/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56928501
biz is now a huge gme thread +HRT

>>56928501
POOLS CLOSED FUDDIE

>>56928501
you could buy KNS and get the oracles and the pump

>>56928501
Link is so easy to trade thanks to all the moonboys

>>56928501
day of the bolt cutter is coming

Where can I figure out what Reddit niggers are buying

>>56928639
reddit

>>56928639
crypto reddit is the biggest psyop people there claim to call something a scam so they can keep the price down while the dca

>>56928501
>You missed out again
I try to keep myself out of the FOMO mindset.
Are there tokens and investment opportunities that do better than my investments? Sure there are.
Are there opportunities that do way worse than my investments? Yes there are.

I'm happy when my portfolio grows and makes money.
I could have made better choices, but I also could have made a lot worse choices.
Since I'm "up" I have to be thankful.

Yo I missed migration, tf. Why they cut that shit off. Is there still a chance to stake. I’m v1 fag

>>56928678
Thank you for the inspirational quote
You're right, all gains are good gains

the poooooool
iiiiiis
fuckin cloooosed
oh yeah THE POOOOL
IS FUCKING CLOOOOOSED
HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEEL??

>>56928501
LINK losers

>>56929033
>i bet it makes him feel baaaaad

Link stakers are breeding males and nolinkers/nostakers and fudders are non breeding males.

Our little linkie lolcows will give us many lolz this bullrun :)
>Dec 5 2020:
MATIC: $0.019
LINK: $13.50
BTC: $19000
ETH: $590
BNB: $29.73
SOL: $1.97
ADA: $0.15
DOGE: $0.003
TRX: $0.03
AVAX: $3.61

>Dec 5 2023:
MATIC: $0.81
LINK: $15.60
BTC: $43800
ETH: $2280
BNB: $232
SOL: $64.29
ADA: $0.42
DOGE: $0.09
TRX: $0.10
AVAX: $26.26

>>56928501
still not selling

>>56928501
KYS Chink bag holder

They day of the bolt cutter soon approaches

>>56929514
This is bottom of the barrel cult rhetoric

>>56928501
But link is outperforming all Reddit coins on ytd

>>56929496
jesus fucking christ

>>56929741
This. Link is outperforming every coin in the top 100

>>56928537
Based LPL chuddie kiddo how you going based kiddo

>>56928501
>another 350,000k Link moved to an unknown addresss
>Link dumps and its growth is stunted
> sergay becomes filthy rich while ripping ppl offwith a slow steady withdrawals (not total rugpull so he can keep doing it)
Link marines continue to happily get fucked while other coins moon.

Tell me if i missed anything

>>56930539
Not SOL, but otherwise pretty much

>>56928617
Don't tell them kek

>>56928672
Heres the thing tho… they all bought doge and shib last bull while you jerked off to vaporware that doesnt exist and now spend all of your days letting a fat russian shit down your throat for sub bank interest while thanking him for it.


THE Cuckolds ot crypto

>>56928501
Is KNS really the next LINK/Rubic shit all over again? I fucking hated the Rubic shilling but I could've gotten rich.

meanwhile I wake up to this

>>56930956
>pink ID
It's over

>>56928617
Wow these shills are out in full force tonight. New campaign for 10c a post again?

>>56929741
>>56930539
holy cope

>>56930958
I love that game

>>56928800
>Why they cut that shit off
you had 7 days
>Is there still a chance to stake
no. unless you want to get scammed by stake.link

>>56928501
Help me out; what do i buy instead of Link? BTC and ETH will probably not do much better.
Do you buy shit that has shown they are willing to pump in this market? (e.g. SOL, AVAX) Or do you buy things that have "unrealized potential" like MATIC or ATOM which have not done that well so far, but still has potential - kind of like how DOT did not follow the initial pumping in October/November, but then pumped in December.

I've spend so many years hodling chainlink, I haven't developed the trading skill to identify what will do well in the short to medium timeframe.
I guess that is the real opportunity loss...

>>56928501
every time you make this thread i go buy more link. its not working the way you thought it would work. maybe its because you are a stupid kike?

>>56932246
link

>>56929037
go the fuck back tranny nigger

>>56929693
the bolt cutters meme sucks. you are a jew. you are from reddit. you should go back and look at more interracial porn and jerk off your micropenis (if you didnt cut it off yet)

Aren't we meant to be getting CCIP mainnet this year? That might give a boost.

