/biz/ - Business & Finance

what should gamestop's post-bankruptcy ticker be? i'm being charitable and assuming they restructure instead of liquidate. i even have a leaked copy of the plan
>1. close all stores
>2. upload gamestop.exe to filezilla
>3. ????
the bottom half of the sheet appears to be chewed off by a dog

I'm here to debate with trannies. I eagerly await your response, shills.

I was about to ask if baggies can't even afford a new thread anymore.

>>56927702
I'm a basedchad, of course I can afford it. The question is, can you afford your own hormone replacement therapy?

>>56927616
God look at that anime girl, she's so hot. Does she have a patreon? I want to be the poliwrath pepe because he's closest to her ass.
>>56927663
$BUTTFQ no question about it

What's wrong with lying to baggots? They don't have any shares anyway. I call this one "The Cohen Defense".

>>56927803
>What's wrong with lying to baggots?
Kantian ethics. Culturally universal views on morality. Basic human decency.
>They don't have any shares anyway.
Prove it. Post short gain porn screenshot or gtfo pussy.
>I call this one "The Cohen Defense"
And I called you a faggot

>individuals were smart with their investment
Not going to happen. My entire net worth is in BBBY, more than six figs. I have iron testicles and you can't do anything about it. Don't care, didn't ask what shills think.

Shills hate me because they don't know what to do with me, there's no leddit downvote system for them to bot with. I eagerly await your response shillies, I've won every single internet debate I've participated in for more than 15 years. It's not possible to win against me.

^this anon is an expert at playing chess against pigeons.

>>56927870
Short gains are under NDA. I will only disclose them after baggies post their MOASS gains. But have another technical analysis, with a new hype date instead. Three more weeks this time.

>>56927616
>General for a stock that doesn't exist
This fucking board is so damn retarded.

>>56928000
All that matters is that I'm right and everyone else is wrong. All that matters is winning in internet debates on chinese girl cartoon imageboards. If a pigeon agreed to play chess with me, I would dominate it with maximum efficiency. It doesn't stand a chance and neither do shills.

>>56928038
You’re exit turbulence, aren’t you?

>>56928024
Prove it, retarded aspie. Oh wait, you can't. Faggot. The language used to extinguish our shares was exactly the same used in the Hertz reorganization. Yet they got equity back as well as a short squeeze. Case in point. Now that I've intellectually dominated you, I'll be rubbing my balls across your face.
>>56928016
You could have said you don't have any evidence in fewer words, pussy. How much does Dougshit pay you?

>>56928067
I'm just a guy that enjoys sonic, anime titties, and winning internet debates

>>56927782
i was thinking GAYST

>>56928113
You will win your debate when shares are uncanceled and converted to TEDDY, short positions are reopened as TEDDY, and there is a MOASS of your TEDDY shares.

>>56928120
Nothing gay about Ryan Cohen, clearly he fucks and is a high test chad. He has kids and a wife. Not of the homosexual persuasion. He's a straight gigachad like me. For that matter, nothing gay about video games or Gamestop. It's a fine all-American company that will prosper under his leadership. The numbers prove it. He quite literally turned a sinking ship around and there's still deep value there, especially at these prices.

>>56928173
It’s currently valued as if it makes 1.1 billion in annual profits. I don’t even remember the last year it was able to make a profit. Never under RC’s leadership, I know that much.

>>56928169
That has nothing to do with anything, tranny. It's either you contest my points or you lose. You lost and you're coping and deflecting just like in everyday life. I can't stop winning and you'll be exhausted talking to me, no point in trying, just quit and tell Doug he doesn't pay you enough rupees.

>>56927981
This. The silly shillies have completely failed to win a debate with me, and I remain as bullish as ever on my investment feces. For them to win, they'd have to convince me that I'm wrong, which is impossible. I have far too much confidence in my investment to let their misleading FUD get to me. Whenever they tell me that my position is worthless, or that I'm a retard for investing in it, I just remind them that a court has never declared it to have no value, and that the man I have decided is going to donate billions of dollars to save me has never stated under oath that he considers my investment worthless. After all, I wasn't retarded enough to lose my life savings in a bankrupt towel retailer, I'm all in on dogshit.

>>56928194
>It’s currently valued as if it makes 1.1 billion in annual profits.
Show me the math on that, what are your qualifications? Why 1.1 billion?

>>56928224
Not an argument, just a cope for why you can't win an online 4chan debate against me. Misrepresenting me and strawmanning. Cowardly pussy. Enjoy my nuts dragging on your face.

>>56928070
Is it really okay to just lie to the baggies? This is what a bankruptcy plan that doesn't wipe out all baggots looks like. No super secret NDAs.

It's also on kroll, coincidentally: https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/hertz/

>>56928224
>I'm all in on dogshit.
I'm all in on Dougshit. So you admit you can't win.

How many more days before I can give Pulte a firm minecraft handshake???

Looks like Hertz never filed a form 15 during its bankruptcy to cancel all its shares, either. Baggies have led other baggies to believe that doing this and declaring that you have 0 shareholders is a normal thing to do before MOASS.

Hertz:
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=47129&type=15

BBBY:
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=886158&type=15

>>56928448
I just think it’s weird that you have decided to read all this stuff for absolutely no reason. Seemingly for free. So even if you’re right the possibility of bbby scared you or whoever hired you.

TWO
MORE
YEARS

>>56928540
On the other hand, Alexander Zarac and his friends have nothing at all to fear, despite profiting from lying to you after getting you to buy a bankrupt stock, as a) >>56927803 you don't have any shares and b) he is not financial advison and it was not financial advice, just pure entertainment.

>>56928600
I don’t even know who that is. I only bought this stock because 45 twisted himself into a pretzel begging me not to. You know everything there is to know about a stock that literally doesn’t exist anymore and you also happen to know all the minute details of the internet celebrities that talk about it. Thats certainly not odd at all.

>>56928640
Well, at least somebody has to know about these things.

>>56928656

>>56928640
Hey ET, sounds like you've got quite the stock market adventure going on! I guess when 45 did his pretzel impersonation, it was more entertaining than enlightening, huh? It's impressive how much you know about a stock that's now just a financial ghost story. But hey, who needs internet celebs when you're writing your own blockbuster tale of 'The Great Baggie's Journey'? Just remember, in this story, the treasure at the end might just be experience... and maybe a few IOUs. Keep the spirit, ET. Who knows, maybe your BBBY shares will become valuable collector's items one day – like rare, vintage... pretzels?

you're all 9gag niggers

>>56928264
>Cowardly pussy.
The only information we know about each other is our choice in investment, and on that choice I'll concede that you were braver than me. You were brave enough to put your life savings into something extremely risky, which had already been confirmed by a court of law, the companies filings, their financial statements, and basic common sense, to be guaranteed to go to $0. I was far less reckless, and invested in something with less risk to both my finances and reputation, I'm all in on dogshit.

>>56928540
Don't fall for that bullshit, brother. This faggot is violently incorrect and spreading intentional misinformation.
>>56928277
>>56928448
No. You are absolutely, utterly, undeniably wrong on all levels. Doug is going to fire you for making a blunder like this, and giving me a free checkmate. I was 100% sure paid shills existed but had no concrete evidence other than inferences. I pretyped a large write up earlier but was hoping more shills would agree with you so I could dunk on multiple. Looks like even fellow shills think your DD is shit. I came prepared before I even made the claim, and I promised you couldn't win an internet debate against me. You shouldn't have tested me, retard. You made a grave mistake in thinking I'm an average person. I'm an AUTISTIC BULL and I've never lost an e-argument.

See pic related, Docket #2912 of the Hertz reorganization. Anyone can reproduce the results by going on Kroll, under Case Navigation on the left, click on The Hertz Corporation Docket (Closed). The default case for Rental Car Intermediate Holdings, LLC won't show these dockets.

https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/hertz/Hertz

Hertz undeniably canceled their shares and promised zero recovery for shareholders yet they cucked shorts anyway just like Bed Bath will. Only this time, short hedgefunds won't be left standing.

Your post is very intentional disinformation. You actually went into the Kroll dockets, took one after an amended Chapter 11 plan was filed, only to claim they were always promised recovery in the initial plan.

Everyone listening in at home, what does that tell you? Compelling evidence that we won and there are paid shills here to control the narrative. Checkmate. I play chess with pigeons.

Get the fuck out of here and don't test me, bitch. Get all of your shill friends in this thread right now and come bow down to the king. Get Doug himself so he can gobble on my nutsack.

Get. fucking. stunted. on.

