/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56357202
Sold 5k at 40-50 but im still a millionaire, now staking.

>>56357202
>still a millionaire
>only took $250k in profits
So you're saying you held back 20k link? what?

I just live as if I don't even have any crypto at all, if I make it cool if not I continue the normal life, all or nothing.

>>56357202
keked at sergeys smirking during this interview.

>>56357202
Oh yes me anon. thought it was smart to swingtrade link, bought into the ico with other anons in the smart contracts.

Started off with 13.5k.
Now sitting at 2k

Did pay taxes and shit and paid off student loans, got €50k in gold/silver, €10k car, €35k house.

Could have made it 10 times over but is a big retard

No comment

>>56357202
I’d rather be in this timeline than the timeline where I sold at $50 and have $500K but LINK is now $800.

>>56357202
>start out in 2017
>bought LINK shortly after the ICO
>trade other shitcoins and make mad profits
>roll profits from shitcoins into LINK and survive the Bear market because of this Move
>DeFi happens and I invest into DeFi protocols
>make huge profits
>L1 craze starts and I invest into it
>make even more profits
>roll profits into more LINK
>now retired multimillionaire with 346k LINK
>6 of my wallets are staking 7k since day 1 of staking
>plan to stake more
>already know what the next big craze will be

I estimate I will reach 50 million in the next Bullrun.

yes but i'm not suicidal just depressed and demoralized. my peak was only about $700k so even if i sold nothing in my life would have changed, i would just have more cash and more link.

>>56357407
>>already know what the next big craze will be
can you share it with us poor souls is it ai?

>>56357407
you made it fren

>>56357202
Retard here,
>ICO buyer
>sold only 30% at 35$
>fell for LINK will be more valuable than eth meme
>roundtripped rest 01. to 50 back to 7

Hurts my soul thinking how much money I fumbled, can't imagine how or why ppl who sold nothing haven't rope

>>56357427
tokenization of real world assets. thats where the next big wave of ICOs will come from.
especially so called "structured products" will be huge, which is basically all kinds of RWA/OCA lumped together for fixed or variable yield. all of that can only work thanks to Chainlinks CCIP.

>>56357432
yes fren I made it but I'm not done yet and not ready to retire.
crypto and chainlink is only starting and I wouldnt want to miss whats coming.

>>56357530
>next big wave
thank you fren sharing knowledge is noble. Can you share any projects you think will benefit link aside or will you see what comes up and go with it?

>>56357530
>crypto and chainlink is only starting and I wouldnt want to miss whats coming.
allow a second question, will you sell how much of your stack or just staking? You played it well last time, i think the 28-30 cycle will be the 1000+ case due to legal clarity, next cycle imo is still a good profit taking opportunity.

>>56357530
what about everest id and identity?

>>56357530
will the eternal link baggies be redeemed by or before 07/07/2025?

>>56357202
i never sold, never will

>>56357530
Also why the fuck is the FUD worse now in the bottom of a bear market than at any other time? This is worse than zeus/simeon/bancor/celsius because we have confirmation of link being deeply involved with the right people, but ZERO price action for FIVE HUNDRED DAYS

>>56357648
>people find out banks are using other systems like canton and progmat and not chainlink
>linkies in absolute disbelief and call it fud
You can have sergey coming on stage and outright admitting to it just being a scam and you will still have delusional cultists trying to spin it the other way

>>56357202
Still holding 35k stinks

>>56357671
>fudding

>>56357648
Normies all FOMO'd into PEPE instead of LINK. Also the alt coin market in general has not recovered yet.

>>56357720
Will Link pump precede btc/market wide pump again? Then get rekt on pairs when btc/eth actually moon, again?

>>56357671
>banks are using L1s instead of Chainlink

You're an idiot lmao

>>56357841
Cope n seethe. Banks are not using your Russian middle man grifting shitcoin

>>56357857
anon, I.....

>>56357202
Kind of but start of 2019 for me. Im just wageslavin' and mclovin it.

>>56357530
>tokenization of real world assets. thats where the next big wave of ICOs will come from.

goddamnit dude, we already know this. Though you make a point about ICOs will be generated. I question this as banks running their own banks and developing their projects and they have all the valuable assets.

What assets do the laymen have that would drive speculation or usage?

>>56357863
5 years from now you'll be here still "winning" gotcha arguments about why (influencer here) is biased against your cult.

>link price - $3.50

It's going to get so ugly in here when Link misses the next run

>>56357407
However, I have to give you props for the insane foresight in investing in the other crazes and making a killing off of them to reinvest back into Chainlink.

I only bought and bought and bought chainlink.

>>56357648
>>56357708
the "fud" as you oddly call it... is this annoying little thing called reality. You married an altcoin. Go look at any altcoin chart that had a major run in a prior cycle to see what your future holds.

>but MY altcoin is the SPECIAL altcoin!!!

that's what everyone thinks, which is what they call irony

>>56357962
>>56357978
what you're doing is like if someone spread their asshole wide in front of strangers in public and then proceeded to tell them how FUCKED they are, hhahahaha!

Fell for the LINK>ETH fundamentals meme during the defi boom. Only took about 100k USD profit. Also lost 9k LINK on bancor and 10k LINK because of greed using Aave loans. I am depressed about what could have been, but not suicidal. Still I am grateful for owning 6 figures $ in LINK, because I could have lost it all in other ways. Also I was completely broke in 2017, so in that way LINK changed my life. For people who are depressed, think about how you could have lost it all in all kinds of ways, instead of missing out on profits. There are people who lost pretty much their entire stack on bancor, ftx, celsius etc.

>>56357978
Pic related Linkies

>>56358009
which one of those tokens already had two parabolic runs, invalidating your thesis about coins that run once only run once? Run three will be glorious, should be starting in about two weeks, I'll be here all days folks!

>>56357202
I held 40k LINK and all my other crypto had like $2.4MM before taxes at the top.

Never sold anything. Do have 50k LINK now. Kept buying, unironically.

I think I'm set if another bull run happens at this point so just stockpiling cash in the meantime in a 5% yield savings account.

>>56357202
Yes I held from 207 AD. I remember this year well, as I was in China. The Battle of White Wolf Mountain. Warlord Cao Cao defeated the Wuhuan tribes, sending the Wuhuan into decline.

>>56357978
calm down

>>56357234
>5k * $50 = $250,000
>im a millionaire

>>56358030

lol sure faggot

In real terms though unlike the people coping with "i sold 100k at $40, still have 50k staked love link". I've just realized in a probably healthy way that there's no free ride. I have to have a life plan and work hard to get anything.

If link works out one day great, but 6 years have already passed and we're all getting fucking old. Im working to get somewhere and not depending on crypto to survive.