>>56930939
look at the price of shib you dumb fucking nigger. its the SAME as last year. actually its fucking less. neck urself.

I got in the staking pool, but I also think that people who identify as crypto tribalists are fucking parsnips.

Imagine being a grown ass man and basing your life and feelings around presenting your balls as representative of an imaginary online army

> Holy shit cringe

>>56928800
>Yo tf
>Why they cut
Why do you speak like a faggot?

>>56932308
It's like that Cartesian despair, Descartes being edgy and went full mental on everything he knows, "i can't trust my senses, i could be mad, a devil could be playing tricks on me, how do i know what is real? what is true? I have to discard everything i know and start all over".
Then he did the whole "I think therefor I am" and slowly added on to it, until he had rebuild his understanding of the world and was confident what he knew of the world was the truth.. The kicker, he went right back to where he started, his world view and what he knew to be true was entirely unchanged after his unhinged radical doubt séance..

If I start looking for investment opportunities, all i see is Chainlink, untapped potential, consolidation at a higher range - prime for a break out to the upside. Short, Medium, Long term MA and EMA reads Bullish, Trend Strength on all time frames also bullish, closer to being Oversold than Overbought.
Confident that Chainlink is not gonna crate like Luna or the likes.

What is even the point of thinking? you know where you end up.. might as well just meme it and masturbate until i make it.

>>56929496
Avax is $32 now
>the absolute state of link baggies

>>56928501
Bought my link at like 12-43 cents a pop
Cost me almost nothing
so really.. you should just delete this post and consider using rope

>>56932523
they are angry you got in early.

>>56932577
Pretty much,
I didn't buy enough, i just bought here and there
It was sketchy then to send money to binance from coinbase back in like 2017 or 2018.
I will just hold again until the next real bullrun

My hope is that we get CCIP before this year is over and reach $20. Then ride BTC ETF hopefully to $30 or so early next year.

We can crab there and then as the halving takes off we'd be in a great starting position for the next run. I have a lot staked but if we hit $50 again i'll probably sell a bunch to get a house. Then leave 5k riding for perpetuity.

>>56932523
And you didn't sell close to $50?
Fucking lmao held all the way down like a retard.

>>56933937
>JUST one more year for a 2X
lol lmao and this is your best case scenario

>>56929496
Seeing these comparisons makes me furious.

>>56929496
Actually this is missing some important context, most of these couns never pumped in 2020 while LINK went from $2 to $20 from March till August. Had LINK not pumped, it would’ve been at $2-$3 like the rest. That makes it 6-7x considering current price

>>56933973
$50 is my 2024 hope and that's well over 2x. Into 2025 i'd like to see it go $80-120 for the next top.

Under 16 now lmao. Link is unpumpable.

>>56932320
POOLS FUCKING CLOSED DUMB BITCH

>>56928678
You were given the gift of life and the blessings of humanity-intellect and will. You yourself were created by and in the image of the Lord Almighty God, who Himself came down from Heaven to save you and all who trust in Him from the wages of sin. Rejoice in all situations for Christ is king.

>>56934094
SIR POOLS CLOSED, WE DO NOT EVEN WANT TO REDEEM

>>56934178
>Christ is king

It’s all so tiresome. I feel like Christianity being heavily pushed on 4chan is another psyop to make people happy with being subservient drones. Training humans to be Christians is such a useful tool for a ruling class and they’ll actually happily serve you and do evangelical missions to go convert more slaves for you (who would otherwise stand up for themselves)

>>56932380
You must go back

>>56934228
Well that is basically the case. Let's not fool ourselves into believing that this is some sort of grassroots thing that just happened to appear across all boards. There's a source and there's a direct correlation with certain political and cultural events that led to a rise in this online Christianity, identity politics firmly becoming a part of the western Right particularly playing a major role in this.

>>56934228
>>56934387
Stfu kikes.

>>56933990
All you had to do was sell the LINK blow off top during the 2020 August run and buy Eth. Even selling 10k link for eth during that time would have netted you around 500 eth.

>>56934396
Not very Christlike of you Anon. Shouldn’t you be dropping on your knees and praying for me?

DR NS

>>56933937
ccip is essentially done, blockchain gaming is the new thing. try to keep up

>>56934387
Honestly interesting point. It’s like if you want to be on the “own the libs” team, you have to be all in with Jesus. It really is just identity politics to divide people more.

