/biz/ - Business & Finance

>the chart today
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>56797096
>LCX is a proud member of the World Economic Forum's Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and has been named Blockchain Pioneer by the Blockchain Research Institute Canada.

>shit exchange
>faked volume
>>mods ban you for pointing this out
>retarded CEO
>>got his wiki page deleted because he tried to astroturf it
>high fees
>no talent
>is paying money for advisors instead of working on the exchange
>their tokenization solution is just a smart contract they forked
>they used to have a dex that they forked, now shut down
>made a diamonds ponzinomic system that turns their main token into a security due to profits being guaranteed to be put into the main token
>regulated but called out as a security by the SEC, for other reasons than mentioned above
>coinbase ended up listing it because of an insider trading scandal
People still post about this shit here? lol, lmao even.

>>56797146
https://chainbulletin.com/lcx-partners-with-monerium-to-offer-digital-euros
LCX as described by WEF:
>A blockchain bank for the new financial world
>>56797165
Few things are as bullish as high effort FUD. Reminds me of early Chainlink threads.
Accumulate away though.

>>56797202
>high effort FUD
It took me personally very little effort but whatever makes you happy.

>>56797277
So you just happen to have in-depth knowledge about the exchange, it's staff, their personal histories, and the policies they've implemented?
Looks to me like you've put considerable effort into that FUD.
Are you still accumulating LCX?

>>56797146
What is your point you fucking retard?

You wanna bet against them go ahead

fucking drooling mongoloid

>>56797321
>So you just happen to have in-depth knowledge about the exchange, it's staff, their personal histories, and the policies they've implemented?
You know what fucking board you are on? It's not hard to do a little research to be able shit on retard anons because it's funny.
The fact your mind cannot comprehend it to the point you think I am holding and just fudding as a joke is giving me a half chub not going to lie.

LCX is the best exchange in Liechtenstein.

>>56797398
>>56797381
more than 2x the rank of XCM kek how do you baggies even cope HAHAHA it feels so good being on top u probably forgotten that feeling

>>56797418
I could die tomorrow happy knowing I don't post "haha" or "kek" in all caps on 4channel like my 14 year old girlfriend does. So I don't mind.

>>56797424
kek seething baggie XD

>>56797398
OMG what the fuck that's revolting

LCX chads, XCM has officially been exterminated. cheers to you all

>>56797476
this is an even greater insult to XCM kek

>>56797096
when they replace the porker with a serious person, they are getting tons of bullish
if it's ever happening, that is

>>56797381
Good luck with your little research, I hope it will profit you one day! What kind of projects are you looking into? Sorry to hear that you missed out on this one.

>>56797476
>>56797398
>tech company hires indians
Now do Google

>>56797601
No real company exclusively hires Indian code monkeys. Monty pays his codemonkeys 7k a year. They have access to all of the exchanges AUM. Not quite the same thing as maintaining a legacy system that has gotten worse year on year to the point Google barely works anymore.

>>56797629
>no real scotsman
Consider changing the filename for your FUD every now and then, you've been using the same pic with the same filename since March this year.
Did you know there is a /biz/ archive that is searchable?
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=lcx+dot+com&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_media_hash=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>56797649
Is this supposed to be a gotcha? You just linked to threads full of evidence LCX are insolvent lmao.

>no real scotsman
What real company exclusively hires Indian code monkeys. Give a single example of one and I will concede I committed a logical fallacy.

>>56797649
Are you retarded, it's kind of the whole point.

>>56797683
No, I just provided a link to /biz/ archives showing (You) posting the same pic with the same exact unfounded claims as in this thread.
If you consider your own opinions as evidence, I'm not sure what to tell you.
Have you heard of a company called Alphabet, inc (formerly Google)?
>>56797715
>the whole point
Informal fallacies are what you consider the whole point? Perhaps you'd care to elaborate for a retard such as myself

>>56797721
>t? Perhaps you'd care to elaborate for a retard such as
I mean the filename part you brainlet.

kek seething baggie army is out in full force today. sorry chink XCM baggies your day is over forever

>>56797726
If you want to underline the fact that it's a single person shilling and/or fudding, sure. Strange strategy to cultivate, though.

>>56797721
>If you consider your own opinions as evidence
I provided sources from LCXs own balance sheets showing they are insolvent. Here you go!
>>/biz/thread/53901881

>>56797737
Good thing it slipped all the audits. If it wasn't for little researchers like yourself, the world would never know and they'd keep operating at a profit!