>>56357202
Bought slightly later than that at around the mainnet launch, but yeah. Sat on 10k link + some eth through the bullrun, peaked at around 630k. Unironically didn't sell because I thought the team might announce staking/ccip at any time (if only I knew, eh?) and cause the price to double or triple basically overnight. I eventually sold some at around 23 or 24 or so and rebought just after the FTX fiasco at about 7. Increased my link stack to 15k and still sitting on 30k of extra cash. Never really felt bad about the unrealised gains, still believe link will comfortably pass ATH eventually though it will take a while yet. All within the same month I broke up with my long term GF, sustained permanent nerve damage to my shoulder, my alcoholic father broke up the family home and I lost nearly 500k in unrealised gains. All of these things still ripple through my life today, the crypto was by far the least painful of them.

>>56358122
What’s you do to your shoulder

>>56358065
>someone admits to an extremely poor financial decision and that they're bagholding
>makes you seethe
explain this, retard - can you not afford even 100 link with what they pay in your country for retard labor?

>>56358132
weightlifting accident, snapped my shit out of the blue while doing OHP, my rhomboid and pec are semi withered now

>>56358084
>Im working to get somewhere and not depending on crypto to survive.
This should've always been the plan tb h. I seriously considered dropping out of college when my portfolio reached big numbers in 2020/2021, but decided I would at least get the degree in case I ever needed a job. Fast forward a few years and I have a very enjoyable job that I might not even completely quit even if crypto takes off again and my portfolio reaches retirement numbers.

>>56357202
i've held 10k link since 2017
Not selling sucks but holding link felt very special at the time, we were all just waiting for staking.
i have no doubts that link will go up again soon, easily surpassing $50. i will do my remote wagie job until then. whatever

>>56358009
Glad that graph is all in the past. I was in ETH and traded back into link 2 weeks ago in time for the coming moon mission. Be crazy to not be all in at this point, desu.

Bought at 17c. I had 8 million at ATH.
The absolute state.

>>56358061
>dumb nigger with no reading comprehension
5k wasnt even 1/10 of my stack

>>56357550
My previous example is a really good one for what to look out for.
And also we arent at that stage yet, there are some promising projects and ideas but none which we can invest in right now.
When these ICOs do happen, it will be impossible to miss, especially if you follow Chainlink closely.
>>56357569
I have money already set aside for these new ICOs and I'm not planning to sell any LINK but I will once again roll my Profits back into it and continue growing my Stack.
>>56357601
Identity is an interesting usecase but this isnt a winner takes all kind of market. check out Vitaliks recent Blogpost about identity and his proposed solution (it was the one where he bitches about the world coin).
>>56357633
its estimated by the big guys (WEF/BCG) that it will take another 2 - 5 years to fully unfold. its a several hundred trillion dollar market.
>>56357648
>Also why the fuck is the FUD worse now
who gives a shit about the FUD? it honestly never bothered me at all and had zero influence on any of my decisions.
>>56357946
>we already know this
I mean obviously if you follow Chainlinks development and read what TradFi is up to then yes you already got it figured out, its not a secret or anything.
Everyone else who didnt pay attention is still stuck in 2017 or so and cant figure out shit.
>I question this as banks running their own
A common misconception that many people have is thinking that Banks and Corporations etc. will only run 1 Blockchain. Thats not the case.
There will be many and all of them will depend on CCIP.
>and they have all the valuable assets
The problem here right now is that the Assets are isolated and the Liquidity is fractured.
By opening these new Products to a broader audience they can get more Liquidity into it which means higher yields.

>>56358221
wow, we got a good /biz/ thread going
today is a good day

>>56357530
Thank you

>>56357407
Congratulations

>>56357530
Fuck off advocate

>>56358373
>tfw advocate just means smart guy

>>56357407
How does one stake chainlink?

>>56358394
At this point find a low returns saving account and make up a BUILD name each day that you'll never actually see. Also get some court order than you are mentally ineligible to access your own money once you've put it in the account.

>>56358386
chat gpt ai frogbot post

>>56358221
>I'm not planning to sell any LINK but I will once again roll my Profits back into it
perhabs the most important question, how did you evaluated a time to take profits in the past especially w. link? Do you use any rules or is it intuition? thanks and good luck !

>>56357530
No one cares about tokenization because that's pretty much beyond the law in most countries. Pretending to own a part of a real world asset like a house is not something that's feasible technically or even legally.

>>56358221
I made a mistake there, banks will be running their own blockchains. Each of them their own chain.

What I'm questioning is the reassurgence of ICOs. The people who will be building these new products will have bank funding. They have no need for ICOs for startup investments. It'd be like Arbitrum who has investor funds, but decide to drop a token just because.

>>56358542
Why can't we get confirmation on the extent to which inter-bank messaging will utilize CCIP? Sergey has presented CCIP as a solution to interconnect the walled garden of bank chains with public/permissioned chains, and to what extent does Chainlink play a role in tokenizing RWA's that serve as collateral for Goldman and Barclays? The only thing that's giving me any hope is Sergey's smug smirking at dipshit crypto journalists when he tells them they'll "get it" when Link is $81k EOY inevitably because everyone will use CCIP and Link stack

>>56358009
retard every single chart in crypto looks the same if you plot them on a linear scale

>>56358538
> Pretending to own a part of a real world asset like a house is not something that's feasible technically or even legally
You are in for a surprise when you learn what a mutual fund is

>>56358164
>weightlifting accident, snapped my shit out of the blue while doing OHP, my rhomboid and pec are semi withered now
Brutal. Sending good vibes your way, fren. Ygmi.

>>56358221
What about regulation? There's not going to be an ico craze like 2017 again

>>56358464
Holy seething lmfao

>>56358600
a mutual surprise?

>>56358386
>tfw smart guy means anyone that says price will go up
Uh huh…

>>56358522
basically I sell chunks of my portfolio on the way up, especially when /biz/ becomes unusable and when hype is the most. I also have some TA tricks up my sleeves and I always make sure to sell into big green dildos whenever possible.
I sell them off into different stablecoins, mostly USDT and USDC (holding this shit is imo the riskiest part).
Some of it I use to finance my lifestyle and rest of it I DCA back into LINK during the bear.

of course I'm not always selling the absolute top or perfectly buy the bottom but close enough that my LINK centered Portfolio keeps growing. Could I have more? Sure.
Am I beating myself up over a couple million missed in theoretical profits? no.
The only important metric for me is to long term grow my LINK stack and as long as this works I'm winning.