>>56934228
>>56935169
You're speaking in particular of American protestantism. If you're acquainted with the Austrian school of economic theorists —the most notable of which I would say is Hayek— he attributes the historical development of modern capitalism to a guy called Bernard Mandeville. This guy was an atheist who was ardently against traditional christianity and criticised it for inhibiting a growing economy because it extols virtue and leisure over vice when he points out that our vices are the necessary engines of a thriving work based economy. Read his book 'The Fable of the Bees'. I've been on 4chan since 2007 and seen this place develop; the influx of Christianity being pushed was a direct corollary of cultural indifference - basically an existential response to an overstimulated subgroup of people seeking meaning. The problem with this is that the very 'medium' of the internet is market driven, and real Christianity is antithetical to the market, so it becomes this ironic almost self-defeating "online movement" driven by "so-called" Christians using the very thing they should be objecting to. They become hypocrites. Most of ones who pushed catholicism and orthodoxy back in 2012 when all the religious sentiment started here are gone.

>>56935927
Interesting post Anon. I miss talking to people like you here. Will check out the book you suggested. Any other more modern economic books you can suggest? Just re-read Signals by Pippa Malmgren, and while I’ve flooded her career after it and disagree with some of her ideas, I wish I could get a 2023 extended edition to contrast how absurd things are today from her perspective when writing it.

>>56933937
>I'm going to sell most of my stack at $50 and you should too because I know best.
Yawn.

kek fuddies

>>56930539

It's the worst performer of the week.

>>56934228
>rm 101 neo's apartment, 1984 etc.
>the worst thing you could imagine according to the kikes that worship satan
>John 10:1
Very truly I tell you Pharisees, anyone who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber. 2 The one who enters by the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. 3 The gatekeeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen to his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. 4 When he has brought out all his own, he goes on ahead of them, and his sheep follow him because they know his voice. 5 But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger’s voice.” 6 Jesus used this figure of speech, but the Pharisees did not understand what he was telling them.

7 Therefore Jesus said again, “Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. 8 All who have come before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep have not listened to them. 9 I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved.[a] They will come in and go out, and find pasture. 10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.

Find Christ but not organized religion anons

>>56928501
>duuuuudeeee you missed out! This shit coin can pump like 3040300x! And chainshit hahahahaj chainshit will only pump 10x from here hahahahahhahah BECAUSE IT JUST WONT PUMP OKAY…OKAYY

idk kys seethe

>>56935927
Anon, I read some of the "cliff notes" of Fable of the Bees and am beginning to read the poems and the poignancy of what you said, followed by the Anon below quoting scripture on an internet forum specifically made of traffic of people shilling useless shitcoins titled "business and finance" is incredible. Amazing really.
>>56936843

>>56934036
$120 is probably as high as it will go before 2030

>>56936843
Anon, "Christ" is organized religion. It is a series of precepts, created by others, by which you choose to live your life. Instead of even trying to articulate in your own words whatever message you were trying to convey with your post, you quoted the bible, even keeping the numbered lines in, really thereby demonstrating how little free thought you have and that you probably copy-pasted it on a shitcoin forum in a thread mocking holders of a useless token for not gambling as effectively as possible. It's incredible! What a place to find Christ, my Lord and Savior! Alleluia!!

>>56932419
This is an intelligent take. The next LINK has been LINK for the last six years, and it will continue to be until there comes a token attached to a project as ambitious, well-backed, and game-changing as Chainlink. You're right that the technicals and fundamentals are all absolutely primed. You're right that the price action is somewhat lackluster. There's nothing I could put my money in that would feel as safe as Chainlink. We're all in the asylum, there's a room with millions waiting for each of us, we just need to wait it out. Go for a walk, enjoy the gardens, we'll be out in the real world one day soon.

>>56930772
>Tell me if i missed anything
you forgot to mention how you got closed out of the pool ahahahahaha

>>56928537
>4% closed!!!
oh no!

>>56928537
It's pure kino how the oldest 4chan meme will now be the permanent rebuke to the fudders.

Anyone who is in that pool is going to be on the receiving end of incredible airdrops, accumulate 4% yield, and qualify for the citadel. The fudders know it, and they can't stand it. They didn't get in. This is the clearest case for isolating early adopters to reward them that LINK will ever do and now that its clear who truly believes in the tech Sergay is able to reward them.

It's over if you didn't get in. You can feel it in your bones. Short term price action on the LINK token doesn't matter.

