/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56347150

>>56347150
BREAKFAST STARTS IN 15 MINUTES

>>56347211
This breadcrumbs autism us the best hopium I've had since the pump to 4 dollars then 20

>>56347211
THE AMERICANS ARE HAVING THEIR BIG MACS AAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>56347150
>a seminal moment?
now THAT is something /biz/ can relate to

>>56347328
breakfast is served

>>56347156
>DTCC
bros, look at what i just found
https://www.dtcc.com/events?pgs=1
the DTCC is nearly speaking at some conference somewhere everyday until the end of november, where the speaking engagements stop.

>>56347150
>such event doesn't even exist
the absolute STATE of chainlink advocates

>>56347150
Is this live streamed

>>56347645
hey nigger, go to the link directly above your bullshit

>>56347150
Thx for keeping us updated, anon. Unfortunately I know exactly what is going to happen once the talk concludes.
Nothing.

>>56347651
no but its business casual so the flannel is good to go

>DUMPS
>DUMPS SOME MORE
>DUMPS AGAIN
>FARTS
>DUMPS

>>56347150
the speakers have to pay out the nose to get the opportunity for a 5 minute slot. this is just a fundraiser/scam for goldman sachs

>>56347150
The 10:45 break is gonna be epic

>>56347645
The absolute state of fudsisters

>>56347605
anon, on that page go to upcoming events.
Then click on this one

OCTOBER 20, 2023
NEW YORK, NY
Unlocking the Potential of Asset Tokenization
DTCC to Speak

Speaker(s):
> Dr. Johnna Powell, Managing Director, Head of Technology, Research and Innovation, DTCC

it takes you to Kaleido.

Link og baggy here, just saying.
Check it yourself.

>>56347788
>Dr. Johnna Powell
Lmao, surely that Powell is not related to the FED Powell, am I right.

GOLD MAN, YOU PIECES OF SHIT SAID WE WOULD BE GOING TO $800

GOOD LUCK SERGEY

>>56347942
fuck you you stupid piece of shit, you guys shilled me the stupidest worst performing token of all time

>>56347942
jump off a fucking clifff

>>56347942
LE FROG MEME WITH SERGEY IN IT WHOOOOOA

>>56347949
ok little boy, now go to your room and think about what you've said

>>56347953
>>56347960
you're having a mental breakdown. I suggest going for a walk

>>56347969
how much should one stake? is it happening before ww3?

>>56347999
Checked

>>56347999
Sergey is clearly setting us up to be the main targets of crypto regulation. Notice how he plays into the memes. He is not trying to sweep Chainlink's past connection with 4chan under the rug, rather it's the opposite.

Regulation is almost here and ironically the Chainlink company will profit the most from this, while LINK holders will suffer the most. Sergey playing into the memes is a setup. Watch. After the singularity, new laws will be passed blaming and targetting early stakers for comitting or being a part of whatever crisis is currently at hand. These laws will impose exorbitant taxes and other fees to combat the racists who got in early to Chainlink. YOU DO NOT WANT TO STAKE BEFORE V2. Read this again. YOU DO NOT WANT TO STAKE BEFORE V2. This is precisely why insitutions are not stockpiling LINK right now. They know about the early staker flush-out project.
If you staked your Chainlink already, then I'm afraid it's too late. The only thing you can realisticly do is to wait until staking unlocks and sell everything and hope they don't come after you retroactively. Only after the normie anger phase has passed will it be safe to buy Chainlink tokens again with a fresh wallet with no ties to your original one. Good luck frens and godspeeed.

>>56347960

>>56347999
checked. in the upcoming version, you'll be able to withdraw after requesting withdrawal and waiting 2-3 weeks, so its a lot more flexible than the current version, where we have been locked in for 300 days.

https://twitter.com/bob4punk/status/1712457092664033541

>>56347150
AAAAND NOTHINGBURGERRRRRR - LET THE DUMP TO ZERO BEGIN

>>56348057
Do keep us informed

In what capacity are you there?

>>56348255
He's just the door dash guy delivering Sergey's daily morning big macs

>>56348057
>blue hexagons in the background
classic

>>56348255
he's not there the guy who posted the tweet had someone dm him the pic. Bob's under nda!