>>56358538
>No one cares about tokenization
The biggest Asset Managers in the World care very deeply about it. Have you done any research at all?
sure doesnt look like you did.
>that's pretty much beyond the law in most countries
not really, laws are adapting for this already. There are Pilot programs for it everywhere.
>Pretending to own a part of a real world asset like a house
your problem is that you somehow believe that traditional asset custodians are gonna vanish. this is not the case.

>>56358464
Most low interest accounts are offering over 4.75% now tho...

>>56357407
It'll be a huge boost on SUPRA as the necessity for oracles is constant.

>>56358542
>banks will be running their own blockchains
it wont be just one per Bank/organization and this whole RWA thing isnt just limited to Banks, this is a lot bigger than that. This is the entire world economy changing in how it works.
Its everything, literally any Asset you can imagine can and will be tokenized.
>What I'm questioning is the reassurgence of ICOs
New products are forming out of these RWAs, new usecases and new ways to generate yield.
Many of these upcoming RWAs will be tradeable on secondary markets and this is where this "new Generation of DeFi" happens, of course there will be ICOs and IDOs for those. Some of them will be of course more permissioned than others.
>They have no need for ICOs for startup investments.
Thats like saying "people dont want to raise money and dont want to gain customers and Liquidity". that just isnt true.

>>56358630
regulations will adapt and already adapt and if they fuck up with those they risk falling behind and missing out.
of course shit like KYC and AML will still be a thing.

>>56358815
i agree anon link will be above $50, no cap, by 2027

Uber become a global behemoth despite massive muh regulations FUD. regulations don't mean shit these days. they will change like jelly as needed

>>56358866
(Verse 1)
I'm sitting here alone, staring at my screen
Thinking about all the Chainlink I've seen
I didn't sell at the ATH, now I'm regretting it
I thought it would go higher, but I was wrong, I admit

(Chorus)
I'm so torn, between selling and holding on
I know I should have sold at the top, but now it's gone
I'm so torn, I don't know what to do
I'm stuck in this limbo, and I'm feeling blue

(Verse 2)
I see all the other holders, selling their tokens
And I'm wondering if I should too, but I'm hesitant
I still believe in Chainlink, I think it has a future
But I'm also worried about losing more money

(Chorus)
I'm so torn, between selling and holding on
I know I should have sold at the top, but now it's gone
I'm so torn, I don't know what to do
I'm stuck in this limbo, and I'm feeling blue

(Bridge)
I know I can't sell now, it's too late
I'll just have to wait and see, what fate has in store
I'm hoping that Chainlink will go back up
But if it doesn't, I'll have to learn from my mistake

(Chorus)
I'm so torn, between selling and holding on
I know I should have sold at the top, but now it's gone
I'm so torn, I don't know what to do
I'm stuck in this limbo, and I'm feeling blue

(Outro)
I'm so torn, I'm so torn
I'm so torn, I'm so torn

>>56358815
>literally any Asset you can imagine can and will be tokenized
Can you give some examples of some novel asset classes that will be enabled by this? The only ones we ever really hear about are real estate and carbon credits.

>>56358839
>$50
thats lowballing it, the RWA Market is in total like something of 800 Trillion in size and it will keep growing.
By 2030 they estimate the RWA market onchain to be somewhere between 16 and 68 trillion.
All these Real World Assets need all kinds of Data and Services to truly function.
So even just 1% of these trillions going through Chainlink would send LINK to $1000+.
I know its hard to imagine because of the sheer size of these Numbers but keep in mind this is just the RWA Market.
The new Usecases and business opportunities that arise from this is a couple trillions more.
>>56358934
Sure, there is all kinds of business Assets like Physical infrastructure, inventory, equipment, machinery, Vehicles from cars to planes to ships, all kinds of Commodities from Gold to oil to Agricultural Products, Financial Instruments like Bonds, Stocks and Securities that represent an ownership interest or a claim on a RWA/Business, Intellectual Property like Patents, trademarks, copyrights, then you have stuff like Collectibles (like Art or any item with value).
and like you said real estate but also land, residential properties, commercial properties and other real estate investments.
thats not all but you get the picture, this market is going to be huge.

>>56359267
That doesn't make any sense at all to me. Are you saying that the planes and ships will be tokenised, or just that it will be an easier way for companies to sell shares? I'm not seeing any reason why you would ever want to tokenise a plane, or what it could mean for basic things like upkeep costs.

Your point about IP is a really interesting one though, and commodities also make sense to me.

>>56357635
The more you stick by shithole, the poorer you'll become. Now is the best time to amass significant gains as QANX has been trending on relevant crypto pages since the recent private blockchain launch.

>>56359267
>we're at the ground floor of something bigger than the fucking internet

>>56359304
moving ownership around on an immutable blockchain, that's the value add. no more 3rd parties authorizing and keeping track of all this shit. it's going to save a ton of money for companies, i.e. they're going to use it

>>56359304
>I'm not seeing any reason why you would ever want to tokenise a plane
there are plenty reasons like fractional ownership, increased liquidity, enables a broader range of investors, efficient transactions, transparency and security, revenue distribution, compliance checks, reduces administrative overhead, compliance features, diversification opportunities, innovative Financing Models etc.
And thats just the plane, other things like insurance and reinsurance for a Plane are also huge tokenization markets and its not difficult to see how these two fit together.
>>56359392
Its kinda like the endgame of the internet.

>>56358084
This is the ultimate whitepill.

>>56359400
>>56359431
Fair enough, thanks anons. You're definitely going to make it, I only have 20k LINK so I'll be stuck in 9-figure hell.

>>56357202
Me- been holding and buying since 2017

>>56359586
Remember someone saying your only regret will be not buying more.

>>56359623
It's true.
back then, my buying power was super low, so even scraping together the 5k that went into that portfolio was a stretch.
Luckily I was still able to get above 10k link, but I still look back wishing I'd have gone all in.
Everyone on biz at the time wasn't as cut and dry as the fuddies try to make it seem.
While there were really great link breadcrumb threads, there was always more link fud at any given time.
The fud was way more potent back then too because you couldn't confirm anything that the breadcrumb threads said like you can today.
Fuddies would say something completely false and at the time there was no way to prove them incorrect.

I should feel lucky that I was able to buy so low, but I still wish I'd have gone full rice and beans mode to get a 100k stack like a lot of the OGs did.

>>56359431
what will be the next top for link in the coming bull?
Will it retrace again ~90% like previously or will it remain higher due to adoption and high demand (universal gas)?

>>56359698
I think the variance will decrease after the next bull but not in 2-3 years already, so I expect a good profit opportunity next bull.