>>56938101
NO POOLERS ARE BASICALLY CATTLE ANON WE SAT THEM DOWN AND SPOKE TO THEM IN THEIR INCEL LANGUAGE MEMETICS AND LITERALLY THEY DID NOT LISTEN

LPL POOLS CLOSED BUY LPL TRUST JONNY

I CANNOT BELIEVE THEY DIDNT TRUST JONNY THE DEMONS MUST HAVE GOTTEN THEM ON THEIR WAY TO THE PUB FOR A FEW PINTS WITH THE LADS

COMPLETELY UNWASHED CHAD BEHAVIOUR ANON

LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY WINNING

POOLS CLOSED LPL

>>56938101
>It's over if you didn't get in
Why? The chainlink team is planning on doubling the space on the staking pool every year, you can basically wait a year and then stake once there’s space available.

I think there might be linkpool shills trying to get people to fomo on staking so they buy their shitty lpl token to get scammed again.

>>56928501
this thread aged poorly. link took a shot and a half from that dump

>>56935927
>the influx of Christianity being pushed was a direct corollary of cultural indifference - basically an existential response to an overstimulated subgroup of people seeking meaning

WAS ALWAYS THUS.

>>56938789
back down to 0003500 we go.
same range as this time last year.
and we were at 0003600 two years ago.

we really don't go anywhere without bitcoin.

>>56938728
guarantee you were saying the same thing about general access getting in to stake a week ago

Why does it always dump the most?

This fucking project is all talk

>>56938789
cmon baby I need another massive dumpy wumpy, papa wants to invest!

>>56928501
Setting aside all the usual larping, all silly fud4fun, all 81k kekkery, I'm genuinely thinking of selling. Every positive spin just sounds like cope when the price dudders around like this. Shit popping off everywhere per usual and very little interest from big CT accounts who help spur hype for stuff like INJ. There was no follow-through after the $17. What are we really even doing here kek? I can't really justify the hold.

>>56940359
Yeah bro sounds scary. I'm going to sell too. Let's sell.

>>56940359
This cone dead

>>56933962
Who says they didn’t sell fuckface

>>56937007
that would be nice. I could retire comfortably on that

>>56940359
I literally can't sell.

>>56937009
Christ hung around sinners, whores, and taxfags because they needed him more than anyone else.

>>56940380
>>56940390
>>56940504
Put it this way: what's the point of denying gains elsewhere? As I said, setting aside all the usual anon bs, what is your true rationale to hold a token with this kind of price action?

gfy is the play

>>56940359
>>56940380
based yea I'm selling too fuck this. Gonna unstake right now and SELL

>>56940764
I make 125k a year working a piss easy job, I'm in no rush and I know what I'm holding, I also am able to afford putting money into shorter-term gainers like AVAX, mid-caps like GRT, and microcaps like LILA, not to mention BTC that I'm planning on never selling.

>>56940904
I find a lot of answers like this every time I pose the question. You've listed a bunch of irrelevant things that have more to do with whatever happens to float your particular boat instead of decisions made to maximise your returns. Ftr, I make more than you. It does not quench my desire to run off with multi millions this next run at all costs and secure my financial freedom. I want to pick winners from now on and try to swim with the narrstive current instead of against it, which is exactly what it's felt like holding LINK since August 2020. This is just me trying to fish for an actual objective, rational reason to believe it will perform well because early signs, much like 2021 though debatably a different juncture of the cycle, are not encouraging.

>>56940937
Did you not get into the staking pool? I gave you other viable options if you want faster gains or a sure thing. Just sell and buy Solana or something, nobody cares.

>>56940996
Why the fuck would I want to get into the staking pool and how would that help a decision which is about optimising returns? What just happened is I asked for a solid rationale to hold LINK and you justified holding LINK by saying "oh don't worry, I hold other stuff too that actually performs".

>>56941053
With staking, I'll get airdrops and free linkies, which is very cool. CCIP and other services like Functions and Data Streams are likely going on mainnet this or next year. The link run from 7 to 14 preceded every other altcoin pump in this rally, not to mention BTC itself. I can't predict the future, but on paper, lonk has the best risk/reward ratio on the market, with AVAX coming in second. What are your alt picks?

>>56928501
Eric Schmidt has to pull some illluminati strings and boost link

>>56940937
You're not going to find any organic answers ITT, it's all cultists and chainlink paid shills. My plan is to sell all my LINK on the way up during the bull and keep the other half of my stack staked. I am tired to death of this retarded cuckold cult.

