/biz/ - Business & Finance

not buying your bags ranjeet

>>56156758
>30 views

>>56156758
Anyone download the video? This is the 2nd time I've seen an investor/institution only talk for chainlink that was privated right after. The first time was the coinbase one. I didn't think to save this one just like I didn't think to save the coinbase one. Fuck.

>>56156758
boring larp
the video is up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_hwOLVe41o

>>56156758
Talk is boring as fuck
These dumb bitches, per usual, are saying absolutely nothing

Who cares the price can barely break $7

>>56156758
SIRS PLEASE TO BE BUYING THE CHAINLINKS

For 6 years this guy has talked a big game about things happening, only for us to ask, what has changed since LINK was created? In 6 years, the best claim is "backing DeFi", which is not needed by anybody but pajeet yield farmers. LINK is a scam designed to take your eyes off scarcity (BTC) and utility (ETH)

>>56156839
>LINK is a scam designed to take your eyes off scarcity (BTC) and utility (ETH)
Whether this is true or not, I hold 1 BTC and 10 ETH in addition to my 10k LINK so I'm set to win either way. I do plan on doubling my ETH stack as well.

>>56156758
I categorically do not care. The Jesus resurrected and announced LINK is the God Protocol
>$5.12
meme is legitimately reality. I just want price up. I'd hoped it would absolutely rip to shred the crypto reddit and Twitter ilk but that ship has sailed so until our thesis bears out in price action it's wrong and irrelevant.

>>56156857
It's absolutely true. If it wasn't, LINK would be right behind BTC and ETH in market cap. There are too many crypto whales with money that would've been fighting over what would naturally be the 3rd biggest/most important crypto. What smart money instead has said, is LINK may stick around long term but it's not worth much. Certainly not as much as BTC/ETH, which is why the market values it at #23, even after trotting this guy out like a mascot to beg banks for "lots of money"

>>56156861
>is the God Protocol
actually according to Szabo its Plural, God ProtocolS.
Chainlink and Avalanche. the IC3 top dogs.

>>56156878
>which is why the market values it at #23
It's #20 actually but again, I diversified in to BTC and ETH so I'm not worried.

>>56156782
Happy to see it back up. Wanted to watch it earlier and got sad is was removed.

>>56156782
This has clearly been edited. It's missing the part OP is referring to.

>>56156758
It's back up:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_hwOLVe41o

>>56156878
>>56156839
>the market is rational
always eventually, but never immediately

>>56156839
>pajeet yield farmers
Hey buddy trustless yield, like miners and stakers getting an ROI for mining or validating is what keeps crypto running. You aren't retarded are you?

>>56156878
first time investing?
there's a reason for the saying "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid"
look at tesla which ranged between $15-20 for years before going to $400
what weren't the "whales" buying up as much as they could if it was so obvious?

>Citi
That collapsed pile of shit?

>>56157068
>look at tesla which ranged between $15-20 for years before going to $400
$15 was the rational price, Tesla is overvalued as fuck.

>>56157028
>>56157068
There are notable exceptions such as ETH, TSLA, and NVDA. All 3 ranged in no man's land for years, but eventually moved into parabolic territory. What separates them from LINK? Quite plainly, all were money makers. NVDA revenue and gross profit were exceptional for years, but treated like a commodity. Tesla margins were insane for a car manf. ETH made so much money for miners and NFT/App creators.

LINK makes money for no one. Nodes need to sell it to survive. The company sells it because it has mouths to feed. Stakers haven't received a dime, and from the looks of it, will receive a paltry $1800 from staking rewards for a full wallet. $1800 to lock up $40k-50k for a year, you would be better off buying treasuries or TIPS. Massive opportunity cost as BTC is up almost double this year. Sergey is a try hard, but he doesn't make anyone money but himself.