>>56359664
I think the main difference is the ability to hold. Lots of the guys with big stacks lost it all to swinging or DeFi scams.

is there a way to invest in canton? just trying to hedge my bets

>>56359723
I remember those being shilled like crazy.
People on biz putting their entire stacks on Celsius or Bancor for like 7%, if I remember correctly.
Now that I think about it, after all those went down was when the fud around here turned bitter and nasty.
The whole "you've been shitting up the board for x years" really saw it's peak in the year after the defi scams rugged

>>56357202
got over 20k when i was a student back in 2017 and 2018
have sold about half into cash, has improved my life a lot
made some mistakes, lost 1k in bancor, 1k in tax mistakes, another 1k on bad trades and nfts
but overall pretty good
this bear market has been rough but that's the usual
sad of state of biz now, is pretty dead
even the fud is nothing compared to what it used to be
those saying how bad the fud is just show how new they are
imagine what it was like when there was a two man team and when a stealth industry project was very real possibilty... turns out link was the industry product
it's been a good last couple of months
ever since this anz talk i've pushed all my timelines up by a couple of years:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-hxya9rZ4U
in terms of regulations they are coming:
https://twitter.com/nullpackets/status/1705040122604105998

>>56359728

>>56358122
Are you me ? Replace shoulder with fcuking up my back deadlifting. Couldn’t walk for two weeks now Im not the same

Replace alcoholic dad with mine committing suicide.

Im cozy link is a coin that will still be talked about the years to come and that’s enough for me.

>>56357202
yup, me

but i have a great job and work with family every day so i already feel fulfilled. it will be nice for another moonshot to secure a giga house and decent car but whatever i missed that boat once already (7 figgies go bye bye). best case scenario all these breadcrumbs coalesce into actual 4th industrial revolution memes and i just stake forever. who knows

>>56357407
>346k LINK
>didn't sell the top
from the beginnings of generational wealth to not even enough to retire
worse still if you check the link/btc chart and realize bitcoin's going to have to go to $300,000 to drag link back up to those prices again

>>56359304
Sit down and read EVERYTHING in this link

https://rsch.baml.com/access?q=s-i517792VNkDKydHLEioQ

>>56357234
Yeah me too I have 840,839.38 link and sold the exact top. Been holding since 2016 by the way.

>>56358815
>New products are forming out of these RWAs, new usecases and new ways to generate yield.
>Many of these upcoming RWAs will be tradeable on secondary markets and this is where this "new Generation of DeFi" happens, of course there will be ICOs and IDOs for those. Some of them will be of course more permissioned than others.

Yeah, I'm concerned that the valuable products being permissioned and gatekept. But you are right in new ways to generate yield. They just need to create a platform to facilitate trading of these assets piecewise which is where these Web3 native platforms can be born and generate ICOs.

>>56360663
Cope.

>>56357202
test

>>56358221
cantonese network fud is pretty good not gonna lie
konichiwa bitches

>>56357202
These same threads were made for eth after the 2018 bubble. Fuck off with your nigger logic. Best investment I’ve made was leaving this board after hearing how most of you sound with your middle school reading levels.

>>56360728
Interesting

>>56359267
It's hard to imagine yes.
There are a few issues with this.
One of them being the time it will take and the second is the effect of low service costs on the profitability.
For Blockchain technology to be successful it has to offer a better alternative through reduced costs and improved efficiency.
You can't charge 100$ in ETH gas fees for a gaming micro transaction and if you use CCIP you can't charge $100 for every transaction.
It will depend on the nature of what is being transferred, and everything will have a different cost structure.

That's why Sergey focused on the banks first because it was supposed to be the most profitable and easiest to profit from with an existing market.
Most of the Web 3 economy does not exist yet and will have to be created like internet was originally only bare bones.

Because of this I can't make any predictions about the price of the token and expect this project to require multiple decades until complete adoption and transformation of the world.

After the extreme manipulation I now find it difficult to imagine LINK reaching $100 this decade, when it should have been able to reach 4 digits.
Even now with all the confirmation we lack a real world example to see the profitability of CCIP with one big paying customer.
The other issue is the lack of proper long term economic thinking from Chainlink Labs.
They didn't expect the delays, which causes the problematic situation of needing a high inflation to pay for the development costs.
However the funds won't last a decade like this.

How is Sergey planning to run this network in a decentralized manner and find a way to pay for both the nodes (no KYC in the future?) and the investors (staking) while keeping a source of funding for his company once the token reserve runs out?

>>56358888

>>56359267
Everything could be solved with a burn/inflation mechanism using ETH and redistributing a part of the fees to development, staking and nodes, however this will be a major change in the token supply and distribution which should have been done a lot earlier in the development phase.

Chainlink has been behind blockchain development for the token economics because it focused on the tech to sell to banks.
But this will make it difficult to change without negative perception the later it is done and we may be stuck with this very rigid pre-minted token supply.

>>56357407
>From generation wealth to earning less than bank interest on a shitcoin

This is one of the greatest stories of REKT I have ever seen on /biz/.

>>56360806
And yet here you are
>>56360932
Ease up on the Adderall chief nobody is reading that shit

>>56360969
Hear to drop a piece of advice for others to avoid shit sucking losers. Here’s your (you). Adios.

>>56360969
Writing allows you to give form to your thoughts and give it a life of its own.
Even if nobody reads it just by this act it changes the world and manifest thoughts.

It will also end up in Chainlink Labs suggestion box through their community advocates who will for sure read it.

>>56361065
That's right crawl back to the cuckshed

>>56361090
>Even if nobody reads it just by this act it changes the world and manifest thoughts.
God damn you people are fucking crazy

>>56361103
You should stop planting the seeds for your future doom.
What you send out into the world will always come back to you with the same type of energy like a boomerang.

You won't be able to evade the consequences for your actions.
Better change your ways as early as possible if you don't want to add more negative energy to it.

>>56361165
Shut the fuck up retard no amount of manifesting and new age horse shit will ever make your shitcoin go up in value and none of that gay shit you just said is true in the slightest

>>56358221
Most posts were like this in 2017.

It was all bullshit

>>56361189
Find God anon, we wish the best for you.

