/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56979993
statistically proven not to work anon

you are better off betting small amount on green every time especially on tables where it hasn't hit in a while

>>56980006
it's only red or black retard

>>56980001
I thought it was statistically the most profitable strategy

>>56980006
Whether it's hit or not makes absolutely no difference. Gamblefags are retarded.

>>56980036
most profitable is being good at poker. every thing else is a scam

>>56979993
Yes I did it for a while and made some money, but you have to play playing with a lot for it to work and casinos set min and max bets so probability is still on their side. I hit a losing skid and lost all my winnings quickly.
I recommend doing it in baccarat (bet player) rather than roulette as your odds are closer to a coin flip.
I recommend doing it in short spurts to pay for your food and drink. Don’t expect to make a living off it
Pic related is why it doesn’t work. I bet black so I’m good but this was just an hour ago

>>56980058
You’re saying if it’s black 5 times in a row I shouldn’t go all in on red when it’s obviously going to be red next? Lmfao Not gonna make it.

>>56980084
zzz

>>56980006
I don't know if you are trolling or you truly don't understand how statistics work. Betting on green or a specific number(not color) does not matter. They are both equally likely to occur. The fact that it is green makes you think that since it hasn't hit in a while, means it will hit again. If you chose a random number and painted it yellow, you would feel the same towards that other number.

>>56980104
doesn't know about casino rigging
it must hit green semi regularly or else ops dumb strat would work

>>56979993
>Take 100 bucks
>Ask for a stack of $5 chips
>Spread them all over the inside of the board. Put more money on your favorite number.
>Make sure you put at least one chip between zero and double zero.
I've made thousands doing this. It works 60% of the time.

>>56980257
>60%
my guess is like 49%

>>56979993
I almost lost an entire Bitcoin on Satoshi Dice doing this. Never again. You will lose.

>>56980072
I always wonder, what if you start betting after 5 times black. Is the chance you hit red greater after that or the same? Like the odds that you would actually witness a 15 black streak or something

>>56980342
its exactly the same you idiot this isnt a paradoxical situation like the donkeys behind 3 doors

>>56980342
midwits think your odds get reset after every roll but that's not how the universe works

>>56980036
It's the most profitable assuming infinite funds

>>56980240
okay, if casino rigging is indeed involved then that throws statistics out the window, but my point still stands if there is no rigging. odds of winning are generally 49% and losing 51% which is an enormous advantage over the long run for a casino with a thousands people playing at one single moment.

>>56980367
if and only if you had truly infinite funds, which isn't possible, would it work

>>56980351
>>56980357
Yup I am retarded, luckily I dont gamble

>>56980015
Yes that anon is retarded but so are you
You have to be 18 to post here

It works like 19/20times you go to a casino. Just that 1 time kills your entire bankroll. You’re earning 300 each time then bam you lost 7-8k

>>56980487
not having a go at you
the other anon that thinks getting BBBBB
is the same odds any combination of B&R over five rolls
is a turbo retardo

>>56980563
says the turbo retard. go put your money where your mouth is. any casino on the planet will gladly take your 49% odd bet.

>>56979993
I tried, with every strategy on earth.

Strategies follow patterns, but we're playing with probabilities here. The moment a certain pattern stops you're fucked, like a long streak of blacks if you're doing a martingale by always betting on red red.

The problem with casino games is they're designed to always fuck you since you can't control the risk.

>>56980668
if you dont hit profit at the beginning your fucked

>>56980702
It depends, you need luck to chose the right strategy at the beginning.

>>56980563
It's the same.
RBRBR is not different regarding the odds, so it's equally rare.

Things like monty hall problem on the other hand are for example bs from my point of view too.

Martingale strategy works for crypto desu.

whats a good crypto casino
and are their roulettes legit or even more rigged?
no KYC, simple as

>>56979993
the only difference between the gambler's fallacy and the law of large numbers is perseverance

>>56980001
I can guarantee you it works if you just do it properly.

Here's how to properly do martingale

Set an algorithm where you only start playing after it hits color1 five times. Then start martingale on color2.

Color1 already saturated its probability, so you have huge odds that martingale with color 2 will pay off. It's like card counting in blackjack.

>>56979993
roulette is possible to beat but the casino is not.

