/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56259784
What did you think? 1 year? I think 15 years is optimistic

DO YOU THINK THIS IS A FUCKING JOKE??!!?!/

>>56259823
Unironically yes. I think everything posted here is a big meme.

>>56259817
I genuinely thought that even a fraction of those trillions that Sergey was ranting about nonstop would come online in the next few years (5 years tops). What's the point of holding a token that will become valuable in 30 years when these senile boomers finally push the green button. I will be 50 by then... and besides in 2030's we will achieve AGI anyways which will transcend chainlink and the entire economic system. i'm genuinely thinking of dumping my bags and spending the money to travel with my family and on material hedonism. fuck this shit

>>56259817
for mentally ill link holders certainly

>>56259784
Who cares? Wahhh I’ll be x years old. Pussy faggot.

>>56259784
>he thinks he can ever make it

They meant it will take 15 years for 90+% of all the banks, DTCC, legacy systems etc. to be onboarded onto the chainlink system which by that point would have total world domination of the financial system. Link by that point will be 81k+

Link will be 1k and 10k long before that from market hype and gradual adoption

We will be at 1k in the next 2-3 years, 10k by 2030, 81k by 2035 (and this is the most conservative estimate)

>>56260436
Yep. We’ll likely see million dollar bitcoin within our lives, if not the next two decades. Chainlink is due a for a massive repricing, even if it isn’t headed to 81k quite yet.

>>56260436
>They meant it will take 15 years for 90+% of all the banks, DTCC, legacy systems etc. to be onboarded onto the chainlink system

They didn't even mean that, not sure what others were listening to but what they said was that it would take 15 years for banks etc to join the DLT space because they are slow at chainging their systems BUT with CCIP they can integrate their current systems to connect with DLT so they can start NOW. Go watch the vid again

OP of this thread is a disingenuous fudder whose opinions will luckily be deleted off the verifiable web thx to chainlink

>>56260542
No, they specifically implied that boomers at the banks are sluggish as fuck when it comes to catching up with tech leaps like blockchain. It's gonna be decades before they get their shit on chain. Sergey nailed it by saying DeFi and blockchain in general are the new internet, and just like last time, these banking/enterprises are going to be 10-20 years late to the party. CCIP and chains are getting to that early 2000's internet stage of functionality, but don't expect the legacy institutions to make big moves anytime soon. They won't risk a dime till this space is mature and fully battle tested. You're going to be clutching that LINK like a virgin to a body pillow for a very long time until that 100x moonshot comes. I feel OP's pain. If you're in your 30's now, congrats, you'll maybe cash in by the time your balls touch the water when you take a shit. Overall, it's just not worth it, especially with strong AI around the corner that could make the current economic system obsolete.

Kek

>>56260686

>>56259784
Same, banks are like boomers, they cant even use their own phones.