>>56357313
>Did pay taxes and shit and paid off student loans, got €50k in gold/silver, €10k car, €35k house.
no you made the best decision you could make at the time

>>56361216
I like the holier than thou version of seething - very good anon. Yes preach to me in an internet forum about shitcoin investing because clearly since I disagree with you and voice my opinion in a grating way I am a dirty heathen

Fuck off self righteous cunt

>>56361293
are you okay anon

>>56357287
This

>>56357354
1000% this. Riding back down 90% from ath and having to wait a few more years is nothing compared to the pain of selling early and missing the singularity and knowing that you could have had it all. In 2017 I saw that screenshot of the eth guy that was swing trading at $14 and sold everything right before the run to $1k. Can you imagine the nightmare that would be? Knowing that you could have had 10 million dollars if you’d just waited and had some patience, and instead you sold for some small pittance. I’ll never make that mistake. Even if I have to wait years and years

I had over $1m at ath btw, and it wasn’t even that bad riding it all the way back down. I literally just shrugged and went in with my life. It’ll eventually pay off, and I’m a patient guy

>>56361368
He's NOT okay 42 he needs to find Christ but not organized religion

Idk man i rather buy something else like cosmos or kava before link lmao

>>56361368
Basedo king 42 thanks for shilling me LPL and Bancor kiddo. Go with Jesus Christ.

>>56361419
>>56361427
>>56361385
This shit is beyond pathetic.

>>56360663
I already have generational wealth and I'm gonna continue growing my LINK stack at whatever pace I'm comfortable with and I have top tier risk management, do you?
so dont worry about me, I have everything planned out and I'm properly diversified.
>and realize bitcoin's
this market is going to be so much bigger than just Bitcoin (read the thread), the entire business logic of the worlds economy will pay for Chainlink services one way or another. How much is just 1% of 800 trillion?
>>56360761
>I'm concerned that the valuable products being permissioned and gatekept.
thing is they dont have to be and there are strong incentives to open it up for as many customers as possible.
>>56360932
>One of them being the time it will take
it will take a couple more years sure, but its a guaranteed moon mission.
2nd: scaling was already solved years ago and the future is multichain/multi VM, gm.
>>56361212
It was all true and if you didnt use all the opportunities that Chainlink offered you, then you didnt try hard enough or maybe you are blind or retarded, pick one.

>>56361456
Everyone underestimated the time it would take to get a proper product.
We still don't have proper staking and banking adoption has been dragging its feet.
Why do you think it would only take a few years when Sergey himself had a 15 year plan that didn't include a 2-4 years delay?

It took decades for the internet to grow to its current horrible state, and that was with centralized CIA funded money.
Blockchains deal with decentralization which makes it even more complex.
We may only get real Web 3 in 1 decade only, and until then will have to depend on banking income which is big, but always slower than previously expected to change.

I remember stories of banks using fax based systems for their ATMs which was running a 50 year deprecated system that forced the phone operator to support this system just for them because they were so horrible with technology.
It's no wonder that they must be salivating at the idea of Sergey doing their work for them, because the other option would have been to do nothing for a century, but holy shit are they slow.

Maybe this is the effect of human bias while in the chasm between mass adoption and apparition of a new technology, but the only thing which could give me a reason to be optimistic is CCIP driving real usage and profitability of the network.
If LINK wants the number 1 ranking it should surpass ETH in income quickly and fix the broken economics before that happens.

>>56361440
>This shit is beyond pathetic.
Says the faggot with 7 replies in this thread, who spends his free time fudding a coin that he supposedly doesn’t even own. Absolutely pathetic

>>56357202
I fucking missed then, but not gonna fade on LINK anymore desu
Trying g to buy as much as possible along with good alts like EGLD, ATOM, SOL, QANX, HAPI and QRDO

>>56361385
Youll be feeling the same way as the eth guy 5 years from now if link never reaches its ath again, which is a very real possibility given how every alt performes after its ath

>>56361456
Also I didn't mean scaling but profitability.
If you listened to Swift talks you should know Swift is a cooperative which does not have a goal of making money and returns the excess profits of the network to the banks using it.
Sergey proved his love of subsidizing everything for free at their investor's expense and called a joke of economics token economics 2.0.

It's very possible that CCIP won't be as profitable as we expected when seeing all these trillions, and you can remove a few 0s from the future business income.
Blockchains are meant to be cheaper and better than the current internet based systems with centralized trust.
Reduced cost is an important part of that improvement.

Sergey is horrible at managing a profitable business, and everything that has to do with the tactics of a business when dealing with other businesses.
BUILD and SCALE was Eric's suggestion to change that, and until every possible cartel attacked his project for years and succeeded he didn't even think of changing something.
This is what LED to hostile LINK investors who now openly criticize the project on twitter out of frustration because they believe the company will fuck up without all this negativity.

So yeah we have a system which is supposed to sell as a product decentralized trust, but we need to trust a centralized group to deliver on it, and it failed in every field with the exception of one, the technology.

If I was extremely powerful I would try to bankrupt Chainlink to gain control over the technology.
I can see a path now to this result thanks to Sergey's past failures.
His only luck is that those who have this power are stupid psychopaths who can't think of it.

I have barely any trust left in this, but have to keep holding it until new results come in.
Maybe it's a form of investment bias.
It was a trap to force us into a multi decade investment we can't retire from.

>>56361541
Absofuckinglutely this. Sergey has the tech and the vision, and he's smart as fuck in areas, but he is a shit businessman that is only able to keep his ship limping along by dumping ungodly amounts of tokens even at the current gutter prices. He hires shit people like Adelyn and Jonny and fkn Rory and that army of overpaid, wfh roasties. Sergey lacks the business sense to take Chainlink into its full potential.

>>56361517
Youll be feeling the same way as the eth guy 5 years from now if link never reaches its ath again
No I won’t, because I made the correct decision regardless of the outcome. There’s a difference between gambling (swing trading) and investing. Of course there’s a chance that an investment fails, that’s the risk that you accept when you purchase it. Swing trading is a way of introducing additional risk. If I were to fuck up a golden opportunity by gambling like a retard, I’d be much more upset than if the asset just went to zero on its own

>which is a very real possibility given how every alt performes after its ath

Yeah because chainlink is just like every other alt kek. Opinion discarded

>>56361541

>>56361558
It's bearish as fuck that Sergey went from Adelyn to Chris Barrett. Big brains don't do that

>>56361633
fucking checked. He went from bad to worse. I don't get how one man can be so smart in some areas, yet so retarded in the people he recruits.

>>56361440
This so much this 4chinners are BEYOND FUCKED. Fuck this noise I'm FUCKING OFF BACK TO TWITTER

>>56357407
me except i rotated all my gains into link at the 2021/2022 top and held it most of the way down

have it all staking now tho since day 1, think it rips super fucking hard the next 4 years

>>56358221
ive probably met like 20 startups per conference that are all trying to tokenize rwa like gold, tbills, etc. lol it seems so saturated already.

agreed tho its at some point the next big thing, cant wait for ponzis to start again

>>56361624
Best one so far. Took me at least 10 seconds to realize

>>56361737
>>56358221
checkout premia btw, options havent really been touched in any major capacity yet and financially operate much more legally / smoothly than perps

>>56361748
options is too crowded
really wish there was something as obvious as link again
maybe it is just link again
with eth's current market cap it would be $335

>>56361751
I unironically need at least $1,000 to really do anything. I want to retire and I want to buy fancy cars and make passive income.

