/biz/ - Business & Finance

you have 10k LINK you could sell half and stake half and still 100% make it either way fuck off

>>56773932
>making it on $150k
>making it on $75k

Link has really done a number on the brains of the people here.

>>56773932
>LINK
>100% make it
Do you have a mental disorder?

>>56773886
>any other long term holder who is having a hard time making a choice?
The choice is so easy there's no choice to make:

NEVER STAKING
NEVER SELLING

Don't trust online influencers who say they're going to stake.
They're either lying or don't actually hold any LINK.

>>56773948
>>56773955
>they don't know

>>56773886
Anon, you will stake you 10K linkies and you will sell your link rewards.

>>56773960
I don't even know if this is troll or not anymore
>>56773974
>Anon, you will stake you 10K linkies and you will sell your link rewards.
this could work but not sure I want all 10k linkies staked, I'll probably go 7777 staked and rest just sitting comfy if we somehow reach $1k I don't have to wait 28 days to sell some

>>56773886
Staking is a midwit trap. Anyone who claims they will be staking is just intentionally giving you bad advice for their own personal gain. Trust me.

>>56774015
I’ll be staking 10k but I have 50k total. I just want the build rewards. When that starts drying up I’ll pull everything out unless the network is insanely established. But yea, anyone locking up their whole stack for minimum a month with the market looking like it’s about to go full bull within the next 6-12 is probably going to regret that.

>>56774015
v0.1 stakers have done just fine, got our 4.75% with LINK doubling in the process

>>56774037
Meanwhile Tellor did a 10x. I'm not shilling but anons may want to look into gems like PYTH. Very good.

>>56773997
>I don't have to wait 28 days to sell some

Anon when Link takes off, it's going to keep going up. We're now in the age of real use cases or bust.

>>56774015
>Staking is a midwit trap
possible but staking 70% and keeping 30% on the side in case link hits triple digits this run doesn't sound so bad, I doubt I'd sell my entire stack even if we hit $1000 eoy, way too married to these bags
>>56774035
>I’ll be staking 10k but I have 50k total
that would make the decision easy, you're sitting comfy

i already sold my 40k stack at $50 and im waiting for $3

It isn't worth it at all staking any coin.

It's far better to sell and swing trade, but most people lose all their money doing that so for them staking is an option.

>>56774035
>build rewards
What build rewards nigger? They were supposed to drop them this year and that hasn’t happened

If that wasn’t bad enough why tf do build projects need a token if they’re already working without one?

>>56774107
lies
>>56774120
>It's far better to sell and swing trade
tried that lost 5k linkies during the years doing that, all though it was my swing folio I should've just held

>>56773886
I have 9k LINK with 5k staked in v0.1. When v0.2 early access opens I will be upping my stake to 7.5k with 1.5k on the sidelines ready to be dumped if we pump hard

Market top is October 2025, so staking full multiple wallets for a year at the very least not touching anything thanks

>>56774380
Big mistake

>>56773886
I have 2.5k and thought about only staking 2k and leaving 500 for swinging off blow off tops, but I also want to maximize staking because once that pool is filled, it's filled. can always unbound 500 later and sell. I also like the idea of holding and never selling, and staking helps with that. I make 125k a year, though, so I can wait.

>>56774408
one thing to keep in mind if you are already planning to withdraw 500, is ideally stake that 500 in a separate wallet, since withdrawing any amount of the LINK you initial deposit resets your rewards earning ability for 90 days

>>56774440
unfortunate only have one early access wallet, I set one another one up for v.3, but the plan is to sell the market top in 2025

>>56774347
I'll probably end up staking around that amount too, that should amount to 1 link per day at $1000 its a pretty good income

>>56773932
do you live in africa?

>>56774143
Because Sergey is a drug dealer that gave all these projects free access to oracles as their first hit. And now hes coming knocking on their door asking them to pay for the second hit with a baseball bat in his hands

>>56773886
This is a stake demon.

Dysgenic freaks who succumb to staking and token-lock addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their yearly circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Staking on demand accompanied by rewards hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Staking is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to impale them all.

>>56775018
so what you're saying is that its better to hold because link will hit $1000 next year so there is no reason to stake ?

