/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56176508
here in America, we have a thing called Private Property, and Private Property rights.

It is a foundational block of what our country was built on.
don't like it?
get the fuck out!
simple as

(there is more than enough Public Lands top provide for things like roads, trails, camping, everything you could imagine.)

>>56176558
The King of Great Britain owned the colonies, ass.

>>56176560
>The King of Great Britain owned the colonies
Kek this isn't even true. The king did not own the colonies, and Britain lost control of them in the end anyways. Go lick boots somewhere else.

>>56176560
illiterate wretch serf

Build your numale yellow-brick-roads on your own public property, fags. I don't want niggers and redditors on my lawn, simple as

>>56176508
The people complaining about this stuff are lead poisoned boomers

Who cares? Future of US is obese mutts living in brazilian favela towns.

>>56176508
maybe in homogenous society I might give a fuck, but not in fucking borgerland. I don't even care about these rich yuppies, it is private property and their rights have to respected. No amount ofjourno seething is going to change that.
Also walkable cities and planning has to come from the government, not at the cost of citizens.
Fucking kill yourself commmie.

>>56177122
The planning did come from the government retard, doesnt change the fact that they still have to use parts of private property to make a sensible path, of course not for free, but if people say they want walkable shit but then dont make place for it, be it

>1pbtid
>january article
yet you reddit retard niggers reply

>>56176508
right wing conspiracy theories have convinced boomers and various chuds that 15 minute cities are some nefarious plot

>>56176558
This. Everything should be privatized at this point. The Government is terrible and needs to be destroyed.

>>56177370
They are a nefarious plot though. Safe real estate in dense "walkable" cities ends up being more expensive than safe real estate in less dense areas + expenses of owning a car (well, unless you get really dumb on your auto purchases). Basically designed to turn you into a perma renter rather than land owner. Walkable cities with public transit also make it easier for the criminal fraction to access your property. That whole 15 min city thing also significantly reduces the amount potential employers you can work at (well, unless you have WFH type job, but then, why live in big city at all?), number of places you can shop at, and schools your children can attend. Restricting those sorts of things that are very appealing to the controlling types that enter urban politics.

>>56177097
>boomers
I’m 38. There is no way in hell I’d want a public walkway going through my property. I hate the homeless. I hate faggots. I hate niggers. I hate rentoids. I don’t want them anywhere near my property.

>>56177370
some american retards read shit about europe and take it out of context thinking its all great

>>56176508
>Pic is all old people

How come only old people own private properties?

>>56177370
>>56177097
>"Muh Boomers something something, reeeee!"
rat brain kike identity politics fuck off

>>56177905
because they worked all their lives to be able to buy a small piece of something (no they didn't get easy or free, like you millennials seem to think. they got a job or two or three and they fucking worked for it and paid for it with blood sweat and tears) and damned if some commie faggot going to come in and take it away.

private property is private property

ignorant commie faggots can leave this country if they dont like it.

>>56177905
Older people have more time to accumulate wealth than younger people + property was cheaper relative to income years ago when they bought; same amount of land was around, but less people. Plus, there is some selection bias here; younger people who do own property are less likely to show up at these sorts of meetings.

>>56176508
>boomers relying on a physical impossibility to save their real estate bags

Unless solid state batteries have a massive breakthrough in manufacturing affordability, car-dependent suburbs are going to evaporate once it becomes unsustainable to maintain. Not even from a "MUH climate" perspective but just from the oil market. SPR release is the only thing keeping gas under $10/gal. Since the Ukraine war started, we're down to half the SPR stock. With the commitment of "war for longer" in Ukraine, how long until this starts hurting the American consumer? Most don't remember that the rapid implosion of 2008 was preceded by a jump in oil prices, squeezing the wagies enough they started to default on their meme mortgages.

>>56176508
>public paths on private property
yeah i'd vote that down too. the state's overreach is already absurd, they don't need even more of a say in my life. also fuck shoveling that nigger bullshit in the winter.
>j-just don't shovel it!
the shabbos goyim police ticket you.

>>56177944
>no they didn't get easy or free, like you millennials seem to think. they got a job or two or three and they fucking worked for it and paid for it with blood sweat and tears
Hey that's cool, but how much did they make when adjusted for inflation? How does that compare to wages as they are now?

milford is kinda in between detroit and flint I'm sure they have reasons for not wanting "people" wandering around

>>56176508
I specifically chose to live outside of walking range of non-whites as a barrier. You must be a sufficient enough human being to own a means of personal transportation capable of highway speeds to approach my dwelling from your poverty infected, shit filled hell hole city. This ensures the absolute low life nocars stay the fuck away from me while I sleep in peace and quiet at night.

>>56176508
Which milford? There's a million of them

>>56177784
>Safe real estate in dense "walkable" cities ends up being more expensive than safe real estate in less dense areas + expenses of owning a car
Have you tried looking at the reality of your own country? Because what you say doesn't seem right, considering the US itself...

>path through private property
The area I live has bike paths everywhere because uhh.... they're not on private property, they're on the ~10 feet closest to the road that the government already owned. I'm in Michigan too, not that far from this area. Weird plan from the start, why would people agree to it?

>>56178996
Some places like to have suburban developments with all sorts of awkwardly laid out roads & cul de sacs, that mean any sort of walking or bike path will need to cut across private property to have routes short enough that people would actually use them. If we would just require suburbs to be laid out in basic grid patterns with some sidewalks near the road, they would be just fine for cars and still be reasonably walkable.

>>56177968
US has more oil than saudi jewrabia so nah

>>56176560
He didn't own shit