Biz is an xrp board and we’ll be fine within 10 years on our yachts and planes and hoes and bitches and caviar and god and money

>pumps the least
>dumps the most

>>56941104
Whatever.
Alt picks should show strong sats performance for as long as possible. INJ springs to mind. As soon as I saw that chart, I bought a bag. It's exactly how I knew we were on for a ride through 2018 with LINK. It put up a fight v BTC. Those days are evidently over so it's back to the drawing board sadly.

>>56941191
I'm pretty much with you. It's totally stopped making sense and not just on the chinz but on LINK CT too. Constant braindead chirping about triple digits like it's a foregone conclusion, which is obviously very revealing of just how far past the PONR people are with this token. It's like even canvassing the idea we won't reach triple digits or we're lagging or not following-through is unspeakable. It's because they know LINK cannot go short of mid-$100s to justify this position. CL in concept still blows my mind. LINK is simply a brick. And all this I just wrote would be far less relevant with any indication this thing still has fucking legs. It pokes above $17 then cucks down sub $15. Zero follow-through. More importantly, battling to keep its sats. Needless fucking stress and red for this part of the cycle, it's nonsense.

>>56941242
You have to understand that Chainlink gave these people an identity and meaning in life, it's not even about the money anymore to them. Makes sense in a way, over 6 years of time invested in a project. Only for the founder to shit all over you. The magic is gone. However, just in case CCIP is huge and the schizos are right, I decide to keep 25k LINK staked.

>>56941242
>>56941253
Just sell. You're one button click away. I'll even hold your hand while you do it.

>>56941253
Weird conclusion but okay

>>56940904
what job? i'm desparately iso new one ;-;

>>56928501
>redditors are x100ing and biz bagholds
So the community that actively shills its own holdings will make gains, while the betas who do nothing but shit on their own holdings every single day will lose out?

What a quaint turn of events.

>>56941253
>over 6 years of time invested in a project.
>Only for the founder to shit all over you

If you don't like founders selling tokens, then why would you buy a coin whose founder explicitly told you he'd be selling tokens?

>>56941681
He's a top buyer fuddie trying to larp as an OG. They're getting quite desperate after the pool's closed.

>>56941681
Sergey never said he would be market dumping his bags on spot you kike, otherwise nobody would have bought

>>56942053
>Sergey never said he would be market dumping his bags on spot
he did

>>56928537
PRICE'S DROPPING RETARD

>>56928501
Kinda by that metric BNB is a much better buy, I am defintely buying link in the coming months though.
t. .25 buyer peak seller

>>56942111
>PRICE'S DROPPING RETARD

from $6 to $15
>dropping

>>56942099
that does not state what you're claiming, are you illiterate?

>>56942369
It says 30% of the total supply is for "continued development".

>>56942398
yes, it doesn't say "30% of the supply is reserved for huge market dumps on illiquid wash trading exchanges" you literal imbecile

>>56942408
What did you think they were going to do with that 30%?

>>56942414
not dump it on spot
am I talking to a bot?

>>56942442
way to avoid the question retard

>>56942442
>not dump it on spot
What else?

>>56942454
way to derail with bullshit, moron
>>56942460
actually reserve it for development, aka use the fucking thing instead of msrket dumping it for for fiat

>>56942471
>use the fucking thing
What?

why are people discussing token dumps, it was in the whitepaper 6 years ago, 1 bil tokens will be circulating, fudders will hold 0 of those and still be invested in link, pretty funneh, pools closed.

>>56942471
they need funds for development. fucking idiot

>>56939640
I don’t think anyone’s in a rush to get a 4% APY on link anon, despite what linkpool shills might’ve led you to believe

>>56942483
It's an erc with a special function, use it instead of treating it like a literal useless funding token

>>56942544
The token is doled out as usage in the 35% portion going to node operators.
The 30% portion is for "continued development", which means it's meant to be sold for funding.

>>56942576
Ok, they could have sold the shit OTC instead of donating to Binamce bots

>>56942584
Who says they haven't?

>>56942589
All those Binance txs from the team wallets
and the constant selling pressure
Holy fuck am I talking to an actual retard?

>>56942576
>The 30% portion is for "continued development", which means it's meant to be sold for funding.
How do you know which part of the allocation has been sold?

>>56942369
Are you literally retarded?