>>56361500
>muh Banks
As if these are the only ones working on Tokenization.
There is also Insurance Companies, Asset Management Firms, Hedge Funds, Private Equity Firms, Pension Funds, Credit Unions, Regulatory Agencies, Stock Exchanges, Brokerage Firms, Consumer Finance Companies, Mortgage Lenders, Payment Processors....thats what Tradfi is and each of them follows their own pace in Web 3 adoption and all of them have lots of Assets to Tokenize and lots of Business Logic that will be turned into a Smart Contract, there are usecases where these TradFi entities can save up to 59% on their Products throughout their entire Lifecycle. Thats a massive increase in Profits.
and of course all these Smart Contracts depend on Chainlinks CCIP.
Commercial, Investment and Central Banks is its own pair of shoes but its not everything and they will adapt faster than you think.
>It took decades for the internet
new technologies building on top of the internet are growing faster tho.
>>56361541
>It's very possible that CCIP won't be as profitable as we expected
It will be the most profitable network that exists. there is no doubt about it.
>This is what LED to hostile LINK investors
nobody gives a fuck about the opinion of some retard and his lunch money being underwater.
>>56361737
>it seems so saturated already
but really isnt, its just getting started.

>>56357202
Il give an honest answer. I played LINK pretty badly in hindsight but I have mixed feelings. Bought as much as I could afford as a broke neet from 2017/18, 41k before Google tweet then stopped buying.
Sold small amounts all the way through to defi summer for dumb shit like holidays etc, then sold almost half to buy a house in cash at $13 after defi summer retrace.
Tried to ladder out on the run up to $50 but wasn’t aggressive enough as I thought we were going to $100-200, barely sold any. Was regretting buying the house.
Peaked at around 850k u realised then held it all the way back down.
I don’t rope because i got a house out of it and realistically I was never going to sell it all or time the top. I could only have maybe $250k more now if I had stuck to my exit plan and not been greedy.
But then those choices led me to having my first child, and i wouldn’t trade her for $250k so that’s how I cope

>>56361751
what are the other options platforms worth a shit? premia:
- leverage
- permisionless markets
- range orders / limit orders / market orders
- best ui
- not a ponzi

>dopex
tvl is faked, they count their pool 2 and the products are garbage
> aevo
private chain nobody knows where their volume is coming from. probably buying / selling their own shit. being on their own app chain means their options are inherently not composable with the rest of defi, either
> hegic
one MAN team (molly is a man), centralized and the whole design is weird
> lyra
not bad at all but stuck on the snx infrastructure so not as agile. i already have a bunch of thales/snx so i'm not gonna triple dip

dude it trades at like 15million marketcap and is the only platform actually all-encompassing. the rest either take shortcuts, fake their tvl or dont offer nearly the same level of usable shit

another episode of
>link moon mission guaranteed, keep hodling fellas!
>link is not just another altcoin, no no no!
>we're just getting started bros, the next decade is ours!

>>56361773
dopex was literally letting the marketmakers set the IV on the options they were buying and not telling anybody for a year, they probably still do. for people who dont understand it's basically letting the buyers set the price, raping the ppl in teh vaults. only reaosn it's worth anything is tetrashit and the rest are hyping it

>>56357202
>been holding since 207
Nah I'll never be a stinky linky Sergey is lying to you all

>>56361777
Checked, trips don’t lie

>>56361796
Kek fuddies

link's superpower was never about being a good token(you know, with actual open market demand for the token's utility)

it was about having a very strong narrative that lead to a blowoff top despite almost zero real demand for the token beyond speculation and almost zero revenue. don't make the same mistake again if you ever get the opportunity.

>>56361777
>>link moon mission guaranteed, keep hodling fellas!
>>link is not just another altcoin, no no no!
>>we're just getting started bros, the next decade is ours!

Trips confirm!
WAGMI fellow Linkchads!!

>>56360732
>Yeah me too I have 840,839.38 link and sold the exact top. Been holding since 2016 by the way.
Good for you, nigger.

I have 60k Link staked and give a big 'fuck you' to anyone who begs me to sell. I'll be selling way less than I earn in rewards so my stack will keep growing. Not sold a single one yet and it's the easiest thing i ever did.
Quite literally doing nothing and knowing my future is on easy street makes me happy every day. I'm sure look back on these times with fondness.

>>56361811
Like I really can't place my hands on what these faggots actually want in a token, price is shit yeah and so is fucking BTC, we may not see a pre-bull this year.
Fucking bank on the utilities of Chainlink, I can affirm that that's what holoride is about to do with its Web3 Oracle.

The combination of Chainlink's Web3 Oracle and holoride's immersive experiences could be interesting. Chainlink could potentially provide data feeds that enhance holoride's VR experiences with real-time information, adding an extra layer of interactivity and engagement

Bearish thread honestly

>>56357202
>six figures
kek I held all in from 2017, hit 7 figures in 2020 and 5 million dollars in the ath in 2021 but kept holding and then swung and got really rekt, now in low 6 figures.
didn't kms, which is weird since i'm low middle class and grew up low middle class so i always thought if i made money and lost it i'd be depressed, but it's just an afterthought, i think the grew up relatively poor part is what caused me to hold, it's like when you never had money you don't really understand its value

>>56362039
holy based. keep hodling, youll make it

>>56362036
Wtf are expecting now fool, this is a bear market so now is the time for us to accumulate alts and I am making sure to be ready to face the fucking quantum threats with post quantum cryptography.

chinkylinkies, come dance to this rhythm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTO10Xgl0eM

>>56361507
Adding EVR to your bag can increase your chances of gaining more staking rewards. Don't miss this too.

