/biz/ - Business & Finance

Fuck you

>>56645928
I’ve missed this anon, he’s got a couple of the all time great LINK posts on this board. Very distinct, rhythmic writing style.

>>56645971

Looking at people still stuck in a "my settlement silo is the best!" mindset is like driving past two people comparing horseshoes, in your Model T.

>>56645987
so is 100 Link okay in 20 years considering I'll never sell it.

>>56645951
No poolers are ripping their arms off and slapping THEMSELVES with their severed LIMBS for missing out on LPL

Pools closed.

>>56645987
Yep that’s him. Clearly a high IQ individual, possibly someone who rubs shoulders with Sergey himself or is otherwise high up in this space in some way or another. Or perhaps just an overeducated dark triad neet with a few K Linkies and thirty mins to kill on a Sunday evening. Hard to tell. The writing style suggests an actual English or CW major. Someone who has consumed a lot of literary fiction over the years. There’s a Vonnegut-esque vibe to it. However the level of familiarity with the tech and project suggests something else entirely.

It was being in the constant company of OGs like this that solidified my conviction in LINK back in the day. I forgive OP for being a bit too idealistic for his own good and overestimating the extreme idiocy of the market back in ‘21. None of us could have predicted things would play out in such nightmarish fashion. Even as I read this latest post I can’t help but think “ah but the timing, you ignore the timing again.” One must realize we are (still) so early. The market must be utterly purged. The team itself has communicated that they’re waiting for legal and regulatory elements to catch the fuck up. So while I agree and appreciate the sentiment, and while I look for to dabbing on ETHfags, QNTfags, doggofags and the like, we are almost certain to have a few more clownish years in front of us yet.

>>56646220
>incel manifesto
Have sex no pooler LOL

Pools closed

>>56645928
when you doing another spoonfeed thread

can’t wait to see bubbakike post this gem on shitter for 200 updoots. fat poorfag normie kys

Does it make sense to get an additional position of Link above $12 if my average of 2k stack is around $4? Do I just sit here and wait and DCA more or get sidelined? I'm retarded

>>56645928
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8932t6Hx7WU
it's already been pumped

>>56646374
81k per link is not a meme in the long term. Even 1 million per link is possible due to staking.

>>56646293
Unfortunately those days are over
But as always
Glad to be here

>>56646451
take your meds shitzo. link will be lucky to hit $200 this cycle.

>>56646461
how is your link-related endeavor?

>>56646462
$200 is the new fud lol lmao rofl

>>56645928
Great post but should I really drop my ROSE bag?

NFCDL?

>>56645928
Charles Hoskinson says oracles are not necessary to bring offchain data onchain

>>56646461
Nfcdl, I was just about to make a thread to try and summon you because I have have a burning topic that has been occupying my mind. Let me know if you’re keen to hear it, because if you were to choose to discuss it in a future thread dedicated to it, not only would it greatly benefit me, but the rest of this board too. I was the anon who suggested the creation and handling of relationships thread a while back, a thread which was enjoyed by many, so thank you for that! Hope you’re well too!

>>56646606

Back in 2021. And who?

>>56646623
>he doesnt know
Official Community Advocate guidelines state we must test all new thread ideas and memes in the Official Community Telegram though? WTF!

>>56646623
What does NFCDL stand for?

>>56646673
>he doesnt know this particular chainlink marketing personality acronym
your newfag is showing!

>Crashes through $16 support while shitcoins pump 30%

ah ah ahhhhp, sit down my eager little jester

>>56646692
your posting style is boring and repetitive

>>56646715
Thank you for your feedback! Your feedback has been sent to chain.link for evaluation. It will help towards improving our products and services including community engagement. Have a great day!

>>56646729
i didn't read your comment because i already know that it's going to be same boring and repetitive rancid garbage

I was going to make a funny copypasta to point out this is exactly what banks are doing to chainlink by building private permissioned blockchains and using central oracles, but that’s a lot of fucking work and you guys are mostly bitter people and/or getting paid to shill link so just pointing out the obvious will have to do.

>>56646741
>Great post but should I really drop my ROSE bag?
>What does NFCDL stand for?
>your posting style is boring and repetitive
>i didn't read your comment because i already know that it's going to be same boring and repetitive rancid garbage
Your previous posts have been sent to our analytical team for analysis on what exactly makes a 4chan post fresh and interesting! Thank you for your feedback!

>>56646761
>boring
>repetitive

>>56645987
LINK is going to $81k, unironically speaking.

>>56646766
>Great post but should I really drop my ROSE bag?
>What does NFCDL stand for?
>your posting style is boring and repetitive
>i didn't read your comment because i already know that it's going to be same boring and repetitive rancid garbage
>boring
>repetitive
Your previous posts have been sent to our analytical team for analysis on what exactly makes a 4chan post fresh and interesting! Thank you for your feedback and have a great day!

>>56646774
>b
>r

>>56646769
>Your brain on Chainlink
Kys schizoid retard

>>56646774
>Great post but should I really drop my ROSE bag?
>What does NFCDL stand for?
>your posting style is boring and repetitive
>i didn't read your comment because i already know that it's going to be same boring and repetitive rancid garbage
>boring
>repetitive
>b
>r
Your previous posts have been sent to our analytical team for analysis on what exactly makes a 4chan post fresh and interesting! Thank you for your feedback and have a great day!