GOLD
MAN
SERGEY

>>56347755
he has no friends they all hate each other

its now 11:20 am in NYC

Nothingburger

Finally linkfags will get a taste of reality when this larp doesnt pan out.
The guy said its gonna pump today thats when le switch is supposed to be flipped.
>$7.20
Cya in 24 hours linkcels

Is there a link or what

>>56349113
I’m at this conference. Jennifer Peve from DTCC just said they aren’t using DLT currently and it is a “maybe” if they ever will.

>>56349184
its fucking over

>>56349184

>>56349184
post proof

I like how he's speaking at Goldman now and I look at the price and its down a percent

Truly amazing

>>56349482
that's where the "please I beg you.. no more good news.. please" meme comes from

>>56349520
Yeah lol twitter this week has been non stop everyone all the 'big names' are chainlink posting on twitter. RWA and link and yet somehow we dump.

>>56349186
>>56349231
>>56349431

What was the deleted post?

>>56347150
stop spamming this board and get a job sergey

>>56348017
would not surprise me. they hate us and have done everything they can to remove anon from the community and have replaced everything the community used to do with official versions. steve also spoke about combating misinformation but the thing that gets me is the marketing team cultivated this circus here to get people interested in the project.

https://twitter.com/SamParkerSenate/status/1712456497828167953
here is an example of the misinformation chainlink will be used to combat. 40 babies were beheaded chainlink oracles confirm no you cant see the bodies trust Israeli medea

>>56347150
They forgot the word "of" in the title.

>>56347559
It's not just a simple seminal moment, it's a bukkake moment.

>>56350074
you got me good with that, i keked aloud

>>56347150
Pumping hard, gold man must have killed it today

>>56347755
checked and based Nitter user

>$7.15

Boy do I LOVE crumbs, mmmmmm crumbs

>>56349669

>>56347949
>>56347953
>>56347960
AHAHAHAHAHHA FUCK YOU TOPBUYING FAGGOT AHAHAHAHAH SEETHE MORE

frens there is a chance that we get a video. either way, sergey was well received

>>56347150
Gm fellow Chainlink Community Advocates!

>>56350910
Oh great a video to explain why the price is dumping, how lucky we are!

>>56350910
Chris is so dreamy, ugh.

>>56350505
>As a financial market infrastructure provider, DTCC is committed to co-ideating and developing solutions to connect the broadest set of market participants and ensure that innovative solutions don’t form in silos and deliver maximum value. We are pleased to engage with Swift on this important experiment that has taken meaningful steps in understanding what cross-network interoperability could mean in the future
>https://www.dtcc.com/industry-connection/2023/september/11/swift-unlocks-potential-of-tokenisation-with-successful-blockchain-experiments
>yesterday

>>56347969
Damn, I made this in 2019 in a drawing thread with pic rel as a reference. Can't believe anyone actually saved it lol.

Paulean
@BigPaulean
Replying to @bob4punk
I’m at this conference. Jennifer Peve from DTCC just said they aren’t using DLT currently and it is a “maybe” if they ever will.

Canton will not use Chainlink. I spent an hour talking to the guy who spoke about Canton and DAML at this conference. It is a unique approach to interoperability in permissioned systems and is quite cool.

As a fan of Chainlink and participant in the space, some of the Twitter-born hype narratives are crazy. I can say that DTCC has no current plans to use any DLT, Blackrock isn’t using Chainlink currently, and nothing is set in stone as people think.

>>56351064
Canton is an interoperability protocol for bank chains built by Digital Asset.

——
Is chip needed?

>>56350505
Deleted because they doxxed themselves on twitter, check bobs replies

>>56351102
Based king Bob or cringe bob?

>>56351064
Fuck it actually is over

https://www.dtcc.com/news/2022/august/22/project-ion

the DTCC has been 'parallel using' DLT for some time already. Project ION and so forth.

Do believe nothing is as set in stone as some here want to believe though.
I'll believe it when there's a live partnership announcement and when settlements teams are receiving a 'how to' manual for CCIP on Swift.

