/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57291300
those anons will make it

>>57291300
>there are anons that actually stalk the pool in order to stake single digit LINK
checked, every single fudder is stalking the pool, they are OBSESSED!

>>57285831
to answer your question, find a wallet that has unstaked, they have likely claimed their rewards as well like this guy

>>57291312
>they have likely claimed their rewards as well like this guy
doesn't it cost like $60 to claim rewards? I dont know since I haven't done that yet and I was not staking during v0.1

>>57291300
So how do i stalk the pool and does it open up immediately after someonw unstakes

>>57291337
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xbc10f2e862ed4502144c7d632a3459f49dfcdb5e

>>57291359
Thanks man. Guess i'll stake single digits for the rest of my life

this guy split his stack into 10-token chunks to stake separately

>>57291392
another one
do you guys think they are farming BUILD rewards, or are they trying to have multiple early access wallets for 0.3 staking? thats a lot of gas to spend

>>57291483
>or are they trying to have multiple early access wallets for 0.3 staking?
are we seriously going to have to wait 8 years for 1.0 staking?

>>57291333
looks like it cost 4 dollars to claim rewards
>>57291490
idk anon

>>57291300
I wanna stake to the pool directly and leave like .1 LINK in space and see if someone takes it

but it makes more sense to just keep stacking my biweekly paycheck LINK into the SDL peepee and get better rewards

t. 2017 LINK OG/LP OG

>>57291392
just how many wallets does this autist have? they all have ENS as well

>>57291565
yeah but is there a required amount of SDL tokens you need to hold to get into SDL priority pool? i guess you can hold one token and get in? and the more token the higher in the queue youll be?

>>57291333
>>57291533
and then there is this guy that spends $8.4 to get $2.3 in rewards

>>57291603
PP access doesn't require staked SDL, but your LINK won't be staked until every SDL staker's LINK is exhausted.

By staking SDL, you get a proportionate amount of LINK converted to stLINK whenever it deposits LINK the public pool. So if you only have 1 SDL staked, you'll probably only see fractions of LINK converted every time it stakes some PP queued LINK. Might be good for newfags but OGs who somehow missed staking would need a good chunk of SDL to get it in a timely manner.

XM0AN

>>57291741
he knows something we don't

>>57291565
>>57291802
you're a fucking dumbass for sticking with jhonny and eric after they both gangbanged you

>>57292620
>you're a fucking dumbass for sticking with Sergey through his Binance dumps
The point of LINK is to enable these frictionless protocols to work. If not for projects like SDL, what's the point of all of this beyond some ledgers communicating with each other?

>>57292593
its another early access wallet for v0.3 potentially

>>57291300
Can't you deploy a bot or web app to track this kind of thing pretty easily? To snipe space if it opens

>>57293388
The only problem with this idea is that the average LINKie is too dumb to do anything for the network beyond pressing buy LINK.

>>57291300
I'm in that picture!

I figured having a few extra steaking addresses might come in handy a few versions down the line

>>57293481
well done anon. may i ask how you set up the alerts to get in the pool so fast?
i'm considering claiming my rewards and then trying to also stake them in the pool to compound them

>>57291490
nah that's not how versioning works. no one ever increments every tenth between versions lmao

>>57295077

>>57291300
Anons, I may need to unstake 100 link later this month. Family matters. I'll make a thread if this dies to give you guys an advance warning.

>>57291741
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xeee62272f00a3dd1b1aee6dd935f1c08513702cf029501cdd14b5b2898b48d00

dude spent $20 to move 0.000027 LINK into the pool. Legendary transaction.

>>57296828
1600 dollars is like 60% of a month's worth of unemployment insurance, wtf are you doing?

>>57291741
He’s probably just testing

>>57296828
just use a credit card...

>>57292620
>he sold
>he thinks about jonny constantly

>not one single mention of LPL
>constant references to that scam SDL
what is this new discord tranny psyop?

>>57291300
>>57291741
The avg crypto "investor" is low iq and african

>>57297900
Jonny Huxtable is a fat northern UK corporation tax evading scammer

>>57291300
unstaking is similar to buying pizza with bitcoin 10 years ago, something trivial at the time but will amount to dire consequences in the long term

>>57291300
lol why? whats the fucking point in earning 1.4 link in a year? Oh gee wizz boys I made $6 last year

>>57297971
Desu

Are the rewards staked if not claimed?

>>57298799
I was wondering what the downsides of taking out just the rewards are as well.

>>57298065
getting multiple wallet addresses eligible as early access for the next staking version

>>57297025
>>57297048

... I'm job hunting... sorta

>>57297020
A few of us spent 50 dollars to stake link dust so our wallets went from 14.999999 to 15k even. There were a few good autism threads on the day. Fucking eth peice of shit costing me half a grand to move tokens around

>>57298799
No, you have to claim it and then wait for space to stake it. The contract doesn't have any control over your link, you have to move everything yourself.

>>57300059
I was low on gas and didn't feel like converting 5 link just to put in 0.000001 Link for $30. It is tempting to look for a chance to fix it though.