>>56773948
>link won't go up anymore
>ever

>>56773961
Sauce pls

>>56773886
im in the same boat as you op

im gonna hold another 6 years

no wife no kids im 33 and now balding, i think ill be a sex tourist and have brown women all over me.

>>56773886
you get 5.11% with stake.link if you get your LINK swapped for stLINK in the priority pool, also its liquid so you get your LINK straight away

>>56775844
lol fucj that, that's a taxable transaction with a group that rugged their previous holders

>>56776121
youre wrong buddy, its only taxable if you 'claim' youre rewards, otherwise you can let it sit and grow, also previous revenue share model would have been shut down by regulators

>>56773960
>NEVER STAKING
>NEVER SELLING
The never selling meme hinges on staking

>>56775844
Gm LPL kiddo how you doing kiddos?
Pool's closed!

>>56776237
lol no, when you stake with them, they give you their shitty liquid staking coin that counts as an exchange, thus taxable. Gonna just stake in the community pool.

>>56776620
youre wrong bro, you have to claim the stLINK for it to be taxable

>>56776445
Hey Kiddo, heard of SDL, its a liquid staking platform for chainlink and the pool isn't closed ;)

>>56773886
stake 100%, because the top of the bullrun will be in 1 to 2 years, either mid to end of 2025, so ud missout on a whole year od staking for absolutely no reason.

>>56773932
You won’t make shit from 5K LINK are you kidding me

>>56774099
Kek found out who will round trip while I sell the top and buy back in 2026

If you don't migrate will you get your BUILD rewards from v0.1? Or was that totally fake and they'd have no way of ascribing the build tokens you were supposedly accruing during that time?

>>56777974
Nobody knows. We’ll see.

>>56778070
LMAO IS THIS THE NEW NO POOLER COPE???

POOLS CLOSED CHAD, SEETHE

>>56778077
Checked + Based LPL chuddie kiddo how you going based kiddo?

>>56773886
>With the pool opening up is it worth staking a few thousand linkies or is it better to sit on the sidelines and wait until this bull run has ran its course?

I don't like LINK, but here's the thing, right now it will either go up sharply in the near future, very very slowly ramp up, or go down over that same period of time (at any speed), or crab.

If you think it's gonna go down, obviously, you sell. You don't so we'll ignore that one.

If it crabs or goes up very slowly, that's when staking will help. And it won't help that much more than selling now, or holding. Meanwhile, if it spikes upward for some reason, holding it means you can sell it then, and staking it means you might get left out.

You kinda feel there's gonna be a bull run. Do you really want to be four weeks away from taking profit if that happens? You could miss out on a lot. By contrast, the amount you'd miss out on by NOT staking isn't gonna be that much over that time period.

Anyway I think this is a terrible time to stake ANY crypto. Sell or hold.

kek fuddie ^^^^^^^

>>56778070
I feel like they would be in a bad legal position based on their statements of v0.1 stakers being eligible for build rewards if there ends up being no way for v0.1 stakers to get them.

If someone exits the staking pool during the v0.2 migration does the team have any means whatsoever of allowing them to access the rewards they purportedly earned.

>>56777491
5k x $1k = not making it? ngmi if you think that

>More information around Chainlink BUILD rewards and eligibility for v0.2 stakers and historical v0.1 stakers is planned to be provided in the future.
im hoping we get this information on Tuesday when they announce migration is open. Infact it wouldnt make sense NOT to finally give us this info. One of my wallets staked presently i would like to consolidate with another, but literally the only thing holding me back is this promise of possible build rewards at some point

>>56773997
>I'll probably go 7777
This was the only option from the beginning.

>>56779223
Dude, the BUILD program is to help startups get their feet off the ground by organizing a deal of the companies offering up a percentage of their token supply in exchange for oracle services they wouldn't be able to pay upfront for.

In other words, it's not about you, the staker. It's about them, the developers who are leveraging Chainlink's infrastructure to build tech that demonstrate the value of smart contracts (which in turn bring value to Chainlink's network).

You can't rush development and which means you can't rush BUILD rewards. Trying to rush these things might end up with a halfassed product and token rewards that are valueless.