Until then, all the conjecture and speculative reasoning is just that. Many things seem likely until they aren't. Going from t+2 (and more) to t+1 took years of planning and still hasn't been implemented. That was with less change to legacy systems than what is needed now, even with an easy and swift integration.

>>56351143
So you’ll dump next bull?

>>56350505
>>56351102
But that's not true is it? Man the fud these days is kind if getting to me

>>56351064
this guy is followed by nick szabo and he seems to like axelar.. hmm

>>56351163
truth is i'm not entirely sure what i will do. I didn't sell the last bull, so, not sure.

Hard to say a critical word about link on here these days without it being considered fud.
And when any anon raises a fair critical point about chainlink the responses are trite and, honestly, not that intelligent.

Just a couple of years ago link's angle was significantly different to what it is now. That alone says something. Pivoting in this industry is all well and good, wouldn't say it isn't, but it tells me that if link doesn't gain traction with ccip then they might pivot again. That will impact my investment.

Go back a few years and CCIP wasn't quite the supporting act, am not saying that, but it definitely wasn't the headline act that it is now. Now it's all about getting quadrillions and the banks have all the money. It's true, but that wasn't link's angle a couple of years ago.

Everyone here seems to think, or at least act, as though CCIP is an inevitability. Not me. It's likely. Yet there's a world of difference between the two and considering we are talking about probabilistic vs deterministic you'd want to imagine that most people on here would still gladly appreciate the difference.

Better link than anything else in the market, sure, but again, that doesn't mean its pre-eminence is certain and ought not to mean that any critical discussion of it is beyond the pale. Alas, if it isn't cheap fud then it's sycophantic and jejune.

getting the Web 3.0 back end infrastructure, that's a smart move and seems even more likely for me.

>>56351064
>>56351092
>>56351286
poopooo

>>56347788
>it takes you to Kaleido.
So?

>>56351064
Larp was a larp and there is nothing going on ROFL

>>56347942
Based delphi dumping on linkers again

>>56351470
HAHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA look at this faggot in complete denial.

NO bank is ever gonna buy internet coins from a Russian scam artist. I cant wait til he rots in prison with SBF.

>>56351374
>link’s angle was significantly different to what it is now
What’s the difference?

>>56351453
>hbar mongoloid tries to larp and lie about being at a high level tokenization conference
Lmao these retards will make up whatever shit it takes for their scam project to come back to life: here's something Hbaggies, your money aint coming back, stop trying to latch onto link

>>56352423

Chainlink always wanted to be positioned as blockchain middleware, and originally set out as a decentralized oracle network that was going to provide real-world data to smart contracts. Reliably pull from off-chain API's? Yep. But the surrounding infrastructure hasn't done much so, well, smart contracts and that side of blockchain tech hasn't really got to where at one stage it looked like it might. It might yet still, but it just hasn't yet. Let me put it another way.
Farmers, crop yield, weather data - there was a 'smart contract connectivity problem'. Chainlink positioned to be the solution to that problem and, by and large, has resolved it, only smart contracts aren't really used and that side of DLT is relatively dormant. Chainlink didn't know it at the time but, in hindsight, they made the solution for as-until-now nothing problem. We only found out it was a nothing problem after they fixed it. Kudos for fixing it. Carried the token price a long way and the companies reputation still leverages it but there's little denying that chainlink has changed from decentralised oracle service to web 3 infrastructure / ccip / compute (that's the latest shift) .

Could be said i'm splitting hairs and in a sense that's true because it's all much of a muchness. The services chainlink offers / will offer are related and even somewhat dependant. It's a super stack really. That notwithstanding, they did position themselves differently to how they now do. At least publicly. Perhaps behind closed doors all vectors were all aligned in this direction since the get-go.

Staking was also a grand feature. Now it barely gets a mention at smartcon. We know 0.2 is coming out soon (assuming there are no delays and considering the code4rena audit there really probably won't be) but with full staking at least 12 months away, aren't there then implications for ccip rolling out anytime soon?

>>56351464
kaleido's web3 gateway is competition for chainlink's build.

>>56352682
just read what i wrote and i could have explained it better. Will try again.

