/biz/ - Business & Finance

so that's why chinklink had this insane pump to $5000 a piece, thanks for clearing that up OP

>>56258052
>>56258076
yeah it's called being undervalued, and a once in a lifetime opportunity

>>56258052

The Great Reset has come at a crossroads with humanity. We can not allow the WEF & the young globohomo leaders to manipulate the markets any longer with their fake wars, prolonged bear markets and gay crashes. In order for the Golden Bullrun to resume, Chainlink(ticker: LINK) needs to be destroyed.
/biz/ will declare WAR on Chainlink next week and send globohomo a message.
You heard it here first. Linkies will be financially exterminated.

Spread the word and prepare your shorts. It's finally happening... The Great Chainlink Short is upon us lads.

>>56258052
>Financial institutions investing in blockchain (nothing to do with Chainlink / CCIP)
>Great now just put CCIP logos everywhere to imply something that's not true

>>56258086
uhm, all these institutions are all 100% committed but deicded to just wait around for every Joe Plumber to buy chinklink on the cheap on shoddy chink exchanges so that they can buy it all back later for 10,000X

Its worse than the Great Reset. It is The Great Taking. Look it up. And Chainlink is the software for it.

>>56258114
none of those institutions actually invest themselves into shitcoins, they buy for their clients, which happen to be dumb retail atleast for now. shows how fking retarded you are

>>56258052
>VECHAIN PARTNERSHIP WITH MCDONALD'S!!!

>>56258145
ahh, yes. They all KNOW it's going to go to an insance price because but they out of the goodness of their hearts decided not to partake until their clients get in on the cheap, but they will swoop in one day and buy at the top for sure.

The cope is palpable in your posts.

>>56258187
you are so completely retarded, it's baffling, no institutuion touches crypto, we don't have regulatory clarity, so their only options is either to invest into crypto companies like jpmorgan did with infura, or buy shares of a crypto company/

retails funds held by asset managers like blackrock, will need to move between private chains though, thats where ccip comes at play

the chart

>>56258348
>price is bad because price is bad
okay

>>56258348
Yep, literally being hammered down rn

The new Chainlink product "Data Streams" is up now, blog.chain.link/data-streams-mainnet

yes, goldman sachs is coming to pump your erc-20 tokens. 2 more weeks only.

>>56258465
neat

>>56258222
What about microstrategy, or SpaceX which we heard "dumped all its bitcoin" last month?

Guys, I’m excited too but it’s literally just a new slide. He’s had banks on his slides since 2017.

>>56258222
I don't buy it. Institutions take risks, sometimes insane risks, all the damn time. They don't need regulatory clarity to buy something that isn't prohibited, especially if they're not selling it to their clients.

>>56258052
i just saw a 4 link tx fee. imagine link at 500$. that's a 2000$ tx. so link wont go that high unless the clients will be those big banks moving 8-9 figures cross chain and they dont do it often.

>>56261235
Yes, it's a great shame LINK isn't divisble by 18 decimal points.

>>56260306
well yeah microstrategy is a way for institutions yo have exposition to btc, but they dont buy btc, they buy ms shares

>>56258094
Yes! We need a bunch of mentally unhinged basement dwellers to take over the world instead. They will definitely lead us to paradise.

>>56261489
This but unironically

>>56261489
this but ironically unironically

>>56258052
they skimped out on the arrows. there are supposed to be arrows connecting the things were link sits in the middle, implying fee collection. it just looks cheap without the arrows, retail will never buy more tokens like this