>>56797777
Monty has never claimed LCX is profitable and his internal balance sheets show they operate at a loss

>>56797779
>operating at a profit!
Can you prove this? They are literally wash trading to fake volumes as we speak. Any profits would be coming from dumping the token on people.

>>56797792
>>56797795
You are comparing liabilities to profit, not liabilities to assets.
See "annual profit" for the profit.
Crypto is not stock, but the MC being 68 million somewhat outweighs the liabilities of 38 million.
Assets and liabilities, not profits and assets.

>>56797869
>MC being 68 million somewhat outweighs the liabilities of 38 million

>>56797165
>>56797795
LMAO this is (You) in the other thread isn't it
>>56797532
>>56797562
>>56797594
>>56797731
>>56797752
>muh wash trading
>CMX bottom is in for real this time
>I'm totally not a CMX baggie though
Can't make this shit up famalam

>>56797872
Did you know LCX dumped 20 million LCX since June?

>>56797883
All me

>>56797398
Holy literal crap. Thanks anon, that's all I need to know.

>>56797883
correct he is in tears he is seething so hard KEK

I think he's waiting on someone here to tell him to do a flip in last ditch hopes we get in trouble when he does

>>56797909
I am waiting for someone to deny that LCX sold 20% of their LCX tokens 35 days ago actually.

>>56797924
>akshually
What you are actually doing is fudding with 2 IDs ITT. '
The lowest lows have been hit by XCM baggies

>>56797961

>>56797961
I am a real human being, and a real hero.

>>56797165
Please be unbiased and post the new and improved sign, this is why we are pumping lads.

>>56797924
>>56797976
And yet somehow, LCX is up 80% in the last month, 10% up in the last 24h.
Meanwhile, CMX is up 3% in the last month, and up 0.1% today.
>>56797562
oh, the irony

>>56798495
Your token appreciating in value during a surprise dumping of reserves is not a good thing.

https://www.lcx.com/lcx-token-company-reserve/
Until June LCX had 100 million tokens locked in their strategic reserve.

https://www.lcx.com/lcx-token-transparency-report/
After that they changed their policy so that "up to 20% of the total suppy" will be locked, this is 190 million tokens. They are locking more tokens right?
>Traditionally, LCX maintained a fixed company reserve of the LCX token.
>Starting from 2024, a variable percentage of LCX tokens that we receive from the utility token’s usage will be placed back into the company reserve wallet, up to a maximum of 20% of the total LCX token supply. By introducing a variable balancing reserve, we aim to sustain stability, ensure trustworthiness, and promote transparency in our financial operations.

No, when they say they will lock up "up to 20% of the total suppy" in their flexible reserves what they actually mean is they can have anywhere between 0 and 190 million tokens in their reserves.

They have since sold 20% of their reserves, LCX is so close to insolvency they dumped over 5% of the total supply on the market. Anyone who understands the illiquidity of the market cap figure knows how devastating such a large sell can be despite it being a small amount by percentage. The price is preparing to tank as they finalise the sales across the open market now that they have removed the 20 million from their reserve wallet 35 days ago. This is visible on chain.
https://etherscan.io/address/0xc90970DD648415756681163F69Eaeb7EB9c28A9C#tokentxns

They have no money, no way of becoming profitable, no users, no USP and no reason to have a token. What is preventing the company from dumping their entire supply of LCX to keep the company afloat? I'm trans btw not sure if that matters.

>>56798515
>wall of text based on a false premise
The pump is due to the regulatory narrative, my very new fren.

>>56798525
>wall of text
I posted on chain evidence of LCX dumping on you along with statements from LCX where they explain how they are dumping on you and arranged it in an easy to read format.

>>56798515
>>56798552
>I'm trans btw not sure if that matters
"High estrogen has historically been blamed as the cause of mood swings and emotional outbursts. Crying spontaneously can become common. Low mood is usually seen in men with low testosterone to elevated estrogen ratio.
I hope you get well!

>>56798599
So you did read my post.

>>56798611
Yes, and as I pointed out, your wall of text is based on a false premise. What caught my eye was a potential factor in your poor decision making process.

>>56798626
>based on a false premise.
Would you care to explain what that is. To me it seems like I posted evidence of the team dumping and you are trying to make off topic discussion to drown out how the team are dumping.
>>56798515
The team are dumping
>the team are dumping
>>56798515
The team are dumping
>the team are dumping

>>56798636
You suppose that a company selling some of their reserves indicates that they're about to go under. That premise is patently false, and I don't find it interesting to entertain your hypothetical scenario.
>>56798515
>they say they will
>what that actually means
>anyone who understands, knows
>price is preparing to tank
>etc etc
I'm sure this all sounds real clever and real in your head, but it's simply a game of making hypothetical scenarios that support your desired outcome.
Like i said, I hope you get well and make wiser decisions in the future.

