/biz/ - Business & Finance

Was there news? I randomly bought some a few months back. Finally something goes right…

Anyone who holds 10k Trac before 2024 should consider themselves lucky.

It's about time this project got the traction it deserves

>>56815515
How high is it going?

>>56816023
From what I people are saying, TRAC should be in the $20 range next year.

>>56816019
TRACtion

I see what you did there

>>56816023
I think that conservatively $15 to $25 is a solid guess for next year, but in all honesty if you look into the project and the things being published on the DKG by institutions like BSI and SCAN, this thing has the potential to hit $70 to $100 before the end of 2024. It's one of the few legitimate projects out there, and when ETFs start popping up, I'm confident TRAC will be part of their portfolios.

This is THE project we've been looking for. The amount of usage and partnerships is only next to link and eth. Fuck knows how this is under the radar. Hold on boys

a trac thread that survives longer than 8 hours
we truly are back

>>56817931
I have a strong feeling that LINK will be utilizing TRAC's decentralized knowledge graph in the future. The two will grow together, and both will be massive... Just looking at market cap though, anyone who missed the LINK train for any reason and didn't fully pack their bags needs to load the fuck up on TRAC. There aren't many second chances like this.

Link = Marines
TRAC = BFG

This is the safest project to invest in right now.

This is NOT an organic thread. Be warned.

>>56819582
Yeah no shit, a slow board of a weird who coin gets dozens of agreeing replies in onw thread with minutes of difference between each one, truly organic

>>56819582
>>56819664
i WILL organically post positive comments on trac threads when i see them and there is nothing you can do to stop me

>>56814861
It's unbelievable that this 2018 scam is still alive.

>>56816758
I thought it would take off years ago and it just doesn't seem to get any attention. It's been a rough bear market. Hopefully you're right...

It's the only crypto that stands a chance of gaining a market cap higher than BTC itself
Top 3-5 is very possible

>>56819828
that's kinda pushing it, BTC easily deserves 1st spot
but top 3, sure

Shitcoiners gonna shitcoin. Scam project, just like every other alt coin out there. Eastern Europeans trying to get one last final pump, before they pull the rug on this.

Been trading below a cent since 2018, only pumps when Twitter influencers shill it, and when insiders pump and dump it during an exchange listing.

>>56820223
>trading below a cent since 2018
Tell me you missed out without telling me you missed out.

>>56820223

Have you looked into their SCAN partnership? Or their work with OneAgrix? Robert Metcalfe spoke at their conference about a month ago... There's so many trash projects claiming that Metcalfe's law on network effects will spur growth and you ignore the one that the man himself actively supports?

>>56816758
>peddling partnerships
IOTA had hundreds of partnerships and look where it is now. Actual usability and adoption by these companies means more than vapourware partnerships leading to nothing.

>>56822253
read his comment again and try to find the word "partnership"
they are USING the network to such an extent that it is reaching current throughput limits of the parachain it's running on and they're having to directly work with parity and google to optimize transactions so that they can allow more adoption to onboard
they're also going multichain for this reason
the meaning of adoption in crypto is heavily skewed towards bs but this project is actually in a league of its own

Fun Fact: I originally found this project on this board. It's been good to me.