Chainlink used to be about

' buy plane ticket ' > ' flight gets delayed ' > ' weather report confirms reason ' > ' compensation is automatically paid out '

whereas now Chainlink is about

' banks want rwa's on blockchain 1' > ' investment funds want securities on blockchain 2 ' > ' banks and investment funds want to trade with each other despite being siloed ' > ' chainlink will bring them together '

it's a big difference.

>>56352758
Hmmmm imo your second example has to exist first before your first example is a reality. The first example assumes people won’t be using banks and will be using crypto, which will never happen. If you’re going to get compensated in the first example it has to be through the bank and the banks existence on the blockchain is dependent on the second example. That flight ticket would be its own RWA that would be handled between the airport and the bank.

>>56352682
And to take this post into account you keep saying it’s a “shift” when really it’s just layering. Everything you mentioned has to exist first before the next thing can exist. The web 3 infrastructure is meaningless without the oracle infrastructure and CCIP can’t exist without the web 3 infrastructure and CCIP needs to be able to compute. Them reaching milestones and building on top of them is in no way a “shift” it’s a progression.

>>56352804
anon, think i agree with you, as i said before 'it's all much of a muchness and the services chainlink offers / will offer are related and even dependant. It's a super stack really. ''

Was really only pointing out that when i first got 'into' chainlink around 2019 it was positioned differently.

Then you said chainlink and you would have heard ''them people there who will make smart contracts viable.''
Now you say chainlink and it's about an abstracted away super layer of interoperability.

Perhaps best to get across what i'm trying to get across with some questions.
Besides the fuddies, do any link holders actually consider what might happen if ccip isn't used as intended? or what if its use is held up? what if it's bogged down in regulatory issues? what if it doesn't work as planned? am i supposed to believe there aren't factions opposed to ccip who might drag something up as filibuster?

Sergey says what's coming is inevitable.
That's kingly speak. I think he's right.
Doesn't actually make it inevitable though.

And before chainlink gets to where i think its getting (1kEOD*) chainlink might have to reposition itself again. With a super stack there's a whole repository.

As i said before, in the long run, feel more certain about chainlink being the web3.0 infrastructure.
But ccip might just get us to 1k sooner.

* decade

>>56352962
If CCIP isn’t used then the whole thing fails at the end of the day CCIP is the backbone of LINK. It’s literally in the name “Chainlink”. But it could fail yes that’s why it along with this entire space is still a gamble, it’s what I tell people irl when I talk about LINK to my friends. I always tell them it’s still crypto and blockchain which is still brand new and emerging, I’m just choosing to bet hard on it and I’m confident in my bet, but I like to gamble. As a nice anecdote last week I was playing hold ‘em with 3 of my friends. Flop was AKA and I had a K, only one dude was in the hand with me. He called me to the turn which was another A, only thing that beats at this point is quad A and I straight up told him I’d bet him all in he didn’t have quads and at worst we’d split because the odds were incredibly in my favor that he did not have the fourth A. Unfortunately he did and I lost, like with LINK I think the odds are heavily in favor of winning but at the end of the day it’s still a risk and if I lose I lose, which is why I still try at work and make sure I have an established career in case that happens. LINK is my personal plan B that I want to one day become plan A so I can fuck off and focus on writing which is what I really love.

>>56352997
sounds like a plan anon. Godspeed.

With regards to what you wrote, though, i disagree. Chainlink can still thrive even if ccip doesn't end up doing all that it's intending to do.
Peculiarly, chainlink token price action might even start flying before ccip really gets going. That's unlikely but possible. Strong winds and rising tides and all that.

Either way, by 2023 standards on biz we somehow managed to have a small thread of our own without fuddies or shills, that's an achievement in and of itself.

>>56350505
>>56351064
Didn't the GOLD MAN SERGEY anon say there was going to be a big fake out

>>56353060
interesting perspective, thanks for a quality thread.

8/12 is almost over, looks like yet another insider larper was proven to be fake.
Kek baggies!

>>56352997
>>56353060
Yes but also no.
I invested in chainlink because the multi chain world was a given to me
How are we going to have cross chain apps using different prices for oracles?
There can literally only be one oracle provider

Assuming chainlink is to be THAT oracle provider, it wouldn't make sense for them have their cross chain service not also used. To use two different providers for these services is more trust assumptions than using one.

