/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>5640684
My body is ready

>>5640684
Realistically how much is it going to be worth?

That's a good speech man.

>>5640684
>that comfy feel when even holding one measly LINK token is enough to buy some small cities in the future

>ground level
whatever helps you sleep at night, late adopter

>>5640684
inb4 LINK dumps to half current value

>>5640868
>Heh, this coin exists for longer than three months.
>It's over, late adopters.
>After five months the Greater Fools™ will follow.

good meme friend

>>5640808
$50-100 is very realistic Q4 2018

>>5640808

Depends on how long you hold.

Code release Q1 ($3-5), mainnet Q2/3 ($7-10)

Marketing hire = better communication = increased demand starting Q1

zeppelin_os will be released later in 2018. ($20 LINK)

SWIFT DLC updates are mandated to be done by Nov 2018.

By Q4 2018 I think we'll see $50

By 2019 LINK will become ubiquitous by being a component of every new dApp and we'll finish the year at $100.

By 2020 SWIFT DLT updates are expected to be live and running, and any partnership with them, even if not for everything, will push this to $250-300 easily.

You've been visited by the stinky limpy linky club

>>5641038
So comfy

>>5641038
God i wish i could time travel

>>5641038
With that prediction even poorfags like me with 500 LINK would make enough money to make a change in their lives.

There's no way. I think $3 tops by the end of 2018 is reasonable.

>>5641332

Nah. Our first pump will take us to $1.50-2.50. We'll see $3 easily once they've released the new code.

>>5641377
Are you a whale/whale group or something? Even so well... Go ahead. I'd love to be wrong.

>>5640684
Sounds interesting

I bought in at .17 cents and have 12k link

I probably should have bought more but I'm comfortable with this

>>5641494

Nah lol. I can just see that these are still early days for LINK. The volume is still tiny, and there are key milestones coming up throughout the year that will pump the price each time. The marketing hire will do a far better job of keeping the project on more people's radar as well so it won't be trapped on /biz/ and that shitty link subreddit. Its a horribly branded project at the moment, but that just means we get a shot at undervalued LINK.

>>5641494
Just like op said

>The people holding this are going to become the wealthy elite.

>Just for lucking in the right place and right time

I know that this sounds too good to be true because it's almost is. Just hodl and buy more links if you can.

We all are going to make it.

>>5641332
>>There's no way. I think $3 tops by the end of 2018 is reasonable.
thing is when people want link, everyone will want it

>>5641845

Yup. And a lot of weak hands have already been shaken out, while people who really believe in it have been accumulating. Most LINK is concentrated in a fairly small handful of wallets, and if enough of those wallets refuse to sell for small gains the demand + limited supply will make the price soar. The volume for LINK is still so small I don't think people really comprehend how far above current price it could go once 10k BTC/day becomes the norm instead of 1k or less.

Lol yep, linkies will become the new wealthy elite. Just as soon as sirgay gets out of bed. Any time now.

>>5642049
Hahahah. The whole sergay is a lazy piece of shit meme on biz has been one of my favorite stories of 2017. It’s really just awesome

>>5641038
HAHAHAHA

>>5642113

Ya what a lazy cunt. Meeting some of the biggest players in finance. He should be updating Twitter instead!

>>5641038
This.
Hold 10k Link and be millionaire by next year.
I'm going to buy more up to 50k.
Feels comfy desu

>>5640684
>Stinky linkies

>>5642113
The best memes have an element of truth to them (or in this case, are entirely true :^)

Cool idea, bad execution

It's actually disgusting watching everyone disregard Chainlink and chase empty pumps instead. This is the most innovative piece of technology that financial and insurance sectors have all been waiting for and it will actually revolutionize the world and strengthen every industry it touches.

Look at Vitalik, Roger, Justin, and Charlie constantly focusing on publicity stunts, shilling, and talking about the pricing of their coins. Sergey is actually the most reliable leader in the cryptosphere focusing only on his technology and development, no bullshitting with publicity stunts. Only honest answers to honest questions when he gets the chance.