>>56157103
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=87393&page=1

>>56157103
>What separates them from LINK? Quite plainly, all were money makers.
mm yeah link won't make any money if it's at the core of the financial system right?
https://youtu.be/C-hxya9rZ4U?si=PGBMKqgPK8TXayfK&t=679
>LINK makes money for no one. Nodes need to sell it to survive.
wow great point retard, btc miners don't need to do this, ethtards don't sell to cover costs
>will receive a paltry $1800 from staking rewards for a full wallet
great point again, are link stakers being paid in usd? no they're being paid in the native asset. at $50, it would be $15k+ a year

>>56157103
also to show how fucking dumb you are, put some number into the calculator here:
https://www.stakingrewards.com/asset/ethereum-2-0
32 eth staked gives you 1.27 eth per year
that's $2060 per year

>>56157224
>>56157144
How many staked link to make it

>>56157224
7k link = $48k
32eth = $51k btw

>>56157231
10k

>>56157103
Look at this high level basher. He totally wants me to sell.

>>56156839
Eth is literally the mother of all scams. Lol pajeet fagfot

>>56156758
>CLG is releasing a blog about it tomorrow.
Chainlinkgoof will blogpost nigger tomorrow get your ducks inna row based kiddos

>>56156857
Lol, biz really up to the brim with pajeet scammers trying to pump eth. Mfckers be tripping. Eth!!!! Hahahahahahaha curry eating mfckers

>>56156758
No mention of Citi in the video…

>>56157103
>What separates them from LINK? Quite plainly, all were money makers.
mm yeah link won't make any money if it's at the core of the financial system right?
https://youtu.be/C-hxya9rZ4U?&t=679 [Embed]
>LINK makes money for no one. Nodes need to sell it to survive.
wow great point retard, btc miners don't need to do this, ethtards don't sell to cover costs
>will receive a paltry $1800 from staking rewards for a full wallet
great point again, are link stakers being paid in usd? no they're being paid in the native asset. at $50, it would be $15k+ a year

reposted with fixed link

>>56157292
Yeee, that’s what I’m talking bout nooogaaa

serg dumped 20 mil yesterday also nothing but bad news for such a miserable hold

>>56157224
I guess you forgot where one ETH used to cost $1 or less? And went up as high as $4500? Meanwhile, for the same low cost, LINK reached $50. That’s a laughable comparison. LINK will never have ETH type gains. It’s a sandbox shitcoin plagued by a cringe community and lack of retail participation. If you wanted to buy NFT’s or swap shitcoins you needed ETH. There’s no real world scenario where people will need to sink money into LINK. That’s why you won’t get the $1 to $4500 move, let alone $50 again.

>>56157368
well we both missed eth so link is our best shot
no point living in the past, same with btc "if onlys"
we will all make it fren (i know you have a heavy stack of link if you're making effort fud like this)

>>56157406
>so link is our best shot
you forgot AVAX, still early.

>>56157419
i am bullish on avax but it's just another chain at the end of the day
watch this:
https://youtu.be/C-hxya9rZ4U?&t=679
(anz has a subnet live on ccip testnet)

>>56156758
no thanks to your scam

>>56156768
God dam i had it saved to watch later but they took it down before i could watch

>>56156883
>>56157419
You avax shills need to kill yourselves. I'm pretty sure its like just one dude desu.

Yes avax is a fast chain. But besides that, ive mentioned plenty of times, at the end of the day its another chain. It doesnt monopolize the space.
Theres FTM, HBAR, ICP, XRP, ETH, LUKSO, boba chain, Sol, polygon, you get the picture. Sure a few quicker seconds is great but if I was a general user I wouldn't know the difference if you mixed the l1 chain backends with each other.

Link on the other hand is complete dominant monopoly. So please stop trying to shill your fucking coin in link threads. Its annoying

>>56157476
>it's just another chain
Its not just another Chain, its a network of networks. Its "Blockchain as a Service".
>anz has a subnet
yes on Avalanche and they are working close with Ava Labs.
you need to do more research.

>>56157636
Chainlink and Avalanche are the God Protocols.

