/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56370431
stfu

>>56370439
think harder anon
I promise you will get it

>>56370431
Larp didn’t come true fuck you I went all in now I’m down

Got a link to this OP? I can't find it anywhere online.

>>56370431
otc probably

>>56370449
Lets forget for a second that 10/13 is currently the exact bottom
But I am telling you. Think one level harder and it will hit you

How about this. Are there any statements that I made, that you have a problem with?

>>56370431
Sergey is going to unlock the other 300mil Link tokens to sell at a discount to his banking buddies while shills are stuck holding their $50 bags.

>>56370484
Goldman won’t buy link it will be given from the 350 mil tokens have for larger institutions fuck off larper I just kill your larp

>>56370496
Okay
Lets say you are right
How do you address the statement of Swift are having him shill to Goldman

>>56370506
What statement? He just went to talk there are dozens he’s gone to that have done nothing for price

>>56370516
Let me rephrase your prior post here >>56370496
SWIFT are going to be the ones giving 350 million to larger institutions
Do you have a problem with that?

>>56370528
This Goldman Sachs thing is old news, Sergey already spoke and nothing happened, if anything, someone that was actually there stated that nobody really knew what Chainlink was.

>>56370528
YES WHY SHOULD THEY GET THE TOKEN FOR FREE

>>56370538
>, if anything, someone that was actually there stated that nobody really knew what Chainlink was
Do you not understand that this is bullish?

>>56370541
Until link finally manages to break out of this 500+ day channel, nothing is bullish.

>>56370541
>buy my bags
No

>>56370540
to induce fomo in competitors. the first banks to make this step will get their OTC tokens, every laggard is going to have to market buy because there won't be any left.

>>56370561
I’ll believe it when I see it assblaster said the same thing and it’s been 6 YEARS

>>56370553
>I too like to follow the heard
I have done some trading, so I will rephrase this to how it makes sense to me from this perspective
You want to buy and instantly watch it go up, no regrets.

What am I to make of all of this?

>>56370577
checked but can you stop being so cryptic and just spill the beans already

>>56370561
this is like when verge put a radio in their wallet and holders have to donate a bunch for a mind geek pornhub partnership. they did not last long as counter parties.

>>56370580
Just think about it anon

>>56370577
>You want to buy and instantly watch it go up
I have been holding link ever since anime-chan started shilling it before assblaster even came to fruition. All these larps mean nothing if the price action is shit.

>>56370584
if verge underpinned all of non-BTC crypto you might have a comparison. as-is, its not great.

>>56370528
>SWIFT are going to be the ones giving 350 million to larger institutions
larger institutions, like the folks in the talk after sergey's
>the arrival of institutional asset managers
>the arrival
>the signal
am i getting close?

>>56370607
To add to my post, the link/btc pair is starting to show an uptrend, so that is at least a little encouraging. But the fact that actual scams/vaporware/ghost chains out-performed link during the 2021 run is very demoralizing.

>>56370596
if the 350m is for swift, and swift has sergey shilling to goldman sachs, it sounds like they'll get a portion of that 350m. still not sure what that has to do with any signal

>>56370608
chainlink does and even have a wallet let alone a radio you are being disingenuous

>>56370484
I would figure Goldman would spin up nodes and supply them with link if they really understood chainlink enough to want to invest in it

>>56370644
>>56370661
Checked
I will reiterate this point before I conclude
>The answer to whatever conclusions you may come to, from any piece of this information, is the signal.
I am not here to debate those conclusions, because I truly do not know. I leave that up for other people to decide, for now.

I find it consistent with my own thinking, that you were only able to produce a bullish output No matter how I played each and every scenario out, given the two conditions in the op. I was unable to find a bearish flaw.


>>56370580
He wants to buy and instantly watch it go up, no regrets.
What do you make of that?

>>56370734
I get it anon, sergey will betray and btc will crash to 15k if these "Golden Men" are going to get their stinky link shower

>How exactly are Goldman Sachs going to buy link?

Easy. They're going to buy otc from sergey and then short on the public markets to hedge.

