/biz/ - Business & Finance

new shirt alert!!!!!

>>56797043
>$14.12

Surely this proof of concept pilot is different, let's hodl together marines WAGMI

>collaboration
>pilot
>webinar
2 more weeks

>>56797059
>>56797070
kek fuddies

A lot of really big players are now directly involved with Chainlink and there is talks of a big financial crash coming soon as a result of 2008. Something to do with the REPO markets I saw on /pol/. Sergey always mentioned that this tech would be implemented after a financial catastrophe and the schitzo in me is wondering if this will be the “solution” to the problem they manufactured. Either way I’m all in and staking in v0.2. Good night anons even though the world might soon be in despair, I believe Linkies will be having the last laugh soon.

PRODUCTION

>>56797043
Not buying your bags pajeet

>>56797177
>pajeet

The fact that all these banks and institutions want to work with Chainlink not just through SWIFT but also with Chainlink directly proves Sergey's point that there will be endless private bank chains.

Ahead of the game really

>>56797043
thevpreliminary proofs of concept are over, now it's time for the early pilots. i'm holdibg my breath for tge beta pre-announcement, it's going to be hmglorious. i picked a retirement home with a big tv already to watch

>>56797043
> 2023
> still just reflecting on a pilot
I'm tired friends

>>56797043
>Swift pilot
It's a pilot with Swift, which is likely to lead to production. However, let's not forget that Sergey recently said he was talking about going into production, so i think it's safe to assume that production is with other clients eg DTCC.
It's still bullish af and the pilot could lead to live production soon after. Either way, Link will explode upwards rapidly soon enough.
Also, fuck all these morons trying to fud you into not staking, or staking less than you have.
Staking in the community pool will set you for life, and you want to be maxxing out your place in it, because you may not get the chance to increase it after v0.2

>>56797796
the staking fudders just want more room in general access. can't really fault them. more room for me as well.

>>56797870
I'm worried my early access won't even get me in to stake, I was not here for v.0.1 since I lost interest in this board but I'll be real sad if I won't get in on this

>>56797796
> 4% returns will set you for life
what

>>56797949
>price of Link won't rise
what

(watch him ignore this comment)

>>56798037
If the main appeal is the sheer token value then why are we talking about staking? That hampers selling, stops you doing more productive things focused on token price like swinging or leveraging. You have to make a case that the 4% return is better than other options. Right now even taking out a stablecoin loan against link and putting that in a current account would give higher returns.

>>56797104
Yes it is the solution and the problem is manufactured
All stock market crashes are jew made

>>56797941
Make sure everything is ready anon. If you have a hardware wallet, make sure it works.

Ledger wallets have a lifetime span of 4-5 years.

>>56798367
>Ledger wallets have a lifetime span of 4-5 years
Source? I've had mine longer than this.

>>56798421
as long as you wrap your tokens, it's fine

>>56798421
My thing died on me and I saw on their page the lifetime of their hardware wallets being around 5 years.

>>56797043
https://youtu.be/VZP5lIzGNT8

In your fear and uncertainty it will be tempting to put your trust in some person or group who emerges and claims to have a "way out", which will involve sacrificing some of your liberty. You must resist this urge. These self‑proclaimed saviors may appear in many forms, under any number of banners: "intellectuals", "influential people", "progressive thinkers", "billionaires", "the UN", "the EU", "self‑selected multinational coalition", "global leaders", "world governments", "radicals", "revolutionaries" or some combination of these. They may appear charismatic. They may appear to have your best interests at heart. They may stand united, arm‑in‑arm, proclaiming "We know the way forward", advancing some form of "people's revolution" or "Global Reset" where "you will be in charge", hawking various "‑isms" and promises of a better tomorrow. These people are not your friends. They are not to be trusted. They are the same global banking elites using the same fear tactics, shilling the same magic potions and snake oils as always. They want only one thing: power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cieu5nDDssc

>>56798516
This is only for battery powered wallets. Ones powered through the usb cable don't have this issue.