>>56157817
>Its not just another Chain, its a network of networks. Its "Blockchain as a Service".
you're just spouting buzzwords kek

>>56157817
Just replying from another thread. Pretty sure its you. but just so any link holders see this and know youre a fucking ICP type jeet.
>56157809

>Yes avax is a fast chain.
Not true, even if it is, barely. I've used other l1s and l2s dude. The time difference is literally the same for the end user. Go in every single l1 thread they all say their's is the fastest.
>the only one that can actually scale. nobody can do what Avalanche can.
Again, go to every other thread of any l1, or even just use another l1... its the fucking same.

>Subnets compete with all these other garbage L1s you mentioned and will absolutely crush them. deploying a new customized blockchain takes less than a minute on Avalanche.
Again... im seeing a pattern here but just to humor you... no, im not shilling icp but go in their threads they mention the same exact fcking thing. Yes they can be jeets but on a board where you use your brain if an avax jeet says their subnets will scale infinitely and i go into an icp thread and an icp jeet says their subnets can scale infinitely, so you guys are competing. Competition is for losers. monoploies where no one can say they do the same thing as you is for winners

>Time to Finality is extremely important in anything Finance, the faster the better. Avalanche clearly wins here thanks to its Consensus protocol.
Not really. An anology, the human eye detect flickers at 60 flickers a second. Theres a reason the most successful monitor company isn't just the one that makes the fastest flicker. Point is, a lot of other chains have subsecond finality. 5ms on jeet chain vs 1ms on avax, doesnt fucking matter

>Avalanche dominates with the Subnets, every Bank, every Institution will run a Subnet.

ICP says the same thing. Again I dont' care for icp point is im just trying to make an analogy that youre just another jeet similar to ICP baggies. I cant stand any l1 chain shillers ICP, FTM, AVAX, Matic (l2 )... cause they all repeat the same bullshit

>>56157838
>you're just spouting buzzwords kek
just because you dont understand whats going on doesnt mean its empty buzzwords.
thing is anyone can launch a customized Subnet in under a minute without writing a line of code and with optional cryptocurrency exposure.
Launching a Blockchain is as easy as deploying a new server on AWS.

>>56157866
already replied in the other thread. >>56157881
tl;dr you are clueless brainlet that has done zero research.

>>56156895
time stamp?

>>56156766
Kek

>i didn't say anything about a timeline hahahahahahahahaha oh and btw UBI will happen
Also they let sergey introduce the new ideas about tokenization and basically said hurry the fuck with your banking systems or get left behind.

>>56157103
network effect from BUILD alone btfos ur 2nd paragraph

>>56156839
>pajeet yield farmers
uh oh, sounds like SOMEBODY did NOT secure a CHAINLINK STAKING spot and is now absolutely BUTTBLASTED that he's not earning dosh by ALERTING of incorrect prices
>Verification not required

>>56157368
>ETH price went high because ETH makes a good return!
>gets shown the return is shit
>OK BUT ETH PRICE WENT REAALLY HIGH! LOL BTFO

so you're telling me ETH went really high despite bad returns, meaning LINK easily may as well
sasuga fuddie

>>56157817
centralized garbage, and no it's not even that fast, kaspa is decentralized and way faster
all the subnet shit is irrelevant btw, no one cares and it's pretty much replicated by L1s like Cosmos, Polkadot... again, no one actually cares because it doesn't scale anything, still slow as fuck compared to kaspa

>>56159032
>BUILD

kek, yeah people are just lining up for some of these tokens anon, especially the much heralded TRUFLATION token

You'll be lucky to get $100 for that bag of slop

>>56159107
>Buttblasted that I did not get $2000 on my $50000 principal instead of doubling my money in BTC

It hurts! How could I sacrifice 4.5% for a 2x! And LINK isn't even worth as much as it was when stakers deposited it!