>>56798698
>You suppose that a company selling some of their reserves indicates that they're about to go under.
After failing to raise money because nobody bought their bonds, admitting they are running at a loss of 750k in Q2 of last year with 17 million in liabilities and an exchange that doesn't work then yes. Dumping their token does seem to be a sign they have completely failed to raise any VC money and have no other way of keeping the lights on. How do you think they will keep paying their army of Pajeets, "advisors" and third party services they are dependant on when they spend all the money they get from dumping this round of tokens?

>>56798525
>wal of ppeppepopopo
If you had a better argument you would have made one
>simply a game of making hypotheticals
lol

>>56798748
You sure do "know" a lot about LCX, huh?
Too bad you bought the wrong coin. Better luck next run!

>>56798778
Why should I argue against a make-belief scenario invented by someone that identifies as a transsexual? What is there possibly to be gained from that?

>>56798820
>You sure do "know" a lot about LCX, huh?
I know this much about every single exchange. Do you not? All you have to do to discredit my theory that LCX are insolvent is explain a way they are currently making money or raising funds. You can't

>>56798849
>discredit my theory
Like i said, I'm not interested in entertaining your hypotheticals. You make two very strong claims:
1) LCX is insolvent
2) LCX has no source of revenue
First you grossly misread their data.
Annual profit does not equal total assets.
Having lower annual profit margin than your total liabilities does not make you insolvent.
Liabilities are countered by assets.
Profits are countered by losses.
You confuse the concepts, or deliberately misinterpret the data.
Your second claim is only backed up by your own reasoning: "Well, they sold some of their reserves, therefore they must be broke!"
Their tokenized bonds just got regulatory approval this year, and are capped at 10 million euros initially. They were quite open about selling some of the reserves to cover the costs of regulatory auditing. Other sources of income include sales of tokenized assets and fees from the exchange.
>Liechtenstein Cryptoassets Exchange (LCX) signed a memorandum of understanding with Monerium, a regulated e-money issuer, agreeing to form a long-term strategic partnership that will enable LCX to leverage some of the infrastructure provided by Monerium.

Namely, the alliance will enable LCX to offer digital Euros issued by Monerium within their exchange ecosystem. LCX said it also might list other digital fiat currencies issued by Monerium in the future. The exchange will further introduce a new fiat gateway and launch several EUR to crypto trading pairs.
https://chainbulletin.com/lcx-partners-with-monerium-to-offer-digital-euros
Most of the services offered by LCX are still in the initial piloting phases. If you do not see where we are going with CBDC and the digital euro, you may well deserve to be left behind on this one.

>>56798849

>>56799021
>Liabilities are countered by assets.
Such as? The building they rent? The rights to Monty's book. LCX have no assets besides the IP of their barely functional exchange.
>Their tokenized bonds just got regulatory approval this year, and are capped at 10 million euros initially
My proof they haven't sold any is that the terms of the bond was as soon as the sale went live they were supposed to show the smart contract of the bonds as per the legal documents on their website concerning the bonds and 6 weeks later they haven't done it. That is 10 seconds work.
The burden of proof is not on me. They said they would make the smart contract address public, in fact that was part of the bond prospectus and then didn't do it. The only reason they would refuse to do the ten seconds work to do this is if they sold no bonds considering that any user who bought bonds would want to see them on chain and ask for a link to them. Pic related from here https://www.lcx.com/EURt7/
>Other sources of income include sales of tokenized assets and fees from the exchange.
It definitely costs LCX more to rent secure vaults to store the diamonds than they make on trading feess
>Liechtenstein Cryptoassets Exchange (LCX) signed a memorandum of understanding with Monerium, a regulated e-money issuer, agreeing to form a long-term strategic partnership that will enable LCX to leverage some of the infrastructure provided by Monerium.
This means LCX pay them to use their service. LCX are one of their many customers and pay them for the privilege.