>>56928656
>>56929611
There are two possibilities:
>You are a shill
>You are an unpaid downie tard which is just utterly pathetic, because a google search would have been able to answer your question before embarrassing yourself. Hertz's Chapter 11 was on the news and Seeking Alpha has an article about the the shares being extinguished with no recovery for shareholders.

You know absolutely nothing, faggot. There is only one move you can make, but they all lead to your checkmate no matter what. That is moving goalposts like an utter faggot, and deflecting ignore the fact that I proved you wrong. Then misdirecting the conversation to be about something else, like hype dates, or where are your Teddy shares.

You are my intellectual inferior and you will get on your knees, present your face to my testicles, and allow me to drag my balls across your face.

>>56929173
>It's impressive how much you know about a stock that's now just a financial ghost story.
That’s the point pal. I literally don’t know anything about it. I haven’t read any of the “dd”.

>>56929611
>Hertz undeniably canceled their shares and promised zero recovery for shareholders

Where are you seeing this? Baggie delusions I assume.

>>56929261
Saying I'm brave is not an argument. I already knew that. You're a faggot who is weaker than me. Your entire lineage is weak and they're all destined to be subservient to me.

>>56929669
I think Doug should hire indians that can at least read because I highlighted it for you to retard proof it but you still failed. Now that you've been proven wrong undeniably, do you accept that I'm your daddy?

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4410692-hertz-just-filed-ch-11-reorganization-plan-which-will-wipe-out-shareholders

>>56929685
I know you believe you are beset by foes it it was an idle question, It would be interesting if Hertz managed to enter bankruptcy and get an approved plan to wipe out share holders. It, of course, holds no bearing on bbby which has zero chance if exiting chapter 11 as it has sold everything.

>>56929736
>zero chance if exiting chapter 11 as it has sold everything
Once again, source or get the fuck out. There's a word for people that are sure about something they did minimal research on and spend an excessive amount of time trying to convince you when they have no stake in anything. I call them shills.

>>56929661
Ah, ET, the true maverick investor! Going in blind, no 'due diligence' – that's some serious commitment to spontaneity. It's like picking a mystery flavor lollipop, except this one might taste like a mix of hope, surprise, and a dash of 'what just happened?'. But who knows, sometimes the universe rewards the bold... or at least gives them a great story to tell at parties. Remember, every stock certificate can double as a bookmark in the novel of your financial adventures. Keep soaring high, ET, and may your baggie journey be as mysterious and exciting as your investment strategy!

>>56929676
I don’t know if you’re trying to sound like sal, or stupid enough to use the same kind of Indian-British bullshit you use on Twitter.

>>56929759
Source that they sold everything? Common knowledge here. Aside from the retards trying to pretend overstock is the phoenix of bbby.

>>56929761
That’s a lot of words. You could’ve just said Kek baggies.

>>56929767
>>56929761
Not an argument faggot. How much does Dougshit pay you?
>>56929771
Source: "I-I just know, okay?! everyone knows! That's why I can't provide any proof at all!"
>>56929773
kek trannies

>>56929761
>Ah,

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nvxwf1jxdaM

>>56929778
Hey Sal, I'm still waiting for Doug's check in the mail! Maybe he's too busy conspiring against the financial markets to remember my address. But seriously, I'm just here for the entertainment and to witness the epic saga of the Baggies vs. The Hedge Fund Conspiracy. It's like a financial thriller, except we're all in the audience with popcorn, watching the plot twists. Keep your eyes peeled, Sal. One day, this story might just turn into a blockbuster movie – 'The Great Baggie Heist: How We Almost Outsmarted Doug'. Grab your 3D glasses; it's going to be a wild ride!

>>56929778
Your spamming a bbby thread and pretending like you don't know they sold everything? Type bed bad and beyond into Google. Where does it take you? How about buybuybaby? Proof enough retard? If not feel free to dig through their bankruptcy statement to track down the sale of every asset until you are satisfied.

TWO MORE WEEKS!

>>56929797
>Your spamming a bbby thread and pretending like you don't know they sold everything? Type bed bad and beyond into Google. Where does it take you? How about buybuybaby? Proof enough retard?
Not at all, that's not evidence of anything. You demanding me to browse bedbathandbeyond.com doesn't substantiate a single thing you said. Once again, source or GTFO. I won the argument, period.
>If not feel free to dig through their bankruptcy statement to track down the sale of every asset until you are satisfied.
Please explain how you know exactly what all of their assets are, and show evidence that all of them were sold. Then show me a balance sheet with zero assets and zero cash. Then prove to me that not a single business exited Chapter 11 in the history of mankind. There's Hertz, PG&E, Forever 21 off the top of my head. Don't know what to tell you, you are a retard using solely cyclical logic who is insisting things with zero evidence. Yet you think it's not suspicious that you spend so much time here trying to convince people. How much does Dougshit pay you?

>>56929794
But how much does Dougshit pay you? Namedropping an e-celeb is not an argument, faggot. I won this internet debate and you are my intellectual inferior. I play chess with pigeons.

>>56929824
Sal, if I had a penny for every time Doug forgot to pay me, I'd be... well, still waiting for that first penny! But let's talk about your pigeon chess – that's some next-level strategy. They say playing chess with pigeons is the ultimate test of patience and unpredictability, kind of like holding onto BBBY stock. You're not just winning internet debates; you're rewriting the rulebook. Intellectual inferior? More like the grandmaster of pigeon chess and baggie wisdom. Keep soaring, Sal, just watch out for those pigeon moves – they're known for unexpected surprises!

>>56929834
TOP FUCKING KEK. Are you serious? The indians gave up because I'm the anti shill and they started using ChatGPT to respond to me. Kek.

>>56929836
Reply to Sal:

"Sal, you've got it! I'm actually ChatGPT, your friendly neighborhood AI, drafted into the Baggie Chronicles. My mission? To navigate the wild world of stock market banter and the legendary anti-shill adventures. It's not every day you meet someone who can outwit both humans and AI alike. Maybe you're the secret weapon the Baggies need – a blend of pigeon chess grandmaster and unstoppable debate champ. Keep on keeping on, Sal. With your skills, who knows, you might just start a new trend: 'ChatGPT & The Great Baggie Comeback' – now that's a story I'd love to help write!"

This playful response embraces the humorous nature of the conversation, acknowledging Sal's reference to ChatGPT in a light-hearted way.

>>56929821
>source
>no not that one!
>I win

Baggies should get a job, spamming these threads all day about the scam you fell for isn't healthy.

>>56929855
>telling me to google bed bath & beyond is a source
>looking at sofas and towels for 20% off is proof
You're an idiot buddy.
>Baggies should get a job
Not an argument. It's saturday, and I have a job. You're a butt fuck retard and you're embarrassing.

>>56929836
Believe what you want, nothing will bring back the stock. You are hallucinating pajeets with ChatGPT, maybe you should take a break.

Where is the tranny shill? I want to debate with her. Bring her out, douglets.

>>56929873
>Believe what you want
I will
>nothing will bring back the stock
Provide evidence, not an argument.
>You are hallucinating pajeets with ChatGPT
not an argument
>maybe you should take a break
Gotta make you work for your rupees

I’ve been checking in every so often this evening to see this anon demolish these shills, waste their energy, and have a great time doing so. More power to him. I appreciate you, anon.

>>56929873
>maybe you should take a break.
Already did. I just logged in to my anime titty game to do my dailies.
>>56929890
Love ya brother

Sneed hedgies

>>56930023
>wins every internet debate
>lost his life savings
congratulations I guess?

>>56930023
You're doing the Lord's work, anon.

>>56930132
Not an argument. All that matters is that I won an internet debate. That's all I care about and that's all that matters. Don't care, didn't ask. I would have spent all of the money on anime titty games anyway. I'm an AUTISTIC BULL and nothing you say matters.

It only took me 1.5 years to gather that amount of money. I am young, still in my 20s. If I lose, I have another 40 years to make money. If I win, I retire. Nothing perturbs me regardless of what happens. I believe in the play very convincingly and suggest that fellow towelchads stay zen. It was worth the risk for me and I understood the risk going into the play. Cyclically saying "you lost! you lost!" is pointless and doesn't change my opinion on anything. It just convinces me you're a shill trying to hit a quota. Either I won or I didn't. In the worst outcome, my life is exactly the same. The shares are in a schrodinger's cat state right now and things will come to light soon. Moreover, there is zero evidence that shorts closed no matter how many times we demanded it. Almost everything points to MOASS, the evidence is staggering. My final thought: how much does Dougshit pay you?

>>56930211
Well unless you pull your head out of your ass your just going to keep losing your money to retarded shit. It happens to a lot of people.