I feel like I'm taking fucking crazy pills watching all of this play out. Etherscan shows that soon 95% of all available circulating LINK will be consolidated into less than 15,000 wallets and that continues to shrink as more people try to chase pumps, they're being shaken into stronger hands. As soon as Sergey's saved up LINK is finally handed over to institutions we'll see the price jump by increments of dollars and it'll be way too for most people by then. This is so fucking ridiculous and scary in showing how stupid most of /biz/ actually is.

>>5641332
I remember when I bought ethereum back in February pretty much everyone (including me) thought $100 ETH by end of 2017 was ridiculous

Once these things take off there's no telling how far they'll go

>>5640684

>>5642288
>bad execution

>slow and steady wins the race: the coin

someone explain this
https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/374960-i-can-t-set-configurepin-in-mode-pwm-work-with-raspberry-pi3?s_tid=prof_contriblnk

Man the dedication you linkies have to this coin is honestly inspiring. I think linkies have the strongest hands of any hodlers

>>5642288
>bad execution
What did he mean by this?

What wallet and where should I buy this if I'm Canadian?

It's been a slow bleed since october. The project is over but we're unwilling to call it dead.

Zoom the fuck out, anon.

>>5641038
lmao you're delusional

NONE OF THIS WILL HAPPEN.

>>5642668

>>5642668
Feels like a very safe investment considering how sideways it's been for so long

>>5642342

AHHHHHHHHHH

Screencapped

Honestly tho who has a reasonable explanation for sergeys absolute radio silence for two fucking months? Besides OH HE'S JUST FOCUSED ON THE COIN

https://discord.gg/C3GmEqn
nice chat

>>5642746
>>5642736

You guys are delusional if you think this is going to suddenly get better. Lots of wasted opportunities while you're waiting for this thng to light up.

>>5642775
What radio silence? https://medium.com/@sergeynazarov/chainlink-an-overview-and-our-focus-14f03335b803

Literally a week ago.

I must agree, chainlinks tech is useful enough to make this coin worth something.

>>5642775
If you're trying to market a product to big players like SWIFT it probably doesn't look good to be involved in this goldrush PnD ICO ecosystem. I pretty much write off any coin that has price updates on its twitter feed as a serious player. The feds could come down hard on a lot of these shitcoin chump dumpers and no big company is going to want to touch that.

The only reason he likely gave his EoY update was to shut up the people spamming every SWIFT twitter updates with questions about Chainlink. It's a really bad look.

>>5642819

Opportunities that are tiny by comparison to the opportunities Chainlink will enable.

Flip other alts if you want, but your goal while we're still < $1 should be to acquire as much LINK as possible. That's just smart money.

>>5642528
>18 hours ago
>stupid rasPi question

Obvious troll

>>5642965
Unironically did this. I'm about 50% into LINK with 50k.

>>5642843
>>5642960
I'm not saying he needs to be a playboy on Twitter, but a once a week update seems reasonable to me as an investor in his product. "hey guys, this is what we worked on this week, this is how far we got, this is the outcome of said progress and what we'll be moving to in the near future." or something simple like that. Twitter is fucking free and doesn't take but a single minute to give a simple status update

>>5643043
I see your point, I just don't think he thinks of us as investors. The whole ICO = investment vehicle equation is really sketchy DESU. He probably sees SWIFT as a potential investor, not NEETS who bought in early.

>>5643043
Honestly, nothing on crypto looks live an investment to me. They have also said many times they are going to let the product speak for itself. You're free to dislike this, as well as you are free to leave.

Teams manage their development differently. If people are losing faith because he's not tweeting every once in a while, you don't have too much confidence in the product in the first place.

>>5643043
Still doesn't get it. LINK investors are lucky to be along for the ride. The real movers are enterprise companies building valuable solutions. They don't need Twitter updates.

>>5643221
You're probably right about that but it still rumbles my raisins.

>>5640684
How about no?

>>5643348

Meh, take it as a blessing in disguise. The price is currently so undervalued compared to other projects equally as non-existent that we're all being given more than enough time to acquire cheap LINK. With the marketing hire in the works, Chainlink should start 2018 with a pretty solid rally as they begin to fix the communication problem. With such a small team I'd rather they play to their strengths and it seems they have. That's a good sign IMO.