>They were quite open about selling some of the reserves to cover the costs of regulatory auditing.
They admitted this after it happened and after claiming they would increase their reserves to 190 million.
>Most of the services offered by LCX are still in the initial piloting phases.
The exchange has been live for 5 years.
>If you do not see where we are going with CBDC and the digital euro
An inflationary death spiral and the death of the EU?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=POG68-SXIsY

Lets get some bullish beats up in this thread

>>56799117
>LCX has no assets
In LCX token reserves alone, at current market value of $0.07146, they have approx. 7.1 million USD.
Then there are the euro, btc and ether reserves.
Then, tokenized bond sales.
Then, sales of tokenized assets (physical diamonds as NFTs, most are sold though so more value in realized revenue than physical assets)
You make so many lengthy claims that are simply untrue. I wonder how that reflects on the integrity of your character.

>>56799275
how many LCX for wife like this, sir?

>>56799358
they sold 20% in June, champ. 80mil tokens remain = $5.6mil worth of LCX as of today. But sure round up a couple mil, Monty would do the same

>>56799117
>my proof
>the burden of proof is not on me
If you accuse someone of foul play, the burden of proof does certainly not fall on the accused. You seem to think in terms of "guilty until proven innocent" - odd enough in itself, but when you are the one making the accusations, it borders on the comical.

>>56799358
>In LCX token reserves alone
Okay anon, you have finally agreed with me, they are dumping LCX on the open market, however see >>56799404 for more accurate numbers.
They do not have Euro, BTC or Ether reservers, if they did they would have mentioned them on their balance sheets when they were fundraising on their bonds that didn't sell.

>>56799451
>>56799358
Regardless, everyone can agree LCX is a based company.
See Monty and his army of brown slaves, and also pic related

>>56799409
That isn't hypocritical at all, learn English. I posted that they didn't follow the rules of their own bond prospectus and show the amount of bonds sold like they said they would. This is proof they did not sell any bonds. They could prove me wrong in 10 seconds by posting a link to the on chain proof the bond exists if it existed. It doesn't and the burden of proof is on them here.

You are going through my posts you already responded to looking for semantic arguments instead of addressing any of my points I supported with evidence.

>>56799451
You can add $10k of SquidGrok to the balance sheet, whatever the fuck that is

>>56799366
Sir, when LCX moons and takes Binance place. You will be able to redeem 100 lcx tokens for a woman like that, and 2 goats!

>>56799451
I stand corrected on the amount of LCX they have in the reserves. 5.6 million USD is the correct figure. This in itself disproves the claim made by >>56799117 seeing the company does indeed have some assets.
They have been open about selling some of the reserves to cover costs, that is not disputed. Google, Tesla, and practically all succesful companies take profits to reinvest in the company.
>>56799496
That is not proof, anon. In a similar vein, I could claim that since you are unable to prove you're not a bot, you are a bot.
Thus the burden of proof does not fall on the accused.
Can you point out when and where they said they would post the contracts?

>>56799117
lmao

>>56799607
>I could claim that since you are unable to prove you're not a bot, you are a bot.
>Can you point out when and where they said they would post the contracts?
I already did. Pic related and sauce on pic in the link here >>56799117
https://www.lcx.com/EURt7/
>They have been open about selling some of the reserves to cover costs, that is not disputed. Google, Tesla, and practically all succesful companies take profits to reinvest in the company.
I am glad we finally agree. LCX are dumping on you because they have no money except for the tokens they printed themselves out of thing air which are being investigated by the SEC as a security. Although as I pointed out they were not open about selling it.
It took a while but you finally admitted I am right.

Not trying to fud sirs, but can someone explain why the top holding wallets from 120-97 all hold exactly the same amount of coins? I thought it looked weird. Please do the needful, my life savings is in lcx.

>>56799670
>https://www.lcx.com/EURt7/
It's not there, anon. I checked. All you have is that screenshot of text. I guess we're just gonna have to take a "just trust me bro" on this one! Seeing the good work you've singlehandedly done, uncovering all the wrongdoings that evaded all the many regulatory audits, I have near full confidence in (You).
>glad we finally agree
But we don't, anon. God willing you will develop the insight and clarity of mind to understand that.

>>56799656
He keeps accusing me of wildly speculating and offering my opinions as facts and I haven't yet. I will do so now though. It is retarded to sell 20% of your reserves of an asset that the SEC are accusing of being an unlicensed security you yourself created. This is not based on evidence, just my opinion. Unlike everything else I posted. I am right though.

>>56799731
>It's not there, anon. I checked.
Check harder retard. I told you it was in the prospectus. If you are incapable of using ctrl f then I will tell you to check page twenty of the link labeled "Wertpapierbeschreibung English – General" on the page I linked. Do you need me to install Adobe reader for you too?