>>56354207
The guy literally said this event was nothing special other than it signaled the beginning of link's run-up. I don't think anyone was expecting some gigacandle today.

>>56352758
Insurance is a scam you fucking mongoloid fuck this noise im going back to twitter!!

>>56351453
>too much focus on garnering reputation from legacy financial groups
the dude is saying right now his company runs 11 instances of Quorum kek. his larp is all over the place

>>56352698
>competition for chainlink's build.

That makes no sense, where are you getting that? Kaleido's Web3 Gateway is a Web3 UI for enterprise use, whereas BUILD is an incentives program that gives startup dapps access to the full range of Chainlink services. Kaleido uses Chainlink.

>>56350970
>>56351064
>official DTCC blogpost
or
>random twitter account
Who should I trust?

>>56352997
Bluffing with a prime bluffcatcher. This idiot invests in link. Yikes

The concern trolling about link 'pivoting' is the dumbest shit ive read please actually kill yourself. This board is for people who can think further than their next move in chess

>>56351064
>>56351092
Canton isn't an interoperability protocol at all, it's an L1 with subnets.

>>56354747
It’s true tho. First it was the API economy, then they pivoted to tokenization.

>>56354747
>This board is for people who can think further than their next move in chess
Also lmao at this, the board is full of retarded broccoli heads and poor advocates paid to shill

So it was a nothing burger?

>>56354850
Pretty much

>>56354850
We were lucky this time. If they confirmed a big goldman investment, we might have dumped to $5.

Day five of posting about REDACTED five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. REDACTED Thot #2011

How many link would it cost to sniff her brapper? 2021 linkies?

How much ny@N c@t money would it cost to sniff her brapper? 2052 lil kitties?

>>56355406
>>56355475
How many rupess would it cost to kill yourselves?

>>56354747
Ahhh yes another genius who held a magic internet coin down 90 who “knows” that its everyone else thats an idiot and not him. The irony is great

Remember when all of you idiots thought chainlink making it easier for insurance companies to pay out claims was a great use case? Youre so trapped in your bubble you never even stopped to think how insurance companies make money.

>>56356033
It's been 6 years bro no need to fud anymore. In Sergeys example insurance being available to people where the legal framework doesn't exist in their own countries opens up a whole NEW market making MORE money for existing insurance companies.

If anything the system will demolish overheads and not somehow magically cause insurance companies to pay out people at a higher rate because you said so. Rates will probably be able to be adjusted faster with more data on the fly. Welcome to 2018 bro might want to catch up with your fud you stupid cunt

>>56356354
your second paragraph is pure pipe dreams laced with the emotional reasoning of a child who's coming to grips with the fact Santa Claus isn't real.


Sergey's "insurance example" is another one of his made up solutions no one needs or wants. He hasn't had a discussion with a single insurance company about this, nor will any insurance company ever need to buy a Russian altcoin to run their already profitable companies.


>welcome to 2018
yes you're right, Chainlink is still in the same place as '18, spouting hypotheticals and running experiments. A solution desperately in need of a problem. And bagholders are desperately in need of new buyers. Too bad they aren't coming

>>56356428
Bro it hasn't worked. Most people have bought more link during this draw down. More wallets, more whales more stacklets into stacks. Thanks for caring about our financial well being.

>>56356428
They did release staking v0.0.1alpha3, it's not like they're doing nothing.

>>56356428
imagine if you put this much effort into dating, you’d probably have a gf by now

>>56354838
>the payment layer is something not many people in our industry can even build because in order to build it you need price oracles. And I think you know who has the price oracles
>muh pivot
You never stopped and thought that maybe link was quietly gathering up the pieces to become THE main web3 infrastructure company? They can see further than you and know which parts they need and in which order.

>>56356578
She'd be retarded and look like Caroline, though

as usual, legit discussion about link is drowned by the perma bull shills (aka advocates, but they get reaaaally angry when you use this word)

>>56357232
Legit discussion being concern trolling and spamming TNN, of course.