>>56156839
>In 6 years, the best claim is "backing DeFi"
lmao you say that as if Defi doesn't matter.
Defi is the reason ETH and all those ICO shitcoins blew up, bringing the entire market along with it.

Basically it's "Chainlink bad because crypto bad" all over again.

>>56156895
timestamp? I think a different video had an edit too

>>56157069
>chainlink bad because banks bad

The cope flows richly

>>56156758
>SpamShit thread by twitter influencer scammers
herbs as usual

Either the OP is retarded or they changed it. It's not private, I can watch it without issues.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_hwOLVe41o

>>56159920
DeFi DOESN'T matter. All it took was a collective of grifting faggots to bring DeFi to its knees, and all the liquidity left with it

LINK is the backbone of DeFi and it's $6. Not important

>>56160018
Defi is what the 2017 bull cycle was all about; it's the prime manifestation of crypto's current capabilities: smart contracts.

>>56159153
>kaspa is decentralized and way faster
no it's not

when the post coming out today. That pussy Zach blocked me

>>56160160
There is no post, OP is a faggot. The Youtube video is public. Sergey says he's in talks with central banks all over the world, they are gonna try retail CBDCs and UBI, but sounds like he thinks it won't work. Watch the video, good stuff starting around 30 minutes.

>>56157264
so when are your stinky linkies migrating to solana?

>>56160463
The testing they did was with Avalanche. No one is touching Solana after that dirty kike SBF's involvement.

>>56160545
so when are your stinky linkies migrating to avalanche?

>>56156839
>For 6 years
Yeah at this point its like who cares. Sergey talks big but doesnt really deliver much. Im not waiting another 6 years to finally get some gains.

>>56159032
>network effect from BUILD alone btfos ur 2nd paragraph
How many coins have you gotten so far? And link isnt the first to try this airdrop thing for holders. it hasnt worked for other coins either. airdropping hundreds of valueless tokens doesnt produce significant value.
>>56157103
>buying treasuries or TIPS. Massive opportunity cost as BTC is up almost double this year
kill shot here. Imagine being beaten at return by not only dino coin but treasuries.

>>56160735
>Sergey talks big but doesnt really deliver much
He completely took over crypto/defi.
If you had shown proof of this alone happening back in late 2017, Link would've instantly boosted to rank 3.

>>56156883
I can save her bros

>56160754
None of the BUILD projects have ICOd yet. Over 50 projects participating so far. Silly to think a few projects won’t be gems. I bet most will either hold them for a while or convert to link right away
>muh opportunity cost
Post trade history

>>56159032
oh yeah? what tokens have you received?

>>56160880
>its silly to think a few projects wont be gems

It's silly too assume you are ever going to see those BUILD tokens, which 100% is a securities violation if you are an american.

You are so silly you don't even realize how silly you are

>NOOO YOU CANT JUST RECEIVE AIRDROPS THATD BE BREAKING A BIG BAD US SECURITIES LAW

>>56160951
>you will never see staking
you are here
>you will never see build rewards

>>56159965
>hey guys, the central claim of the thread is not true
>ignored

>>56160880
Guarantee 75% of these never actually see the light of day.

>>56160840
>completely took over
>Worth less as a project than multiple animal memes

No one takes this man seriously. One for his weight, two for how poor his project is. If it weren't for his completely scammy "keep 500 million tokens to dump for cash" he'd be begging VC's for down rounds. There is no argument to this

>>56160840
>Link would've instantly boosted to rank 3.
It was rank 5 so it did its job on hype. And now look at it.

>>56161012
>>completely took over
Yes.

>>Worth less as a project than multiple animal memes
You do know why, right?

>>56161029
>it did its job on hype
You say that like it's a bad thing.
"Hype" is the fundamental reason Satoshi gave for Bitcoin price action.

>>56161029
Explain how ada, xrp, doge, … stay high in the rankings, if not for hype.
Because it certainly isn’t because of fundamentals.