>>56979993
i don't gamble

>>56979993
The best strategy is to go all in for black/red and pray.
Martingale or even betting in tinier stakes more reduces your chances significantly, the only thing it does is extend the time it takes for you to lose all of your money.

>>56981970
There is no probability saturation if you really think about it. RBRBR is equally likely. Just like BRBRB or RBBRR or BBRRB, etc

>>56979993
All roulettes are rigged. I've seen them land on one colour 8 times in a row which is statistically extremely improbable, but since it is possible good luck proving they are rigged.
And most of the time they make money from retards who just discovered the Matingale and think they are so smart.

>>56981923
Since the roulette has green as well the law of large numbers works against you. If it had only red and black and you started by losing money with enough plays you could eventually equalise your wins/losses and end up on 0.
Since it has green as well the more you play the more likely you are to reach the state where you win just slightly less than you lose so the more you play the more money you are guaranteed to lose thanks to the LoLN.

>>56982102
if you have seen it land 8 times in a row on the same number then how much time have you spent playing it?

>>56981681
Every play in roulette is a game state reset since the wheel is emptied and respun. The odds are always the same. History doesn't matter.

Monty hall reuses game state, which is why the odds change. The game isn't reset when the door is opened. Your 1/3 odds choice becomes stale when one of the losers are revealed. The easiest way to think about it is by increasing the door count to make the trick obvious. If there were 100 doors and you picked one, it's a 1/100 shot. Now 98 of the goat doors are opened, leaving your initial choice and one other. Do you keep your 1/100 choice? If this is how the game works, and doors are revealed every play, you'll find that changing your choice makes the odds significantly better.

Though if the host is allowed to pick whether to open a door or not, you should stay. This is a good way to troll people who think they're smart.

>>56982344
I like to think about it that every spin you lose 2.70% of what you bet (in European roulette atleast)

>>56982344
Best explanation of the goat door concept I've read. And people say 4chan is full of idiots please

spent hours pouring over yt vids about this and best one i've seen so far is playing fibonacci on the two columns, and one color. best to do this on roulette machines since there are lower mins, less restrictions and rquirements, no BS stress from other players crowding the table.

also:
Many LV strip casinos have 0,00, and Triple 0 (hidden as a brand logo) at their table, but for some weird reason NOT on electronic machines. and el cortez is the only LV casino with single 0. maybe this is the last little opportunity. casinos don't want you betting table min across inside numbers and outside, so they require at least table min on the outside AND separate table min on the inside. but again, that requirement isn't applied with machines. despite all the rules i have won big on table roulette when i was in the zone and got lucky (combination of upping per-number bets, hedging on the outside to recover chips and minimize loss when none of the inside #s hit, etc.) and i have also made some money on the machines. overall though i have lost because i got drunk a lot and most of the time didn't play with clear strat.

>>56980357
>>56980240
>>56980104
back to back green is incredibly rare, but green, no green, and green again hits and i've seen it. or green, no green for 5 spins, then green again. it appears random but again if you're playing tight you should almost never bet green twice back to back. long string of R/B happens all the time but usually caps out at around 8-10 in a row from what i've seen. rarely does it go above 11 in a row. same goes for bacc. you also need to have a large enough bankroll to change bets up and down.

this guy was a dealer for his entire life and then started his own dealer school. his whole life after HS including present-day is focused on roulette and casino games. yet he still thinks that each spin is not completely independent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWDdIt1E2rI

the wheel doesn't have a memory, but reality somehow does.

the same statistical "laws" that say it's possible for one number or color to keep repeating, also supports the "snap back to average" of the streak ending abruptly. hopefully that makes sense. according to stat nerds, the wheel doesn't have memory, each spin is random and indepdent, so it is possible for 8 to repeat five or more times in a row. but that's if you're talking about near-infinite spins. by the third time a number or color hits, you're probably not going to bet too high on those. there's a lot of subtle psychology, self control and bankroll management involved. that's why playing at a table fuckin sucks if you're trying to win big over an hour long. if you want to play to have fun and socialize then the tables or a one-wheel machine is where it's at. but if you want to autistically grind it out you have to play alone at a machine and ignore everyone else, and just try to spot the momentary patterns.

(YES we get it, on a long enough run of thousands or near-infinite spins, there are no fuckin patterns it all averages out).

Holy shit I can't believe this thread is still up.