>>56370793
they're going to buy it with btc/eth

stealth great thread or drumming up hype to get people to buy into this nice little pump. i for one believe the former

yeah cool larp thread. i think im just gonna sell this last pump before under $5 prices. see you maybe in 5 years when we get some first use cases

bros will it moon before penis inspection day? my co has a mean grip
https://twitter.com/TTEcclesBrown/status/1713422909652574240

>>56370431
>Baggity baggity start doing the coppity
You retards are so pathetic it's fucking unreal lmao, and people laughed at me when I came out as a pond holder

>>56370734
the copium since day 1 is that banks will buy our bags outright and cause the singularity because they need access to cl services. this is unlikely given that banks already see investment in technical adoption as a risk-on buy-in (a sunk cost). why would they further sink funds into a volatile token on top of an already volatile (read: uncertain) tech investment?
to my mind, and according to wp 1.0, it makes more sense that cll maintain past course and subsidize link service usage both technically and payment wise (either gift tokens, or accept otc flat rate payment for service, and handle sla payments to dons), except this time for banks.
in this most likely scenario, the banks come to rely on the service, and eventually generate a return on technical investment. the more dependent they become on the service, the more likely they are to accept the fully fleshed tokenomics model as an acceptable market to interact with in order to fulfill their dependencies. i guess the idea is that they will be at some point happy to participate in open market Link purchases/speculation i.e. step in as strongly incentivized demand.
regarding your post, i think you take explicit shilling to banks, and evidence like the anz poc, as a sign that the infrastructure is ready and the banks are ready to become dependent on that infrastructure to make money.
the problem is that it's not clear how long it will take for banks to develop the required dependencies to justify open market purchases; it's been 4 years and original mainnet launch partners STILL do not have to do this, and it's extremely opaque which ones do (i'm not aware of who does, if anyone, tbqh. maybe GNS?)

i don't feel the bullish read you have here, it still hinges on several VERY unclear factors.

>>56371041
It's not the same, LINK has been around for longer than that piece of shit

>>56371007
How about you sell, and forget about it and come back again to watch it under .1? Sounds good to you?

Any1 have that pic of chainlink in 2026

>>56371041
Baggie no cope? Baggie no cope

>>56371041
Checked and definitely kek'd

>>56371045
OP btfo

>>56371062

>>56372428
>Price will be 20k in Jan 2024
HODL MARINES!!1, WAGMI SN=SN

>>56370431
only thing i can think of is monitor on chain activity on ccip/staking and that would be the signal institutions i.e. are live, and goldman will have a node/accumulating staking for number go up up and beyond.

DTCC is related to Swift right? they were doing a test/POC, maybe when Swift/DTCC is live, goldman will flip the switch on, aka the signal

Have you guys maybe considered that, as everything has been confirmed 1000x, now is the time to just let it ride with Chainlink and put your attention into other things? What is even the point of even breadcrumbing any more, now that there is no longer any doubt?
Might as well set a phone alert for $20 and find a wholesome hobby to fill your time.

>>56370484
Zoom out retarded advocate shill

>>56370541
An insider actually confirmed that there are no current plans to use link

>>56370628
>the god protocol
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55

I was there. The people shilling that “it is happening” are disingenuous. I am unironically an “insider” in the DA dept of a large bank. My friend, who was also there, did an AMA here and was banned from posting here, without reason (I can screen cap what he sent me). Chainlink investors moderate this website apparently as they’d like to moderate what content is “truthful” on the internet. The OP of this thread is trying to be cryptic and string more people along to invest. It’s all quite tiresome really.

>>56372580
>cube logo
we've made it

>>56372580
What did Sergey say

>>56372613
He said “I hate advocates”

>>56372613
700k to Binance

The original insider said November, maybe October we see the sign. I don’t think the conference was it.

It'll be like Dragginz supply/demand but Link

Big brain here

>>56372580
I asked people to find a flaw in my argument.
This place is not afraid to hold back
I did not see you do that in any meaningful way

>>56372580
>I can screen cap what he sent me
this plox
was this his post here?
>>56358380

>>56372956
y u ignore
>>56371045

>>56371045
This is actually reasonable "FUD"
I've made my peace with having to wait another couple of years.

>>56372613
Makes sense

>>56370431

>>56374292
Damn, he's such a based king

>>56370431
(You) are going to dump your shitcoin and goldman will lap it up like a wall street janitor.

>>56372508
Brutal

YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP.


The price has gone up 200% since the last time we posted. Holders have increased by 10.

p.s. we have a meme contest going on for the next two weeks, join the telegram or discord to enter and win. LETS FUCKING GO!!1661!!

YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP.


The price has gone up 200% since the last time we posted. Holders have increased by 10.

p.s. we have a meme contest going on for the next two weeks, join the telegram or discord to enter and win. LETS FUCKING GO!!1661!!

>>56372508
>maybe if I try again to post the retarded Hbaggie larp, this time will stick
lmao kill yourself brownshit

YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP YOUVE GOT TO PUMP IT UP.


The price has gone up 200% since the last time we posted. Holders have increased by 10.

p.s. we have a meme contest going on for the next two weeks, join the telegram or discord to enter and win. LETS FUCKING GO!!1679!!

>>56372428
It is so sad that crypto.com chain is nowadays cronos or some shit

>>56372428
Lol how many retards don't know inspect element.