Some of the funniest posting power being wasted on an Icx anon, wasted.

>>56799785
>pic related from here https://www.lcx.com/EURt7/
>NOOOO YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN THE ENGLISH VERSION OF WERTPAPIERBESCHREIBUNG
Outstanding communications champ, i'll look into it

>>56799809
I posted the relevant screenshot and the website I saved it from. That is usually an acceptable way of sharing information online.
>It's not there, anon. I checked. All you have is that screenshot of text. I guess we're just gonna have to take a "just trust me bro" on this one! Seeing the good work you've singlehandedly done, uncovering all the wrongdoings that evaded all the many regulatory audits, I have near full confidence in (You).
Thanks for the vote of confidence. I am glad I didn't let you down.

>>56799800
>funniest posting power
I honestly don't think anyone except you finds it funny. But the important thing is that I am having fun.

>>56799862
>relevant screenshot and the website I saved it from
If I need to look through twenty pages of a document behind a link labelled ""Wertpapierbeschreibung" without you pointing it out specifically, this goes beyond any usually acceptable ways of sharing information online.
Thanks for pointing it out on further request, though. You sure did "a little research" on this project, huh. Hope you'll understand what you're looking at, eventually.

I'm just here for the cute pictures. Keep arguing.

>>56799954
I have kind of run out of things to say. I'm sorry anon. Do you want me to post cute pictures anyway? What kind of girls are your favourite?

>>56799879
That's my point, it's being wasted because only a few people can laugh, should be more but also not, it's both a good and a bad thing.

>>56799988
I quite like tanlines, but I am not here for that. Anything cute. Christmas related, tea related, ice cream related. Who knows.

>>56800000
>>56799999
shitcoin get check

>>56799988
2.4. MODALITIES AND DATE FOR THE PUBLIC
ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE RESULTS OF THE BID
The offering results correspond to the total number of tokens held in the smart
contracts. The Issuer will announce the placement status on its website
https://www.LCX.com/ at the end of the year.


>Issuer will announce the placement status on its website
https://www.LCX.com/ at the end of the year.
>WILL ANNOUNCE AT THE END OF THE YEAR

That's your answer right there champ.
Of course, you already would have known this had you read the document.

>>56800012
End of 2022 brainlet. See https://www.lcx.com/EURt7/
> LCX filed the security prospectus for a 10 Million EUR tokenized bond with the Financial Market Authority Liechtenstein in January 2022.

>Anything cute. Christmas related, tea related, ice cream related.
The chemo saving /biz/

>>56800074
Wrong again.
Page 1 of document:
LCX AG
Based in Vaduz, Liechtenstein
("Issuer")
from
01.02.2023
This Securities Note together with the Registration Document dated 01.02.2023 and
the Final Terms together ("Base Prospectus").

All of this exchange is fake. Imagine listing an Exchange token on another exchange kek. Also highest fees, and CZ called the CEO a fucking scammer. Monty has the phenotype of a scammer.

>>56800140
>imagine listing an exchange token on another exchange
So, like BNB, CAKE and a gorillion others?

>>56800124
>Page 1 of document:
I see you have read page 1. Well done! Just 51 more to go.

>>56800162
Just accept defeat and register on coinmetro like the rest of the cool kids. I bet you don't even use LCX yourself.

>>56800140
This is what high effort FUD looks like. Absolutely bullish for LCX, can't help but marvel the fervent attempts to denigrate and disinform ITT

>>56797398
Chad Monty showing off his flock of brownoid slaves. I got my 10k suistack, just waiting for the switch to be flipped so I can trade it in for a Liechtenstein passport, a castle, and an invite to the WEF cabal.

>>56800194
LCX was approved for selling tokenized bonds on february 1st 2023, as the document points out together with the fact that smart contracts will be made public at the end of the year of 2023.
https://www.lcx.com/wp-content/uploads/EN-2023-02-01_Wertpapierbeschreibung_LCX-EURt7_signed.pdf

>>56800200
>fud is bullish
would have thought these retards killed themselves in 2022 but here you are

>>56800200
>informing people and warning them about a scam exchange, being a ethical person that took time out of his day to create this image for the sole purpose of warning others
>t-this must be bullish for LCX! Truly bullish!

You need to kill yourself for the betterment of this board.

>>56800233
I know you are new here, but had you seen the early LINK and Fantom threads, you'd know that heavy FUD on projects with actual utility is extremely bullish.
To counter trade /biz/ has been the way ever since 2019 or so.