>>56980563
>>56980583
>>56981681
First of all the point the first guy was trying to make is that BBBBR and BBBBB have the same odds. So betting based on the BBBB makes no sense. Yes there are more combinations of B&R obviously but that's irrelevant.
I honestly can't believe people still try the Martingale system.

Last, you're wrong about Monty Hall. The odds going to 2/3 is true. It's actually very simple to see. You have a 2/3 chance of picking an empty door on your first guess. If you do this, the other empty door gets removed and switching your choice will go from empty door to prize door. All you need to do for this to happen is to pick an empty door, so obviously there is a 2/3 chance of this happening. The other 1/3 chance you'll pick the prize the first time and switch to the remaining empty door.

Remember to sage this thread because it is both off topic and retarded.

>>56983267
>>56982344
everyone still arguing about Monty Hall problem still doesn't address the possibility that the player picked the correct door from the start, and thus switching might fuck him up in the actual real world, even though abstract odds have improved once one goat was revealed and thus he "should" switch. also matters if the gameshow host chooses which door, or if the door is chosen randomly.

>Remember to sage this thread because it is both off topic and retarded.
and yet there are dozens of even worse nonsensical threads.

>>56980342
this is why casinos fucking HATE it when you don't play every spin or hand and sit out often. they fuckin want you as drunk and stupid as possible. a truly pro player would have bet the streak of 5+ blacks, and maybe lost at most once or twice when he attempted to switch. let's say he bets $15 table min on Black and wins 5 times in a row, he's up, and decides to switch to Red, same amount, and loses $15 because it lands on B again. at that point he's still up. he can say "alright it's staying black" and go back to B, or he can sit out, and see how it goes. or he can just not bet on colors. a big psych issue with tables is this nonsensical expectation that you have to play a certain way, or every spin, or with other players. on machines you don't feel that way and are more likely to win. but also machines might be rigged since there's sensors everywhere on the wheel and above. if you think it's 100% rigged or unbeatable then just don't play, or play something else. or go for the food and hookers.

go watch any roulette vids, either live games or some dealer fag with his own wheel, and see how often the same color lands more than 8-10 times. it's possible yes but just incredibly rare. so if you're in a live game and you're not playing colors, but then you suddenly notice that R has hit 8+ times, you are justified in saying, ok this streak is probably going to end and you can make a little from betting black or green. a lucky guy or pro player would already have a sense of when 0/00 are going to hit.

on the two wheel machines, i saw a girl hit 0 and 00 twice, and she bet around $25 or $30 each number, so she walked away up around $1.5K or more, just from focusing on green.

noticing that "green hasn't landed in a long time" is usually helpful. but of course statistically yes it doesn't fuckin matter. but we're talking about live games not sitting in math class.

>>56980342
What you are talking about is called the "gamblers fallacy", the odds of red/black depend on whether you're playing a zero or double zero wheel and either way its less than 50/50 which is what gives the house edge, its 48.6% and 47.4% respectively and they do not change whether the wheel lands on black 5 times in a row or a thousand times in a row, its always 48.6% (zero wheel) or 47.4% (double zero wheel)

>Meet Niko Tosa, the Man Who Proved Roulette Was Beatable:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-04-06/meet-niko-tosa-the-man-who-proved-roulette-was-beatable

>>56983882
in terms of probability yes you have absolutely NO mathmatically-backed reason to believe a B x 5 streak will stop and suddenly flip to R. and in real-action, a streak of 5 is not uncommon. however, it gets more interesting if you observe more than 10 of a color, and then start betting the opposite colors, because more than 10 of R or B is quite rare in real play. maybe there is a more elegant mathematical way to express it, but the same laws that make R,R,R,R,R,R,R possible also has some built-in constraint whereby eventually it will flip to B or G.

hypothetically in a real game, packed with players, and imagine everyone was betting R because it is seen as the luckier number, and it kept hitting R over twenty times in a row, eventually the faggot pitboss would find some excuse to stop the game and claim the wheel needs to be checked for balance.
but according to you and statistically, each spin is independent, so R x 20 is totally possible within a narrow window. of course once it keeps spinning it will average out to percentages you stated after high enough # of spins.

if you had a bankroll of only $500, and you kept betting R, and it kept hitting B, and on the 7th spin you went "all in" with whatever was remainig, and you lost, it would be upsetting only because you had such a limited amount of funds and weren't controlling bet size so that when you are finally betting on the winning color, your bet was big enought offset all past wrong bets. this is why a millionaire gambler like Dana White can play BJ which has a lower house edge than roulette, and still win, because he doesn't buy in with a tiny little bitch amount. and if he blows through $50K in the first few hands he can just keep getting more chips.

the highest top-level paradox with gambling is that you are more likely to win if you have a huge bankroll, and you're more likely to get rekt if you have a small bankroll. same goes with trading. but if you're already rich why gamble? for fun!