>>56779597
>percentage of their token supply
the token supply will just be increased up front to account for this. it's all just numbers pulled out of a hat, the only realy thing happening here is retail investors giving them money out of their paychecks that they worked for. all they get in return is talking, blog posts and marketing

>>56779597
Chainlink advocates
>advertise build rewards so people buy link
>duuude the rewards are not about YOU stop asking for the rewards

>>56779713
>the token supply will just be increased up front to account for this
And? They're still giving whatever % of their supply to Chainlink.

>>56779832
no one buys link because of build rewards you groestlecoin gussler

>>56774065
DO NOT REDEEM BLOODY BASTARD

>>56773886
If those 2k link you sell allows you to take a significant measure of control of your life, then do it. 8k will be upper middle class when the network's mature. But if you're just looking to pretend you're rich until you run out of play money, don't even think about it. If you've held for this long, you know what you have. Don't squander the opportunity.

>>56779597
>You can't rush development
Why is it that every other crypto project moves at lightning speed compared to chainlink. If CLL keeps up this speed they will be overtaken by PYTH for sure.

>>56780141
yeah its to use for personal improvements not squandering on watches or cars
>>56779352
>This was the only option from the beginning.
indeed, thinking back I was always going for that

>>56780026
>no one buys link because of build rewards

So advocates are just lying now. Pathetic to see what link has become

>>56779832
Nothing changed about stakers getting build rewards, retard.

>>56780341
so when are we getting them you sack of retarded shit?

>>56780341
>not giving build rewards was the plan all along

>>56780573
Who said build rewards aren't going to be given?

>>56780666
>staking will never happen!
>build rewards will never happen!
>you are here

>>56777974
why the fuck would you not migrate from v0.1

I am steak king

>>56780696
We're all still waiting on cryptoeconomic staking as laid out in the whitepaper. This ain't it, kid.

build rewards are going to be absolutely worthless. Good luck with gravel coin

>>56781102
ah yes, i forgot the "not real staking" cope. thanks

>>56780149
What crypto project is developing tech as diverse and as secure as Chainlink? Beyond Cosmos and EVM blockchains, what tech is being as adopted as Chainlink tools? Show me all the Chainlink equivalent tech from the Pyth Network.

This shit about complaining about the speed of development is retarded when you're invested in tech that's revolutionizing finance. You really want to slap a deadline on this?

>>56781296
it's just retards with less than 1000 link
pay them no mind

>>56777469
Are you okay popo? You’re speaking like a deranged nigger

>>56773974
What link rewards? They don't exist yet.

How will the build rewards be distributed? Every wallet gets the same or does link amount matter? I have 2 wallets in 0.1 with 7k but was thinking of putting 15k to the same pile, but maybe i will get more if i keep them separated

>>56782612
I’m keeping like 400 in 1 wallet and putting the rest in my 2nd wallet. Feels like having 2 wallets with access to early whatever the fuck could be worthwhile

>>56781310
shut your mouth.

>>56781296
>You really want to slap a deadline on this?
Yes, ideally. Sort of like how Sergey slapped a deadline on CCIP and staking 2 years ago and failed to deliver on both.

>>56781171
You're the one coping, advocate. If you told someone in 2017 about the state of the chainlink project in 2023 they wouldn't buy a single token..

whats the point of staking? just sell the extreme tops of every bull run.

I sold at $4 when "google partnership" was announced, cause it did a x10 in like a week. Then i sold again at $20 and then 45ish.

Selling parabolic increases is the play, not 4% each year LOL. I wouldnt be retired and living easy if i waited for staking

$1
per
Link
per
month

minimum.

JPM said they want $5-$10 billion daily volume on their blockchain by 2025. that's just one entity that will have it's own blockchain.

stakers win in the end, because they'll be printing money. but do what you want I guess.

>>56783512
>just time the top dude
2 days ago you said you sold at $50 >>56774107

>>56773886
Use Stake.link, you get 5.11% apy when your LINK gets swapped for stLINK in there priority pool

>>56783520
how does staking secure that volume, thereby earning fees?

