/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57580094
I doubt it
120k is the top and thats about it
get used to the idea

>>57580094
Also where this chart came from Never seen this one before 450k wtf

when in 2030

>>57580094
>ETF
Possible but if I have to guess, 150-250k.

>>57580295
This
No way bitcoin can reach 400k, come on..

>>57580280
>>57580313
Shouldve bought in nerd, have fun seething on the sidelines

>>57580313
This time, the Chinese won't be able to fuck with the bull run.

>>57580280
>>57580313
>disbelief

>>57580344
7pbp /thread

>>57580344
We're in the hope/optimism phase

>>57580094
>Dec 15 2026
Anon that will be the first up move from the next bear market low
Top is way earlier

>>57580434
Read the chart, 450k is the bottom of the next bear.

>>57580094
Most people expect 100-200k so it will absolutely not end up in that range. 450k might be a possibility.

>>57581061
Shut up nigger

>>57580136
Nah. We're almost at 50k and not even at the halving. 3x previous ATH. Look for 200k as a top but take some profits at 150-180.

>>57580136
Assuming zero inflation from the last runs, we'd expect about a top of 200k without the blowoff top. That's not even factoring in increased adoption. Now go ahead and factor that in that extra 50% USD devaluation and the psychology of the market effected by that

>>57580094
Sounds about right

>2026 top

LOL

even 2025 is unlikely

my hot take is a 2024 top.

>>57581332
Read the chart, that is 2026 bottom according to it

>>57580136
If shit goes off and bitcoin does some crazy ass shit like 30-40% gain in a day and breaks 100k I'm fucking gone. Anything north of 80k to me is greed. 100k is insane greed.

>>57581332
Sell in may and run away.

>>57581372
It really isn't though if the big funds are truly going to allocate 1% to bitcoin. That makes 250k per pretty reasonable and actually conservative if there is other buying.

>>57580313
I remember thinking the same way when people talked about BTC reaching $10k in 2017. Come on, man.

>>57581372
I'm retired off BITO calls if btc reaches 100k this year. People don't realize how hard it is to hold onto something when >100% your entire net worth is in it. Praying to God every day that it happens.

>>57580094
jerome powell won't let $450k happen if anyone other than biden wins
they will however continue propping up stocks until election day, a drop down to <$12k is delusional you missed the boat if you're not already in

>>57581332
honestly think this is possible, pi cycle top forming towards early 2025 so it could also be end of 2024 and would fuck over all the people that are aiming 2025 because of 4 year cycle. Might have to check with correlating astrology to get the full meme picture

>>57580094
>>57580136
>>57580295
>>57580313
>>57581047
>>57581061
>>57581161
>>57581304
>>57583537
>>57583539
Don't look at the Y axis look at the X axis
>>57581332
Maybe earlier 2025 than previous cycles would suggest. But we are nowhere near yet

dont forget to tip me when you make it bros, qr code is on the image

>>57586193
oops now included

>>57586207

Looks we are about to experience some huge dumps based on that chart soon.

>>57583539
Dude Powell hates biden, he's trying to cuck him this election by keeping rates high.

>>57580094
Cycle top around 150k

600k

>>57580094
Probable not guaranteed

>>57583539
No one cares about burgerland, clown

>>57584122
Why do you think we wont see 2 pi cycle tops? And have you checked that btc natal chart?

>>57580094
When rates come down, everything will go parabolic. Bitcoin will go exponetially parabolic. I can see a moment of full dementia where it touches 400k

>>57580327
>the Chinese

Btw, Ethereum has had twice the growth BTC had over the past 24 hrs.

>>57587414
BTCETH chart due for huge correction, 20% at least, but might be a while before rotatooors do their thing

>>57587435
I can't believe people are still referencing that pair, this isn't 2017.
When BTC moves up, ETH does as well and the inversion is true as well.

Right now, those two assets don't compete with each other, and they likely never will. They complement each other.

250-300k is somewhat reasonable if you believe that this cycle will perform as well as the last. 300k+ if it performs better but that's a tall order. 250k minus 75% correction takes it just below previous ATH which doesn't seem impossible.

>>57587475
Yes but one is going up forever and the other one may or may not.

To hold ETH you should be compensates for the risk, if you're not then it's not worth it.

>>57587509
There's a lot of logical fallacies in your statement. To be clear, I'm a Dev that has worked in smart contract development and currently conduct research in various facets of the field. So I'm not just talking out of my ass here, I know exactly why ETH is a valuable asset class that will very likely continue to appreciate in value.

I am not making any careless claim that there is an asset that exists which will go up forever. There isn't a single person working in finance that would make such a careless claim.

>>57580094
it's always below cause of front runners who think they are geniuses trying to gain more fiat.

>>57581372
Just sell half

>>57587542
>I'm a Dev that has worked in smart contract development and currently conduct research in various facets of the field

>>57587604
Don't feel bad, you're not stupid. You're just lazy.

>>57581161
im a poorfag so im prolly gonna play alts instead. what buy?

>>57580094
Nah that's dreaming. 350k top.

>>57580136
as long as my alts 5x from here min I will be happy

>4-5 trillion valuation (200,000 dollars BTC)
>reasonable
that's why you're on this board and not on a yacht.

NVDA STOCK REFERENCED IN some posts is currently in its euphoria stage. This means accurately predicting the price of it is unreasonable and stupid.

>>57587542
If you were anywhere competent you would know that only money requires a Blockchain and that client server will always be the way for anything else, and that the things happening in crypto is just cryptographer playground which no one except them care about, and that anything useful will be copy paste everywhere else, no token needed, just funding

>>57587769
If you think Ethereum is meant to replace AWS or full stack development frameworks then you don't know what you're talking about.

>>57587852
Tell us what do you think Ethereum is meant to replace, that will be something that don't require a Blockchain