/biz/ - Business & Finance

Don't laugh. It is a good project just a little overvalued. It is worth 3c a token.

really dumb name
sounds like some Tim and Eric type joke name

>>56955492
Aren't you bored yet? How many months have you been posting this? Nothing better to do than play with your pp and post this crap? Listen, ASSHAT, ICP IS going to $2k. FACT. It is the future of the blockchain. FACT. I'd love to see your ugly fat face in 2026 when ICP is at the no. 1 slot and all your BitLinkXLPDogEth CRAP is 0.00001. Idiot.

>>56955492
>>56955526
NOBODY KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS BUT ITS PROVOCATIVE. GETS THE PEOPLE GOING!

My computer is interneting

Please someone post the 2021 memes when ICP launched at 500 of the senile people having random falls and blaming their Internet Computer

>>56955507
send it 3c i dare you, i will literally buy them all

>>56955541
>It is the future of the blockchain.
>isn't a blockchain

kek

>>56955641
>>isn't a blockchain
Right, it is a collection of blockchains

>>56955492
> Icy pee

>>56955724
It's the glue that connects all blockchains together (multichain) without bridges.
ICP is 100 + IQ play, because you cannot convince me that cross chains can secure any value outside crypto clown-world.

>>56955625

>>56955492
Avax is done pumping against the market now and is down while ICP is up. Cope

>>56955492
3c gang

>>56955625

Martha, my Internet Computer is not the only thing goin up

>>56955939
correct the same VC's behind avalanche and ICP, to maximize profits they pump avax first for distribution, then go the next project ICP

>>56955492
>ANAL IN THE ASS

>>56955625
Help me, Internet Computer!

>>56955492
>judging a book by its title

>>56955724
It's a third party that's completely irrelevant. You ICP niggers are just as dumb as Linktards, they just got better meme power and thus more pump.

>>56956030
The contents of the book is far far worse than its cover.

>>56956214
Dfinity and Roland Berger were showcasing their VRC system powered by ICP @ cop28 United Nations. 198 countries and world leaders came together to discuss sustainability and reducing the environmental impact of waste. 189 countries at cop28, 1 unified global standard and framework for waste recycling, over 31 Million listed companies.

McKinsey & Company estimates that the market for VRCs could be worth $3 trillion by 2030.
Brazil adopted VRC, 418 Listed Companies in Brazil.
https://theemiratestimes.com/voluntary-recycling-credits-vrc-initiative-at-cop28/
https://youtu.be/YdY8UQ7nrs8?t=861 [Embed]

I am done accumulating. I will keep shilling.
Have fun missing out on the largest adoption usecase this space has ever seen.

>>56955492
i love my putter
all my friend and SPX bags are inside it
(next to the key of the cage of the girl with marie rose cosplay)

>>56955541
>How many months have you been posting this
try years

>>56956214
>It's a third party that's completely irrelevant.
ICP is a collection of blockchains. Each subnet has it's own blockchain. I wasn't talking about integrations. I believe that there is a huge advantage to the ability to host the front end and back end of a smart contract in one solution.

>>56956318
>customers who give a shit: 0

I really don't give a fuck about your security scam token.

>>56956348
In the future there won't be multiple blockchains. Their maybe a few, but if it's not done onchain it isn't a blockchain technology and therefore can be disregarded.

In 2017 Ark claimed it was going to link all dem chainz too. It's a fucking scam. Link claims it's going to link all dem chainz as well. It's all bullshit. Bitcoin was designed for direct data inputs. These designs put out by these scam companies is fucking retarded, convoluted and miss the point of the technology.

>>56956379
>In the future there won't be multiple blockchains.
The future is multi-chain.

>>56956379
>Cope
198 countries give a shit, this is why ICP was invited to demonstrate their product at cop28
ICP isn't onchain? Prove it
Whatever you hold, it's garbage compared to ICP. I'll make that bet anytime.

>>56956379
And 31 Million listed companies divided by 198 countries will give a shit, because the Government themselves will involve all stakeholders across sectors to tackle the global waste crisis. And you will absolutely rope when China adopts VRC powered by ICP.
I am done accumulating. I will shill nonstop, nothing you can do, fuck poorfags and neets they have years to average their stack.

>>56956428
Retarded assertion. The people pushing multichains are exchanges, because this divide allows them to middleman the entire ecosystem. Defeating much of the point of Blockchain.

There is no advantage in having multiple chains, quite the opposite.
>less security
>data siloing
>extreme friction between chains
>inoperability between chains
>retarded protocols
etc

>b-b-but ICP solves this
No, it doesn't it's a trusted intermediary defeating the point of the blockchain in the first place. Same goes for Link. If I want data from say an exchange, the exchange should publish the data onchain and I can pay them in Bitcoin (microtransactions) for the data. No scam shittoken requried + plus gas fee + fee + dev dump + trust. SHIT IS DUMB. I cannot wait for this scam market to collapse.

>>56956440
I really don't give a shit about your climate change propaganda from the UN.

>>56956514
>I cannot wait for this scam market to collapse.
At least we can agree on something.

>>56956514

Newfag doesn't know the difference between multichain and cross chain.

How is it less secure? With multichain, you initiate transactions on other blockchains without coins ever leaving the network. The intermediary is a contract.

Crosschain requires you to lock tokens on blockchain A and mint them over to blockchain B. The intermediary is a usually an exchange.

You are blockchain illiterate.

>>56956603
>How is it less secure?
>what even is Proof of Work?

Bitcoin is the most secure database known to man. ICP is a company that manages and pegs bullshit on your behalf. In theory anyway. Really what they do is sell unregistered securities.

>>56956636
Bitcoin can't scale and Taproot upgrade is going to be rolled-back, good luck inscribing metadata on bitcoin. Secondly, you can't inscribe any meaningful data on the bitcoin network, it's metadata, reference data, data linked to external hosting services. (this is a single point of failure) and use of an intermediary.

Secondly, there is no usecase for Bitcoin, other than digital gold.

>>56955492
BTC = decentralized money
ETH = decentralized contracts
LINK = decentralized data
ICP = decentralized internet

>>56956636
typical ICP fudder - blockchain illiterate.
Fuds protocols he doesn't understand, hold tokens he doesn't understand.

>>56956765
The bigger picture is that technology (particularly blockchain, AI, and automation) is advancing to a point that the ancient system of central government enforcing social contracts is becoming obsolete. Does it seem right that we would continue using these traditional forms of government that pre-date even written history in the era of computers? The inevitability of corruption has always been the limiting factor of traditional centralized governments, and the ones who benefit the most from the current power structure are the ones who are most opposed to advancement. We are unironically witnessing a major turning point in human history: the "singularity", if you will.

With that in mind, does anyone know of any projects that are working on a decentralized AI model using blockchain? Current AI models are highly censored or gate-kept from the public altogether. It seems like the logical next step is decentralization of AI utilizing public blockchain, but maybe it's too early. Imagine a decentralized AI with the ethos and security of BTC.

>>56956720
>>56956774
BTC isn't Bitcoin.

>>56955492
>>56955770
>>56955920
>>56955977
>>56956018
my sides

>>56956440
>cope28

>>56955492