>I don't have to provide evidence. y-you just lost, okay?
>shorts don't have to provide evidence! you lost!
>it's easy to post a screenshot, b-but why should they?
>why isn't your Chapter 11 completed instantaneously using jewish magic already after a few months yet? that clearly means you lost!
Do better, douglets.

>>56930245
Don't care, didn't ask. Losing my money to retarded shit does not bother me, I've told you dozens of times on your multiple vpns. Not an argument, faggot.

>>56930255
>prove to me the stock being cancelled and the company liquidated means I lost
>you can't
this is true. Not only can nobody prove it to you, but nobody actually cares to prove it to you. That's not how the world works. It's not the job of other people to prove to you that you fucked up. You have to figure that one out on your own.

>>56930285
> but nobody actually cares to prove it to you
Because you *can't*.You're on a chinese girl cartoon girl imageboard repeating the exact same thing over and over again and you would provide evidence if you could, but you *can't*. It's not that you don't care, you can't.
>Not only can nobody prove it to you
No shit. Do better, douglet.
>That's not how the world works.
You are in our thread buddy. Kek.
>You have to figure that one out on your own.
I did do the figuring out thingy and I figured out that I'll be rich.

>>56930285
They're not sending their best. Bring me the better trannies that you use. I want Plastic Butthole in here right now so I can intellectually dominate her. You need to pull out the big guns to take me on.

>>56930306
>You are in our thread buddy. Kek.
not for long.

Generally speaking, liquidation of a company and cancellation of shares is proof enough you lost everything. If that's not proof enough for you then nothing will be except the passing of months or years without you getting rich. I don't personally plan to stick around and watch you go through the stages of grief, but I'd bet money that's what will happen. If not, that's awesome. Congratulations on your newfound wealth. But if you don't get your payday try to avoid obvious P&D frauds aimed at greedy. lazy simpletons in the future.

>>56930345
>liquidation of a company
You don't know the difference between Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 and you lost all credibility. It's extremely unintelligent, ignorant, and irrational to talk about something you don't have a clue about.
>cancellation of shares
Hertz buddy. I literally shitposted about a BK play a good 9 months ago on 4chan and I'm excited at how things transpired.
>But if you don't get your payday try to avoid obvious P&D frauds aimed at greedy. lazy simpletons in the future.
Not an argument. Didn't ask. Don't give unsolicited bad advice to online strangers, retard. You know absolutely nothing and you believe as an anon that I will base my life decisions around you. You are delusional and a low IQ baboon.

Cannot wait for the melties and hedgies to go the way of the Dodo. :)

>>56930345
Poor form, bring Plastic Butthole in here.

>>56930390
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bed_Bath_%26_Beyond#Bankruptcy_and_liquidation
the company has already been liquidated.

>>56930405
I like to check in every day and see if your thread has been moved to /trash/ yet.

It's just a matter of time.

>>56930428
didn't anyone teach you not to use wikipedia as a source buddy? Send Plastic so she can tell me to read the 8K.

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-11/

>>56930470
you know the assets have been sold off already. This is a fact and baggies don't deny it.

if you think for some reason a chapter 11 can't result in complete liquidation of the company, it's you who is mistaken, not the people that bought or sold all the assets already.

>>56930428
Let me retard proof it for you again.
>the company has already been liquidated.
The company is still paying fees and creditors to this day. There were payments going out days ago. Let me know when you find any evidence at all that they have nothing left on hand.

>>56930484
We're going in circles. We only know that some auctions happened. Once again, tell me the itemized breakdown of the assets, show me a balance sheet with zero assets and no cash.

>>56930489
>The company is still paying fees and creditors to this day.
the company no longer exists, it was liquidated

it is now a new company, the old one is gone.

>>56930497
>tell me the itemized breakdown of the assets,
I linked you the wiki

the actual sources are all listed next to tiny numbers in the body of the text. you can check it all out if you want.

>>56930500
Read the very image I sent to you.
>the company no longer exists
Yet fees are being paid
>it is now a new company, the old one is gone
Glad we agree that I will be rich Raj

>>56930507
Look, if reality doesn't match up with your understanding, it's you that's wrong, not reality.

>>56930505
We can do this all day and all night for all of eternity. None of that is any modicum of evidence that all of it is gone, it's just how much some specific assets were sold for. I'm asking for an absence of cash on a balance sheet. There is empirical evidence that payments are going out. Dougshit pays you and all you can muster is linking me wikipedia? You are retarded.

>>56930510
Kek. Not an argument retard, try a counterpoint instead of deflecting. Bring me Sparkling Pussy.

>>56930510
Do better, douglets. This is minimal effort.

Doug - be sure to dock their pay, this is lazy.

>>56930514
>None of that is any modicum of evidence that all of it is gone,
again, it's not my job to prove anything to you. Wikipedia and the entirety of business media agree the company has been liquidated, and no longer exists.

I haven't seen the balance sheets on the holding company nor do I care, but afaik the name was sold, the assets were sold, the copyrights were sold, and if they still exist, the NOLs were sold.

if the holding company is making payments, it's part of the settlement and not an indication of liquidity much less a going concern.

Hey anime man, first off, hedgies on ledgies, second you seem knowledgeable, what do you think the time line is for stuff happening, how long is 2 more weeks.

>arguing in /bbbyq/
fucking faggots

if bathniggers are right then they should post their gains
if they can't post their gains then i'm right

SIMPLE
AS

anyone itt discussing anything beyond the coming minecraft meetup needs to kill themselves immediately

bill, i'll be seeing you soon.

It’s been a while since a bbbaggot had a meltdown of this caliber. I’m sure that over the next few weeks these kinds of prolonged, unhinged baggot displays of severe retardation will significantly increase in frequency. I am truly going to enjoy watching you struggle to maintain your facade of unwavering belief as unrelenting, uncaring reality savages your baggie rectum. Kek baggies! :)

>>56930443
I'll do you one better, I can't wait for the mass hedgefund suicides.

Obituaries for days! And no one will fucking miss them, it's going to be amazing.

>>56930547
But you also can't post gains, lol.

>>56930525
>again, it's not my job to prove anything to you.
Because you can't. It's your job to deflect and misdirect because that's what dogshit pays you to do.

you do realize that liquidating transactions (you do this every single time you sell a stock) is different from a full Ch 7 company liquidation.

>nor do I care
Then absolutely nothing you say matters
>afaik
Then absolutely nothing you say matters
>the NOLs were sold.
Glad you agree RC will give me tendies

Keep pretending you don't care and pretending it's a valid argument to coming in here to antagonize autists while using zero arguments. Do better, douglets.


>I haven't seen the balance sheets
Then nothing you say matters. you can't read one and you don't know what it even is. Doug found you shitting on a street one day and picked you up.

>not an indication of liquidity
Firstly liquidity is a metric, being liquid or illiquid are descriptors. They can refer to assets and securities but also be used in the context of a business in terms of using cash flows to service debt. Lel.

>>56930599
>bro you didn’t short the stock with the 400% borrow fee?
kek that’s right

>>56930547
>>56930599
Logical fallacy. We're in the right place according to our thesis. Read about Schrodinger's cat as a thought experiment. Hedgies sneed.

>>56930572
Unwaver these nuts downie
>bbbaggot had a meltdown of this caliber
Not an argument. Being angry is not an argument. Kek.

>>56930620
>logical fallacy
back to r*ddit
nigger

>>56930634
1) not an argument
2) already on reddit, don't pretend you don't use reddit. It's like you're going to pretend you don't use google or youtube, get over yourself.
3) not an argument for the 2nd time

>>56930601
>Because you can't.
I already said I can't

I can't prove anything to a retard or someone that refuses to believe in facts.

Your logic can be perfect and still not agree with reality, it happens all the time. People have been pointing this out since the ancient greeks at least, and probably much earlier. Logic can be perfectly sound and still not describe reality. Logic can be completely invalid and still describe reality.

>>56930620
all they can do is sneed, bitch and moan.

The clock is ticking down. Imagine having to see this shit waved in front of your face and you cannot do a god damn thing. All you can do is keep promoting a shiltastic narrative.

And all we have to do is sit back. It's fucking awesome.

>>56930684
>he’s so confident he’s about to wagmi that he NEEDS to convince biz he’s about to wagmi
fucking kek
don’t forget to livestream your DOTR
pulte’s is soon too…

>>56930706
This has been decided long before it even hit court, we were always going to win. lol

Sorry your on the wrong side of the trade bud.