>>56942627
We know two things:
1) literally every single link token moved by Sergey has gone to Binance
and
2) nodes have been getting paid in link by Sergey ever since mainnet launched

What does that tell you?

>>56942630
Tally up the node rewards, hackathons, grants, ...

>>56942658
>Tally up the node rewards, hackathons, grants, ...
How does that even answer the question?

>How do you know which part of the allocation has been sold?

Are they selling part of the node operator or company allocation?

>>56942878
>How does that even answer the question?
That tells you how much they're sending to network participants.

>>56942219
Desu. Kekfudders really like to embarrass themselves

>>56942946
Nigger are you retarded?

>>56942946
Kek based downie

>>56943028
>>56943054
Wait, how does it not?

>>56943282
Anon wants to know if Sergey is dumping from the token allocation reserved for the company, or if they’re dumping from the token allocation reserved for node operators. Anon is not asking how many link tokens are being dumped, we all know that.

>>56943028
Feel free to elaborate.

>>56943389
>>56943389
If you want to know how much has been moved from the network participant allocation, tally up how much has been moved to network participants.
Fuck you're stupid.

imagine still holding link in 2017+7

>>56943508
>network participant allocation
lmao wtf ok now you’re making shit up. Sorry bro didn’t know you were really retarded.

>>56943555
Here comes the semantic cope

>>56943567
>Tally up the node rewards, hackathons, grants, ..

How could you even know if the link spent on these activities come from the node operator or the company allocation? All of these activities could be considered either node operator fostering or company development.

Do we really need to guess? What happened to truth over trust?

>>56943651
>How could you even know if the link spent on these activities come from the node operator or the company allocation?
What the fuck are you even talking about.
If the tokens are going to node operators, then they're from the node operator allocation.

What the fuck is this retardation even.

>>56943651
There’s no way for you to verify what part of the allocation the team’s dumping. You have to guess, it’s like a fun game created by Sergey to keep bagholders distracted while he dumps millions of link.

>>56943680
>If the tokens are going to node operators, then they're from the node operator allocation.
You can’t provide a source for this claim. You have 0 info about what allocation the team is dumping. Truth > trust and Sergey is not being truthful, you have to blindly trust him which goes against the ethos of chainlink. That’s why link is dumping, sorry it’s the truth.

>>56943734
>You can’t provide a source for this claim.
You are literally retarded.
Holy shit.

- dude it's called crypto yeah, it's going to change the world, dude.
-nation states can't control it, it can't be manipulated, it's your freedom, friend.
-it's the perfect store of value, bro, it's a hedge against inflation, trust me on this one, okay.
-Brother this is a once in a century event, maybe rarer, it's a total reform of the global economic system, it's like the real estate boom x1000, brother.
- no nation state can stop it, when the collapse comes the USA will balkanize, and people will sell their souls to get a satoshi in return, brother.
- Let me tell you about alt-coins, brother.
- It's p2p digital gold which means peer to peer, did you know it bro?
- Tokenized master books, unbreakable encryption, totally secure.
- Yes brother, there are a lot of non-digital currency uses, that's what alt-coins are about.
- Everyone needs to be monetized, don't ask me why brother, I buy them you should too!
- everything will be tokenized bro, it's not just a database.
- when everything is tokenized everything will be monetized brother.

>>56932419
great description of an echo chamber right here folks

>>56929496
these prices should be pinned at the top of biz as a warning for new cult members what they're getting into

>>56932306
>duuuuuuuude I ape'd in!!!
this reads like gamestop...bottom of the barrel iq

>>56932380
/thread

>>56938021
are you really laughing though? Just in the last few days, it would now take you over 2 years at sub-bank interest link staking rate to return to where you were

>>56940937
smart man...it would've been better if you realized this last year as many alts are now up 5x+ from '22 lows but better late than never. Lots of cult members are going to miss another bullrun


>>56942099
did the team ever say anything about hiring 500-1,000 worthless remote employees while never releasing an actual product. I've never seen a startup succeed who does it backwards like this.

>>56943780
>never releasing an actual product
Like 90% of defi has been running on Chainlink for years now.

PSA for everyone, take note of how enraged >>56943763 is getting just by someone asking questions of where the money goes. You know what this reminds me of... Jeff Skilling's (Enron) famous earnings call when he snapped at an analyst for asking why they can't produce a balance sheet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2K7luvpKCI


This was one of the first public cracks that raised a major red flag across Wall st, alerting people something was wrong. You see this a lot with the CL community. The catfishy loser on twitter goes crazy on people who dare to question his cult. Just food for thought...

