[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 257 KB, 1077x1794, Screenshot_20240103_144426_X.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57170515 No.57170515 [Reply] [Original]

HOLY FUUUUUCK

>> No.57170549

nope, this has been debunked multiple times, it's a different CCIP, not chainlinks

>> No.57170569

>>57170515
holy fuck interdimensional lizard psychics frontran his post with this -10% dump just to lessen its impact they REALLY DO NOT want chainlink to win

>> No.57170658

>>57170515
Get Vitalik on ze line!
/Bogged

>> No.57170816

>>57170515
Vitalik shilling is ultra bearish, ask Kleros fags, UNI fags or Truebit fags.

>> No.57170822

>>57170549
pool's closed

>> No.57170852

>>57170515
It's CCIP-read for ENS you braindead piece of shit.

>> No.57170916

>>57170852
>CCIP-read
which is what? Which is what? huh i cant hear you?

>> No.57170944

>-12.3%

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>> No.57170991
File: 82 KB, 2297x658, 1672951285821388.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57170991

>>57170549
>>57170852
It literally is Chainlink's CCIP, anons.

>> No.57171019

>>57170991
then why ens +20% meanwhile link -14%

>> No.57171035

>>57170991
You linktards really are low iq subhumans aren't you?

>> No.57171053

>>57170515

Meme skeleton shills a meme scam

What else is new?

>> No.57171113

>>57171035
cope

>> No.57172413
File: 45 KB, 487x458, 1614543234156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57172413

>>57170852
>>57171035

>> No.57172428

>>57170515
Delusional linktards will literally see him shilling ENS and ignore it. ENS is up 30% today btw.

>> No.57173783

>>57170515
ENS +40%
LINK -13,87%

>> No.57174472

>>57171035
Why do you say that? It looks like he proved his point to me--just curious why you'd blow off his evidence.

>> No.57175523

>>57173783
kek if options were allowed I would’ve made millions buying puts on link. It’s that easy. Sergey is such a greedy shithead

>> No.57175883

>>57174472
because the pool is closed is why.

>> No.57175891
File: 72 KB, 366x807, pool's closed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57175891

>>57175883

>> No.57175900

Fuck me imagine being a fudsister today after reading this lolol -you can imagine them groaning, going "oh shit, what now?" before reluctantly but dutifully thinking of some desperate, halfassed response. This thread is wonderful to witness. Thanks, OP. I'll fetch the popcorn...

>> No.57175906

>>57170515
Vitalik has also shilled Kleros in the past and look where that’s gotten it. His word doesn’t mean shit.

>> No.57175913

Vitalik bends the knee - 3rd Jan 2024
You love to see it, boys
Perfetto

>> No.57175917

>>57170991
>Oct 22 2021

Fkn kek

>> No.57175953

>>57175906
im all in on link. since 2017. but sadly this, no one pays attention to what vitalik says anymore which makes this all the more bearish.

>> No.57176029
File: 53 KB, 500x682, 1586230069070.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57176029

>>57170515
ICP is bein shilled everywhere everytime, its so fucking insane that even there are ICP shillings on Beoble.
And its beta testing isnt over yet.
Quite interested on the ammount of money those fucking devs are actually putting behind this massive spam

>> No.57176072

Reminder that Chainlink CCIP is not what Vitalik is talking about. CCIP is a standard that allows for querying of off chain data. Chainlink CCIP "cross chain interoperability protocol" is a bridge. Not what Vitalik is referring to.

https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668

>> No.57176218

>>57176072
>not what Vitalik is talking about
Oh really? So what IS he talking about? What does 'CCIP' stand for, in this context, and where can i see more info about it? The link you posted doesn't even define what CCIP in fact is. I think it's pretty obvious what it is but I'll happily stand corrected, if you can show some evidence.

>> No.57176223

>>57176029
>>57176029
ALL ORGANIC SIR.

>> No.57176228

>>57176218
If he was talking about chainlink it would affect the price. Guess which coin pumped after this announcement? ENS or Link?

>> No.57176237

Because chainlink is the only ccip relay available.

You are literally obsessed.

>> No.57176240

>>57170816
this is what you get when a pedophile shitcoin developer recommends your trash.