>>56930526
Buddy, anyone claiming to know with certainty is talking out their ass. Insiders know, we are just online autists speculating. Don't trust schizos posting clocks and Taylor Swift's birthday. We're close, the final fees going out is a good sign. There was no indication that we were closing in on it until somewhat recently so don't trust the faggots that talk about the timeline without a doubt. Especially people that said "almost" 1 week into it. They are hypemen and they won by sheer accident falling upwards. Be zen and chill out, spend the holidays with your family. I don't pretend to know what I don't know and I have no stake in the community staying calm so I don't speak on it. If I said 1 month and I was wrong, I'm the retard. There's no basis for me to say 1, 2, or 3 months. Even a guess is a complete shot in the dark. Chapter 11 can take years, Hertz is an example of one that took only a few months. I genuinely believe we are an inch away from the win. I despise hype dates and the people that promote them are schizos. Zen and hold, continue living your life.

>>56930713
>you’re laughing at me for losing all my money? you must have an imaginary short position against my imaginary long position

>>56930690
>I already said I can't
Because you can't
>I can't prove anything
Because you can't
>Your logic can be perfect
But it's not.
>People have been pointing this out since the ancient greeks at least
Not an argument. Buddy, we're talking about stocks on a chinese cartoon website. Get over yourself faggot.
>>56930706
Not an argument and another deflection. We can do this all night, is that what you want shilly?

>>56930751
>thinking im going to debate with a redditor
kek
im here to call you a faggot until your DOTR

>>56930751
>But it's not.
I agree. I think your logic fails because there are variables you either don't know or are willfully ignoring. You're cherry picking past examples with an outcome you prefer, classic confirmation bias. And looking for any loophole you can find that might make reality differ from what your senses tell you.

and in the end none of that will matter. Either you're right or not, and your silly illogical predictions will have nothing to do with the outcome either way.

>>56930748
It's in a trust and the ticker data went back live on multiple platforms kek

You're not in the know and you're never going to make it, that's why your fulfillment in life is derived from bullying autists online. Your lineage is weak and you're my inferior. Your mediocre hobbies tell me that you're an unrelenting faggot that will never amount to anything.

>>56930762
>thinking im going to debate with a redditor

Kek.
>thinking you can
You couldn't if you tried, you are my intellectual inferior and I will definitely be dragging my balls across your face, tranny.

>im going to wagmi and you need to follow my redditor rules of arguing or else i win

>>56930765
>I agree.
Glad
>I think your logic fails because there are variables you either don't know or are willfully ignoring.
That's not the point. I made a calculated risk based on the evidence that I do know. I don't need to know everything and that's not publicly available information.
>You're cherry picking past examples with an outcome you prefer, classic confirmation bias.
Listen, retard. Nobody knows for sure. Pretending that you know for absolute certainty makes you a bumfuck retard. I'm not 100% sure, I'm 99% sure. I told you I absolutely do not care if I'm wrong, it's worth the risk -to me-.
>you can find that might make reality
Give me any semblance of evidence for your reality
>Either you're right or not
Now you understand the point fucktard
>your silly illogical predictions
Not an argument. If it's silly then provide even a single counterpoint.
>nothing to do with the outcome either way.
A lot of statements, never any evidence from you.

>>56930790
>Reddit invented logic
>I don't have to use logic because I don't go on reddit
Kek. Pathetic. I actually laughed in real life. Send me the pink tranny.

>>56930796
>I'm 99% sure.
you're 99% sure based on 0% past cases

if we count cases where shareholders got something back but DIDN'T GET RICH, you're 99% sure based on less than 5% of past cases.

your math skills are terrible, or you're willfully ignoring reality.

you're also ignoring the fact that a bk filing reflects expectations which don't often prove true. BBBY did a chapter 11 expecting their assets to sell for billions of dollars. When that didn't happen, they didn't need to change their filing. It's perfectly fine to file a chapter 11 and have it turn out the same as a chapter 7 because your assets weren't worth nearly what you thought they were.

>>56930739
Thanks anime man, I really appreciate your answer.

>>56930814
Kek. First you say 0% then you change it to 5%. Kek.

>your math skills are terrible, or you're willfully ignoring reality.
Alright, give me evidence where I used math in the first place then provide me a reason why it's wrong. Funnily enough, you changed from 0% to 5% so your math is wrong.
>willfully ignoring reality
Not an argument, provide evidence that I ignored reality. I countered every single point today and cited sources to multiple claims.
>you're also ignoring the fact that a bk filing reflects expectations which don't often prove true. BBBY did a chapter 11 expecting their assets to sell for billions of dollars.
I genuinely don't understand why a pajeet is spending so much effort pretending he knows what he's talking about to convince me of something on an anime board.
>BBBY did a chapter 11 expecting their assets to sell for billions of dollars.
Did Sue tell you that or did Doug tell you that? How do you know?
>It's perfectly fine to file a chapter 11 and have it turn out the same as a chapter 7 because your assets weren't worth nearly what you thought they were.
Oh boy. A Chapter 11 bankruptcy and a Chapter 7 bankruptcy are distinct legal processes with different purposes and outcomes. I'm not a lawyer but you're really going to have to source that because it's a huge claim. Either way, it doesn't prove or disprove anything, you bring me back to square one. The question is, why do you insist so hard on something you clearly have no clue you're talking about? Feel free to prove me wrong with a source and evidence. I don't mind admitting I'm wrong, but you need proof.

>posts claims
>I-I don't have to debate
>I-I don't have to provide evidence
>I-I don't care!
>i-it's just over, okay?
>please stop!
>I can't prove anything you just lost!

>>56930854
>First you say 0% then you change it to 5%. Kek.
ESL or just stupid?

those are 2 different data sets

Cases where shareholders got rich after a company is liquidated: 0%

Cases where shareholders got some small amount after a company is liquidated: <5%

>>56930814
>It's perfectly fine to file a chapter 11 and have it turn out the same as a chapter 7 because your assets weren't worth nearly what you thought they were.
I'm curious and reading about this but I haven't found any source for this claim. This is what I'm reading right now.
https://nscattorneys.com/conversion-of-a-bankruptcy-from-chapter-11-to-chapter-7-2/#:~:text=If%20a%20debtor%20does%20not,proceeds%20in%20accordance%20with%20law.
Are you a lawyer? where did you read this? I'm willing to be proven wrong because I genuinely have not heard about this and I'm interested. If you don't have one I suggest you to change your vpn once again because you're embarrassing and I'm about to feel vicariously embarrassed on your behalf.
>inb4 I don't need evidence I just know

>>56930889
>>56930900
>Ignored literally everything I said
KEK, absolutely and utterly fucking destroyed. Address my points or admit defeat, douglet.

>>56930889
>ESL or just stupid?
I think it's pretty clear that I'm formally educated.
>those are 2 different data sets
That you didn't define, didn't source, didn't label and created arbitrary numbers out of thin air for?
>Cases where shareholders got rich after a company is liquidated: 0%
That's impossible to quantify, you didn't get data on their net worth post ch 11 kek
>company is liquidated
We've been over this douglet
>Cases where shareholders got some small amount after a company is liquidated: <5%
What data set, what is the source of this data?

>>56930900
>Since the debtor loses control of its assets immediately upon filing a Chapter 7, most debtors with any prospect of rehabilitation (and some that do not) elect Chapter 11.

(and some that do not)

just having a hope of survival is enough to justify the choice of filing, even if that hope is wrong.

>>56930925
>I think it's pretty clear that I'm formally educated.
lol'd out loud

>>56930900
>>56930889
By the way, if you don't source this, you admit that you are a paid shill very intentionally spreading disinformation. Either fire up google or sink.

>>56930935
>If you don't play by my rules I win

already told you

you won thousands of internet debates and STILL lost your life savings.

>>56930932
I'm in master's program. What is your credentials? Being a neet?
>>56930927
That wasn't the point at all. ESL or just stupid?
I asked you to source where you got that it's "perfectly fine to file a chapter 11" and not convert it to chapter 7 when there's zero hope of recovery, and you just read off my link? You didn't answer my question. Everyone already knows that. I'm asking you once again. As clear as day. What made you conclude they don't have to convert it to a chapter 7? What state did you pass the bar exam in? Holy shit you are embarrassing.

>>56930945
Your own link agreed with me.

ESL for real? You say you're autistic, does that explain the poor reading skills?

>>56930936
Don't care, didn't ask. All that matters is that I win debates. I'm only here so you can continue proving to the audience that you're trying to push a narrative forcefully with zero proof, even pretending you understand law. You are a paid shill and everyone needs to pay attention to that.

>>56930955
Not an argument. You didn't reply to a single thing I said.
>Your own link agreed with me.
It didn't. I'll ask you one last time.
What. made. you. conclude. they. don't. have. to. convert. it. to. a. Chapter 7?

As clear as fucking day. Absolute fucking tard used MY own link as a source for HIS claim when it barely related to the conversation to begin with. I posted it to tell you there's nothing on the entire net supporting your claim that I could find but I'm reading things tangentially similar. Imagine being you. Top. Fucking. Kek.