>>56983068
>>56983114
>>56983690
>>56983738
>>56984267
>>56984432
typing a lot doesn't make you right

I have a roulette strat that works, but its based on psychology.

I have written scripts to test this. Over the long run you always lose. I have also asked a casino staff member and he said 20 blacks or reds come up in a row at least once a week. Also the 0 throws off the 50-50 chance.

>>56979993
Yeah I lost $800 in a night. It's embarrassing. It.was black 9 times in a row....

Here's a screenshot of a game I play every now and then

Is there an online roulette that does not force you to play every spin? To test these ideas?

>>56985963
a free one, not irl money.

>>56980342
>I always wonder, what if you start betting after 5 times black. Is the chance you hit red greater after that or the same? Like the odds that you would actually witness a 15 black streak or something

The problem you will face is that live casinos take like 3 minutes per spin and online casinos will kick you from the session for being AFK. They've already factored this in.

>>56979993
Ex-croupier here.
It's only feasible if you have infinite amount of money, and if you have that why waste your time?
If you only have shitload of money, you need a table with no betting limit on odds/even, hi/lo and black/red and which has a low minimum bet. If you don't have even that, you're an idiot. Here's the thing that Martingale fags never get: you'll ever only win the amount you start to bet with. Sure, after several losses the amount you bet can be huge as fuck, but if you win, your profit will only be as big as your first bet. And unless it's the table minimum, the bet gets really big, really fast. And as casino quite often have bigger minimum bets on 1:1 bets, it might get big anyway.
Getting a 16 blacks/reds in a row is nothing unusual, my personal best is 22-24 (can't remember, we had a display showing 20 last numbers, they were all black and then I spun couple more) and around 10 is something you see several times a day.
The house can ALWAYS suck up even a 24 losing streak, even if the player is foolish enough to start with a higher bet. But only degenerate gamblers can stomach losing 10 in a row and then betting more than 2k to win a buck. And there are enough of those in the world. And for them it was always a huge pot, as they never remembered the amount they had already bet and lost in order to get there. If they bet big, then they must've also won big.

>>56986222
>The problem you will face is that live casinos take like 3 minutes per spin
don't see how that's a problem. they don't require you to play every spin nor do they care if you avoid colors during a streak that you missed out on. the less than 50/50 vs even money payout is exactly why some don't like playing colors at all. many popular strategies focus on the columns, or the dozens, or streets. the only times i've ever walked away with profit is either playing inside numbers and getting lucky, or columns only, or some combination. you would need to progressively up your bets to catch a flip, or be smart and fast enough to catch the start of a same-color streak.

>>56984459
>NOOO STOP TRYING TO THINK AND POST YOUR LINE OF REASONING!!
typing just a little doesn't make you right either.

>>56986298
You're going to potentially wait 3 hours for a streak to make $5?

>>56984432
>if you had a bankroll of only $500
is that really a baby bankroll? whenever I go that's how much I spend between bets, food and drinks. why yes i got wiped out in a minute betting no pass at the craps table, how could tell?

bump best thread in the catalog

>>56980367
>>56980036
And assuming the casino doesn't have a limit

the way to win is to watch the ball and place your bet after you have calculated where it will land. just see faster, idiots.

>>56986321
3 mins per spin x 10 spins all landing on one color is half an hour, not three hours, assuming you're not playing any other spots. and no you're not just betting $5 on the flip you're going "big". of course it will look ridiculous to play nothing at a table, but definitely not a big deal if at a machine.

