[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 47 KB, 512x512, Pepthefrog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57560020 No.57560020 [Reply] [Original]

>he doesn't know about the secret watermark

>> No.57560024

>he doesn't fucking care

>> No.57560400

>>57560020
I do, so I usually right-click save instead of taking a screenshot.

>> No.57561203

>>57560020
what?

>> No.57561214
File: 233 KB, 808x805, 58454523.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57561214

test
>please wait a while before making a post
when did this shit start

>> No.57561230
File: 190 KB, 808x805, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57561230

>>57561214
test2.jpg

>> No.57561235

>>57560020
There is no secret watermark. Craig is literally like that faggot you knew in middle school who would always just make up new lies to distract from the other lies you caught him in

>> No.57561246
File: 17 KB, 311x355, 5516604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57561246

>>57561230
hmm an invisible watermark that leaves the image the EXACT number of bytes, while still being caught by the "duplicate image" filter... i find this dubious.

>> No.57561268

>>57561246
Because 4chan strips away exif and other metadata during upload, so if your watermark is truly invisible, then it's not going to pass the duplicate image filter

>> No.57561271

>>57560020
>he doesn't know the watermark is only revealed under UV light and is Craig's shitstain when he wiped his ass with the whitetoiletpaper

>> No.57561280

>>57561268
EXIF and metadata are not useful for a watermark anon for the exact reason that those are easy to lose and impossible to track

>> No.57562968

>>57560020
Checked

>> No.57565067

should I be concerned about my ai posts getting watermarked?