>>56362471
Ay ay ay

You already know wassup

I'm always looking for new alpha to blast my bag you feel me I heard about this new joint Ny@n C@t Money It just dropped like two weeks ago and I'm already super bullish on it The price has been stable AF and there's mad talk about the project Yo I'm not playin' I heard that people are already 10x'ing on it Adding the new kid on the block to your bag can only mean that you're gonna get that sweet sweet staking cheddar

Everyone in this thread is a perfect trader. I bow too you. You are a god

>>56362574
For the mentally challenged (all of you) this is sarcasm

>>56357601
Everest is going to be huge for real world assets too. Nobody else has the licenses and they're doing programmable RWAs

>>56357202
>>56357246
bro this nigga replied to himself

>>56361541
you have outgrown link as an investment. less intelligent anons will continue to hold, but you are better off finding better investments for your money. i wish you luck on your journey, you'll make it

>>56357407
big if true
>>56361723
almost same. sold big portion of link at ath for other shitcoins and made lotsa gains. then started buying back to link too early and some other shitcoins started rugging. still over 100x in profit from crypto

First post in here since a long time ago. This was my home in 2017-2018. My port was 50% eth 25% LINK 25% REQ back in October 2017 and by Christmas I had moved to 50/50 Eth/Link. Watched that 2018 crash happen in January and was pretty bummed about it as I bought my eth sub $50. Never sold anything and instead decided to move all my eth into link in the summer of 2018. I was deep in the rabbit hole and bread crumbs here. I had over 150k link at this point. I just sat on my hands waiting, not selling, all the way until $40 where I sold some to buy a house in cash. I now have much less link than I did back then but am just waiting for the next move up.

I think my biggest regret after going through two bull markets and basically holding outside of switching from eth to link in 2017/18, was not pulling the trigger in summer of 2020 and moving some back into eth. After links run up against eth I had grown my eth equivalent stack to multiple thousand eth and decided to just keep everything in link. If I had moved even some back into eth in august 2020, I would have been completely retired by now. Eth was my first baby after all in early 2017 so it is terrible to think about.

>>56357246
This is some of the most cringe samefagging I have ever seen.

>>56362650
He clearly meant to reply to the first response

>>56362689
IT IS FORBIDDEN TO SAMEFAG ON 4CHINNEL

>>56362693
yo what it do anon I just ran across this new coin called Ny@n C@t Money and let me tell you I'm straight bullish on this one I heard it launched two weeks ago and everyone's sleeping on it The potential here is insane I'm telling you If you aren't buying this coin right now you're an ABSOLUTE degen straight up I've already dumped my whole stack into this coin and I've just been stacking some more whenever I get a chance I'm telling yo this coin is about to go nuclear

>>56362016
>had 3 million
>now has under half a million

I bought 3k for around a dollar a piece and I'm still here..............

>>56362814
Yo yo yo I just copped some fire NCM token on uni this thing is a fkn game changer I'm not gonna lie the whole degen game is lit af This NCM token has a solid dev team and the marketing is on point too The tech is gonna be sikk af when it drops I swear to fkn God bro Don't be a fkn beta cuck get yourself some NCM quick before it's too late

>>56362778
I won't be letting go of it when we reach ATH next time, either. People like you let go too easily and get priced out forever. Always sell before the big moves.
Sorry it happened to you but life can be a bitch. Better luck next time. Or next life.

>>56362929
Yo what's up bros I just heard about this totally sussy crypto money token that launched a couple weeks ago called Ny@n C@t money It's a total gem that's gonna send all my bags straight to the moon The dev team is straight based and their whitepaper is totally stacked with all the sickest degen strats I don't blame you for missing out on the launch but I'm defs gonna be holding these bags through all the crazy swings to come The next time we hit ATH you won't catch me paper-handing my tokens No cap fr fr

>>56357407
>I estimate I will reach 50 million in the next Bullrun
that seems like an understatement with what we know now

>>56361769
>having a daughter
Makes sense coming from a link holder

Someone post it

>>56361224

>>56357202
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 700k before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 700K into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 5MM, but more likely 10MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link were about $80 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen.

>>56363261
Link is going to triple digits in 2 weeks sir you must rescind this organic reply and accept my truth

>>56363261
it's the weekend, is lying on the internet really how you want to spend it?

>>56362684
why should you move link into eth and not btc?

>>56357202

>>56357202
By the way don't forget that there is no supply left to buy on exchanges.
Sergey's dumps instantly vanish from exchanges the moment they appear.
All the remaining supply is bag holders who are too lazy to use their own wallet and risk another FTX situation when the game of musical chairs and manipulation ends.

If you want this Wickoff accumulation range to end remove your supply from the exchanges and make them sweat when they realize they sold something they don't own and didn't manage to get more of it by manipulating the price lower.

>>56359267
>So even just 1% of these trillions going through Chainlink would send LINK to $1000+.
just because "1% of it goes through chainlink" doesn't mean that link, the token will get any of that value
you're just repeating low effort hype from 2017 when we all used to get high on the "if x amount of USD goes through chainlink then link will be worth XYZ USD"

visa and mastercard are processing shitload of value each day but aren't worth that much

>>56364213
>just because "1% of it goes through chainlink" doesn't mean that link, the token will get any of that value
yes it does
oracle nodes aren't free

>>56364213
>visa and mastercard are processing shitload of value each day but aren't worth that much

Retard. Viss processes about 12trill and is worth 500 bill.

>>56364213
>just because "1% of it goes through chainlink" doesn't mean that link, the token will get any of that value
Link holders will receive 99% of that value. Only the remaining 1% goes to nodes. Nice fud, though.

>>56362929
Retard, your link will never be worth 3 million again. Nothing will pump it that far

the desperation around link is higher than i've seen in failed alts back in the 2017 cycle
so many must have been buying last cycle instead of selling

>>56361767
Fishy no one gives a shit about your stupid fucking btc/ link trade. No one cares about you at all faggot

does anyone know how long early access for v0.2 has been open?

>>56357530
>tokenization of real world assets. thats where the next big wave of ICOs will come from.
What RWA coins should i be in? I dont even know any of their names.

>>56364144

This is the only post that matters. Its been shown time and time again on chain that a large majority of the manipulation is because retail keeps their LINK on a CEX or locked on a lending platform (AAVE) where large players will borrow it and market it dump it after taking out shorts on Binance

There will only ever 1,000,000,000 people should be remove theirs from circulating supply if it isn't staked through Chainlink's contract.

>>56363144
Yeh yeh hits pipe. Unironically don’t see it that way now. It’s just female nature and as long as she’s happy idgaf

>>56357202
Never sold a single one
And never will

>>56362471
Oh yeah anon, this is the smartest move ever. The EVR staking opportunities, and a connection to our innovative metaverse is a top notch.

>>56364862
Why not focus on the trendy narratives like AI, AGII will be live on MEXC tomorrow. This is best Ai assistant for web3 enthusiasts.

started with 240k link from 2017. now have 87k link. cashed out a bunch, bought a $2mil property/land, got everything I need. riding that 87k forever now.

>>56365517
will you make up a higher number when the link price crashes further?

>>56365634
Not everyone is a poor brownoid here.

>>56362684
>look at the link cube before the qt
what has this place done to me

>>56365037
can always raise her to understand dignity/worth/etc, i know plenty of genuinely oldschool trad women

>>56359728
>>56362673
>>56363335
>>56365634
Kek what is wrong with you friendo?

let the record show the past smartcon and sibos conferences have revealed this project to be exactly like the people who buy this token: half-baked

>>56365409
I get AI already actually. RWA is the other meme i dont have yet.

