[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 153 KB, 1440x1904, 20231120_183419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721572 No.56721572 [Reply] [Original]

>At the absolute best scenario link can only do a 4.48x
Why are you holding this shit?

>> No.56721586
File: 60 KB, 845x925, 1610889866311.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721586

I bought at 10c

>> No.56721588
File: 186 KB, 1440x1958, 20231120_183603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721588

.

>> No.56721608

>>56721588
I’ll still be a millionaire off of that but it’s going to 100

>> No.56721610

>>56721572
You don't think it can have a ten times bigger market cap than that? Btc is a switching with no use case and link will be bigger than it but btc will also do a x5 from here long term.

>> No.56721611

>>56721588
In a bull market, the market cap of BNB will be a lot higher than it is now

>> No.56721616

>>56721572
>>56721588
Idk man. I'm brainwashed. I've only make 100x profits after the price has dumped... I am ashamed for being such a fool, and I thank you for reminding me. Please continue to do this good work.

>> No.56721641

>>56721611
Just hold bnb then it's at least inflationary

>> No.56721698

>>56721588
if you bought BNB instead of LINK in 2017 you would have made x100 more

>> No.56721699

>>56721572
>"Link can only do a 4.48x!"
>own pic shows it can clearly and easily do a 85.81x

good one

>> No.56721743

>>56721699
No coin will surpass btc I posted it to show how delusional you people sound when you say shit like $1k link. 4.48x is if it reaches bnb mcap

>> No.56721756

>>56721572
>>56721588
The fact that you're using a website to calculate that, tells me all I need to know about you.

>> No.56721764

>>56721743
>No coin will surpass btc
1) wrong
2) nobody said anything about surpassing

>> No.56721776
File: 15 KB, 573x314, 1700460196806426.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721776

>>56721743
>No coin will surpass btc
delusional

>> No.56721775
File: 10 KB, 645x773, 1515503657585.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721775

>>56721641
>it's at least inflationary

>> No.56721777

>>56721743
>he doesn't know

>> No.56721789

>>56721756
>>56721764
It's even worse than I realized. Half of the supply isn't even in the circulation for chainlink while bnb doesn't have that problem. So as the supply goes up mcap will increase but the price will stay the same or drop. Yikes

>> No.56721788
File: 27 KB, 640x355, 1700012981970098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721788

https://vocaroo.com/13STog7msWe8

>> No.56721811

>>56721775
Yes

>> No.56721815
File: 2.56 MB, 824x916, 1687905046809240.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56721815

>$250 is fud
fuddies kek

>> No.56721824

>>56721811
>>56721775
Ooooh I am dumb I meant deflationary

>> No.56721852

This thread is the perfect example why most of you will get fucked with bear market PTSD.

You all forget how absolutely retarded things get near the top. If LINK just gets to the ATH market cap of SOL at that's $120 LINK already.

>> No.56721899

>>56721852
>Just hold back to sub 2 digits again bro

>> No.56721969

>>56721789
>Half of the supply isn't even in the circulation
Bitcoin was $10 when half its supply wasn't even in circulation.

You keep making a fool of yourself.

>> No.56721988

>>56721969
Yeah but link isn't bitcoin

>> No.56722016

>>56721969
Link doesn't have the first mover advantage of bitcoin

>> No.56722032

>>56721988
>>56722016

Solana was $1 when 90% of its supply wasn't even in circulation.

>> No.56722206

>>56721777
nice

>> No.56722223

>>56722032
Solana is a VC coin designed to pump by its creators. Once again, stop comparing link to other coins that have better tokenomics.

>> No.56722280

>>56722223
XRP was $0.006 when 1/3rd of its supply wasn't even in circulation.

>> No.56722313

>>56722280
XRP is on par with bitcoin and ethereum because it’s one of the OG coins. At one point it had over 50% of bitcoins market cap while link has barely reached 2% at ATH.

Nigger don’t you get tired of coping and getting btfo? Link has shitty tokenomics and the team’s dump will affect the price drastically.

>> No.56722331

>>56722313
Matic was $0.01 when 1/5th of its supply wasn't even in criculation

>> No.56722383

>>56722331
Yeah, Matic has better tokenomics that’s why it was able to pump so much. That’s the reason they were able to steal one of ETH’s biggest developers (Hudson Jameson) from Chainlink. Oh, bet you didn’t know that huh?

>> No.56722384

>>56721988
>>56722016
>>56722223
>>56722313
King of the goalpost movers

>> No.56722401

>>56721572
Even if i began believing your horseshit, which of course I never will; i would never sell my Link out of sheer spite because i know it's what you want. That's worth as much to me as the riches that await me.
What a pity.

>> No.56722419

>>56722383
Stellar was $0.002 when 3/4 of its supply wasn't even in circulation.

>> No.56722440

>>56721588
BNB will triple in price min at market top so if link matches BNB mcap it’ll be more of a 13x from current price. Enough for me to make it

>> No.56722476

>>56722280
>>56722331
>>56722419
Dude stop being so cringe. All of these projects have massive VCs behind them and much better marketing than chainlink. Just accept that link will melt faces in 10 years but in the meantime the price action will be shit, doesn’t really mean anything in the short term.

>> No.56722523

>>56722419
Another OG coin, release in 2014. BTC dominance over 5% at some point. Link can’t compare.

>> No.56722529

>>56721988
>>56722016
>>56722223
>>56722313
>>56722383
>>56722476
>noncirculating supply bad
>(but only for Link)

kys

>> No.56722557

>>56722529
It’s bad for every project. But all those other projects had VCs with massive pockets and the goal to pump the token price. Link doesn’t really care about marketing nor the price of the token, at some point people even thought they were using the “hiding strategy” kek. Get real kid.

>> No.56722558

>>56721698
No one even talked about bnb in 2017. Only people that bought it was dust amounts for trading. Sad

>> No.56722578

>>56721572
is this post supposed to get me to sell? I've held for 6 years and the fud has gotten so bad that its only name calling and link can only reach $x and lets not forget fuddies projecting their cuck fetishes as well

>> No.56722604

>>56722557
>It’s bad for every project
Clearly not, since every coin under the sun (except Link) seems to have a reason to nullify it.

>> No.56722614

>>56722604
I wonder what chainlink is doing with the money from the dumps. Guess we’ll never know though, doesn’t seem very transparent and trustless but maybe that’s just for bagholders and doesn’t apply to the CEO

>> No.56722664
File: 699 KB, 888x1057, 1677228777839672.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56722664

>>56722476
>>56722557
>muh marketing
Very few coins in the history of crypto have had better marketing than Link.
Pic very related.

>> No.56722700

>>56722664
>thinks research from a 3rd party company is the same as marketing

ha ha ha, you don’t even know what marketing is huh?

>> No.56722877

>>56722700
That’s the best marketing imaginable.

>> No.56722892

>>56722614
you hold link

>> No.56722924

>>56722892
He’s le ebin “let’s keep out normie money” fudder.

>> No.56722932

>>56721988
yeah, it's better

>> No.56722953
File: 6 KB, 229x221, 1697897002698913s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56722953

>>56721572
I just like the token ok.

I just buy buy buy. I literally don't care about the price, I just need more stinkers.

I NEED MORE.

>> No.56723140

>>56721777
blessed