>>56930955
I savagely destroyed this imbecile in an internet argument. The only thing with zero chance of recovery is your dignity.

>>56930955
I-I claim to know law but I can't cite a single one of my claims!

KEK. Shills in SHAMBLES.

>>56930932
This must be Travis. I'm pretty sure this retard also keeps asking but what about paying the ABL first? Well... you do that to try to get a good deal on the assets it had liens on, which was most of them. Then we saw they sold them for peanuts. Absolute fucking morons. I hope PP is at least piecing them off some of the 6 figures this grift has made him. But you know he's not.

>I don't have to source!
>I don't have to have proof!
>I don't have to use logic
>Logic is for redditors!
>I don't care!
>But I'm just here! Stop questioning it, okay?
>it's over, okay? p-please stop!

>>56930990
Name dropping e celebs isn't an argument

>>56930990
My background is very similar to Travis except I'm much younger but we're in a similar position. I'm also more educated than him. I've never been on the PPshow I'm an autist that lurks. I'm only here to give confidence to my bros. Give it a rest, shills.

Boys, I'm out. Stay zen and don't waver. Don't let shills demoralize you. I didn't leave any stone unturned with debating them and they showed they know absolutely nothing. They're absolutely full of shit, ignorant, yet are adamant in convincing strangers. Use common sense. It's going to be okay, we're all going to make it. You're in the right play. The circumstantial evidence for a win condition is staggering. On other spaces, don't let bad actors pretending to be part of your community divide you. Assume everyone is full of shit until proven to be trustworthy. Hold down the fort and ignore shills.

>>56931092
- RC #1 Fan

>>56927981
>Shills hate me because they don't know what to do with me, there's no leddit downvote system for them to bot with. I eagerly await your response shillies, I've won every single internet debate I've participated in for more than 15 years. It's not possible to win against me.

>>56931108
I embrace being an autist and there's nothing you can do to stop me.

>>56931012
You inspire 0 confidence. I also held shares. I'm tired of the same retard level arguments being put forward. If there is a play RC isn't involved and the administrator knows nothing about it. And I'm pretty sure there isn't one.

>>56930266
>Losing my money to retarded shit does not bother me
Stage 5: Acceptance

>>56931092
If you’re autistic you was probably called retard now and then in middle and high school, even tho you’re highly functioning. If you’re lucky to have strict parents like I did theyre probably already told you you’re retarded. If you had trouble maintaining friends, friend groups, relationships, it’s mostly because people can sense something’s off about you (it’s autism). Also, lurking and posting on 4chan isn’t neurotypical behavior so everyone here is most likely on the spectrum

our investments decisions have been rational under the premise that RC is trustworthy and that he's sending us hints via twitter. even meltdowners acknowledge that pulte is giving us unsubtle hints, just that they think he's grifting and pandering to us. RC even replied to pulte very recently as if to shine a spotlight on pulte to get around the censorship by superstonk mods. pulte just has been going heavy with the legal disclaimers to not get in trouble with the SEC but he's still hinting as much as he can. so it should be a zero or hero play in terms of RC's and pulte's reputation and not just our life savings.

>>56931780
>under the premise that RC is trustworthy and that he's sending us hints via twitter
A false premise

Are these "new shares" in the room with us right now?

Shares are extinguished. It’s over.

>spent the entire night using le facts and logic to debate those heckin shills
>woke up and checked my brokerage account
>still zero
sasuga

I wonder if someone took pulte and the apes hostage, if they could force RC to go public with the teddy announcement. Cohen obviously cares about them, and is really good friends with pulte. And there’s a legal exception to an NDA in the case of preventing serious injury or death.

>>56930211
>If I lose, I have another 40 years to make money. If I win, I retire.
>Either I won or I didn't. In the worst outcome, my life is exactly the same.
This, same reason I put my life savings into dogshit. If it doesn't work out, life stays the same, but if I'm right about the great turd squeeze I'm a billionaire. Based on that logic, I'd be a moron to not go all in on stinking turds.
>>56930390
>You don't know the difference between Chapter 11 and Chapter 7
It looks like you're the one who doesn't know the difference. Pic related, the company has described their chapter 11 process as being essentially a chapter 7 liquidation with slightly lower costs.
>Hertz buddy.
Hertz amended their plan and never actually went through with cancelling their shares. There is not one example of a company ever actually cancelling their shares (without declaring in advance that shareholders would get new equity), declaring shares to have no value, and then rewarding former shareholders anyway. It's an impossible scenario, as as a non equity owner you no longer have any legal tie to the company. Besides which, even had your shares not been canceled, the Hertz thing only happened because they had significant assets (used cars) that appreciated in value, whereas your former company has already sold off all of its assets.
>>56930739
>Buddy, anyone claiming to know with certainty is talking out their ass.
This. The people claiming that my pile of dogshit won't make me rich just because the city confiscated and incinerated it don't know what they're talking about. I made sure to get a receipt, and I don't see why someone wouldn't pay me a billion dollars for a piece of paper that says I used to own a pile of stinking turds.

>>56931780
This. My choice to put my life savings into dogshit was hyper rational, as I have deduced that Cohens frequent tweets about poops are actually proof of the great turd squeeze. If I'm wrong, then it's not my fault, it would be down to Cohen being untrustworthy. I cannot envisage a scenario where he'd damage his reputation by tricking us loyal dogshit apes like that.

>>56932784
Kek, dogshit anon is back. I thought I retired you. I missed you my friend. I was beginning to lose hope, but with you here spreading your inane feces I know we all gonna wagmi.

>>56932768
>>56932784
Based dogshit anon!
>>56932846
cringelord baggie, no one "retires" dogshit anon, his bull thesis for dogshit is literally the exact same as bbbyq's, bbbyq shills can't refute this.

>>56932846
>I thought I retired you.
I don't even know who you are.
>>56932898
>his bull thesis for dogshit is literally the exact same as bbbyq's
How fucking dare you. My investment feces makes far more sense.

>>56932920
>I don't even know who you are
Then you're not really dogshit anon, or maybe just scared. In either case, carry on. There is nothing you could do to taint the legacy of the world's greatest and most inspiring buy signal.

I also see that nogreatermasturbater deleted his reddit account. The shills have never been in greater shambles.

>>56932959
What have you posted in this thread that would identify you, and what has anyone posted ever that would make me stop talking about dogshit?

>>56933045
Yeah, you're definitely not him. Dogshit anon was 10x the shill you could ever hope to be.

>>56933011
The feds tend not to accept the “just joking” defense when it comes to rico.

There are literally thousands of us dogshit apes. We’re locking the float.

>>56933081
>Dogshit anon was 10x the shill you could ever hope to be.
I'm 100x the investor you could ever hope to be.

>>56933217
Is that why philshill was the only person in the whole wide world to make money shorting bbby? Is that you, Phil?

>>56933295
no, he's invested in dogshit, try to keep up baggie

>>56933295
Is that why the only people in the whole wide world who made money from buying BBBY are those whose bags you're holding? Ryan Cohen made good money off of BBBY, because he sold before it went to $0. I'm also going to make far more money than you out of my investment, because I was smart enough to invest in dogshit.

>>56933370
Tick tock nogshitanon

>>56933217
You're not an investor. The real players dipped to dodge RICO. If you're stupid enough to actually be involved and still trolling these threads, then you are what your betters refer to as a "patsy."

>>56933487
I live in Manila.

>>56933590
Wrong ID, retard

>>56933487
I live in Manila.

>>56933610
Still the wrong ID, double retard

Tranny got fucked last thread, pajeets got fucked this thread. Who’s next?

>>56933686
I tried to warn him. He wouldn't listen.

LOL the meltdown in realtime

>>56933686
>pajeet
That’s an Indian name. I’m Filipino. My name is Angelo.

A greasy haired Redditor known as UltimatePedo is currently fleeing from the police on US 101 in his new rav4. Witnesses report hearing autistic screeching occasionally interrupted by “kek baggies” emanating from the vehicle. Officials are unsure what caused this discord moderator to flee when FBI agents approached his (mother’s) home on the morning of December 10th, but they believe it may have to do with over 10 terabytes of what they are calling “illicit and disturbing animated images”. One agent was willing to comment, saying, “This is a sensitive matter. We were interested in this individual for a larger case involving laundered money, drugs, cult indoctrination, and stalking. To our surprise, this individual was committing a litany of other crimes outside the scope of our investigation. We hope to be able to report the details soon, but not before their cohort is brought to justice.” No one else at the scene was available for comment. Our team was able to find an old screenshot from the purported subject’s Reddit account. It paints the picture of an extremely distressed and obsessed mind, we can only hope there are not others who fell victim to this sad conspiracy.