>>56366187
Most people wont even be able to buy into RWA's only projects worth anything that i have seen need you to kyc to use their shit and their are geared toward institution use.

>>56362016
What was your average price? I want to calculate the massive loss due to cult membership, faggot

HAHAHAHAHAH youre down MILLIONS because of the crypto Gamestop…what a fuckin loser

>>56362048
Just like IOTA and VECHAIN hodlers, r r right?


You hear that small voice in the back of your head right…and it just keeps getting louder and louder. You idiots got scammed by a Russian and still cant see it. So sad

>>56362688
If you want to see cringe, come by these threads in 2026 after Link completely misses the next run. You, and all of your brethern faggots are going to be beyond suicidal. It couldnt happen to a more smug group of cocksuckers so just consider it the universe evening things out, faggot

>>56364144
Does your chart show the 500M more coins, plus all the trapped bagholders. Link is the same as ICP from tokenomics standpoint. What a fucking loser you are begging poor people here to buy your worthless altcoin hahahaha kys you homo

>>56366208
Yeah dude banks cant wait to buy an NFT representing your house!!!! Stfu virgin no one, I repeat no one, cares about your imaginary metaverse where you become important. Fucking loser

this coin has ruined my life.
ive unironically missed out on 3 massive opportunities that i called in advance because i didnt want to let go of chainlink. called exchange tokens in 2021 going to space early, retarded metaverse coins in early 2021 (specifically SAND at sub fitty cent) and called the btc double top, all 3 times i talked myself into believing that holding chainlink would give me positive exposure to all 3, as it was supposed to be the mechanism that tied all the different shit together, so why switch anything up.
we can all fantasize about this or that decision we couldve made in the past to be trillionaires now but im not talking about missing out on ai stocks/coins, nfts or any of the other pump and dumps that i know were never realistic things i wouldve traded, the 3 things ive listed here i was vocal about and tried to talk other people into getting on board on.
i havent lost money on link, after the $1000 end of year prophesy was posted in february 2018 i bought at 40-44 cents and sold at $4 (second time we got there) and $14.88 and then some more on the way down through $20 but i just held the rest, i still have thousands of fucking shitlink

Based on my review of the research report hosted at the provided URL, here are some key points regarding assets that are discussed as potentially bullish:

- Chainlink (LINK) is mentioned as a critical decentralized oracle network for next-generation DLT/BCT use cases like the tokenization of traditional assets, as blockchains don't inherently have access to real-world data like market prices, weather, etc. Oracles provide this off-chain data to blockchains.

- Ethereum (ETH) continues to be viewed positively long-term, though there are some near-term scaling challenges. It remains a core blockchain for the digital asset ecosystem.

- Avalanche (AVAX) is highlighted as a blockchain that can optimize the trade-off between scalability, decentralization and security for certain use cases like DeFi applications and regulated/institutional use cases.

- Algorand (ALGO) and Polygon (MATIC) are identified as scaling solutions that provide low-cost transaction processing with final settlement on Ethereum, making them appealing infrastructure for applications.

- Tokenized versions of traditional assets like Franklin Templeton's BENJI money market fund token and Ondo Finance's fixed income funds are seen as catalysts for institutional adoption, as they provide familiar assets in a digital format.

- Digital assets that represent ownership of carbon credits or royalty streams are discussed as areas that may see growth as tokenization enables new markets and liquidity for these assets.

In summary, infrastructure providers like oracles and blockchains as well as tokenized traditional assets seem to be viewed positively in the report as areas of potential upside. Does this help summarize the report's bullish perspectives? Let me know if any part needs more clarification.

>>56366578
the voice in the back of my head says NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT!

>>56359267
Which of these will blow up

https://app.rwa.xyz/directory

>>56364889
>There will only ever 1,000,000,000 people should be remove theirs from circulating supply if it isn't staked through Chainlink's contract.
I wish I knew what he was trying to tell me

>>56367951

Kek we may never know

Roundtripped 7 figs. Cashed out 100k in total, paid for wedding and down payment with the gains. Wish I sold more in 2020 and diversified into uranium companies and more precious metals, but given the revelations of this year I'm feeling more comfy than ever staking and just waiting for the inevitable. Not making it in 2021 was a blessing in disguise since I now don't take making it for granted and I have been working hard advancing my career and become a more well rounded person in general. When we make it, we will be stronger than ever

>>56366578
>>/biz/image/JJepxdf1Tzu1CqkprOAAbw

Kek fuddie

>>56357202
Sold everything at 40. Advantage of getting in early.
Now looking at supraoracles and waiting for the TGE.

>>56366624
you're a bot

>>56357202
>got into crypto right at the peak of hype 17/19
>stayed around after crash
>learned that Chainlink is everything Q2 of 18
>all-in by June 2018
>got a stack of 12k+
>ATH was at more than 500k USD
>cashed out at multiple points for a total of around 40k USD
>now got 10k staked and more than 2k on the sidelines for emergencies with a total value of around 92k USD

I guess shoulda coulda woulda but the bottom line is I cashed out 40k from a 6k investment and still have close to 100k riding on the ticket to Mars. I think it's a win either way and I am taking the risk consciously. Since staking has been up I've been quite comfy actually as the opportunity cost of high interest rates is now eliminated.

>>56357202
I’ve held 3.5k since 2018. Feels bad because now I’m actually looking at the real estate market and thinking about how my LINK stack was worth > $150k at one point and what the mortgage payments would have looked like if I would have sold in 2021 and had more to use for down payment. Can’t imagine what it feels like for anyone who held 10k+ LINK through all of this.

>>56360946
Midwits assuming zero positive price action, ever

>>56369338
If you have 3.5k then you should be waiting for the hyper moon, not desperately chasing symbols of a rapidly vanishing middle-class.

>>56357202
Yeah, still holding 50k.
Wish i had more if i played my cards right but whatever.

>>56357202
Held since first night listed on binance . Accumulated 45k Link. Life was comfy. Had portfolio value creeping 3 million. Link in Celsius, Bancor ,FTX, Voyager, Gemini Earn each making me more Link. Price crashes, exchanges fuck me. Able to scramble and get most on ledger. Now have 28k Link, 7k staking ….

I’m still gonna make it right?

>bought 2017
>max out my bags in 2018
> 276,000 LINK
>Sold a lot
>holding 111,000 LINK

Ive tied up a lot of $ in real estate. Had a failed biz venture.
Spent $350,000 at fertility doctors hoping to expand the family. No results yet.