/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57122334
just don't invest in it then.

>>57122334
Yes, there is evidence - ample evidence. Any other questions?

>>57122334

>>57122334
you're right, link is shit and doomed to dump to 0
rationally you, and all your ilk, should market sell immediately

>>57122520
T Systems has less link than the average 2018 holder. Rather fucking embarrassing for an "enterprise" dontcha think?

>>57122428
There is none. Otherwise you would have posted it. Dumb fuck

>>57122616
>There is none.
I just posted some: >>57122520

>>57122334
Expecting corporations to pay rent to access an price feed for dogcoins is delusional. Any asset or commodity with actual worth and volume is being actively tracked and arb'd by every trading house on the planet by their own hardware. Also, your cult sucks and doesn't produce anything for anyone. Never has and never will.

>>57122616
I also like to move goalposts when I look like a complete retard

>>57122616
Why would I bother proving something to you that is and has been readily available for the general public? You're simply a retarded fool, sopping up the putrid memes of OG's from years long past. You are owed nothing, and you will receive nothing. The hellish reality of your life is self imposed, as is your loneliness and bitter disposition. I'm afraid you will die alone, in poor health and having never accomplished any of your potential - but you can turn it around at any moment! I'll be praying for you.

>>57122778
if you are dead, your health is poor by definition. it is therefore impossible to die in good health

>>57122642
I just refuted your post as insignificant. Call me when an enterprise has more than a fucking suicide stack you dumb cunt.

>>57122724
I haven't moved any goalposts you fucking retard.

>>57122778
You're a schitzo. a genuine 100% schitzo. There is no fucking proof of any enterprise using chainlink in any significant capacity whatsoever. That gook from hong kong... what's he using chainlink for right now? When did he last slurp up a bag of link like the average dick sucking marine? You're all fucking idiots.

>>57123356
>no enterprise is using chainlink
>posts evidence that they are
>nooo that doesn’t count
Lmao

>>57122334
i just popped sum gummies while im flickin on my blicky YUH

Everyone should be asking what happened to the 3+ billion dollars sergey got from all the dumps and why he was still dumping at $5, is he not bullish on his own project?
Also why is he dumping now and killing any upward momentum. To me it seems like hes simply frontrunning the nothingburger that is his grifting company.
Its a race against time to dump all the tokens before everyone finds out its all just been smoke and mirrors. He didnt develop anything its just vaporware

>>57124258
/thread

I still contend he lost a shitton on Celsius. CL was listed as a creditor on the bankruptcy filing

>>57123652
>Dead cell phone company chucks a quarter in a wishing well

Surely you you have a better example

>>57122778
Let the dead worry about that
>>57123356
There is significant prove of many enterprise institutions actively using a walled-garden version of CCIP, you just do not wish to see it. I will pray for you, against your wishes - you can thank me later, via prayer. Praise the LORD!

>>57124350
>4 billion in revenue
>dead cell phone company
ah yes, the gaslighting continues

>>57124258
It's strange how retards think bootstrapping the future's underlying trustless architecture should cost nothing

>>57122616
>is there any evidence?
yes T Systems
>T Systems don't hold much LINK

lmao the old goalpost shuffler hahahahaha

>>57124410
They have 15 fucking link tokens. how is this bullish? They are in the business to sell their data, they don't give a fuck about earning or pumping link

>>57124698
Pools closed, kid. Why ya here again?

>>57124608
It's just lazy fud for newfags and redditors. Link has been inflated less than plenty of other major coins the last few years, but it's the only one they ever mention in that regard.

>>57124776
Wtf is sergey doing with billions and billions? It doesn't cost that much to make an oracle, its just some software and the code is so small. I can make a keepers contract in 15 lines of code bro like how the fuck is that worth billions. SERGEY SELLS MORE THAN ANY OTHER TOP 10 PROJECT

>>57123652
Desu. Kekfudders are embarrassing

>>57124853
Why are you still talking?

