[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 79 KB, 621x640, 3511DE81-72CB-4E05-9A62-64DFBCBBFD1B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57112100 No.57112100 [Reply] [Original]

>link pumps
>Btc shits
Do you STILL not get it?

>> No.57112111

Kys Bitcoin never dumped during the link october gigapump

>> No.57112116

>>57112111
It did multiple times but link just kept pumping

>> No.57112139

BTC moves are more correlated with AVAX eccentric behavior, Pre-Dumping against the market=BTC likely to fall. Pre-Pumping=Alt season soon to commerce

>> No.57112152

>>57112116
You scum are ful of shit, Bitcoin pumped with and after Link

>> No.57112232

Btc was green all day yest. If your theory is that once Link goes up a few %, then btc can never go red again, thats insanely delusional. Btc has red days all the time, as do normal markets.

>> No.57112247

Also why are there alts constantly running 20%+ in a day lately despite what btc is doing? Why is Link so frail and limp while these coins are immune to btc?

>> No.57112258

>>57112247
>>57112232
>>57112152
>>57112139
You need to shut the fuck up if you are too retarded to know anything you stupid retards

>> No.57112271

I woke up knowing BTC shat itself and brought link down with it. I was right. Only 2 possibilities
>It’s Sergey doing this for his masters
>A powerful set of whales hates Chainlink

>> No.57112333
File: 310 KB, 750x948, 1685196662196016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57112333

>>57112111
>Bitcoin never dumped during the link october gigapump
That was the first time in like two years that Bitcoin didn't dump when Link pumped above $9.
And guess what, Link handily broke out after that.

That proves that the only thing keeping Link from successfully breaking $9 during the past years was the fact that Bitcoin dumped every time Link touched $9.
Pic very related.

>> No.57112410

>>57112258
Oh see the little pajeet gets angry when people are not accepting the bullshit hes throwing at them

>> No.57112518
File: 152 KB, 971x1411, 1686913983367202.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57112518

>>57112271
>>A powerful set of whales hates Chainlink
ya think?

>> No.57112536

>>57112333
For what purpose though?

>> No.57112546

>>57112536
See >>57112518

Most likely just to fuck with link, for some reason.

>> No.57112650

>>57112247
Why is no one answering this? Why can other alts run so easily despite what btc does?

>> No.57112708

>>57112650
Because BTC doesn't always dump the second they pump, like it does for Link.

>> No.57112780

>>57112708
Ahhh so it has to be matched up to the second or else it doesnt happen? That sounds reasonable

>> No.57112818

>>57112780
>or else it doesn't happen
Or else what doesn't happen?

>> No.57112836

>>57112100
That's crazy! Can you point me toward the coins that aren't correlated to BTC??? You're clearly a high IQ gigabrain for noticing this!

>> No.57112960

>>57112836
This is BTC being correlated with Link, not the other way around. You moron

>> No.57112995

Either newfags who haven't been around to see any of this manipulation and dismiss it out of reflex or deliberately disingenuous faggots on a payroll.

>> No.57113012

ICP is up 13% on the 24 hr chart. I just checked the hourly, it was in step with btc for a very small dip about ten mins ago. Holy shit does the conspiracy apply to ICP too? And possibly other coins?!?!? We need to look into this further, theres no telling how deep this goes.

>> No.57113057

>>57113012
>We
you can do whatever the fuck you want to, I personally do not give a single fuck about any other crypto

>> No.57113119

>>57112960
That's crazy dude can you explain further? What coins can I invest in that don't dump when BTC goes down?? Please help me!

>> No.57113159

>>57113119
This is about coins where Bitcoin always goes down when the coin goes up

>> No.57113176

>>57113012
>does the conspiracy apply to ICP too?
If it happens every time for ICP, yes.
But it doesn't.

