/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57225448
If you're that stupid I hope they do. Lol.

>>57225448
What did you say

They gave to prove that you said something untrue. Did you lie on the review?

>>57225448
Their case is hopeless and will be dismissed.
>but but
No.

>>57225448
Contact the local news station lol, no one can sue you over a fucking bad review, this has been demonstrated countless times.

>>57225448
Man all I want is to obliterate Mexican girls' faces with my cum, but I'm stuck in this god damn all white ethnotown.

OP here, for context some libcuck coffee shop near me had a drag queen story time and i left a review calling them groomers.
They said in a reply that they would sue me if I didn't take down the review, and I thought it was an empty threat.
Well I got served court documents today for defamation. Apparently anything that's a "lie" is legally defamation?? And (((they))) determine the truth??
This is fucked, I don't have money, so what do I even do here? When did we let small business destroy the first amendment???

>>57225602
if this isn't bait, then no shit that's defamation idiot. just take it down and it'll probably go away.

>>57225602
just double down and tell them to go fuck themselves

What's the business OP? I'll leave them a 1 star review right now

>>57225615
I already deleted when I got served.
But what the fuck how is that defamation when I do it but libcucks can call chic-fil-a "homophobic chicken" and nothing ever happens to them?? The double standards in this country is fucking insane.

>>57225602
They can’t do shit op. Call them groomers in court. Trust me.

>>57225602
Enjoy the Soros appointed judge throwing your ass in jail.

>>57225651
Because big corps dont care or dont want bad press for sueing some poor tranny

>>57225651
>I already deleted when I got served.
and you will get thrown in jail for being a spineless pussy

I'm mean what are you even sperging about? you have no money anyway, what can they take from you? leave the contry if you're scared

>>57225602
if you are poor why tf are you living the life of a coward? You have all the power. They can do nothing to you. Its not like they will send you to prison. Just stop giving a fuck.

>>57225651
>>57225675
yep what the other person said. I doubt it goes anywhere. They would need to prove they have significant losses from the fact to recover anything I imagine. You might consider paying a lawyer for an hour of their time just to consult with and make sure because I'm sure as hell not a lawyer.

You're a dumb motherfucker btw

>>57225602
Quadruple down if you have to, don't let the groomers win.

>>57225718
this
/thread

>>57225651
>I already deleted when I got served.
you lost then
write it again

>>57225602
This is actually insane how they can just steal from you for calling them a name

>>57225448

call up your insurance and see if they'll pay it out for you

>>57225645
still waiting on this OP. if you were smart you could post pics of the drag queen story time on /b/ and get them raid the review site. what are they gonna do, sue all the anons? lol

OP is full of shit. Gives us the link to their biz or GTFO.
Also

>>57225715
They got significant backlash from a lot of people so I do think they will try to pin their major losses on me

When I say I don't have "lawyer money" i mean I don't have anything liquid. So I can cash out some crypto for one, but it would be at a loss.

I am aware I'm dumb for believing that free speech still existed.

>>57225602
How did they even manage to serve you? The jeets at google would never lift a finger

Don't know why my trip keeps changing, but no I'm not gonna post any identifying information
I'm not gonna feed the fire, I was really hoping someone would tell me its just a scam, but this trash is real. Fuck this gay ass country.

>>57225896
then you are a pussy and will get what you deserve

sage

>>57225651
>I already deleted when I got served.
Thays an admission of guilt
disclaimer: I have no background on law and no client what I'm talking about

>>57225602
Just write more bad reviews of them, never answer a single thing and never take responsibility for anything

>>57225947
I also have fat retarded fingers LMAO

they can't do shit to you for sharing your fucking OPINION on their event programming. I'm sure you're hardly stating it as FACT that they are grooming children. tell them to go fuck themselves, and to eat a dick while they're at it

>>57226001
My friend got sued a few years ago for leaving a bad review on a business. It was a 2-3 year thing that eventually his insurance just paid out for him and he had to write an apology to the owner. Different circumstances because the guy isn't poor and his insurance covered it for him but at least accept that this stuff does happen lol

>>57225854
Sounds like they have a pretty decent case for defamation. They could get a judgement for damages potentially. I think paying a lawyer is worth it

>>57225602
Name of the coffee shop? I'll call them groomers too

>>57225602
Post the name of the business for the lols.
They can't sue all of us.

>>57225448
You are leaving out some information like the cunt you are. There's no way they are suing for the one star. I bet you write mean shit.
And there it is >>57225602. I seriously hope they sue your ass, not because I disagree with your opinions (which are based), but because how much of a dense moron you are. Why would you EVER show your power level right next to your personal information?

>>57225896
Change your mindset. This could be a fun little excursion for you. This is still America and you can say whatever you want and that includes having any opinion. Just don't cuss in the courtroom.
Like the other anon said
They have to PROVE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that your little post caused significant damage. The fact that other people hate them doesn't mean they can pin it all on you.

Next time make an alt account though and save yourself the trouble.

>>57225602
Then don't call them groomers and say specifically what they did (have drag queen story time with toddlers or whatever age it was) and say this exposes kids to sexuality at a young age when sexuality of any kind was not permitted with kids 20+ years back and let people form their own conclusions based on their actions.