>>56986281
martingale doesn't seem to work for roulette, but maybe for BJ and baccarat. fibonacci is much better for roulette.

here's inverse martingale using play money in BJ, he goes from $1500 to $20k in under 20 minutes by betting aggressively when he's winning:
https://youtu.be/bAzZVWIhl7s?si=8horWgjzujsmVPb9&t=75

Are you broke and have only 10 bucks to invest? Then check this guide https://pastebin.com/wAxve1Fu

>>56980257
>GTFO id
kek, that just gives you an illusion of not losing, but you're losing money nonetheless, I would dare say is not even minimizing losses; also your wins are relatively small

>>56980541
shit, this. I tried martingale in pancakeswap predict and I got fucked twice, los about 400usd so its fine, because I was seriously thinking about putting more than 2 grand there. I think its good to treat it like and atm. just $20 wins for the day/week and use it to fuel your car or something

>>56985963
Just bet minimum to substitute as free spin

Are you broke and have only 10 bucks to invest? Then check this guide https://pastebin.com/wAxve1Fu

https://www.jackpotfinder.com/news/the-martingale-biggest-gambling-wins/

Are you broke and have only 10 bucks to invest? Then check this guide https://pastebin.com/wAxve1Fu

>>56982102
>colour 8 times in a row
Lol that is very typical. I have seen 20 times in a row couple times

Are you broke and have only 10 bucks to invest? Then check this guide https://pastebin.com/wAxve1Fu

this hot woman has never lost by chasing streaks and using martiegale:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_72pAe_Wqw8

>>56987162
>be smart player
>spot a potential trend
>keep betting that same color
>win 8 times in a row
>go with gut feeling and either stop betting color after 8-9 times, or start betting opposite color
>also hedge a $1 or $2 on green when you feel like it's been too long with it not hitting
>get free drinks
>tip the waitress $1-2 and joke around, have fun
>walk away up $50-$100 to take a break and have a meal
>come back and do it again
it's so easy even a sexy woman can do it. just look at the cute way she taps the screen with her little fingers. no stress. just fun and easy money.

>>56981716
How would you do that ?

>>56981970
That's actually pretty smart

>>56981970
No retard if it keeps hitting that color it's because the wheel is off and you should exploit that

Martingale is the most retarded noob 'strategy'. Casinos love that shit, they can easily beat it just from having a minimum and maximum bet amount, and that's before the house edge they have. There's a reason you never see millionaires using Martingale, just fucking retards betting thousands and losing their entire bankroll just to win the $5 betting minimum.

>>56983068
You sound like you're joking but I'm afraid you're not

^^^gambling addiction awarebess thread^^^

>>56986549
>Better for BJ or Baccarat
Ok, first of all, how the fuck would it work better for BJ? You don't consistently have near 50/50 chances of winning. Yeah, the odds of winning don't matter as Martingale QUARANTEES that eventually you'll win that one bet, but you still have to have a roll big enough to handle those losing streak, which in BJ can be longer than in roulette. Secondly, oddswise Baccarat is really no different from roulette, and there's no reason Martingale would be better suited for it than roulette. You are chasing streaks hoping you are on the winning side either way.
Bottom line: Martingale works, but ONLY if you have shitload of money to waste and are willing to grind out minimum bets at a time. All the "wait until x amount of y has come and the bet against" bullshit is wishful thinking.
>Reverse Martingale
All this (and others like fibo) does is create an illusion of a working system when you occasionally win big. But gamblers tend to forget their losses and only remember their big wins (and maybe their biggest losses). People posting their streaks on youtube and streaming their gambling on online casinos usually have some kind of and affiliate deal with them. And few post videos of them losing, once again creating the illusion of a working system.
But, it's your money. Sure, you could get lucky and have the ball bounce your way a night or even two in a row, and if so, good for you. But do that consistently for a year, record the results HONESTLY and post them here.
In the long run you just can't beat the house, but you are free to try.

>>56983267
Remember to fuck your mother.

>>56985474
What strategy might that be ?

>>56980084
I did this once and kept upping my bet each time and lost everything after it hit red 7 times in a row.

>>56987813
you were betting *against* the trend (repeat reds). you should have immediately spotted that and kept betting red until that streak ended (by losing 1 bet when it finally hit black). instead you did the opposite, you went against the streak. many get rekt in baccarat by going against the streak. and pro baccarat players know when to bet with the streak, especially early on. of course, if you see BB or RR there's no way to know "for sure" that this is the start of a trend for 3 or more repeats. that's why it's gambling. same goes for Bacc...sometimes it goes Banker Banker then Player, and if you had bet on Banker thinking it was starting a 3+ repeat streak you would've lost $25 or whatever the table min is. but if you were correct you would've won and kept winning.

