[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 39 KB, 1280x425, IMG_4800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56204124 No.56204124 [Reply] [Original]

How effective is a populace with small arms at defeating a military invasion and occupation? If it looks like China is on the verge of invading Taiwan (let’s assume they succeed in landing) and the government distributes a rifle and 300 rounds of ammo to every able bodied man and woman, how effective would they be at making life for the occupiers hell? Assume they have basic training in the operation of the weapons and basic marksmanship but no combat specific skills.

>> No.56204128
File: 422 KB, 571x540, 1625584248079.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56204128

>>56204124
you could just nuke them from orbit

>> No.56204133

>>56204124
>How effective is a populace with small arms at defeating a military invasion
not at all. Have fun with your kids getting shot in school chud. Can't say i'll feel sorry

>> No.56204151

>>56204124
Won't do shit for an invasion, however it would create an endless insurgency once the winning army is forced to occupy the country.

>> No.56204180

>>56204128
China’s biggest strength in a Taiwan invasion is that they have artillery systems the size of an 18 wheeler that can hit Taiwan from mainland China.

>> No.56204181

>>56204133
You're fucking retarded but see >>56204151
And also this isnt a sustainable thing for said invading force so yes an armed populace (US size) would fuck them over

>> No.56204521

they wouldnt be able to hold or occupy the country in any sense without flat our population removal

>> No.56204733
File: 67 KB, 1204x1120, 1600547668829.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56204733

>>56204124
ask /k/

>> No.56204781

>>56204124
I'm more curious of how effective the US populace would be in warding off it's own military should the Federal government go full Satan and sick the military on it's citizens. Factoring in things like a good chunk of the military refusing to fire on their countrymen and such.

>> No.56204802

>>56204781
How are they going to pay the military when the tax goy becomes combatants?

The best they can hope for is seizing assets and land as a reward for mercs, and it won't be cheap

>> No.56204818

>>56204151
This is the correct answer. The chinks would love to see all the population with a rifle in their hand, lined up along some sandbags. So they can blow them the fuck up with artillery, the real way is insurgency ala Afghanistan, where you cant tell your enemy from a farmer. Inb4 hurr durr just kill everyone - then you are have committed war crimes and the international community will butt fuck you

>> No.56204819

Not effective at all, the gorilla meme only works when the occupiers want to be nice china doesnt give a shit and will just start doing shit like collective punishment and i doubt the chinks at taiwan really care that much about being annexed by other chinks.

>> No.56204837

>>56204124
You should post that on /k/ instead of /biz/.
The short answer is that it depends of morale. If it's high then the taiwanese can make the place hell on earth because Taiwan is basically all moutains and forests which would make it very easy to host an insurgency/guerilla for a prolonged amount of time.

>> No.56204841

>>56204124
>>56204781
US Military couldn't win against the Vietcong or goat fuckers in the Middle East. What the fuck makes you think they stand a chance against their own countrymen? They're the most heavily armed population in history and half of the Military itself would crumble under such duress. The Pentagon has spent millions think-tanking it and every single scenario shows they would lose drastically. It's easier to subjugate and control the population with Bread and Circuses rather than kill them outright.

>> No.56204850

>>56204819
This, also, the Chinese / Taiwanese living in Taiwan don’t believe in their government strongly enough to take up arms. Even if an armed faction were to resist, its numbers would be too small to change anything, and the Chinese would absolutely gutterstomp them with extreme prejudice. Plus, if we armed the rebels or tried to instigate more of them into rebelling, it would be an act of war, and then we’d be fighting the Chinese in a land war. No thanks.

>> No.56204969

>>56204850
>This, also, the Chinese / Taiwanese living in Taiwan don’t believe in their government strongly enough to take up arms.
Yup, the people of Taiwan don't hate China like the brainwashed cattle of the USA that thinks they steal organs and genocide Muslims, because some cult said they did. Their economy is also heavily inter-dependent.
I don't think China is even in a rush for full reunification, they can wait it out a few years as the USA crumbles as a global power. China will beat the USA without firing a bullet.

>> No.56205007
File: 70 KB, 500x375, b2 lrasm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56205007

>>56204124
it's not as effective as a couple of B-2's sinking the entire CCP navy before they even realize it with LRASM's.

https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-says-us-forces-would-defend-taiwan-event-chinese-invasion-2022-09-18/

>> No.56205279

>>56204124
I dunno ask the Taliban