>>56774120
>It's far better to sell and swing trade, but most people lose all their money doing that

Quite the contradiction there, kek. You proved your claim wrong in the same sentence
>just get lucky gambling bro, its easy as long as you don't lose

Fuck, I'm going to be driving home from work when V2 goes live. Should be able to make it home and stake about 2 hours after. I'm not going to get fucked over am I? The pool should still have room I would hope

>>56773886

Anon, I am in the same spot. Probably won't stake bc i'm too retarded to use wallets safely. But I am considering it. I have a little over 10k stinkies as well, and might stake 3500, which is the reserve 3.5 suis that I will probably never sell even during the next bull, bc its too scare to think of not holding link during a gigamoon and be priced out forever. The other 2/3 I will probably try to sell in the 70$+ range this bull

>>56783960
it won't fill up during migration. maybe during phase 2, but I doubt that as well

>>56779713
>the token supply will just be increased up front to account for this
It's a percent of total supply. Doesnt matter how much they raise the token supply, it'll be the same value

>>56783970
Okay good. When V1 went live I staked during the first 30 seconds

Probably going to stake another 7k when they open up phase 2 also

>>56783960
Is my 15k priority staking slot guaranteed to be available for the 9 days or is there a way that the pool fills and I lose my allotted space? Not sure if I need to take the day off.

>>56783966
You dont have a hardware wallet?
I'ts pretty fucking easy, you should be fine anon. It'll be worth it to stake, thats one of the biggest benefits of holding link. Those of us that staked during V1 already got over 300 link

>>56784064
I think the way it works is that anyone thats already in V1 staking gets a guaranteed spot to migrate their staked tokens + rewards. But we're not guaranteed a spot for the additional 7k once that opens up

>>56773886
look into stake.link liquid staking - stLINK is what you want

>>56784064
Theres 3 phases

Migration Phase where you can transfer the shit you already have staked + your rewards

Early Access where people who are already approved to stake can then add up to the 15k amount

Cuck Access where plebs can try to squeeze in.

>>56784368
Gm LPL kiddo how you doing kiddos?
Pool's closed!

>>56784077
What I don't understand is how it works with a hardware wallet and metamask.
You're basically linking the hardware wallet through your metamask, right?

So what would happen if your metamask got compromised somehow?
Would you be able to open a new mm and link your hardware wallet without jeopardizing your Link or staking rewards?

>>56782896
He's the CEO of the company but he's not the lead developer. He operates by their schedule. They can't afford to screw the release of this tech up. This is globally financially revolutionizing tech.

>>56784453
metamask never has access to your hardware wallet private key.

hardware wallets are hardcoded to process data formatted in a specific way. it receives the data from metamask, signs it when you click the physical "sign" button on the wallet, and sends the signed calldata back to metamask. that's why you always check the details of the transaction on the wallet screen, it will show you what it's being asked to sign

>>56784630
bro thinks Sergey owes him a free lunch baka

>>56784427
>jjjj
checked

>>56784453
when I checked eligibility via walletconnect it was possible to do so with ledger live so staking should be able to do the same without having to use that awful extension right?

>>56773886
>Steaking

Imagine buying risky IOU shitcoins that can be rugpulled any minute, just TO EARN FUCKING BANK INTEREST, when that money could be earning interest in a FDIC secured legitimate bank with a real address, real people and real assets.

>>56786570
>fiat money
>not IOU
KEK

>>56781384
i was having a stroke
yeah well, my point still stands, just fucking stake, you can always wait a whole month to unstake, the bullrun top is far ahead, the halvnening didnt even happen yet. so its really safe to stake for now.
i dunno why people over think this, i mean your linkies are just sitting in your wallets doing nothing, why not earn 4.5% on them?
why missout on free linkies while waiting for the singularity, also what i find kinda weird is people in here think they must fucking time the top no matter what or they lost. thats not how it works, chainlink price will keep going up and consolidate at higher levels, there is no need to be in a rush

>>56773886
Crazy how permissioned and convoluted Chainlink staking is.

>captcha: NGSGR

ive kept my linkies on an exchange this whole time
tell it to me straight im not getting into the pool before it closes am i?

>>56786663
You're fighting with fudders, not genuine holders. Everyone here is staking the max

>>56786698
sorry gos

>>56786778

>>56782946
>If you told someone in 2017 about the state of the chainlink project in 2023 they wouldn't buy a single token
lol if you showed people in 2017 about Chainlink absolutely dominating the oracle space and Defi alone, they'd all sell their houses to go all in.
And if you just showed them one real-world prospect like DTCC or something, they'd sell their immediate relatives and a kidney too.