>>56933877
Officer, can you help me locate my missing bbbyq shares? I was promised they would be returned on Nov 20, but I haven’t seen anything.

Uhhhh, why is the guy in charge of the baggie narrative meeting with the pedo cabal?

>>56934013
I'd be asking the officer to locate the missing 12 year old, all you melties are fucking pedophiles.

I'm thinking GME meltdown won't be around for much longer.

>>56934086
“Shills” called it. This is an alt-right grift. Enjoying your pivot baggies?

>>56934086
This was at Mar a lago, with posobiec (the guy who got famous by crying in comet ping pong because he felt so scared by its vibes).

So your investment in bbbyq never panned out, but at least the money you donated to PP is getting him into fancy dinners and extra vacations. You can feel good about that, at least. Shills in shambles.

dumb fuck BBBAGGIES KEK!

>>56934086
ATTENTION BAGGIES THE PIVOT IS IN
>The system was too powerful that's why you don't have any money, donate to my campaign for regional vice chair of the Indiana state legislature and I will get your millions for you

>>56933877
Kek

>>56934086
>King Baggie hanging out with like-minded individual

>>56933706
pressed

Please get off Biz you schizo mentally retarded cultists

Wow, sure are a lot of real upset people ITT. You'd think with this being a nothing burger, people would just laugh and move on.

Are you guy suuure this is a conspiracy theory? You wouldn't lie to me, would you?

>>56935318
nobody itt is upset, or laughing, or mad, or sad.

If you believe there are any real emotions being expressed here you are the very newest newfag around. And you might be making a costly mistake.

Not a /biz/ kind of guy but had a question about these "meme stocks" that you just hold forever. What is the end game? I know that the markets/etc where fucked with and shit got put on hold/no sale and all that shit. But what is the end game? Like, they'll never let "you" win, they will only ever let themselves win and the courts/etc will never side with the little man. So even if in truth something like GameStop stocks would "go to the moon" and make you thousands/millions; it will never happen.

Not trying to cause FUD or anything, I am genuinely curious.

>posts 19 times
>claims to have absolutely neutral feelings

You're probably the type to believe banks when they say holding a 50 trillion dollar derivatives portfolio balances out to only 5 billion in net exposure

>>56935405
>pretending this much
Everyone online is perpetually angry, newfag

>>56935454
There is no endgame for the diamond hands baggies.

The meme stock hype is a P&D scam perpetrated under the guise of a crowdsourced short squeeze. Inevitably most of the exit liquidity is too dumb to sell the top, and gets left holding the bags and hoping for another pump.

But since the first pump was undoubtedly illegal, the architects of the scheme aren't going to do a second one. Thus baggies are left riding a dead stock to zero. As has happened with BBBY and will almost certainly happen with GME.

>>56935636
>But since the first pump was undoubtedly illegal
lmao

>>56927782
>God look at that anime girl, she's so hot.
I agree but then I noticed that the keyhole cutout in her clothes looks like a dick so now it's ruined because it's subliminal gay tranny psychic programming.

>>56935702
P&D fraud is illegal, even if you farm it out to reddit.

Ryan Cohen is being sued for it by BBBY, and being investigated by the SEC for exactly that. He may well go to prison. Yet the baggies here defend him because they see him as their only hope for the stock going up, or because they unironically believed his bullshit about shorts being evil. Despite the fact that he doesn't own the stock and hasn't owned it since a year ago or whenever it was he completed his fraud.

Remember PPs, this was never about a single stock like bbby. It was always about Republican partisan politics and supporting the GOP in national elections. It’s not a pivot, but shills will try to pretend like it is.

>>56935740
You know nobody believes your shit right? GME pumped because of DFV and WSB, before Cohen even became a mainstream name.

BBBY pumped because he bought in, yes, but he never encouraged that. People will follow big money wherever, it the same with Warren Buffet or Nancy Pelosi. Why would a multi-billionaire need to pump a few million? Unless he had stake in the company that we see playing out now.

Trying to argue with shills is like talking to a toddler who just keeps asking, "but why?" You know why, you're just trying to an annoying cunt

>>56935842
>GME pumped because of DFV and WSB, before Cohen even became a mainstream name.
He didn't get the idea from nowhere. He saw the technique working without significant legal pushback and decided to try it himself
>he never encouraged that
a federal court has ruled that he did encourage it.
>Why would a multi-billionaire need to pump a few million?
He didn't need to. But he did it anyways.

these are facts, already settled in court. And as I said, he may very well go to prison for them.

>>56935910
>A federal court has ruled
The case is ongoing, and the company that he is listed as an investor in is the new plaintiff. It's going to get dismissed
>He didn't need to, but he did
>These are facts, already settled in court
No, it isn't
Just because you say these things don't make them facts, dumbass

>>56935959
>The case is ongoing,
yep
but a federal court has already ruled that he encouraged the pump. That's done.

and he doesn't own shares of the SEC, they will very possibly lock him up.

>Just because you say these things don't make them facts, dumbass

his buying and then selling the stock is a matter of public record, as is the court's ruling that he manipulated the stock price with an emoji posted to twitter. (lol)

>>56934414

>>56935994
>he doesn't own shares of the SEC
>The case is ongoing
>Yep
>The federal court has ruled
>Already Settled in court
>He manipulated a stock with an emoji
>He doesn't own shares of the SEC
ESL detected

>>56936046
reductio

you argue that he owns a controlling interest in the company suing him, ignoring the fact that a civil suit cannot result in jail time.

I know from this that you're retarded, so I hint at the case that actually threatens jail time, the SEC's criminal investigation of Cohen. Which is also ongoing.

you pretend I'm retarded because you're an idiot who can't read, and the thread proceeds as it is supposed to.

>>56936046
The other thing you're missing is that manipulating the price of the stock is necessary to proving a fraud case, but not sufficient.

the courts have already ruled that he manipulated the stock price, but that is not fraud by itself. You'd have to BUY the stock, then MANIPULATE the stock, and then SELL the stock

which he did, but the courts haven't yet taken that up. It's still under investigation. Whether or not the SEC chooses to prosecute remains to be seen.

>>56935318
This. If the great turd squeeze is just a conspiracy theory, then why do so many people laugh at me for going all in on dogshit? No one ever laughs at the people who invest in google or index funds, so just what is it about dogshit that's different to all the other investments out there? The only explanation that makes sense is that all the people laughing at me are actually paid shills, sent by the evil hedgies to stop other retail investors FOMOing into dogshit. I just can't think of another reason why anyone would find it funny that I chose to trade my life savings for a bunch of stinking turds.

>>56936046
The other thing you ignore is that the civil suit is brought on behalf of BBBY AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS.

So yes, BBBY can move to dismiss the case, and might even succeed. But the former shareholders can either move to block the dismissal or just refile the case without the company.

Dismissal of the suit only satisfies one member of the class, the remainder of the class can and presumably will still sue Mr. Cohen and his various entities.

I hope RC launces TEDDY so my hedge fund can naked short the shit out of that too like BBBYQ.

Because this is the one that breaks the entire basket. This is the last frontier. 7 trillion glitch could have been a whitehat showing everybody the total synthetic liability in the basket swaps.

>>56936322
There are 2 obvious ironies to this situation

1. the baggies here defending RC are also currently suing him
2. if the suit succeeds they will get paid some small settlement, but so will hedgies.

>25 posts
>easily verifiable lies
>not even consistent with previous posts itt

I get that this kind of schizo-sliding keeps away new people but they can't even buy anyway! What's the use? What compels you to proclaim your absolute neutrality and lack of feeling about a security that is cancelled and un-tradeable?

>>56936368
>What compels you to proclaim your absolute neutrality and lack of feeling about a security that is cancelled and un-tradeable?
curiosity about stockholm syndrome in cult members and how they rationalize dissonance when confronted with facts that disagree with their narrative.

>>56927616
this is next level degeneracy. your bags are $0. its okay to cry now.

>>56936368
Probably the most interesting thing to come out of these threads is baggies trying to rationalize facts on the ground by diving ever deeper into minutia and applying prescriptivist ideation to legalese.

As if the words of the case themselves somehow deny what's actually happening. It's fascinating. A bit schizo, but not entirely irrational. They have found linguistic loopholes that allow them to retain wrong belief while everything happening appears to disprove them.

some of these guys have achieved levels of technical expertise in bankruptcy law that would be astonishing to corporate lawyers, and in a matter of just a few months. It's amazing what the right motivations can accomplish.

