/biz/ - Business & Finance

Excuse me, I would love to buy one "the real Bitcoin" with my 401k. I heard that it was Satoshi's Vision to be the only goberment approved shitcoin, how do I get exposure so that I may become stiff, sers?

The bonded courier will be here any minute now, along with the ghost of JFK Jr, and Q himself!!!!111

>>57261291
Kek

Mods! Satoj! Someone call Gary Gensler, they've got the wrong blockchain! I can prove it in court (like the white paper intended!) Why are they approving BTC ETFs, they were supposed to go to jail! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>57261291
Plot twist, ETF was nothingburger, COPA is the real event to watch for.

Creg has forsaken us, Reddit Armie

>>57261291
If the ETF is so good for bitcoin why is BTC down 0.5% rn and BSV is up 4.2%?

>>57265086
I don't hold any Bitcoin (ticker: BEE TEE SEE), but the Aushole kept saying wait and see, he will be vindicated by the US regulatory system
>Meanwhile

>>57261291
This image activated a weird fetishistic thinking in my mind as a child. Also congrats on your very successful ETF launch dork.

>>57261291
Who cares about the boomers and their ETFs. Bitcoin was meant for so much more and BSV is realizing its true potential. Fuck off with your talk of price and your hopes of someone else pumping your bags. You've all become slaves to the dollar.

>>57261291
They still think the Blackrock ETF is for BSV. Fucking shit eating morons.

>>57266313
It's not about the ETF, fuck all that, it's about how hilariously ass-blastingly wrong creg and his followers are. How many more weeks? When will we "all see"?

>>57261291
>How come Bitcoin (ticker: BTC) got the ETF approval? Explain this to me in terms of weeks? I don't get it, you were all so STIFF!
Learn to read the small print.

>>57266804
Ah, clearly they're going to switch to the one tr00 Bitcoin, (ticker: BITCOIN), then?

>>57261291
God I wish that were me

>>57267296
If you have the reading comprehension of a 12 year old, you can clearly say they mentioned they can invest in any 'fork'.

Not rocket science...

>>57267363
Yes, I was clearly making fun of you. If *you* had any literacy, then you'd understand that the provision is referring to if the network forks after the ETF is launched. Does creg have a time machine? We're many years past the point where if we were going to get an ETF at all, then his fork (proven in muh courts1!1) would already have won, based on his timeline.

Why would they launch with the BTC ticker, and then backpedal to a literal-who chain? They'd be laughing stocks.
>Generally accepted as Bitcoin
I don't care that they have a "we can disagree" clause in there, nobody "generally considers" or perceives BSV at all, let alone as a serious project

>>57267424
>I don't care that they have a "we can disagree" clause in there, nobody "generally considers" or perceives BSV at all, let alone as a serious project
KEK you're in for a surprise.

>>57261291
bitcoin?
what the hell is that?
people like me only buy cheapos like VINU to slurp every single 2x out of it every month

>>57267524
Can you put that in terms of weeks, like asked in the OP? I need to make sure I have enough popcorn for the supposed happening. Two more weeks? Twenty? Two hundred?