>> No.57176254
File: 945 KB, 1400x1750, 1601238950192340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57176254

>>57176029
CCIP*.

And, I mean, it *is* their only project nowadays, considering nobody uses oracle tech anymore. Understandable they'd want to put the word out there I guess lol

>> No.57176277

>>57176218
Anon, it's obvious you're larping as a retarded baggie. Try harder next time.

>> No.57176291
File: 15 KB, 453x470, 1601238560134905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57176291

>>57171053
lmaoa this. it's kinda pathetic really. chainlink coverage is so shallow they'll drink any drop they can lol

>> No.57176296

>>57176029
>>57176254
Beoble is for apefucks anyway, normal to see them rallying on stupid shit like this.

>> No.57176305

>>57176072
This. Turns out linkcels are complete npc midwits.

>> No.57176318

>>57176029
IT's CCIP YOU DUMBFUCK

>> No.57176333
File: 96 KB, 1180x594, ccip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57176333

>>57176277
Kek, never mind, I found it in the Github
Seethe n cope kek

>> No.57176541

>>57176333
Trips of truth and fuddies eternally transitioned.

>> No.57176577

White linkie fragility in this thread

>> No.57176581

>>57170515
maybe it's just a typo?

>> No.57176583

>>57176541
They certainly went quiet, didn't they? kek they're so shit at this. it's too easy nowadays

>> No.57176586

>>57176029
marketing doesn't even exist for icp
lmao

>> No.57176629

>>57170515
there you have it. for L2s to have any use chainlink is required. for a successful internet of contracts, chainlink is crucial.

>> No.57176630

>>57176333
>>57176541
Here's an ENS dev confirming they're different.

https://twitter.com/AlexSlobodnik/status/1672223313546887168

>> No.57176693

>>57176630l
lolol keep going this is fun to watch. also, can you tell me what CCIP stands for, in your 'nothing-to-do-with-chainlink' ccip? You keep forgetting to tell me and i'm simply desperate to find out. Obviously it's an acronym of some sort, but what could it possibly stand for? Oh, do please tell us?
Am waiting patiently for your answer.

>> No.57176742

>>57176333
idk im still not convinced
which chainlink is this referring to? there are many chains that link

>> No.57176772

Chainlink was a thing that already happened, cucks. It's mc is billions. You're no better than shibbaggies at this point.

>> No.57176824

>>57170515
fake

>> No.57176945
File: 57 KB, 825x400, wemix unagi ccip launch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57176945

>>57176072
EIP-3668 was called 'Durin' until ENS got a grant from Chainlink in October 2021. Then the name changed to CCIP-Read.

https://web.archive.org/web/20211201194203/https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668

>> No.57176957

>token pumps
>they sell
Doesn't matter
Nothing matters
Buy a token that's liquidated six years from now, not once a month forever.

>> No.57177002

>>57176945
Pic suggests ccip this month?

>> No.57177114

>>57176742
lol ikr?
>>57177002
let's hope so!

>> No.57177614
File: 2.87 MB, 3000x1926, wheres sergey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57177614

>>57177002
Maybe private/whitelisted access only but it's a real CCIP app and it's substantial. Quite a lot of WEMIX traffic on the CCIP explorer since December.

>> No.57177656

>>57176945
OH YEAH HUH? HUH???

WHAT ABOUT THE LPL X ENS PARTNERSHIP THAT WAS CONFIRMED ALREADY

LPL POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

>> No.57179232

>>57177656
rim hors jon
the lpls close
uh huh yeh
u dint buy
wot abot it
jon hors rug

>> No.57179542

Chainlink's CCIP is meh, don't know why y'all keep bringing it up. For me, it's gotta be Enigma's CCIP for privacy and Request Network's CCIP for speed and ease of use.

>> No.57179682

>>57170515
He's a real visionary, dude. He was just chatting about account abstraction. I'm totally backing projects pushing that now—I could rake in millions. Props to Brillionfi and Forum for taking the lead here.

>> No.57179691

And yet he didn’t mention chainlink so the normies won’t even know ahahahha

>> No.57179705

Holy shit this is so bullish for Cucklink I’m gonna check the price and see if anything’s happening
>oh it’s still hovering 14.25 like it has for 3 months

>> No.57179990

>>57176945
>https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668
it says nothing about token usage, kek baggie

>> No.57180249

>>57176945
Excellent find.
Here's the current version of that archived page: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668
They simply swapped Durin for CCIP read after that 2021 grant.