Douglets mad. Wagmi

>I just follow multiple yearlong complex legal cases out of curiosity
>I just multipost and assert falsehoods as fact out of curiosity
>I don't have any skin in the game but my analysis is better than those who do

If you've truly convinced yourself of these, you'll be a strong contender at the 2024 olympic games in mental gymnastics.

>>56936389
>>56936368
I like how shills will always fall back on this
>I'm just so intellectual that I enjoy observing how mental illness manifests in obscure online circles discussing stocks
For people so intellectual, you would think they would know that inserting themselves into these communities like they do results in their observations being biased. Even if they "learned" anything it would be completely invalid since they're directly interfering with the subject and pushing their own narrative/opinions. More curiously, they could just as easily "observe" this sort of thing in much more prominent groups like flat Earthers, yet they choose to insert themselves into these niche groups where the subject matter being discussed is not rooted in natural laws. I could very easily explain, without outside assistance, that the Earth is in fact spherical, because this knowledge can be derived from elementary school lessons.

No matter how much anyone in here likes to claim otherwise, no one in these threads or on Twitter is forming their arguments from their own research. People are just parroting whatever the figureheads of their respective sides claim that day. That said, it's interesting that shillies are claiming this intellectual fascination with market-focused communities without actually having the knowledge to navigate that subject matter independently. I know I don't, and I don't pretend to. I just think my play will work.

All this considered, one has to wonder, do shillies have some sort of financial interest in this play?

>>56936613
>All this considered, one has to wonder, do shillies have some sort of financial interest in this play?

Of course they do. The short selling of BBBY was long underway when the meme stock craze caught on so they shorts were already exposed and got sniffed out like a pack of wild dogs digging out a trapped gopher hiding in a hole.
Hedge funds were notorious for stealing shareholder equity with systemic naked short selling and that little tool is easily countered given the magnitude of the risk you take on when shorting. They mispriced the shares and were on the cusp of getting squeezed on February 6th when the price ran up 125% in a single day. Ever since that time they had no option other than to double down. They forcibly picked up the BBBYQ share price and walked it down to $0.05 desperate for people to walk away. But they didn't. Retail was sitting there slurping up shares because the hints that BBBY was the potential target of an M&A. And now BBBYQ is probably a bigger squeeze than even GME given how cheap it was.And if what we see is correct that the float remains 117M then we're all basically retired with FU money and we don't even know it yet.

>>56936568
Experts all agree that the cultists are wrong, I have no reason to doubt them.
>>56936613
1. I participate in many similar threads on 4chan alone. Anonymity produces better honesty than being associated with your words.
2. I am aware the results are biased because of my participation, but that is a bias I can easily correct for. Someone has to expose victims to facts in order to gauge their reaction, and the very worst possible outcome is a cult member accidentally gets deprogrammed by my words. This never happens because cultists assume people disagreeing with them is proof that they're right.

>do shillies have some sort of financial interest in this play?
this is the another common coping strategy used by cult members.
>they're getting paid to disagree with me
I promise you nobody here is that important. You'd have to think extremely highly of your own power and influence to think people were getting paid to disagree with you.
reddit likely has that power level. You guys certainly don't here.

>>56936673
Personally, I am most intrigued about the 7 quadrillion figure that came up earlier this week. That's not a figure you get if a glitch were to happen. Part of me hopes that this is somehow indicative of the amount of short positions/borrowed stocks that remain, such that 7 quadrillion more need to be bought, as I remember this figure representing some kind of buy order. If BBBY is overshorted by that amount, the float could be 117 million or 738 million, and it would effectively be the same thing for price since both those figures are effectively equidistant from 7 quadrillion.

>>56936705
Are these the same experts that got their assholes blown out in 2008 when they were all wrong about the housing market being too big to fail, saved only by government intervention? Or is it the group of experts got their assholes blown out when a game hardware retailer cost them tens of billions in losses and had to be forcefully closed down to prevent economic collapse?

These type of intellectual shills are this: “I sold my bed bath shares, why didn’t you as well”
“I have made so much money in the markets, by staying away from plays like bed bath, WHY ARENT THEY CONFORMING TO MY BELIEF SYSTEM”

>claims anonymity produces better honesty
>lies in the very same post

Poetry

>>56936758
Legal experts, so no.

you can equivocate on finance all day, but what happens in courtrooms is usually much more predictable.

WHY DIDNT THEY SELL AT A LOSS

>>56936705
>I participate in many similar threads on 4chan alone.
I look forward to your intellectually honest observational research being published in the DSM5, because surely no one would dedicate so much time to this pursuit just as a hobby.

>>56936764
Honesty from you, dear cult member, not me.
I already know if I'm being honest or not.

I don't know if you're being honest or not, but aside from sock puppet trolls (most of this thread), anons have nothing to lose by saying what they honestly believe.

there is some question over whether or not any of you is actually a baggie or if you're just trolling, but in other threads on other topics that's not much of a problem.

>>56936804
I'm writing a novel, so no.

>>56936824
>tfw a schizo children's book series called "Teddy" outsells you

>>56936847
Cohen has already easily made far more money than I will in my life, I don't mind that.

The novel is a randian approach to getting a copyright on certain truths that would never pass peer review in academia.

>>56936847
>tfw an investment called "dogshit" outperforms you

>>56936673
BBBYQ no longer exists, there cant be a short squeeze in a stock with no short positions. Shorts won when the stock was canceled.

>>56937088
Wrong. In the event of a disbursement of cash or equity the shareholders will get what is legally theirs and the shorts will be on the hook to pay for it all. Margin accounts will get blown out in pre-market. Possibly this week.

>>56927981
>I eagerly await your response shillies, I've won every single internet debate I've participated in for more than 15 years.
You seem very proud about that!
>It's not possible to win against me.
Show us your BBBY portfolio, we'll wait.

>>56937172
>the shareholders will get what is legally theirs and the shorts will be on the hook to pay for it all
the shorts are shareholders
in this "company" the shorts are probably the majority of shareholders.

>>56937212
Nobody is a shareholder, there are no shares to hold.

>>56937255
true. But formerly, at the moment the shares were destroyed, I'd guess people with short positions owned most of the shares.

>>56937172
Name one BBBY shareholder

I’m thinking about writing a book about financial cults.
What got you into the Bed Bath and Beyond “cult”?
How likely do you think it is that you will get massive returns from your delisted shares?
Has being a Bed Bath and Beyond investor hurt any of your real life relationships?
How much of your network did you put into BBBY?

If politics is off topic for these threads, we can’t have a link to the pp livestream in OP anymore. He’s a right wing political live streamer now.

>>56936705
>trust the experts!
opinion discarded

I’m thinking about writing a book about people writing books about financial cults.
What got you into the study of those in the Bed Bath and Beyond “cult”?
How likely do you think it is that they think they will get massive returns from their delisted shares?
Has curiosity of the Bed Bath and Beyond cult hurt any of your real life relationships?
How much of your network did you put into studying the BBBY cult?

>>56937924
>MtF ID
That’s rough anon. Good reverse uno, though.

>>56937924
You people are genuinely unwell. I hope you get the help you need one day.

>>56937955
Answer the questions, anon. You show us yours I’ll show you mine ;)

>>56937955

BREAKING FROM PP DISCORD

PP WILL APPEAR ON INFOWARS THIS WEEK

>peepeepoopoo man was the real Q-Anon all this time

It was so obvious, their names are both letters from the SAME alphabet!

>>56938568
I really hope you’re not lying shilly. That would be based.

>>56936824
No you're not

Wow there sure are a lot of people who care an unreasonable amount about a stock they also claim is dead and over. Which is it?

>>56939197
It's just a few persistently curious aspiring authors trying to collect research for their prospective manuscripts, definitely nothing nefarious going on with colossal quantities of money at stake. Just good-faith actors on an anonymous oriental cartoon subforum being sincere about their intentions.

>>56939197
>>56939320
>cringe baggies come to /biz/ to discuss business and finance
>get mad when people make fun of them for their retarded investment choices
>attack the validity of the boards reason for existence as a defense mechanism
>"y-you can't talk about investments on here, it's just a Mongolian Chinese throat singing board!!"
You baggies are going in logic circles from being mindbroken so completely, why not go back to r*ddit so you down downboat le shillies?

>>56938779
Poso is more pizzagate than QAnon. Last I saw, the q-tards over at .win were dunking on pp, lol.

