediaries or centralized cloud. True web 3.0 is the Internet Computer, decentralized full stack crypto cloud. FUD the tech linkies, you can't. Largest R&D operation in crypto and attacked by our favorite bankman. DYOR

>>57623799
LOLO SOETORO MANGUNHARJO

>>57615791
It's because Smart Money has been buying for weeks. Something BIG is coming

>>57615791
Sergon Nimarov

>>57615791