>>5643454
It's best plan if that's what they're actually doing. But that's a lot of faith (blind hope) we're giving them

>not on bittrex

fucking shitcoin

Singapore tonight!

>>5643589
nobody cares about shitrex, get with the times, grandpa.

>>5640684
I am proud to be a stinky linkie.

>>5640808
Big bucks nigga thas all u needa kno

>>5640868
>t. an actual, coping late adopter

>>5643566

How is it blind? Do you understand how big of a deal ZeppelinOS was? At the very least it should shut down the "they've done nothing" fud, even if the fudders can't wrap their head around the scope of the zeppelin post. Clearly the people who need to know about the progress that is being made do know.

>>5643684
What does this mean?

>>5642668
>muh sats

>>5642668
>slow bleed
>uptrend
>currently found new floor at previous ATH
>measuring in sats
What was it like buying BTC for the first time at $6k?

>>5643932
Remember when zaddy Sergey said he has no interest in pumping price through announcing partnerships, and he'll let the partners make the announcements?

Announcement incoming.

>>5644072
>>5643932

this. unironically read the project ubin report. There is explicit language describing an oracle service that undeniably describes chainlink. We have reason to believe an announcement from the singapore exchange is coming tomorrow. There will not be a name drop but it will confirm that they are moving forward with a chainlink implementation. The smart money's eyes are on it even if it's still flying under the dumb money's radar. Buy now or regret it forever.

To whom it may concern

I had a dream last night

Derby told us to inspect the smart contract website.

I had a feeling this was really good news

I feel something with this coin

Cap this

>>5644158

>DLT also enables Smart Contracts, which
are virtual agreements encoded on the
network that are automatically executed
based on logical conditions. Referring
to our example again, let’s now imagine
that John issued a Smart Contract with
instructions to send Sally $20 if the stock
for Company X reaches $1.20 earnings per
share. The Oracle – a trusted data feed to
a Smart Contract, which may be needed
when data is not intrinisically available
on the ledger – validates the logical
conditions of a Smart Contract. It watches
the earnings per share value and triggers
the Smart Contract when the earnings per
share of Company X hit $1.20. As soon as
the condition is met, it will automatically
trigger a $20 transaction to Sally. This
offers an extremely powerful benefit to
many different industries by enabling the
automation of complex business processes
(often with multiple untrusting parties) with
the use of logical conditions and rules.

Is this what you're talking about?

>>5644072

Where do we see this announcement?

>>5642395

>liquified

>>5644244
Sergey not derby

And checked

>>5643906
99.9% of LINK fud is unsubstantiated claims, complete bullshit, or epic memes. Some fudders know this is a gem, and want to accumulate cheap, some are just tired of seeing LINK threads all fucking day, some bought near ATH or missed out on the rigged presale and are really bitter about it. Some just fud for fun (i do this sometimes).

I have 5k link. What is my worth in USD at the end of 2018?

>>5642113
haha toply memed my sir. Such awesome memeage

XD

>>5643043
>I'm not saying he needs to be a playboy on Twitter, but a once a week update seems reasonable to me as an investor in his product.
You are not an investor. You are not anything special. You have contributed nothing to the development of ChainLink. Buying a funny internet token and hoping the price goes up does not make you an investor. You do not matter at all to the success of ChainLink, none of us do. Sergey already has partnerships, he already has industry recognition. Sergey very easily could have secured ALL of his funding from angel investors/firms or fintech and instead he CHOSE to do an ICO. Because that's the kind of guy Sergey is (he's a philosophy major for a reason), instead of only allowing insiders and big swinging company dicks to make money off of his product which IS NOT MARKETED TOWARDS THE AVERAGE PERSON, he chose to hold an ICO so the average person could get a piece of the pie. Now every entitled faggot here who buys LINK is upset that they didn't get an easy 10x in a month so they panic sell and fud. Sergey doesn't give a shit about some loser whining on /biz/ about his bags because he knows what he has, he knows the opportunity he is giving you, and he knows that if you sell and fail to make money off of LINK it is because of your own weak hands, and you will look back in regret when you see that all you had to do was wait a couple months. But you didn't because you're impatient and wanted Twitter updates and blog posts too much to see the bigger picture.

