/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57289322
I probably need a 14x

>>57289322
oh quite easily anon. 4yrs from now shib will probably be $0.01 in value so anything is possible.

>>57289332
Brain damage.

>>57289322
Damn never seen this semen demon milf before

>>57289322
Who is this semen demon

it could unironically do a 4x in the next 4 months with even just a mid tier bull run.

>>57289777
checked, looks like we're about to make it

>>57289322
I find it very hard to believe we wont be above ATH in 4 years. I have been wrong before though.

>>57289695
>>57289773
kek nadine dorris. she's a British politican. pretty based but wouldn't fuck unless hammered.

>>57289322
Damn I need GILF like that.

>>57289322
Halvening + CCIP GA = 4x

>>57289322
we're doing 30x this year, ride btc/eth next year then cash and and wait for ze crash to buy in again

>>57289888
checked but no thanks

thanks for the insights anon. I've been holding since 2017 but I just need a 4x to make it forever now. $60 link still feels like a pipedrean

>>57289938
will there be a crash with institutions (muh this time its differe) in the game with ETF's ?

I feel like everyone will sell the top and there likely wont be much of a free fall/ opportunity to by back cheaper?

Link is hitting $100, minimum, this bullrun (next summer/fall). I predict $125.

>>57291837
October 2025 is the market top, mark it in your calendars and thank me later

>>57291457
That's what I'm leaning towards. Do take some profits if there is a godcandle, but don't sell everything.

i don't understand the people looking at these top 20 blue chip aka blue shit projects hoping for big gains

the best possible scenario is you almost get a 2x in an entire bullrun

it's like you people see massive returns in crypto, go on coinbase and buy the first thing you see. no one is getting rich from litecoin or link bro

>>57289322
>4x in 4 years
cool FUD

>>57291908
>the best possible scenario is you almost get a 2x in an entire bullrun
you're a dumb retard

>>57291946
he's just a late comer

>>57291945
how is it fud?

LINK has 75x from when I bought it at at $0.20. I'm asking if it'll end up at 300x within 4 years.

>>57292471
>I'm asking if it'll end up at 300x within 4 years.
again, FUD

>>57292558
sure, ranjesh

>>57292809
you're the ranjesh FUDer

>>57292826
your ID spells cuck

>>57291908
links got a lot more X's to go in my opinion, more than a 2x.

also another 2x from here puts me at more than a 80x on my initial investment on link (a lot of us were accumulating well under 50 cents). so even youre conservative asspull still makes me wildly rich. if someone bought a random low marketcap pump and dump and got a 10x in 2 weeks, a 20% pump for me probably adds more portfolio value than that person would get. i don't think third worlders, jeets, and people bad at math realize how much multiplicative gains people who are early to things like btc, etc, or link or whatever get.

>>57289322
Zero. It will top out at around $25

>>57289322
>That LINK does a 4x in the next 4 years?
0% chance for spot LINK token
100% for Grayscale LINK Trust (ticker: GLNK)

100%

>>57289322
Same chance that I would suck on those big ass titties until I coomed. 100%.

>>57294315
those tits are like medium size at best