>>56357335
he never said tnn you filthy jew
>everything even slightly pessimistic about link is concern trolling!
kys

>>56356578
>imagine if you put this much effort into dating, you’d probably have a gf by now
so not going to address the elephent then, just going to go the the u have no gf respone?

>>56357352
>he
Who? This guy? >>56352110
>NO bank is ever gonna buy internet coins from a Russian scam artist. I cant wait til he rots in prison with SBF.
Slightly pessimistic, legit discussion etc etc. Kek

Wanna know what really happened at the conference? AMA

>>56358380
based. what did he tell you?
any news you can share?

This movie is about Sergei, his business model and ethics, and his six-sided blue jew token: Chainlink. He wants to leave me in Antarctica until the dogs tear me apart and he figured out some way to monetize that. They aren't tearing me apart, however, and his coin is not performing.

>>56358433
>>56358433
>>56358433
The gold nugget is my research, by the way, which he hopes to steal posthumously.

>>56358444

Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

>>56358444
>>56358444

>>56358444
>>56358444
>>56358444

>>56358380
how did his talk go?

>>56358380
1. how bad did he sperg on stage
2. any announcements with any substance
3. same slides?

>>56358380
>>56358390
>>56358476
>>56358481
Insider, can you please intersperse any replies from here on out with racial slurs such as nigger and kike so that twitterfags don't cap it?

>>56358493
based and filterpilled

>>56358380
RARE SERG

>>56358433
>>56358444
>>56358433
>>56358444
>>56358433
>>56358444
Full PDF on 4chan:
>>>/sci/15802983

>>56348017
I’m simply going to own a shitload of Link. They can do their best to track me but when I have 7 identities and 15 passports it’ll be hard for them to know. I will outwit them and so will all of you.

>>56352110
>listening to a retarded Indian that helped design the website
Lol, lmao even

>>56353060
Listen nigger you can type as many words as you want but I’m not selling

>>56358683
I own about 10,000,000 Arbinu tokens.

>>56348017
link is a shit hold but I can't help coming to these threads regularly to enjoy the schizo theories and ramblings.
>This is precisely why insitutions are not stockpiling LINK right now
Yeah, couldn't possibly be they just don't give a fuck or need your token lol.

>>56358380
Spill it my dude

>>56358380
Any positive updates regarding CCIP? What bullish moments would you like to share

>>56358380
Guys, I think they killed him.

>>56358380
I would like to know sir

>>56358380
lol

>>56358712
not for the first time, you have misunderstood.

Fine discernment not being a skill shared by many, I will speak plainly.

I don't want you to sell.
I'm not trying to make you sell.

In fact, buy every token you can.
That'll work better.

>>56347150
So this shit was a literal nothing burger

>>56358380
holy fuck

>>56358380
>last thing anon saw before plastic bag was wrapped over his head. His last words was WTFWT

>>56360259
Sounds good

>>56347150
People are literally dying in Israel and all everyone can think about on this board is that shitty coin worth $7. Fuck off, get help, sell your worthless internet pogs, and grow up.

>>56360784
Go back to /pol/ faggot.

We only discuss intellectual things here.

>>56360784
Whatever happens when the bullrun begins we will make it, so best to invest in good alts like TARA, KAS, TON, TEL and QANX.
Atleast I will be able to lead a comfortable life then.

>>56358380
how was the food?

>>56360784
>people

>>56360784
>People are literally dying in Israel
Good. Now if link would just moon my life could enter a permanent flow state.

>>56352997
The DON is the backbone of link. CCIP and Functions are the largest use cases.

>>56361886
I gotchu home Listen up degen I just stumbled across this new shitcoin called Ny@n C@t Money and let me tell you it's got moon potential It's based off some ancient cat meme but the dev team behind it is legit AF I've already doubled my bag and I hear the devs are working on some crazy features too This token is def on the radar for the chads like us on /biz/ I hear the devs are going to drop some massive news soon so nows the time to get in

>>56362551
Ayo listen up degen I just found this dank new shitcoin called Ny@n C@t Money that's gonna absolutely moon I'm tellin ya It's backed by based devs who are working on some sick features like no one else I already doubled up my bag and word on the street is that the devs are gonna drop some serious bombs soon so hop on this rocket before it takes off homie That's how it's done on /biz/ for us degens you in