>>57175917
See above in this post.

>> No.57180319

>>57176945
based
fuddies utterly btfo as usual
vitalik bows down to sergey

>> No.57180468

>>57179990
Stop being retarded on purpose

>> No.57180480

Chick gave me a rimjob tonite

>> No.57180487

>>57180480
Post pics

>> No.57181540

>>57170515
bulliush

>> No.57181746

>>57180480
rimrug jonhorse
seepe n cothe
lpools close
captha w0tabt

>> No.57181761

>>57170515
>ctrl+f chainlink
>0 results

>> No.57182049

>>57180249
Why did chainlink give them a grant though? Something tells me they didnt do it for fun

>> No.57182051

here's the thing...the chart

>> No.57182076

>>57182049
So? They have billions upon billions of free investor dollars to do as they please with no legal restriction. They give out grants to random Africans at coding events. One of the execs also just took a leave of absence (sponsored by investor donations) to write the cringiest novel of all time.

>> No.57182090

>>57170991
This takes me back to the old days of LINK shilling. Where anons would ctrl+f for the word “link” and use it as proof of chainlink support.

>> No.57182102

>>57182076
>One of the execs also just took a leave of absence (sponsored by investor donations) to write the cringiest novel of all time.
source

>> No.57182106

>>57182049
>Why did chainlink give them a grant though?
Both parties mutually benefit.

>>57182090
le mao, are you saying the Chainlink grant recipient is a different Nick Johnson from a different ENS?

>> No.57182845

>>57170515
He arranged the letters wrong, should be ICP

>> No.57183040

it's all so tiresome

>> No.57183048

>>57183040
How so?
We have Vitalik literally urging "all L2s" to adopt CCIP.

>> No.57183791

>>57182090
>Ctrl+f LINK
>35 results found
Got u bae

>> No.57183866

>>57182090
It started the other way around. It used to be:

>ctrl + f LINK
>0 results found
>yawn

On every fucking webpage or document that was obviously (or not so obviously) talking about LINK.

Honerable mention to the guy that used to spam:

>Mainnet out for 3 months, 0 active users
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>> No.57184741

>>57170816
True sir, my village is very dead very poor!

>> No.57184842

>>57182102
https://twitter.com/AriJuels/status/1742597034748567983

your donations paid for this

>> No.57184941

>>57184842
adem your thread didn't gain any attention so now you're trying to take over this one how fucking pathetic are you (don't answer everyone already knows you're a crippling porn addict with no friends lmao)

>> No.57184983

>>57170515
and guess who has early CCIP mainnet access on all available chains, that's right... SOLID

>> No.57184991

>>57184983
And Vitaliks mom likes us

>> No.57185413

>>57184983
>circulating supply: 7 million
>max supply: 100 million
oof

>> No.57185556

>>57170515
A literal pedophile shilling something which has a C and P in it's name what a surprise.

>> No.57185622

>>57184983
Is it unusual that the only ERC20 tokens I've ever bought are LINK in 2017 and SOLID? I'm still stacking both, I'm just wondering if it's strange that I just keep winning yet most keep losing?

>> No.57185653

I'm so confused. So ENS is creating something called CCIP-Read, which shares the same name as Chainlink's CCIP, was funded by Chainlink, and also references Chainlink's CCIP in its code, but it has nothing to do with Chainlink's CCIP?

>> No.57185828

>>57185653
The fuck

>> No.57186067

>>57185653
Yes, the black swan project created by none other than Chad O'Rourke himself, Jason Parser's arch enemy. Cups of coffee will never be the same.

>> No.57186199

>>57182106
who is le mao?