No joke, an Airbnb guest threatened to sue me for leaving him a bad review.
I just laughed it off and reported his ass.
But if OP lives in 'murica he should be worried, there's a high chance they'll wreck him in court

>>57225448
Female lawyer. What did you expect?

>In some situations, opinions and hyperbole (unbelievably outrageous speech) are protected, and the speaker would not be at risk for libel.
I find it hard to believe they think they can sue you for obvious hyperbole. They don't have a case, and you shouldn't delete your comment.

>>57225448

>>57227018
Depends on jurisdiction, but if you are caught saying something untrue about someone which would hurt their reputation in front of a large audience, that can be a problem.

>>57225475
fpbp
this idiot might go to jail

>>57225602
>using your real name

Retard or fake and homo

>>57225782
This I am waiting with 7 accounts to leave horrible reviews. I hope I make one of em rope.

>call a bunch of gay faggots groomers like they are
>THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO SUE YOU. ENJOY JAIL.
just turn up in court and laugh like this dude did.

>>57225602
Cuckservatards on suicide watch
HAHAHAHAHAAH
Dude watched too much tuckler carlson

Convert to Islam and represent yourself they can’t touch you

>>57227136
lawyer on the right passed away.
https://www.criminal-lawyers.com.au/blog/doogue-george-criminal-defence-lawyers/joshua-william-taaffe

>>57225782
based

>>57227387
Vax status?

>>57226331
do it OP. we will make them regret their faggotry

>>57227540
Unvaxxed. You?

>>57227589
Uncut & unvaxxed
But I meant the lawyer who died of "natural causes" at age 44

>>57225602
>>57225448
Bro you're supposed to use a VPN when you leave the review using an encrypted e-mail provider account that you made while on the VPN.

>>57227678
Most likely vaxxed.
You couldn't enter a court or a prison in Melbourne without 3 vaccines.

This thread is a larp until OP posts the coffee shop

>>57225651
You know exactly why. Enjoy the decline.

>>57225602
That's what you get for being a conservacuck LMAO

>>57225602
You need to sacrifice your livelihood for the greater good goy. Fight this all the way even if they throw you in the slammer forever! Your family will understand (or else they're not white)

>>57225602
LMAO chuds literally cannot stop losing

>>57225602
Retard /pol/brain LMAO get fukt

>>57225602

>>57225602
legally defamation means the burden is on them to prove you caused financial losses to their business
its very, very difficult for a plaintiff to win a defamation case

>>57225448

Lol this is hilarious.

My brother is an attorney so let me offer a little advice.

For starters their case is ridiculous. For them to have a monetary claim against you they have to PROVE to a courtroom that your comment caused them to lose money, which is nearly impossible. So 99% the case is going to get thrown out on day one.

You don't have to have a lawyer but it does not make you look good to not have one. Did they get one? It's possible they just sued you in small claims.

Lawyer or no, just go to court on the date, explain the situation and it will get thrown out.

There is another possibility, assuming your case isn't some tarp, find a conservative lawyer in the area and see if he will take the case for the publicity. That's very possible since I could see this case getting state news, and possibly even national.

The way game works is this...You can sue anyone for pretty much anything. If they play the game right they can shred you financially because of their relative worth. If they play it wrong, they'll set themselves up for a counter lawsuit where you can force them pay your attorney fees. Most of them will not play it wrong. So if you have $10,000 to your name and I have $1,000,000 to mine a $300/billable hour attorney is nothing to me. To you, it is pain. So I can use the legal system to essentially put your in a headlock and force you to submit. This is why really savvy wealthy people are skittish around litigious people, especially wealthy litigious people. No one wants to really play that game because it becomes a massively wealth destroying pissing contest. You are in the cross hairs and they have forced your hand. You either take down the review or start looking for an attorney of your own.

>>57225448
I nearly got sued by KFC for writing "Colonel Sanders' chickinz pecked me on the balls!" but the negro judge pointed out that this is a complement. Lucky me because otherwise I would have got 2 years.

>>57226331
I'm game for this do it OP dont be a faggot

>>57229282
>sued
>facing jail time
Retarded larp civil courts don’t hand out jail sentences.

Anyways op ignore the seething reddit trannies in this thread. Send this to fox news, trump, musk, desantis, or any other lower level player like Charlie Kirk. Then share the business here too

>>57225571
Careful, it only takes a single sperm in a 10-foot radius to impregnate one...

>>57225953
This and I would also start vandalizing the business at night in Minecraft.

No one would ever fuck with me like this though because they don’t know what a psycho like me might do.

>>57229445
That’s Indian people lmfao

>>57229597
Yeah, but the Mexicans have it too

>>57225448


How the fuck are they tracking you down from a google review this must be bait

>>57225571
Damn right

>>57229787
> he doesn't accuse people of being pedophiles online using his full legal name and date of birth as his username
Never gonna make it kid

>Retarded fake thread
>1PBTID
I hope you're given a beating

>>57226027
What kind of Fukien I surance pays out if you get sued for defamation, lmao ,

>>57226300
Based anon, ape together strong

>>57226331
Bazed

>>57225602
Anon, its really easy for you in court to prove someone else used your computer to post it, or you can just bring your little cousin to that coffee shop and make him pretend to say they are hitting on him or something haha

>>57226447
Proof beyond reasonable doubt only applies to criminal cases, not civil disputes. In a lawsuit all you have to show is evidence. It's up to the defendant to refute it.