I have multiple wallets staking but not enough LINK to fill them and can't afford to buy more to do so. What do?

>>56786803
Creditmaxx

>>56784427
jjjj checked and kekked

>>56786788
>went from 11 cents to 50$ and is prepping for 150$ ez for this bullrun.

eww what a disgusting investment

>>56783529
kek this stupid fudding motherfuckers really

>>56784368
Fuck off nigger

>>56786559
walletconnect doesn't support trezor, which is what my priority staking access is tied to.

>>56773886
sit on the sidelines
it's the safest place to be anon

>>56788574
what about metamask?

>>56784453
>Would you be able to open a new mm and link your hardware wallet without jeopardizing your Link or staking rewards?

Correct. The private key from the hardware wallet is completely separate from the private keys generated from the Metamask account. What I did last year was link my account, stake my link, and then I uninstalled my metamask extension (and reinstalled for my daily wallet). That way my new metamask has no knowledge or previous information of my hardware wallet. And even then, the privatekey stays on the hardware wallet and is never shown to the computer. It only delivers a signature.

>muh watered down staking with no slashing or alerting or anything meaningful that would actually contribute to securing the network
>muh pocs and breadcrumbs
>muh chris barret tweets
>muh advocates and muh fudders
>muh zach and muh adem
>muh fud memes and antifud memes
am I the only one not giving a single fuck for all of this until LINK hits $1k?
I genuinely could not care less about this staking, or shitcoin airdrops, or fudding, or deboonking the fudding, or literally any of this massive pile of steaming shit
I might abandon /biz/ and crypto in general for the next 3 years and check LINK's price then
in the meantime you call all suck my balls
fuck you /biz/

>>56789434
Based

>>56789434
Yeah but you'll miss the shadow fork upgrade.
Serg will announce a time limited token migration to a new standard, you'll come back on a bunch of useless tokens.

so i really want the max limit, i have 4 staked wallets 28k link staked. how do i perfectly allot the additional 7.6~k link to make the cap of 15k perfectly? anyone have an amount?

>>56789434
spoken like a true OG marine
i think based

>>56773886
Holding all of it forever is a baggie retard strategy. Don't stake and begin to ladder out when the sums at play are too life changing to ignore them. The money is useless to you if you never sell to claim it. Don't be greedy but don't be paper hands. It's a balancing act.

>>56783520
I’m legit NGMI 2k a month? T_T

>>56789434
this is me

>stake half, 10k out of my 20k
>get "rewarded" with 487 as a result after an entire year

fuck off

>>56790374
latest no pooler cope just dropped based kiddos

pools closed! seethie!

>stake two wallets with 15K Link each
>stake additional 10K link with SDL
>earn ~1720 link per year, more than 95% of people can afford to buy
>be price next year between $75 - $100
>make between $129,000 and $172,000 without having to sell my staking amount
>still have 25K link to sell on the way up

This is literally what we've been waiting for for 6 years and it's going to be glorious, why are you all so bitchy?

>remember this is only the beginning and these price numbers will be 5-10x what they are now in 5 years.

Good God, I'm excited for you little rascals.

>>56773886
This is a stake demon.

Dysgenic freaks who succumb to staking and token-lock addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their yearly circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Staking on demand accompanied by rewards hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Staking is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to impale them all.

>>56790711
Yeah except chainlink has the limpest dick in crypto and probably won't even break $25 next year.

>>56789434
>I genuinely could not care less about this staking, or shitcoin airdrops

That's cool. I for one will be taking advantage of the allotment that you would have competed with me to fill for more of my stack and I'll be enjoying linkies Serg and Steve oh so generously are donating to us under the guise of "staking to help secure the network". I will also appreciate the 70+ startups already committing to giving the node operators + stakers a cut of their token supply before they even have finished their tokenomics design and ICO launch.

>>56790374
>>>stake half, 10k out of my 20k
>>get "rewarded" with 487 as a result after an entire year

This man gets it.

>>56790852
said the limp dick

>>56786980
I could have made more in a few months buying sh1b or d0gecoin?

>>56776121
Imagine paying tax on crypto LMAO

>>56786570
/thread

THE cuckolds of crypto

>>56791009
Hey I've got my 4k in priority, but this fucking piece of shit missed the 2021 top, was one of the worst bear market performers, and I'm expecting it to miss the next bull too. Link is the single most important thing in crypto and one of the absolute worst performers, simple as.