Waited for a while for this to get on bittrex, made an account on binance now should I buy now?

>>5644346

I agree. It's very good in the sense that every single angle has been meticulously prodded for weaknesses in a way that has generally been out of the public eye and pretty much exclusively on /biz/. And this really seems exclusive to link. Since crypto mania took off this summer/fall I haven't seen a single token that has been subjected to this level of scrutiny and research.

It's great, i'm going to take great pleasure in this becoming the reddit flavor of the week in a few weeks or months as they brag about buying in at $2 and prattle on and on about how this is "revolutionary" and that normies wouldn't understand. it was hyped incredibly before sibos but since then there's been so much new money and people it can definitely have a new run. Unlike last month it's a great time to be a linkie.

>>5644403
500

>>5644532

I think so mate, I don't see it getting much cheaper unless the whole market tanks, in which case you just buy more.

>>5640684
i believe you

>>5642668
>someone bought link at 1000 sats

jelly as fuck

>>5640684
GUYS THIS IS NOT A JOKE.
I AM OUT OF MONEY TILL LIKE MARCH 2018. I ONLY HAD CHANCE TO ACCUMULATE AROUND 300 LINK COINS.
WTF CAN I DO I AM TOTALLY FOMO'ING TO WAIT ALL THE WAY TILL MARCH?????
REEEEEEE

>>5640684
Guys, all this shit is so 2017...

just leave it already

>>5644792
>only had time to "accumulate" 300 LINK
>less than $150 worth
>won't have more money until March

fuck off you fucking middle school nigger

>>5644158
>We have reason to believe an announcement from the singapore exchange is coming tomorrow.
That reason being?

>>5645089

>>5645193
The reason is link is in a cup and handle formation following a target j curve formation. If we don't pass a dollar within 10 days put 10 shares in my pooper and screencap.

>>5645479
TA is not a reason to believe an announcement from the singapore exchange is coming tomorrow.

>>5644880
LINK was never a 2017 coin...

10,700 linkies here. Gonna get to 11k and daytrade a 1k stack to hopefully hit 15k eventually.

>>5641332
>it's too good to be true therefore it isn't

>>5645559
>singapore exchange

what Singapore announcement?

>>5645728
that's what happened when a wagecuckery programmed slave gets confronted with an idea of becoming financially independent. He nervosly looks around to put his shackels back to calm his inner slave down
I estimate that 90% of biz link hodlers will get weak handed at 2-4$ and after wasting that money on stupid shit they will go back to wageslavery, only the strongest of hands will be rewarded with freedom

>>5640684
Stop fucking shilling this shit!!!!

1k link here, bought it last week after finally figuring out that all the shit talk on here is 100% fud.

aiming for 10k by the end of the year but that's about $5,000, which is almost impossible as I have to wage-slave.

What's the absolute minimal amount of link I need for a $1mil payout in 10 years time?
I just want to provide for my family, build a legacy, and fund right-wing groups for the upcoming european war.

>>5646107

If you want to know where chainlink will be in ten years let me give you a hand.

www.deadcoins.com

>>5645952
FUCKING NO YOU FUCKING SCUM YOU ARE THE FUCKING WORST FUCKING SCUMMY STINKY NOLINKIES FUCKING GET OUT GET OUT

>>5646107
10 years. Let me just check for you.

>>5644792
Damn imagine being this guy. He's 90 % there. Hes in the right place. He knows he could be rich. But all hes got is $150 bucks.