>>57124853
Idk bro, maybe it's because they are subsidizing a project they aim to make decentralized by eventually unloading all of their supply to achieve this result as explained many times before. But there's no need to explain much of this at all, because most of these posters in this thread are one person replying to themselves. No linkers, stay mad. Lol!!!

>brainlet fud thread filled with 1pbtids with the same writing style again
wow really subtle samefagging fud-kun
no wonder the pool never filled u- oh wait it filled in 5 hours after you spent several thousand doing this kind of thing
RIP

>>57125779
Best part is as soon as a good argument or point is made the thread is abandoned and a new one is made simultaneously. Has been going on at least a year close to 2 with the same shit, really makes you wonder

sorry FAGGOT never unstaking I am going to live off staking rewards

POOL'S CLOSED

>Not one paying enterprise customer named itt
>B-but T-Systems!

T-Systems has pocket change staked as a node operator, they're not PAYING for anything. Next! Show me a list of enterprises using Chainlink. Datadog? Crowdstrike? Salesforce? Real fucking enterprises with money paying for Chainlink services. Not one well paid twitter fag can answer this question.

>>57124669
>the janitor at google buys $5 of dog coins
>dude google backs my shitcoin!!!

Can you bros give a better example of enterprise buy in or no…its perfectly ok to admit there isnt one, just be honest

>>57124776
Yeah but other coins didnt cuck holders nearly as much. Cue the the 2020 to now pasta. Before you spazz out, yes link was a great pick pre ‘20, but after horrible opp cost wise

>>57124853
Why can no one answer this? All these vague answers about muhhh infrastructure, yet theres no users and no product. Where does all the money go…what are they paying for and how much? Give some specific numbers. Remember, TRUTH > TRUST

>>57125892
Can you provide some links to the “good argument” threads?

>>57126113
Idk maybe start with responding to my other post in this thread you glazed over intentionally

>>57126057
>>57126075
>>57126100
>>57126113

Mental Illness. You don't like LINK? I have an idea. Go outside? Don't open LINK threads? Don't create LINK threads and spend your life fudding LINK that anyone with above 75 IQ can see through?

LINK $500 2024.

avocados on suicide watch again

>>57126057
>there are no examples
>no that doesn’t count, give a better example
He’s on the run, lmao

>>57126331
Im prob outside more than you. I have a tan in december

>spend your life
Projection. You’re having revulsions over someone discussing crypto on a crypto forum. Maybe you could have 4chan build you a separate safespace subreddit

>75 iq
Just a heads up, Ive never heard an extremeley bright person mention iq in real life. My work involves the top % net worth…you never hear it. You should take your own advice and go interact w people outside

>$500 2024
Thats fantasy. If I had empathy Id feel bad for you, but I dont

Psa to anyone new — never marry your investment

>>57126513
Oh yes.. an IQ means nothing individual.

Nigger.

>>57126499
No one is on the run. Reality shouldnt bother you. A man is able to weigh the evidence for and against, no feelings.

So Ill ask again, do you have any other examples? Its ok if the answer is no, just say it like a man

>>57126519
My comment went over your head

>>57126549
I hold more LINK than you.

>>57126538
OP question was
>is there one shred of evidence
A shred has been provided. Everyone is satisfied, except for you, who is absolutely furious, for some reason.

>>57122334
GLINK

>>57126285
Ahh yes the old vague subsidizing le “future”, whatever that means. If someone raises $3B to build a highway and as we’re closing in on a decade all we have his pictures of a theoretical model of what they might build, I’m a little skeptical, but thats just me. But anyways back to the thread topic, just go ahead and point to some examples of enterprise buy in.

>>57126513
>never marry your investment
How about that 2004 investment in Amazon. Probably should have married that one.

>>57126558
>furious
Quite the contrary. I enjoy debating. Not everyone has low t

The rest of your post I agree with. Sadly tho that shred is all that exists, which is incongruent with the picture painted by the team and community

>>57126620
There’s no debate. Shred requested, shred provided. Followed by 20 posts of your hysterics as you desperately try to reset the goalposts.