>>56159107
actual staker here, alerting isn't even a thing yet so stfu

>>56160995
they obviously took it down and removed the segment in question, einstein

>>56159920
>Defi is the reason ETH and all those ICO shitcoins blew up
weird, I don';t remember "Defi" being a thing back in 2016 at all
Defi is more of a 2019-20ish buzzword, shill

>>56161140
alerting is definitely a thing, larper

>filter obvious fuddie
>refresh page
>read the 15 posts that are left and then close the tab

>>56161161
Defi is the application of smart contracts, which is what 2017 was all about.

>>56161169
I'm not a node so not for me, negroid
>>56161188
>google DeFi before:2018
>0 results

>>56161228
>>google DeFi before:2018
>>0 results
If you were semi-early to Chainlink, the only place where you could even buy Link was Etherdelta.
Which is a DEX.
Which is Defi.
In 2017.

oopsie, newfag.

>>56161250
nobody even called a DEX "DeFi" you tard

>>56156857

2.5 btc, 30 ETH, 11k link here

>>56161250
he's right that DeFi wasn't a meme until 2019-2020. Nobody called a dex "DeFi" in 2017.

>>56161053
I dont mean it as a bad thing. Im saying there is no hype now.
>>56161134
Right...there is no hype for link. its a dead project. No one cares about vechain or iota either anymore.

>>56161256
>>56161349
According to the 2014 Ethereum whitepaper, the primary application of Ethereum is "financial applications". See pic.
Ethereum's primary reason for even existing was always decentralized finance. That's what the 2017 hypefest was all about.

>>56161351
>its a dead project
Lol Chainlink is what’s keeping the future of crypto alive.

>>56160979
you haven't seen staking shit head. v0.1 isn't staking.

>>56161380
how can you be that dense and autistic

>>56161644
You tried to play semantics and it blew up in your face.
Why the fuck you thought ETH was about anything but finance is beyond me, your stupidity must be truly something to behold in person.

>>56161825
anon, you're literally playing semantics as you desperately try to save face
stop talking to me

>>56161825
>Why the fuck you thought ETH was about anything but finance is beyond me

It was originally supposed to be what Internet computer protocol was. Then turned into the shitcoin highway.

They could reduce the amount of crypto scams by 95% just by switching eth off.

>>56161551
>it's not real staking!!!
funny how I'm earning so much link then

>>56161825
I am not that anon but I also think that you’re a fucking idiot. It is well known and accepted that “defi”, as a phenomenon, started in early 2020 with the invention of liquidity pools and AMMs.

>another partnership announcement
>price -2.66%
kek linkers love pain

>>56161956
>>56162223
I said Defi is the reason ETH blew up, and the 2014 whitepaper for ETH quite literally says it's all about "decentralized applications doing finance".
Which is the very definition of Defi.

Just because a snazzy name was made up at some later point in time doesn't change the whole basic concept.
You're coping very badly.

>>56162317
self-aware post

>>56162287
at the end of the day you're just arguing over semantics, which is gay

>>56157275
why the double standard? eth has a much higher in market cap than link, it's only natural that anons talk about it

>>56163472
yeah cuz it's overvalued

>>56163338
I’m talking about the fundamental use case of ETH as laid out in the original whitepaper, you’re talking about the name that was invented for it at some point.
You’re the one arguing semantics.

Sergey will betray.

>>56160604
Migrating to other oracles like SupraOracles and DAI would be better.

>>56157368
Link was $0.20 at some point and it could easily reach $400 that’d be a 2000x, at current prices link could 65x.

>>56157082
You’re a drooling retard. Let me guess, Tesla is an electric car company? Lmao

>>56161140
>alerting isn't even a thing yet
kek faggot tell me how I know you are still seething about not getting into staking v0.1

Just found out about this.
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/09/19/citigroup-unveils-token-services-for-institutional-clients/

>>56167805
>https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/09/19/citigroup-unveils-token-services-for-institutional-clients/
bump

>>56167805
>>56168732
dead chat, dead coin