>>57300029
Unemployment insurance homie
Get paid even if you aren't working

>>57293292
Dingus, when link pumps and i can sell im going to build a competing staking protocol just to spit johnny and eric

>>57300747
where will you get the nodes

>>57292620
I'd bet my left gonad both those clowns are SDL staff. Prob the rimmer himself, esp the bozo who wrote "t. 2017 LINK OG/LP OG" you just fucking know there's no way anyone would be dumb enough to not stake in the community pool and instead forfeit all of it to 'stake' with a gang of crooks like Jonny, after the stunt they pulled kek

>>57291300
checked. thats cool i hope they make it in. god bless.

>>57300756
bribing them, just like johnny and eric did.
>>57300782
it might be or its that one retard who keeps posting threads about 9% apy with a 4 year lock up. These guys are fucking braindead

>>57300782
I'm in both pools dumbass
The funny thing is the 7k I put into SDL is out earning the 15k in the community pool. I did not know how much better their rate would turn out with v0.2

Whatever came out of that anon reporting Johnny Horserimmer to the authorities for tax evasion?

There was some clearly shady shit he pulled where he failed to report the company's income or something

>>57301163
>out earning
So, you're saying, with a straight face, that you (who claim to be '2017 LINK OG/LP OG' -cringe you would even put that here which makes me doubt its truth) who presumably came through the LPL debacle, are happy to trust these clowns (whom i think you are actually one of) as far as you can spit them? Story doesn't add up, dude. You're transparent and you and your fraudster mates can go fuck yourselves. Also, why are you shilling this shit so militantly? You stink of fish.

>>57291300
I'll never understand the desire to let someone else hold your token hostage for an apy and a shitty one at that. You could have bought Celestia at $2 and if you were so desperate to steak and hand over your tokens you could be earning 16% apy and get air drops. You're getting mogged by TIA. A coin people got for free.

>>57301447
As a forward thinker and not a backwards seether, I'm happy with the results of where the protocol is at yeah.

>>57301582
you're only happy because you're a greedy cuck that got in at the bottom. I bet you locked for the full 4 years too huh?

>>57301447
>>57301663
kek still seething. I'm glad you got fucked in the ASS. no one can unfuck you LOL. get rawdogged

>>57301663
Part of my stack, yeah.
Another part of my stack is 0y staked so I can sell it if the market makes it make sense to, hence the positive vibes (or shilling if you want to call any positive commentary about the protocol that)

>>57301679
i dont enjoy getting financially raped by two men no.

>>57301725
Enjoy your 4.32% rate that will continue to decrease with the next version of staking because there's a limited subsidy supply

>>57301734
i plane on selling out of link this cycle. The fat ass is priming everyone now to hold for the next bear cycle. Will buy back into Link and then SDL sub penny

>>57301760
>fatman won't get away with it this time

>>57300808
Wait a second you're actually some kind of retard who thinks that the 9% APR is related to SDL locking?

The 9% APR is from LINK staked on their platform because it's being used by hard working nodes and not a gibsmedat 4.32% subsidy.

>>57295015
I just have a tab open to periodically admire my rewards and gaze at the full pool

>>57301917
i honestly dont even care. Like i said im going to wait for next bear to buy some SDL as it will be sub penny

>>57301951
Great point, just sold 100k thanks anon
I'm outie

>>57301921
based pool watcher

The final poolsize will be 75 million correct?

horse rimmer strikes again

>>57301679
>glad you got fucked in the ASS
Jokes on you, my friend. I never bought any LPL and in fact was one of the more vocal proponents of 'why would we need a token to stake a token' which turned out to be 100% on the money correct. Now the brazen shysters (you're no doubt one) are at it AGAIN. I find it difficult to believe that many have been hoodwinked into it this time around, though there's certainly a few cunts like you floating around trying to lure newbies in.
Anyone considering SDL: DO NOT do it. Look into what these absolute conmen did with Linkpool and don't fall for it.
I love these opportunities to repeat the message and I'm glad the shysters are here, actually. Thanks boys!

>>57303358
t. SDL holder

>>57303389
Kek what a pitiful, feeble response! Thanks again for the opportunity to tear you lot some new assholes. I enjoy it rather more than i should, i think :)

>>57303389
WHAT ABOUT LPL HUH???

I was an early LPer not a OG because initially I thought it was pointless but then I bought a small bag. Having to change over tokens and the dog way the team did it with the hyping of the screenshot means I won't trust them with any link. I've kept the small bag of sdl in the 4 year lock up but am expecting absolutely nothing from them and think it will go to zero.

Fuck the 9 percent. Anything with their hands on bit shouldn't be trusted. Especially when you should have had ample time and wallets to stake in the official pool

Jeez. Keep giving jews your LINK. you'll learn one way or another...

>>57303418
caught ya
>>57303502
SOON fellow LPLchad

>>57303358
>Jokes on you, my friend. I never bought any LINK and in fact was one of the more vocal proponents of 'why would we need a token to run an oracle' which turned out to be 100% on the money correct. Now the brazen shysters (you're no doubt one) are at it AGAIN. I find it difficult to believe that many have been hoodwinked into it this time around, though there's certainly a few cunts like you floating around trying to lure newbies in.
Anyone considering LINK: DO NOT do it. Look into what these absolute conmen did with Cryptamail and don't fall for it.
I love these opportunities to repeat the message and I'm glad the shysters are here, actually. Thanks boys!
2017 pajeet FUD energy

i went to the SDL website for the first time ever to read about them and was greeted with this

>>57304905
thats gonna be a no from me dawg

>>57304905
i heard a horse took a poop in the pool