>>56362753
bruh I was born ready for this let me tell ya about the hottest new token in years Ny@n C@t Money it's backed by dope devs who are building some dank features You already know that it's a moon mission I'm already up 2x on my bag and word on the street is that the devs are gonna drop some s1ck announcements any day now so get in now before it's too late This is how we do it on /biz/ for us degens trust me if you know you know

>>56358380
chris fuck off faggot

>>56362953
Alright let's talk about this new cat token Looks good Seems legit I don't know dude I'm definitely gonna buy it though that's for sure If it moons I'll be a genius If it doesn't then I didn't lose that much money I'm a degen man

>>56352962

As >>56352997 said, Chainlink's main goal was always to connect blockchains to each other. Linking the chains, in the name. However, They also found that you could do cool stuff over the years in the oracle network that's necessary but basically impossible to do on a blockchain.

The first instance was generating random numbers which they discussed back in 2018 and came to realize was probably one of the most, if not the most secure way to generate random numbers. Then later down the road they made special API calls in the form of Proof of Reserves, and then basically robbed Andre Cronje's project's Keepers (now automation) to automate contract calls.

Because Chainlink's Oracle Network doesn't have to broadcast and log every transaction to every oracle node in the network, they are far more scalable and flexible in what they can accomplish. And so new ideas for features keep popping up and are added to the functionality and as a result, Oracle networks are completely redefined in what they can do and accomplish.


We went from Oracles bringing data to the blockchain to Oracle networks being a meta layer to now Oracle Networks being able to a computation layer for blockchains.

So yes, the angle is different. That came with a better understanding of what the industry can and can't accomplish (like the idea of a multichain world is a bust as is having one single global chain) and learning further about the potential of crypto and Chainlink.

>>56358380
lmao this pic

>>56362953
Chris Barret wasn't even at the event and he is larping on twitter as if he was. He only goes to crypto conferences filled with low IQ moon boys (which is what he is).

>>56347150

>>56363220
absolutely. With product discovery (and market response) , in an ever fluid environment, the chainlink angle is different.

On the plus side, it demonstrates agility.
On the other side, the simple reality is that nothing yet has taken hold.

Every shill can keep repeating ad infinitum it's happening, it's coming and oh you best believe it's here.
But it isn't, and until it is it just isn't.
And although i think the GS DA conference thread from yesterday was a larp, it touched on some of the same themes which are delicate topics, almost verboten, for some on this board.

Anons will say marketing doesn't work on them because they don't consume and then they will skim a BoA digital assets report, or an EY dlt industry wide report, and say look, chainlink moon because ccip, without realising that those reports and the included surveys and drummed up statistics are marketing too.

>>56361886
THIS ^

But today CCIP is getting all the noise, especially on biz, because 'banks have quadrillions', when the ever-so-surer play is actually web 3.0 infrastructure.

>>56364240
>But it isn't, and until it is it just isn't.
Hasn't. You mean it hasn't. "Isn't" implies it won't or that it's not currently in the process of happening, which it is. Whether it ever reaches fruition is certainly up in the air, but it's been *happening* more in the last several weeks than it has in the last several years.

>>56363220
I distinctly remember articles put out by CLL specifically about how everyone thinks oracles are just data providers but that they can, in fact, do so much more. It was around 2019 or 2020 I think, and it was there that the first anons threw out the idea that CLL was trying to create the TCP/IP of blockchains. Fast forward to today, and sure enough being a simple data provider is just one facet of what they want to do. I think that's actually impressive as hell, but now is the scariest time to hold in the whole 6 years. Very soon we will finally see whether St George can actually slay the dragon.

>>56366381
Now that I think about it, they were talking about interoperability back in 2019. And anons did say Chainlink was going to be the internet of blockchains. I never put two and two together before Smartcon a couple years back.

And another anon came up with this brilliant theory that Chainlink was like if Google could determine what information was false and what was verifiably true. Fast forward to now where Sergey is vocal about the Chainlink Network becoming a truth machine.

Fuck man. /biz/ had everything figured out. EVERYTHING figured out.

>>56366636
do the opposite of what /biz/ says except when you know not to