>>56943763
Sorry but show me a source that shows what part of the allocation the team has dumped.

You can’t.

You’ll try to flip the conversation to other topics or avoid it altogether, but you will NEVER be able to provide a source.

Sorry, but it’s the truth.

>>56943780
>these prices should be pinned at the top of biz as a warning for new cult members what they're getting into
It has outperformed every single one of those tokens handily on a longer time horizon.

You have to either believe one of 2 things at this point

>LINK, one of the best performing alts all time, has underperformed the last few years and is due for a huge run
>LINK, one of the best performing alts all time, is totally useless and is going to zero

So either buy or don't, but what is the point of you sitting in this thread arguing with LINK buyers? I am guessing you own a lot of LINK yourself, otherwise why would you be so emotionally invested?

>>56943797
Congrats! That must be huge for the coin pri--ACK!

>>56943797
>Like 90% of defi has been running on Chainlink for years now.

Quick correction.

> 90% of defi has been SUBSIDIZED BY Chainlink for years now.

Don’t see how that’s positive for the link token price.

>>56943830
>on a longer time horizon.
and BTC and ETH have outperformed everything if we examine all time ROI
the absolute state of bagholders

>>56943826
>asking questions of where the money goes
He's not asking where the money goes.

He's asking whether the tokens going to nodes are coming from the tokens allocated to nodes.

>>56943847
>> 90% of defi has been SUBSIDIZED BY Chainlink
lol

>>56943864
>the retard keeps going
shut the fuck up dude, you're literally trying to gaslight the board that
>market dumping tokens on chinknance was akkssually part of the plan and this is how it's done broskis! look at muh hecking vague and obscure development allocation slide from 2017!!
kys

>>56943861
But that would be equally as stupid. You need to examine BTC and ETH from the time of LINK's inception. Because LINK didn't exist prior.

Remember, you are comparing all of these to LINK. So LINK is your barometer. Start from LINK's beginning. Otherwise you're just bullshitting to fit your false narrative.

>>56943864
>He's asking whether the tokens going to nodes are coming from the tokens allocated to nodes.
Fucking kek
This board, man

>>56943864
>He's asking whether the tokens going to nodes are coming from the tokens allocated to nodes.
No one is asking that, why are you trying to change the narrative?

LINK has a circulating supply of 556 million tokens out of 1 billion total supply. 350 of those millions come from the ICO.

Where are the rest of the 206 millions coming from? Node operator allocation or company development allocation?

Why is it so hard to answer this? I’ll tell you why, because Sergey is obfuscating the information on purpose. Your guesses are utterly useless, Sergey keeps preaching truth over trust but he can’t even provide a breakdown of what allocation the dumps are coming from.

You are a phony and shall be judged in hell for your crimes against humanity advocate.

>>56943898
neither did SOL, MATIC, INJ, BNB, and the list goes on but you still yap about muh all time overperformance!!!
that's entirely meaningless to someone who has rode BTC or ETH since, let's say 2015
so, you have no fucking point

>>56943910
>No one is asking that
See >>56943651

>Where are the rest of the 206 millions coming from?
They were already circulated between the ICO and today.

>>56943914
Again, you are comparing ALL of these to LINK. So compare them to LINK's all time price action. Not the other way around. If you can't understand this very simple concept I don't really have time to sit here and try to teach you things, you'll just have to be a brainlet.

>>56943874
Brother, I know some big companies are paying millions of DOLLARS in fees to smartcontract (Sergey’s company), but the dumps used to subsidize BUILD projects and the the lack of fees reinvestment into the LINK token makes this project’s tokenomics one of the shittiest I’ve ever seen in my life. Sergey can have a 2 decade plan to implement his grand vision of chainlink because he has billions of dollars in his treasury, but me and thousands of other anons can’t, so we’re forced to sell link to not miss out on the upcoming run.

Can’t even ask legit questions without advocates coming out of the woodworks to derail the threads. Very sad situation desu.

>>56943960
>I know some big companies are paying
Celo is one of the smaller companies using Chainlink.
And all of them are paying.

>>56943891
Why are you getting angry? Calm down kitten

>>56943900
>He's asking whether the tokens going to nodes are coming from the tokens allocated to nodes.

Can anyone provide a breakdown of the circulating supply vs allocation or are you going to keep derailing the thread with unrelated insults?

