/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56169864
Are you saying it isn't?

>>56169864
post your hands

>>56169864
>195.56 LINK

ccip isn't open for everyone yet.

>>56169864
Maybe palpable means something else in his country kek

Also, saved.

>>56169864
>private bank chains (hidden)
>$6 bazillion
check m8

>>56169864
Nice "industry standard" that you have right there. The protocol can barely generate 1k in fees per day and the market cap is still at 3B. Its not even funny anymore, just sad... Linkies deserve to lose all of their money.

>>56170033
>The protocol can barely generate 1k in fees per day
You do realize the Chainlink protocol is more than CCIP, right?

>>56170047
Very palpable response

>>56170047
Okay look at the oracle fees then, they are nonexistant.

>>56170001
so why did they hype it all summer? "CCIP Summer" what a joke. Who is allowed to use it right now and who isn't?

>>56169864
Holy shit... thank god I sold this dogshit. All this hype for that amount in traffic? Linkies on suicide watch.

>>56170047
oh yeah you're right, they also check prices for free and fund diversity events that you pay for

>>56170111
>"CCIP Summer" what a joke
What the fuck are you talking about lmao

>>56170025
Think it means 'flushable'

>>56170103
>>56170121
big oof

>>56170047
Keep telling yourself that. Oracles service is cool, but their main selling point for the past 4 years was CCIP and you know thar. They have been promoting it like its the next coming of christ, until you check the usage graph... Don't worry though anon, you'll make it once Sergay finishes dumping on you.

>>56170243

Don't you guys get tired of doing the same thing and adding no value to the world?

Baggies in shambles kek

>>56170111
I think you got it mixed up with "oracle-less summer", which was an actual thing (until they got exploited again).

>>56170166
>oof
gay

Also the chart

>>56170122
look at Chris Barrett's or any other ambassador twitter from this summer. That was their catch phrase. Why would you hype something up that isn't even working yet

>>56170111
>. Who is allowed to use it right now
so, this chainlink "protocol", it's decentralized... right? right anons?

>>56171377
Do you have brain damage?

>>56171417
yes, I do hold chainlink and think it's going to a trillion market cap

>>56171424
Good bot

>>56169882
>DTCC and swift
wow it's literally nothing

>>56170047
you cannot be serious
you guys have been hyping this CCIP shit for 2 YEARS
and now you're just gonna go
>uhh, actually Chainlink is more than CCIP it doesn't matter that much
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLL

reminder

Haven’t bought a single Chainlink (ticker: LINK) token since 2018.

>>56171369
It's a ccip, ccip summer

>>56172196
KEK

imagine my surprise when another crypto infrastructure company fails to find anybody willing to pay for its services
you have to start with retail or you fail.

>>56171436
Literal flatlander