>>56646769
That post is incorrect, swift charges fractions of a penny for that total volume, their total revenue based on swiftnet packages or per diem messaging revenue. The only other fees would be related to trade settlement or FX which would not be paid on every trade if the customer wants to FX themselves or clear through a separate clearinghouse.

>>56646779
Your posting style is boring and repetitive please remember to keep posts fresh and interesting to improve board quality and user morale. Thank you and have a great day!

>>56646792

>>56646803

>>56646813
Thank your for your feedback. Users are encouraged to write boring and repetitive posts to sell more crypto currency tokens. Boring and repetitive posts have been found to sell tokens "like hot cakes". We hope for your sake you find this explanation "helpful". We wish you a pleasant 4channel.org experience.

>>56646841
: >>56646813

>>56646839
>big banks and institutions charge 3-5% on every transfer
Maybe if you’re poor and transferring money to your family in Mexico they charge that much kek

If that was the true rate, you could save 2.98-4.98% by buying FX swaps in the currency you want instead.

>>56646846
>>56646841
>Thank your for your feedback. Users are encouraged to write boring and repetitive posts to sell more crypto currency tokens. Boring and repetitive posts have been found to sell tokens "like hot cakes". We hope for your sake you find this explanation "helpful". We wish you a pleasant 4channel.org experience
>>56646778
>Great post but should I really drop my ROSE bag?
>What does NFCDL stand for?
>your posting style is boring and repetitive
>i didn't read your comment because i already know that it's going to be same boring and repetitive rancid garbage
>boring
>repetitive
>b
>r
Your previous posts have been sent to our analytical team for analysis on what exactly makes a 4chan post fresh and interesting! Thank you for your feedback and have a great day

>>56646864
: >>56646813 (You)

>>56646862

>>56646606
Charles, please...

>>56646882
I agree, faster transactions at a similar price point do save the bank money. Generally easy enough, if (net profit) - (expenses) > (net profit) * (opportunity cost) then use new system.

>>56646913

>>56646927
Weird cope. Makes sense though, if linkers could ever get past the google blurb then maybe they would realize the “trillions in value” link is capturing are actually non-existant.

>>56646753
Explain to me like I'm a retarded 5 year old

>>56647063
There’s no reason to pay a premium for an oracle network to confirm your data if you have a mutable chain. DON’s only make economic sense for immutable chains.

>>56646753
>this is exactly what banks are doing to chainlink by building private permissioned blockchains and using central oracles
Guess who are the node operators running this "centralized" oracles (in reality semi-decentralized oracles).

Hint: 11,000 banks cooperative.

Guess what standard they're using to run these oracles.

Hint: FAT

>>56647156
>$15

Yeah sure Jan

>>56645928
didn't read
token is not needed

>>56647173
What's LINK's proper current value according to you?

>>56645928
>People still think L1s are relevant investment vehicles
altho i agree in theory with what you said, just look at sols recent performance to show you how markets are entirely irrational and the most retarded dogshit can and will pump
there will be a new shib next year and people will call it retarded beyond believe but despite that it will absolutely skyrocket in price

such is the nature of markets

>>56646220
I agree, I would actually have appreciated the market completely getting nuked by the SEC simply so we can restart with less malicious actors. Will be another few years of choking them out sadly

>>56646803
Chainlink isn’t about replacing Swift revenue, dumbass.
It’s about replacing huge parts of the infrastructure the entire finanicial industry uses.

another nice thread shit up by fags
nice thread though

>>56646753
>banks are building private permissioned blockchains
Yes.
And how do you connect these private permissioned chains?

Funny how you fud L1s and pretend you're fudding Chainlink.

>>56645928
>cringe

>>56646462
This cycle doesn't mean long term.

>>56645928
beautiful

>>56645928
You realize if the new world order decides not to use ethereum, youre all screwed right? And why would they? Its ALMOST as bloated and inefficient as the Dollar. What are you linkies gonna do if XRP takes over? Gonna kill yourself? Gonna drink some bleach? Gonna jump off a building? Thats the difference between you and I, if I dont make it I will continue on regardless. Yall ate catfood to make this happen. I just worked harder. We are not the same.

>>56648903
ethereum not needed

>>56648922
Correct. Its a shitcoin that exists to birth other shitcoins. It has performed its task quite successfully and now crypto has turned into a speculative marjet thanks to this bullshit scamchain we call ethereum.
>we need a universal gas token so we can trade our frog tokens for our dog tokens
Lol no you dont.
>all the fraud and blatant theft is a bug not a feature!
Lmao nah, its a feature.

Come to your senses, get some of the standard before its too late. Ethereum wont be used, its already too compromised by pajeets.

>>56648976
why don't you fuck off cripple shill

>>56648994
You know Im right. Thats what scares you the most.

>>56648994
Nobody that actually produces value will ever use it. Let that sink in for a moment.

>>56648994
The only value ethereum produces is usury and outright fraud and you know it. This is why we say chainlink isnt needed. Because the entire blockchain its trying to link isnt needed. Put down the cat food and open your eyes anon

>>56646623
Please link to that thread.

>>56650739

>>56646451
If Link captures the value of the entire derivatives market, it would be worth $10,000 a token. 81k is an absolute cope and nigger tier thinking