>>56943974
Awesome, is there anywhere I can see the fees getting paid?

>>56943995
Look up the Celo thing, it had a public vote.

>>56943874
The key point however is that they hand over money to CL labs, not the actual nodes

>>56943950
>noooot faiiiiir compare everything from link's ICO reeeeeee
eat shit bagholder

>>56944015
No shit. Imagine having to pay a whole bunch of nodes individually every time you wanted to use an oracle service.

>>56941591
It's a devops role, so get into IT, compsci, sysadmin, etc...

>>56944022
So you admit nobody pays the nodes? Thank you, now we are getting somewhere.

>>56944037
In almost all cases, the one who created and runs the contract will be paying the nodes.
If you just want to use a contract that already exists, that's obviously not going to be you.

>>56943874
pay up, bitches

>>56944044
Why then does Sergey need to use premined link to pay the nodes? Why doesn't he use the so called fees collected?

>>56943986
>Can anyone provide a breakdown of the circulating supply vs allocation or are you going to keep derailing the thread with unrelated insults?

No one can because Sergey obfuscates that information. Anons thought the dumps would stop once the company allocation was depleted but since Sergey is hiding the allocation dumps info you never know when the million link batch sells will stop. Your best bet is to assume all 1 billion link tokens will be in circulation soon. Btw, links market cap will need to surpass its previous ath by 2.4x just to get to $50. Most tokens never go back to their previous aths, even less so when their supply goes up almost 3x.

>>56943995
There’s nowhere on chain you can find this info. You have to scroll through thousands of obscure articles that might, or might not be accurate as of today.

>>56944061
He said he would many years ago.
Don't like it, fax it to 2017.

>>56943986
>>56944068
It's very simple, if tokens are going to nodes, then those are from the node operator allocation.
lmao

>>56944074
Thanks for confirming that nobody pays the nodes, except for premined tokens dumped on linkmarines heads.

I will continue to drive people away from chainlink and harass the team members online and destroy any sort of sentiment.

>>56944093
>premined tokens dumped on linkmarines heads
Just as promised in 2017 kek

Imagine crying about milk spilled 6 heckin years ago.

>>56944074
>It's very simple, if tokens are going to nodes, then those are from the node operator allocation.

So… out of the 206 million link dumped after the ICO, how many have gone to node operators?

>>56944008
That’s for one company. Is there anywhere I can truthfully verify the chainlink fees onchain?

>>56944117
>So… out of the 206 million link dumped after the ICO, how many have gone to node operators?
count em up, muchacho

>Is there anywhere I can truthfully verify the chainlink fees onchain?
Probably

>>56944132
>probably
>count them up

So there’s nowhere you can find the information. Got it.

Why would I trust Sergey instead of having a truthful way to verify that info on chain?

>>56944160
Literally nobody's saying you should trust him.

>>56944160
The node operator portion seems to be 6 million link, while the company portion about 200.

6 million link over a period of 7 years shows a extreme lack of demand for chainlink services. As for the other 200 million link, they’re either being used to subsidize the defi space which is why the price drops so often, or there’s massive bloat in the company and they’re overpaying employees/over staffing. Probably a combination of both.

Overall, everything looks extremely bearish for the token price.

>>56944352
>subsidize the defi space
see >>56943874

>>56944372
Dude, your responses are literally useless. Don’t @ at me useless incel.

>>56944401
Did you get in the pool?

>>56940359
It’s hard for me to take a break from my HARDCORE GOONING sessions to find the time to sell is the issue for me.

>>56944781
What’s the point of staking if you need to wait a whole month to unstake? For a 4% roi per year. Seems scammy

>>56944860
I don't discuss chainlink with no poolers.

I wonder why Anons waste time arguing with fuddies. It doesn't matter, they're mind broken and argue in bad faith.
Just ignore them, without (You)s they seethe.
Pool's closed.

>>56945472
Absolutely based

>>56945787
>dumps 10%

Slurp that turd baggie hahah

>>56930956
If Rubic had stayed cubic

>>56944826
makes sense that a coomer can't think clearly.

>>56947151
IGNORE HIM BRO HE'S A DELUSIONAL NO POOLER THEYRE BASICALLY CATTLE

LPL POOLS CLOSED

AWWW DID YOU MISS OUT ON THAT SWEET APY???

POOLS CLOSED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY WINNING

SEETHE

>>56934017
major MAJOR league cope bucko