>>57126582
Subsidizing the future wasn't even the point I was making, but sure let's bring that up as well because you're bright enough to know the talking point after conversing in telegram and waiting to respond until someone can tell you what to say, or they showed you the flow chart. But there wouldn't ever be anything that would make you see any other conclusion, save for I fucked your mom last night and she squirted all over me, hence lil bros angst. I definitely wore a condor because it was a questionable hole. You deal with the top percentage of pajeets on shitstreet where you gamble on whether the poo will be yellow or brown, not very impressive when you compare it to outside of your sphere (the ganges river). You're working pretty hard for your 10 daily rupees jaydeep, i respect that. It makes sense you don't have the reading comprehension to understand I'm referring to creating a protocol that is actually decentralized. It doesn't need much subsidization to take off, but for it to stay at the forefront of usage, just as it would be wise to invest in plumbing in your country so your gut flora wasnt composed of your peers feces. Measuring intelligence doesn't matter, because regardless you simply cannot understand the implications of the framework being laid for the next industrial revolution. The subsidization of the network is just icing on the cake, to bring innovation faster (build projects). You can speculate on the "skyscraper" but I'm telling you, on the off chance you're sincere, you probably belong in the other midwit threads like gamestop, precious metals, or xrp

>>57126620
>the team
Cringe max. only fudders use this term when talking about Chainlink. Mind you, most of the fud is likely posted by this imbecile

>>57126746
so you're telling me chainlink is no better than gamestop or xrp?

>>57126834
kill yourself, fucking subhuman

>>57126834
Idk brother, you're either a midwit normie, as ive been around and irl the vast majority of actually room temp iq ""invest"" in the aforementioned precious metals, xrp, or gme/bedbath. Or the same guy with a different ID. Precious metals is the only thing maybe closer to normal iq but it's still a boomer rock. Regardless I must have hit the nail on the head somewhere in the last post. It's not like you'd come clean, not just because the water you bathe in is the same water you shit in, but because you're retarded and I'm right

>>57122616
>Rather fucking embarrassing for an "enterprise" dontcha think?
Yes it is, they still don't fully get it I assume.

>>57127973
Who’s they?

Wait why again do linkies cheer on the people scamming them? This board is so weird

>>57122616
>>57124258
>>57122334
>>57124316
>>57126010
Anons, you're right. You've exposed Chainlink Labs and its advocates. Well done.
Now, I think it's time we all ditched Link and stopped spamming this dead board with these threads.
Whoever left holding Link is either paid to do so or mentally unstable.
It really is time that we finally abandon this shitcoin and move on. Imagine the possibilities if we put our minds and efforts to look for the next 1000x?

>>57126513
>I have a tan in december
That's called being a paki cunt.

>>57126555
Sold my LINK for PYTH and other half for SUPRA sale. Still very low.

>>57122616
>>57123356
>T Systems has less link than the average 2018 holder
T-Systems has made over $3 million in Link since they started running nodes.

Plus, you said "in any capacity", so you're moving the goalposts regardless.

>>57129714
>$3million revenue in almost 4 years
LMAO

>>57129724
the average gas station has higher annual revenue than that kek

>provide one shred of evidence that a traditional enterprise is using LINK in any capacity
>this node run by a traditional enterprise made $3 million in LINK running a node
>HAH $3 million is not very much
look at the fuddies squirm as if they are being burned lmao look at them shriek and wriggle and hiss

>>57129724
>>57129770
Turbocope

>>57122778
K

>>57129779
It's literally free money and it's going to grow exponentially

>>57129779
It's 3m in 4 years anon, it's unironically pathetic and if that's the only example of "real world usage of the token" your fellow sisters can come up with I got pretty bad news for you

if chainlink is so special then why does it have such dogshit price action. it may be needed but its not wanted


ETH, AVAX, SOLANA there is an endless list of ponzis that constantly outperform by 10x multiples

the evidence speaks for itself

>>57130860
OP asked for "one shred of evidence that any traditional enterprises are currently using the LINK token in any capacity".
T-Systems more than meets this criteria, the thread is over. No need to cry about it.