>>56797082
hes stating a fact

>>56797644
you and me fren, i cant stand this shit anymore >>56797796
>It's still bullish af
the only thing thats bullish is that we are going to get the money printer turned back on. in which case meme shit pumps hard because retards buy meme shit

>>56798655
That's why I have with the Ledger Nano S (not the Plus

)

>>56797043
>>56797082
>>56797142
>>56797204
shut ups you pieces of shit
you ruining the board
enough

>>56798700
I mean my Nano S died on me despite being a usb one. My Nano S Plus works at least.

>>56798699
>adoption isn't bullish, only government gibs are

Then what the fuck are you doing in a Link thread

>>56798780
making money off of go gibs same as you

>>56798780
It’s called “this is a suckers rally”, the losers who sell at $20, $50, $100, $200 etc are the fuel required for it to run much higher. This was always the plan, you can’t shake no life autists in a single cycle, but you can demoralize them with lukewarm price action for a half a decade to the point they’ll happily take their first exit.

>>56798801
>making money off of go gibs
Then why are you in a Chainlink thread?
Chainlink's absolute biggest advantage is unprecedented adoption potential.
If you don't think adoption matters, then Link is the last coin you should be looking at.

>>56798889
im in this thread having a discussion. why are you in this thread?

>>56797057

>>56798367
sucks.. I moved most of my tokens to multisig wallet but that wallet won't have the early access

>>56797142
"From PoC to production."
>PoC
>People of Color

>>56798367
>Ledger wallets have a lifetime span of 4-5 years.
this... after five years of holding faithfully, i tried to access my bitcoins and the blockchain said "sorry these coins aren't available anymore due to bitrot, please upgrade to more recently mined coins" i lost everything wtf

>>56798914
Holy fuck you're illiterate

>>56797070
>>56797080
All you tards are signalling with these posts is low time preference and /or that you guys are poor. Outting yourselves as anything but autistic. You need to go back.

>>56799104
i just said im in this thread having a discussion. what are you on about mate

>>56799294
If you think adoption doesn't matter, then Link is the last coin you should be buying, holding, and discussing.

>>56799340
i dont have time to spoon feed you on why you're wrong

>>56799463
Link is arguably the one coin with absolute biggest immediate adoption potential in all of crypto.
Saying "adoption doesn't matter" while holding Link is the peak of stupidity.

Mark Cuban is all in Link because he realized it is all that fucking matters - after getting burned on retard shit. I expect this to be a trend going into the next few years, ie, famous VC's revealing that they are ALL IN FOR SERGEY

>>56799484
it doesnt matter if god himself is using link. if there is a bear market then it means fuck all because people are selling market wide. i dont see what's hard for you to get about selling to take profit

>>56799093
AAAAHHHHHHHHH FUCK
I GOT THE SAME MESSAGE
WHAT THE FUCK IS BITROT

>>56798058
>sell your Link
kek, no, you worthless piece of human garbage.

>>56799867
Holy fucking shit! FUCK NANO LEDGER!

I just connected mine to migrat to v0.2 staking and all of my Link are still locked in at $7. What the fuck do I do? How do I upgrade to $14 Link?! This is fucked...

>>56799093
>>56799867
>>56800143
kek I love this kind posting but I think it's a little early; certainly there aren't any newfags here yet that'd believe something like this

Ctrl + f "chainlink"
0 results

>>56797043
Betray?

>>56797104
Yeah, I can see quite a good number of institutions that are partnering with LINK and even Allianceblock also partnered with them to work on compliance tools

>>56799484
Given what LINK is building you are correct
>>56801273
I think LINK might want to integrate its NexeraID into their system

>>56797043
Well
yes
LINK and XRP unironically

>>56797043
>6 years
>$14
>kek fuddies
oh boy...

>>56797043
fuddies, yes you. GET THE FAWKIN ROPE

>>56797043
this will eventually filter through to the price

>pilot project
kek call me when there's something real. fuckin pathetic losers

>>56805176
lol bro these fuddies are seething harder than patrick collins

>33rd largest company in the world
lmao they're basically bragging about being a billionaire's maid

>pilot
holy kek. maybe in 20 years this will actually be implemented

>>56797043
Average LINK fuddie