/biz/ - Business & Finance

old news
priced in
token not needed

Big whoop, vodafone is now a node op. Everybody runs a chainlink node ops, its not special.

>>56455421
also this

Who cares? How does this affect the price of Link? Exactly, so shut the fuck up.

>>56455427
>shut the fuck up
/thread

>>56455397
fuddies absolutely seething
good job OP

>>56455436
>>56455427
>>56455421
I thought we were done fudding

>>56455405
>>56455421
>>56455426
>>56455427
>>56455436

>>56455397

>>56455427
>telling someone to shut the fuck up on an anonymous image board

room temp iq

>>56455726
shut the fuck up

>>56455397
Hey nice!

>dumps 20%
>Sergey dumps 700k link
>Find Ari Juels kissing your mom

>>56455397
Oh wow another integration. Chainlink could integrate the moon and the price would drop

>>56455726
Eat shit advocate

This is definitely year old news. I distinctly remember saying
>WOAH! THE PRICE ACTION MUST BE CRAZY
with snow on the ground to a German phone company testing link for free with subsidized tokens.

>>56456010
>>56456005
>>56455973
>>56455953
Guys we don’t have to fud anymore the range broke

>>56456024
Looking good!

>>56455421
"Everybody runs a chainlink node ops" is now fud.
Let that sink in.

>>56456319
It’s comical at this point. I sure hope these fudders are secretly holding link, because I can even imagine spending this much time and energy fudding a token that you don’t even own. Just to watch it explode to $1000+

There will be suicides for sure

>>56456543
There’s going to be posts like that eth one where the guy swung his stack and missed out on the bullrun. But instead of a swingie, it’s going to be a fuddie that didn’t realize all the rest of the fudders were secretly link holders and joking when they were fudding link

>>56455935
>>56456005
no. I simply wont. You seething retards cant do anything about it. LINK $1k EOY

>>56456543
obviously fudders hold link/have a financial interest in it
they're not just doing it for fun
would you spend hours of your day doing something for no incentive

>>56456152
unironically yes
29k sats is key support, if that holds next up is 40k
then 90k
if it breaks 90k sky's the limit for this cycle, no other major resistance from there
last cycle link did a 60x in sats bottom to top
if it does just a 10x this cycle you're looking at 200k sats, that's $200 top at $100k btc, and those are all extremely conservative estimates.

>>56456995
and as predicted, bouncing off 29k sats already
the next year and a half is going to be painful for anyone not holding chainlink

>>56457817
Post feet

does anyone here actually use vodafone? they suck. this is just some manager trying to grab a bonus for "innovating"

>>56455543
chainlink advocate d4
fudderxd3 (en passant)

now the fuddies are asking who is vodafone... kek.

vodafone used to own almost half of verizon wireless and sold it to another verizon division for like $100/150 billion. This was around 10 years ago.

vodafone is huge. Not sure the order as it changes but the big ones in Europe are t-mobile, vodafone, deutsche telekom and orange. Our market is

Those 4 in Europe are like at&t, verizon and t-mobile state side.