I remember when Hudson Jameson cancelled Nick Johnson because he posted some anti-trans stuff on tik tok or something and people said it was because the ETH "people" didn't like ENS working with Chainlink

>> No.57186349

>>57186067
>Cups of coffee will never be the same
They are in the shadow fork

>> No.57186368
File: 31 KB, 751x307, vitalik blog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57186368

>>57170515
https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/12/28/cypherpunk.html

>> No.57186433
File: 638 KB, 595x594, nowotny.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57186433

>>57184983
I thought Krypton was the one true CCIP dex.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrk7PGjMYNg

>> No.57186567
File: 260 KB, 750x500, 1691570875241219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57186567

>>57185653
>>57181761
>>57180249
>>57176945
>>57176742
>>57176333
>>57176072
>>57172428
>>57170852
Let me be real fucking clear to you fucking idiots.
ITS CHAINLINK.
It's almost as if none of you can just google and read a fucking blogpost for 2 minutes.
https://blog.chain.link/ens-grant-for-ccip-read-development/
>In addition to supporting the development of CCIP, this grant will help fund ENS development. ENS will integrate CCIP into their project to support the issuance of on-chain domains on layer-2 networks. Supported by CCIP’s generalized cross-chain message-passing capability and Chainlink’s broad support for a large number of widely used layer-2 networks, ENS will be able to expand support for more scalable on-chain environments. This will enable ENS users to create and manage domain names on layer-2 networks at a much lower cost compared to the same activity on Ethereum, all while staying in sync with core ENS smart contracts on the Ethereum network.

>Vitalik: All L2s should be working on CCIP resolvers... ENS is super-important, it needs to be affordable!
>Blogpost: This will enable ENS users to create and manage domain names on layer-2 networks at a much lower cost...

>> No.57186717

>>57185653
Ergo lead developer and the original owner of smartcontract.com website is also developing his own CCIP that has nothing to do with either ens or chainlink kek
https://x.com/chepurnoy/status/1739297802126049342

This is the same guy that said Sergey wanted to make a vc exit with link (kushti)

>> No.57186730

>>57186567
>Let me be real fucking clear to you fucking idiots. ITS CHAINLINK
Nope, the team already confirmed its not related to chainlink in discord

>> No.57186781

>>57186730
Thanks for clearing that up. Just sold 100k

>> No.57186953
File: 50 KB, 1028x196, 169157806591319.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57186953

>>57186730
The absolute state of fudfucks. Literally denying reality.

>> No.57186959
File: 1.47 MB, 3844x1080, CCIPread.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57186959

>>57186730
>>57186953

>> No.57186982

>>57186959
This. Chainlink CCIP confirmed. Even Vitalik saying so. And someone called Nick Johnson. Strap up.

>> No.57187118

>>57186953
lol ok your getting desperate and thats funny after years of shitting up the board ur aboutta miss another run hehe

The chainlink team literally confirmed it has nothing to do with chainlink’s ccip.

Pools closed chuddie kiddo haha

>> No.57187123

>>57185653
Stop asking questions! CHART!

>> No.57187198

Everyone in this thread owns chainlink

>> No.57187208

>>57186567
The da fuck?

>> No.57187264
File: 498 KB, 1082x695, 3d73b957eafab3448c4d8e64d40f3245.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57187264

this is the year brothers, i can feel it
>interest rates dropping
>halvening
>etf approval
>ccip general access
>vitalik shilling ccip
>ccip institutional usage

it has begun

>> No.57187285

>>57187264
2 more weeks
check em

>> No.57187298

>>57170515
lmao globalist puppet

>> No.57187301

>inferior ccip to ICP
>inferior staking to ICP
>inferior tech to ICP, does not require chainshit oracles
>ICP explicitly shilled by eth skeleton man
Kek link baggies

>> No.57187366

>>57187301
Just buy link ok? 2 more weeks then 1k eoy

>> No.57187400

>>57187118
Ignore him bro he's a seething no LPL pooler

Based LPL chuddie kiddo how you doing based LPL chuddie kiddo pools closed awww miss out ha ha sucks to be (you) cuck!

>> No.57187494

>>57187400
Checked based and LPL pilled kek wills it!

>> No.57187812

>>57175891
kek. saving this

>> No.57188801

>>57170515
the token that does CCIP best is certainly ICP, why use Link or any other token when ICP does everything they do better? Not only is ICP on the cutting edge of CCI it does so much more than any other token by doing a majority of what it does ON CHAIN

>> No.57189160

>>57187400
>>57187494
whataboutism
pooles coped
shoulda bought [REDACTED]