>>56800233
>>56800236
I wish you both the best. May you find wealth and happiness in this life. It may not be this day, but I hope for that day to come.

>>56800236
But sirs, your intention is to actually warn about a shit exchange, and try to convince others to sign up for an even shittier exchange.

>>56800266
>I know you are new here
>but had you seen the early LINK and Fantom threads
Lazy. There is "FUD", then there is verifiable facts.
LCX has been around almost the same time as Fantom and accomplished nothing.

>>56800288
No, you don't. You are a condescending little shit.

>>56800232
They were supposed to show the information on the smart contract at the time it was launched and didn't. They were then going to do a press release on that information end of 2023 (they won't) but anyone capable of reading a smart contract should have been able see it already by then. All you have done is show me that they have not yet failed to make a press release that is due in the next 32 days.

>>56800294
Times are a-changing, my young one. There was a time for DEX, and there will be a time for CEX along with CBDC.
I think you would feel better if you didn't act so hostile. People may not be just how you think them to be, son. I wish you the best, even if I disagree with you.

>>56800324
>All you have done is show me that they have not yet failed to make a press release that is due in the next 32 days.
That's the spirit, lad. Baby steps.

>>56800339
I have listened to you spam kek baggies and slurs for years now.
Don't give me this shit.

>>56800355
>They ignored article 1.8 of their legally binding contract but will surely honour article 2.4!

>>56800378
Fortunately for LCX they won't be sued for breach of contract because nobody actually bought the bonds.

>>56800357
Yes, all anons are one person. I'm that one person.
>>56800378
There comes a time when a man must question his judgement. Did I interpret every factor at play correctly? Are my beliefs founded on solid evidence, or did I skip a step or two? These are hard questions.
What I am implying is that you may have misinterpreted the data and founded your strongly held beliefs on false premises.

>>56800466
My mistake, your ID color is very similar to >>56797418.

>>56800466
>>/biz/image/dJYfSqlYut4lvJJhTfAzgA

>>56800488
Thank you for offering me some insight into what appears to be a long standing feud between XCM and LCX bag holders. I thought this was a new thing that appeared after the new pro-regulation narrative. I may have to reconsider my antagonistic attitude towards XCM baggies.
What started this war in the first place?

>>56800544
>What started this war in the first place?
Me!

>>56800553
Can any one man wield such power?

>>56800569
I wouldn't know, i'm not a man.

>>56800596
Right. Well, you do you bro, I hope it makes you genuinely happy.

>>56800553
You are the KDA tranny am I right?

>>56800614
She's very cute, I've seen pictures of her penis.

>>56800621

>>56800621
>the fudders are part of an organized homosexual conspiracy
somehow I am not surprised

>>56800616
No, I have been arguing with her for almost 5 years in PNK threads though. There are far less posters than you would think on /biz/.

>>56800708
Jesus christ allmighty, are you the tranny that shit up those countless fantom threads?
Let it not be so, sweet baby jesus, for that was unforgivable

>>56800768
Yes, definitely. I am also probably all the other trannies you hate too.

>>56800793
The plot thickens considerably.
This war may be a holy war after all.

>>56800844
Yes, all anons are one person. I'm that one person.

Fantom is a massive shitcoin

>>56800972
Wanna make out?

>>56801017
I like girls that are terminally online but dislike them when they pass beyond the line I drew in the sand and end up knowing too much about being online, i.e. end up posting on 4chan. So sorry no.

>>56801058
It's over...

is 10000 lcx enough to make it

>>56801181
If it is then Monty sold 2000 make it stacks 35 days ago.

can i trade on this shits from canada? their website sucks, wont let me register but will try on pc soon
their support guy said it is available

>t. phonefag

>>56801181
10000 lcx will probably be worth the entire xcm marketcap in a few years, so no you wont make it.

>>56801309
answer my question u retarded shills
is this exchange actually good for trading perps??? qrd me your stupid bags

>>56801372
lmao nvm

>>56801372
>is this exchange actually good for trading
Obviously not. Screenshot taken just now.

>>56801402
brutal

>>56797165
I'd rather keep my money on a platform like CryptMi where I don't need to pay any fee for all transactions

>>56797096
They started the pump on it already.
Can we drive it down to 0.3 for another entry kek.
>>56801517
The app and its services are great but its token is shit

>>56801323
Monty isn't working like a the horse that kevin is. Kevin actually knows what he is doing while monty is flexing with his rolex he bought and being on constant vacations.