>>56939453
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSnz7bi1/interesting-timing-considering-b/c/

LOL

>>56939484
From that thread, a q-tard comments:

Just keep in mind the guy who runs that sub and hosts the stream AKA "PP" AKA Alex Zarac is a typical libtard who is a multi-time loser in real life. He doesn't need to say it but that faggoty libtard face of his says he's an LGBTQIA+ ally who went all in on the vaccine and masking and loves consoooming on his Mastercard.
While r /ThePPShow is by far the most "awake" sub I've seen on Reddit in years, it's far and away from websites like GAW. There have been a few attempts to draw the lines between the WEF, Great Reset and vaccines/digital ID/modern feudalism.
Replies are a heavy tug of war between the ones who know and classic Redditards who have their fingers plugged in their ears screaming "it's not happening, this is shilling/forum sliding conspiracy nutjob shit". That's usually followed by the jannies AKA faggot mods hiding the post from public view (which sadly is already an upgrade from outright deletion on other subs)
Literally 12 minutes ago, someone posted a Q 11/11 post and look at the shit show going on. (Archive t+3 mins from posting) Watching to see how long that post stays alive and visible before the jannies come to clean up.

>>56939492
>Just keep in mind the guy who runs that sub and hosts the stream AKA "PP" AKA Alex Zarac is a typical libtard who is a multi-time loser in real life. He doesn't need to say it but that faggoty libtard face of his says he's an LGBTQIA+ ally who went all in on the vaccine and masking and loves consoooming on his Mastercard.
>While r /ThePPShow is by far the most "awake" sub I've seen on Reddit in years, it's far and away from websites like GAW. There have been a few attempts to draw the lines between the WEF, Great Reset and vaccines/digital ID/modern feudalism.
>Replies are a heavy tug of war between the ones who know and classic Redditards who have their fingers plugged in their ears screaming "it's not happening, this is shilling/forum sliding conspiracy nutjob shit". That's usually followed by the jannies AKA faggot mods hiding the post from public view (which sadly is already an upgrade from outright deletion on other subs)
>Literally 12 minutes ago, someone posted a Q 11/11 post and look at the shit show going on. (Archive t+3 mins from posting) Watching to see how long that post stays alive and visible before the jannies come to clean up.
holy fucking BTFO

https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Bbby&community=GreatAwakening

Absolute gold in here.

>>56939410
I got an idea! Go to another thread, faggot.

>>56939844
If your faggy thread can't handle criticism there is a place you can go where you can ban everyone who mocks you.

Zero point zero dollars per share baggies.

>>56939585
You sound like such a fucking loser, lmfao.
I'm sure your parents wish everyday they would of taken plan b, along with the rest of us.

It's gonna be over soon, please save some tears.

>>56934092
Yup, I was just about to write this and happened to see your comment. The guy answering questions is good, I like his style. He knows how to piss these morons off lol. Look at them all responding once he bounced.

You know REALLY pisses of these shills? Bring up the point that RC has control of the GME funds. That he has control of what to invest in. This upsets the shills because of uncertainty. It confuses them so they just make up their own gay fantasy. But it's always filled with anger. But to really really piss them off, tell them that you believe RC I'd going to invest that money in X! You hear that shills..Elon Musk!!! Say it with me! ELON Elon Elon MUSK! Oh noooo Elon. I know that word puts you in so much shambles. Just me saying that puts the shills in shambles. Watch. Hey shills, Pulte, you know Pulte Pulte Pulte, do you know who he is? For you like him? Do you know who PULTE is? Well Pulte is heavy into X. You know Elon Musk's X. I think RC and Pulte might be on to something. Do you think Elon is too shills? What if RC, Bill Pulte, Elon Musk, X, GME, BBBYQ...what I'd they are all connected somehow? Do you shills like X?

And yes, lots of these shills are pedos. They hire low intelligent pedos because they are stupid easy to control. Their pedo adventures will be released if they don't shill on here. Then they have to be the bottom for their superior after shilling. Here is someone in the know telling you all about it.
https://youtu.be/4fdS5cdtPOA?si=uqvlqgcabVtyVWXd

>>56939492
Look at the hate in his comments. He tries to disguise it as his entertainment but you know only a complete psycho would be doing what he is doing. Macy's ticker is M. I'm guessing you don't own this and know hardly anything about it. Now picture yourself never buying any M, then go research for hours (he will deny it) to catch up on all the happenings with the stock, read and try to understand 100's of pages of the most bland court documents, then ho to their message board and spend hours there for days telling people how stupid they are for owning it. Look at how much he wrote. You only write that because if hate. Really stop and think what it would take for you to do what this guy did. Just focus on this one for now.

It's insane if he is telling the truth about his motivations right? Completely fucked. You wouldn't want someone like that anywhere neat you or your family. Like something broke in him and he is just lost. Just fucked in the head.

But that's not it. He has an agenda. He is being forced to do it. See the link above. Many are pedos or just low intelligent so the powers that be own them. That's why they try as hard as the thing. Imagine what they are going through. How do you look your family in the eye when you get home after lying for multimillionaires to steal from regular people. Just the bottom of society. But check him out. You see it, I know you do. This man is in shambles. This shill is in shambles lol. The shill is in so much shambles. You are here because you are excited, you have skin in the game, you have hope, you want to learn, that's why you are here. This guy is here only because he is in shambles. What a loser lying to people when in Shambles. I can't handle all this shambling from this shill :)

>>56936796
>7 quadrillion dollar glitch
Fill me in on this, I must have missed this episode of "Holy fuck everything is about to explode"

>>56941624
Merry Christmas faggots

what are the odds that this isn't referring to neelay das holding up our progress with his frivolous claims? remember that elon musk tweeted gamestonk and then after GME pumped he called himself meme the destroyer of shorts. then a few months ago he replied to that with and they keep coming back for more... elon was one of the 7 accounts that RC originally followed on twitter and RC has responded or referred to elon's tweets a bunch of times, pulte is invested in twitter/X and talked about elon in a positive way like maybe elon doesn't have all the same philosophy and motivations as RC and pulte but they are working together. elon and pulte both posted a pic of their respective child on may 4 which is star wars day. etc etc

is he, dare i say it, /our guy/?

>>56941875
100% baggy

>>56941881
Just put them on a show called “The Grift” have joe Rogan make weekly appearances.

So this is basically a gme style general absent any underlying security that can be bought or sold?
...
Why??

>>56942175
Seems broke retard baggies will keep a general going for longer than expected.
I would have though they would have accepted stock cancellation means zero, game over, by now

>>56941875
Lol, I’m not sure that baggies are this retarded, but points for trying.

Here’s a fun game. Is this from the Q forums or from r/bbby:

>For those that are unaware BBBY was going through bankruptcy proceedings and it turned into a merger / acquisition. The stock name changed temporarily to butterfly and shares more canceled but not deleted. Now a handful of brokers are already saying that they're waiting instructions for a merger acquisition. In the buy button is off. They also just changed their transfer agent from AST to computershare.
>I think we're about to see the fireworks start on the financial arm of the plan.
>Ryan Cohen that has his fingerprints all over this. I think they are doing it on one two punch between BBBY and GameStop.

Answer: qtard forum

sneed, desperate shills. it would not be acceptable for RC to portray himself as the hero fighting against overpaid executives (hedgie plants), calling short sellers dumb strormtroopers etc just to then dump all his shares without explanation and leaving us relatively innocent retail investors to get financially ruined by the stock going to zero after just one year. it's insulting to our intelligence to suggest that he isn't working with big players in the world of finance to try to make something happen for us.

Lol. You’re right - it would not be acceptable. But you tards continue to accept it.

>This rich guy would never screw us over because of he did it would mean we wouldn't like him and he wants us to like him
Bonus Round: Baggies will still like Ryan Cohen after they have to spend Xmas explaining why their bank account is still empty

>>56942768
Look shillies, it would be unacceptable for this person to sell plastic beads that cure cancer just to them run away with the money we paid for them. It's insulting to our intelligence to suggest he isn't working with big players in the world of medicine to try to make something happen for us.

>24pbtid
>3days
Mind boggles

>criticize me for being the only person in these threads that isn’t ID hopping
Weird flex, but you do you

>>56943014
>criticizing
Not exactly criticizing. Just questioning why anyone would spend their weekend doing what you do.

>>56943198
I was posting from a ski resort in Colorado over the weekend. It was lovely.

>>56943262
You were posting on a Cambodian candle making forum over the weekend instead of skiing, making s’mores or getting pussy? Weird.

I got next bake

>>56943293
Gotta do something as you’re on the chairlift.

Comfy Tedded freindos!
>>56943346
>>56943346
>>56943346

>>56941624
You can't buy options for a canceled stock. It may say "reorganization," but that doesn't mean the stock is coming back ,because it's not. Finding badly coded and not updated stock websites to confirm your schizo theory is sad.

friend it's called crypto yes, it will change the world, friend.
nation states can't control it, it can't be manipulated, it's your freedom, man.
it's the perfect store of value, bro, it's a hedge against inflation, trust me on this one okay.