>>5640684
I don't know if I still believe, OP. Look at this. This is how a real CEO gives an update: https://modum.io/ceo-update-december-2017/

>>5646263
It's going to sting in a few years, knowing what could have been. He cant even afford payments on a 5k loan

>>5646263
>>5646350

He could invest in coins that have potential

>>5645941
This. I've only got 2k link but I'm not selling until 2020, no matter what it reaches before then

>>5644158
Dude, the project names R3 as one of the providers for the info
R3 is the creator of CORDA, Corda is the competition for LINK
Unless this people are cucking them they're gonna go with Corda :(
Plz tell me im wrong

>>5646107
5k should be enough for one mill

>>5646724
>t. someone who doesn't know what corda is

>>5644294
oh shit. it should be liquidated. brb kysing myself

>>5646745
Nice argument faggot
Are you coordinating another PnD?
Corda is a DLT oracle solution already being used by like 100 banks
Its not 100% "de-centralized" but how much do banks care?
Specially considering LINK is not even up and running yet

>>5646904

Only good advice in this thread lol. Dump your link for real projects. XLM, Circa, Raiblocks.. Holding link is a joke.

>>5646724
Post proof

>>5644158
>>5646745
>>5646904
"R3 and MAS believe that DLT offers the potential to:
• Improve domestic securities transactions, offering Delivery-vs-Payment (DvP) settlement
in cases where it is not already available
• Significantly improve cross-border payments (Payment-vs-Payment) and securities
transactions (DvP)"

>>5647102
I still believe in LINK, just not on this singapore thing
They will try to PnD it, usd price will stay above what is now afterwards anyway

>>5647102

This is neither link nor corda you fags

>>5646724
>>5646904
and here we have an example of a pajeet trying to FUD LINK. notice how the first post he pretends to be a concerned LINK holder, and in the 2nd, he turns into a rabid LINK hater, all the while posting unsubstantiated rumors as fact. a fascinating case study in pajeet psychology

>>5640868
got in at 16 cents....feels good

>>5643018
Same here anon, were going to make it

>>5647163
... R3 is the owner and creator of Corda
Just like SmartContracts.com is the owner and creator of ChainLink

My id is OMG NO lol
You cant invest in corda anyway so...
LINK has a bright future, but this kind of implementation? We're AT LEAST a year away from seeing

>>5647188
Im balls deep in LINK faggot, just not deluded
Also sage'ing every post so I dont spread unnecessary FUD

>>5647282
It is always the same with most LINKIES (I hold LINK too)

They are truly the Rick and Morty fans of the crypto scene

>>5640684
new to this, help, should I buy it on binance or somewhere else?

Jesus fuck tl;dr on those text walls please, I have around $500 on binance, should I go all in in this shit right now or am I too late?

(yes I am that poor)

>>5647239
>We're AT LEAST a year away from seeing
you fags keep saying this shit, and yet if anyone listened to you (won't moon for AGES) they would have missed the moon from 15 to 70 cents.

seriously how dumb are you people. you keep acting like LINK's price won't budge until the project is literally 100% complete, at which point you can just happily buy some and get a 100x the next day. lol....

>>5647544
>>5647574
Binance is the best exchange to get this, and with 500bucks... Really cant go wrong, this seems like a good entry point too

>>5647587
Why dont you copy the full quote faggot?
Didnt mention price, I was talking about implementation
Price can go to whatever the speculation pushes it to, I dont care about that though
I got in at 15cents too, so its not like im waiting for it to be finished to get in
Just warning you to not FOMO because of some random article that probably has nothing to do with LINK

Get in, dont FOMO in while its being pumped. That's it.

Convince me to buy LINK instead of REQ

>>5647587
>>5647720
Sorry to have called you a faggot, I just now realize my sentence got chopped
Typing on a phone with rural internet and its not great

>>5647792
DYOR

guys just stop fighting, the reality of the situation is we link holders all going to be fucking rich. end of story no need to be angry

>>5647637
okay ty

>>5644792
It's okay dude. 300 link is enough

>>5647792
buy none of them - rather buy skycoin, if will outperform them all t.me/Skycoin

>>5646107
I have 1k link also and I'm gonna find left wing groups to counter you with my link

>>5643824
mined bitcoin when it was <$1 :)

>>5648014
we're not talking about btc here, larping newfag

>>5646311
How a real CEO with a marketing team/guy gives an update

>>5647438
>rick and morty fans of crypto
Just fuck off somewhere else

>>5648401
Hit close to home, huh?

>>5648000
>proxy political war via link

best timeline