>>56987661
working systems work precisely because the player has self-control enough to quit when he has hit his profit goal AKA walk-away point. and no, i don't only watch vids by those who post themselves only winning. i'm not that retarded and get what you're trying to say re: affiliate deals.

all this probabilistic talk about "in the long-run" doesn't mean anything in real world application because we're not talking about someone who plays thousands or hundreds of thousands of rolls/spins/hands/etc.

if someone starts with a pretty avg. $500 bankroll, plays a tight game but starts losing, he *might* regain his money if he increases his bets via martingale (or fib) and is more likely to do so than if he just kept betting the minimum or whatever small amount he was comfortable with. of course, the element of luck: if he's lucky he might break even and be up a little. if he's unlikely he keeps doubling his bets and loses it all. $500-$1000 is usually how much the avg. player uses. pros would have a much higher amount and vary their bets much more.

anyway, comparing mart vs. fib, the CEG guys vastly prefer fibonacci for progressively increasing bets whether they're on a winning or losing streak. they mock martigale all the time. according to them, the only upside to martigale is that it's super-easy to just keep doubling, it's something you can do while drunk. however, if you're there to win and be serious, like Dana White (UFC founder/ceo) then he recommends never drinking any alc at all.

somewhat tangentially related: when is this streak goyna end????

>>56980006
>on tables where it hasn't hit in a while

>>56980084
kek based

>>56980104
Dude i got in a car accident last week and now i dont even use my seatbelt anymore because the chance of getting into a car accident twice in the same week are extremely low

>>56981970
>Color1 already saturated its probability

>>56982102
>land on one colour 8 times in a row which is statistically extremely improbable

there is literally 50% chance of that happening, or 49% if you take into account the 0

>>56985963
3mins of code in notepad

lmao this thread was hilarious

cant tell if people are being serious or trolling but thanks everyone

>>56988290
kek

The only way to play roulette is the following : 5 tries of a number.
You divide the money you wanted to play with in 5, put one fifth on say 23, you do that five times.
Win or lose, you get out.

There's no method.
Just ways to mitigate losses/take profits.

>>56980001
faulty assumptions

>>56980385
"The spinner glitched"
your casino funds are not safu

>>56987916
>Long run doesn't mean anything
It doesn't, if the player stops playing completely when he's up. But if he keeps returning to the table then we ARE talking about thousands of spins, albeit spread over a longer time perhaps. All aggressive betting does is give the player the chance to win big occasionally. It does not give the player an edge over the house if he keeps returning. Yes, discipline is also a key factor in this and reduces the house edge, but I have yet to see any evidence of betting strategy and discipline being a net positive on roulette. Can't say anything definite for baccarat, though, and though BJ had an optimum strategy that was profitable back in the day, I'm under the impression that has been nullified by rule changes over the years.

There is no real world staking strategy that can turn negative EV bets into positive EV you absolute spastics. You can't defeat probability by changing the amount of money you bet.

>>56979993
Don't do it. You retard.

>>56980257
>playing at double 0 roulette

>>56983690
>still doesn't address the possibility that the player picked the correct door from the start
Yes I literally mentioned that in my explanation. That's the 1/3 chance of loss.

>also matters if the gameshow host chooses which door, or if the door is chosen randomly.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem
>Standard assumptions:
>The host must always open a door to reveal a goat and never the car.

>and yet there are dozens of even worse nonsensical threads
Yes you sage and report them all you fucking retard.

Every time I think this board can't get any worse and I meet new retards like you.

>>56979993
I have tried not losing money at the roulette using Kelly criterion.

>>56979993
Yes. You have to have big balls and deep pockets to cover a string of bad luck. If you can handle it, it works.

>>56980001
It fail if you keep and keep and keep playing.
It have more than 99% chances of working if you have the ressources to keep doubling down enough time and leave when you're ahead

>>56980006
>especially on tables where it hasn't hit in a while
Hahahahahahahaha

>>56980084
>this time it's different

>>56979993
Roulette casino theory is how you beat the market. First trade 100, second 200, third 300, and so on. The casino operators want you pulling the lever on a slot machine, not averaging down, leveraging equity against drawdown like a real capitalist. Watch casino probability exploitation videos on youtube. Lots of applicable info there