>>56789434
Yea its tired now. Soooooo tired. Either bring out CCIP and 1k EOY or stfu.

>>56773886
look into stake.link liquid staking (its the Lido of Chainlink)

>>56791563
get the rope XI

>>56791563
>Pic

Jesus Christ.
Chainlink's entire "business" earns less than a lemonade stand run by children.

How do I withdraw my link that was staked last year?

People will think it's fud but i honestly don't give much of a shit about v0.2, if anything it pisses me off that i'll have to spend money to migrate.

The actual returns were always cunt tier shit but I put up with it in v0.1 on the vague hope that the build rewards might make it worthwhile. Those still haven't appeared and at this point i imagine 90% of the list is probably already vaporware. But now I guarantee if you don't migrate you'll never see them, so it's a sunken cost fallacy. I'll pay my $200 eth + tip + ADL donation and move to v0.2 to continue getting that sweet sub-inflation interest.

>>56792087
Except it is the best performer so far this cycle fudcuck motherfuck bitch

>>56794315
Took me two seconds to confirm this was entirely false with a filter to only allow 500m+ MC tokens.

>>56794373
Those are all scams except LINK nigger

60k +rewards over 9 wallets. Restaking all of it plus rewards plus 2k more I bought in last year.
I think it's the best move and frankly enjoy doing the polar opposite to what fuddies want me to do. Their fudding will increase my success, ironically.

>>56794399
Nice. Will you do 4 full wallets plus one with the rest or keep the 9 wallets staked?

>>56773886
stake.link offers liquid staking like Lido

>>56775496
Its not looking good

>>56794488
Think I need to leave them as they are. I'd need to unstake them to move them from those wallets which would screw up the migration. Will leave as is. Maybe there will be a way to combine them later but it's not really a problem rn. Things are looking good.

>>56794633
Seems like the safest way to do it. I have 6 wallets staked right now and my autism wants me to have 3 fully staked wallets but I don't wanna risk it for just that.

>>56794240
It does piss me off that we got NO BUILD rewards during v0.1, that was the entire fucking promise.

the staking pool is gonna fill up instantly isnt it? i have 20k link and held them for long enough to be in early access, but moved them to a safer wallet in the middle of the eligibility period so im stuck in general

im fucked arent i?

>>56794373
It's literally been outperformed by btc this bear market you fucking retard. If link had any decent price action whatsoever it would've been back to $20 a long time ago. It's absolute dogshit right now even after getting out of that $6-8 range, and it will continue to be dogshit indefinitely because for some fucking reason the money power simply does not want link to go up. I have multiple literal who microcaps I bought this year that have outperformed link by like 1000% already. I'd say what they are but then you'd call me a jeet shilling pnd shitcoins.

>>56794373
>>56794315
Oops. Sorry, g67uzkEW.

>>56794232
>CCIP
>Chainlink's entire business

Pick one

>>56778279
There were no build rewards in version 0.1. What are you even talking about, street shitter?

>Those on the Early Access allowlist will get priority access to v0.2, after the v0.1 migration period ends.
Does this say I have to check for eligibility by connecting my wallet even though I know based on the requirements that I am eligible? How much time do I have left to do it?

I was just making sure my computer is ready for the staking transfer. Have a new computer, so installed Ledger Live and updated the Ethereum app. But now my wallets aren't showing. Anyone knows what I have to do?

>>56778433
thats not making it. 5k x 10k = making it

>>56786570
Anon, we need midwits to stay in the ponzi to keep it afloat. Staking is one way to accomplish this. Why they are doing it now instead of accumulating I don't know. Maybe they are bored bagholders?

>>56773886
have you heard of stake.link - its the Lido of the Chainlink network

>>56794315
BTC is over 50% of its ATH. Stink can only manage 30%.

>>56797822
But Link broke out of the 18-month bear market before Bitcoin.

>>56797116
You don't need Ledger Live. Just go straight to metamask and connect your ledger.

Also note that Firefox Metamask isn't working with ledger for some reason but Chrome works fine.

>>56797983
>>56797116

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSL0UYcnYkA

This is what I'm talking about.