>> No.57113233

>>57112152
Sar, you're indian

>> No.57113311

>>57113012
>Holy shit does the conspiracy apply to ICP too? And possibly other coins?!?!? We need to look into this further, theres no telling how deep this goes.

we've been tracking the btc/link dumps for years retard. it's not something people just made up yesterday it's been a consistent pattern for a very long time. if you see something happen once or twice, maybe it's a quirk, some bad luck. if you see something happen 10 times, maybe you get suspicious. we've seen it happen dozens and dozens of times at this point.

btw i'm not saying it's happened today like OP was, today isn't even a great example of the pattern. we just talk about it a lot because it's happened a lot.

>> No.57113330

>>57113311
symmetrical triple dubs of truth

>> No.57113427

>>57113311
Too bad everyone is too inept to figure out the people doing this (including the team and me)

>> No.57113464

>>57113427
To be fair it would be pretty damn impossible to find out who’s doing this.
Even if the exchanges were willing to publicize the funding wallets behind these dumps, as soon as the dumpers use any kind of obfuscation (e.g. some privacy coin) the trail goes completely dark.

>> No.57113532

>>57113159
The Link Coin has gone up a lot this year sir, I'm trying to understand

>> No.57113617
File: 484 KB, 579x581, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57113617

>>57113464
>To be fair it would be pretty damn impossible to find out who’s doing this.

>> No.57114397

>>57112100
You have a mental disorder called schizophrenia

The world does not revolve around your obscure token

>> No.57114408

>>57112100
correlation doesnt mean causation unless you got some meat with these veggies

>> No.57114606
File: 412 KB, 1363x1524, 1703786534694.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57114606

This "theory" has been disproved already. You retards only think this because you literally only look at chainlink.
All the alts follow bitcoin, but you guys focus on chainlink so in your world view everything revolves around chainlink

>> No.57115262

>>57113311
>consistent pattern
>but it didnt happen this time
>we

Hmm…seems like a flawed theory there bud.

>>57113464
Well the team is the biggest seller so maybe start there

>> No.57115305

>>57114606
This. Link is irrelevant. We’re doing ordinals and ordfi direct on btc (on chain). Who the fuck gives two shits about link anymore. Like, gtfo of my face with this garbage posts.

>> No.57115421

If Linkies believe that the BTC price revolves around manipulating LINK, what other hilariously stupid shit do they believe?

>> No.57115461
File: 288 KB, 1666x1324, 1687525451707076.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57115461

>>57114397
>>57114408
>>57114606
>>57115262
>>57115421
triggered hard

>> No.57115481
File: 112 KB, 250x242, 22231.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57115481

>>57115461

>> No.57115625

>>57115461
>Gamestop, POWER to the players

>> No.57115674

ok Link is back up on the hourly... why isn't btc dumping? Are the conspirators taking a nap or what

>> No.57116358
File: 293 KB, 945x1800, 1621761900891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57116358

>>57112100
posted it yesterday and no one listened, as always

>> No.57116380

>>57115674
It happens when it threatens a major run or when it breaks through previously strong resistance. If it dumped every time Link was green BTC would be dead.
You freaks know this anyway, it's common knowledge and clear as day.

>> No.57116504

>>57116380
So convenient. Link would be over $100 were it not for this retarded conspiracy. But Link's price is also supposed to be driven by something other than retail speculation as a utility token.

>>57115461
How many shitcoin twitter twits are out there? You could pick a random shitcoin's tweet and line it up with BTC's prive movement as well. God biz is so pathetic, why the fuck do I come here.

>> No.57116537

>>57116504
>only link on every major announcement
pull up some other shitcoin, go ahead

>> No.57116581

>>57112100
Dash to trash

>> No.57116703

>>57114606
You should update those charts

>> No.57116901

>>57116380
>major run
Havent seen one since 2020. You seem to call every 3% move a “pump” as if this was a boomer stock

>> No.57116919

>>57116537
>major announcement
Like what, product delays? These are “major” to you because youre stuck in a Gamestop echo chamber. In before muh Swift…yes we knew of testing in 2017