/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56056762
>both had good news
Ripple: only partly a security (the part that applies to institutions lol)
Chainlink: deep concrete integration with Swift

Yes, totally the same.

>>56056762
Chainlink my guy, it's not arbitrary that this board has a massive boner for LINK. Take the LINKpill and just hold. Watch the replies and their seethe to my post here too. That should give you additional information about how insecure noLINKERs are.

>>56056774
>>56056762
That said, be aware the Bitcoin always dumps whenever there's a big announcement regarding Link.
It's been going on for years, and doesn't show any signs of stopping.

>>56056762
>>56056774

XRP: Only real cryptocurrency with use case and full legal clarity

Chainlink: Scam run by a fat Russian that is not needed

>>56056832
>Only real cryptocurrency
lol it literally doesn't do anything other basic bitch L1s can't.

>>56056762
XRP

>>56056762
LINK will be $1000, sergey is just selling his entire bag because he wants to share the wealth

>>56056762
The one with the legal clarity

>>56056762
Oh look another LINK shill thread.
This board is garbage

>>56056762
>retarded chud link thinks link is on the level of xrp

>>56056797
schizo with delusions of grandeur OH WE ARE THE CHOISEN ONES, OH THE MARKET IS DUMPING CAUSE OF US! OH WE ARE GETTINNG SUPRRESSED CAUSE WE ARE SO IMPORTANT!
its fucking pure entertainment to read these nigger chudlets

>>56056774
>XRP: the token is NOT a security, certain sales pre 2018 may have been
>getting sidechains, launching CBDCs including a US CBDC mandated by the federal reserve and a EU CBDC mandated by the ECB
>getting AMM built on top of its DEX pathfinding execution engine
>constantly name dropped by world bank, BIS (just tested XRP offline transactions), IMF, and now BRICS (as was found in breadcrumbs last year)
>LINK: proof of stake security
>muh CCIP is only EVM compatible (ethereum is a security)
>months after XRP holders warned everyone about BRICS, there is not 32 countries involved that want fuck all to do with SWIFT

>>56056762
Do some research yourself beyond biz

>>56056762
Should I buy PlayStation or PC?

>>56057997
pc

I want to kill myself

>>56058115
dont

>>56058115
do

Chainlink sirs do the needful token very needed and much profitable riches guaranteed for this project. Just aped lfg sirs do not fade.

>>56058115
We only have a short time here anyway, find a way to keep going for now. I think it's a sign of spiritual health not wanting to be in this broken world but go out in God's way, he loves you anon. Jesus died for you personally that you will live beyond this horrible place but you need to focus on that and not think about taking your life. Prayers are with you anon.

>>56056774
too bad the price doesn't change because sirgay dumps on you kek

>>56058115
why, life goes pretty fast on its own already

>>56056774
>concrete integration
we're only at concrete integration v0.1, which is blog posts about successful tests

>>56056762
>Should I buy chainlink or xrp?
Both. Buy 1000 LINK and 10000 XRP

The absolute unrivaled STANDARD

>>56056762
>XRP
>court win
Who wants to tell him?

>>56059011
May be this desu

>>56059410
Uhhh linkie? You should probably stop reading bitnigger.cum articles

>>56059410
Xrp still has potential for the next bull season anon. I'd also accumulate other assets like Gods, Ride, and Sand for gains in the next cycle as they have been building during the bears.

Link is the superior schizo coin

>>56057325
>>LINK: proof of stake security
nope. the alerting feature and rewards put link staking in another category

For the sake of our industry, buy xrp.
Support the builders and bet on fundamentals.
Might I suggest other blue chips as well like cardano, solana, and tellor?

>>56056762
XRP and it isn't even close. See:
https://pastebin.com/qkwrjAvg

Schizo formatted and first bit is a bit in the weeds institution speaking but if you read it and don't buy at least a small bag to hold through the uber crash you are ngmi..

>>56061731
>ICO
>Buying and holding a STAKE in a security with an expectation of profits from dividends
Linkies don’t even know the rules, and they cheered for the SEC kek. I’m not making it up either, gensler said it himself. Honestly don’t want him out of crypto, I know mETH niggers and other proof of shit holders are waiting for gensler to leave so they can decide when the public will be able to sell their expected profits.

Why do these threads exist? You can buy 50/50. Or if you like 60/40 depending where you sway. What about 65/35? Or even 90/10?
Did you know Chainlink for example can be divided to 18 digits!

>>56061921
Yeah, it’s an EVM shitcoin. Can’t go outside of 18 decimal points.

>>56058241
>the price doesn't change because sirgay dumps on you
Damn, I had no idea sirgay was this much of a Bitcoin whale

>>56061877
Chainlink is a utility token.

>>56062345
XRP is a utility token and it got sued. LBRY was also a utility token and it lost against the SEC for having an ICO.
Algorand, Cardano, Tron are utility tokens and they got labeled as securities.

Warning for all newfags, don't EVER do LINK.

Sergey dumps millions of link a year. He knows the product better than you and he is dumping it.

Or you could listen to anonymous 4chan users using a VPN who totally aren't trying to dump their bags they bought for $50.

There's a reason why LINK FUD exists and it isn't because of "bears", bears are a meme. It's just clear that it's a retarded shitcoin and you all got scammed. Pic related

>>56062388
Thinly veiled low effort self-fud linkcel post

>>56062410
you must be new here.

Sergey knows the product better then you do. And the chart never lies. In this case, I'd go for XRP but in all honesty I wouldn't do either. Banks are just going to do a CBDC and alts will die.

GM based kings

>>56056762
LINK is the one you want

>>56056762
they are both worthless globohomo shitcoins

>>56056762
I would rather go for XRP instead. It is not a security and it has the backing of the law. Yeah, but personally I would prefer to go for altcoins with smaller MCAPs like NXRA and RDNR that have equal potentials of growing as big as XRP and chainlink.

>>56061833
You’re handsome

>>56062907
What do you recommend then?

>>56056762

XRP because its going 1000 dollars by 2030. Worth the wait anon.

>>56056762

>>56056774
But swift is being replaced by XRP.
Kek
Linkies...baka

>>56057024
This. Even rippletards don't think their dumps are related to anything but their own scam.

>>56056762
Buy MINA, thank me later

>>56064502
What in the world is this and why do you think it is any better than XRP or LINK? Bring up something like LDO and CYMI then I can relate.

>>56062433
Not all alts will die. There will be a purge and if your shitcoin happens to support hundreds of zero value shitcoins then it’s probably not gonna do very well.

Bro you are comparing both based on price action for a major event. Otherwise neither has anything in common. Anyways, neither is a good choice overall either. Look into other options. Kava (good staking rewards via Kinetix, they delivered on all their promises so far so I trust them) and Ton are my winning calls.

>>56065441
They won't for sure. As long as they are useful they will live on. Regulations will also back them up. XRP will make it. SpoolFi will as they are both making provisions for compliance.

>>56056774
the crypto itself was ruled not a security
just the sales to certain institutions could have been security sales but the crypto even then wasn't a security
it's kinda weird but "security sales" is different than ruling the crypto itself a security, which xrp itself was ruled not a security

>>56064502
Kek I've got 8k MINA just accumulating via staking since it's the highest APY stake coin. So far safe to say it hasn't been a good investment but they're announcing a major update tomorrow so that might be interesting.

I remember when the ICO was on coinlist and I almost bought it for $3 but I couldn't get in the first 10,000 at the time. Good riddance for that.

>>56065567
It's been overruled retarded baggie, because it was a retarded ruling, it can't unbecome a security when it's offered to individuals. The investment (THING) offered remains he same no matter who it's offered to.

>>56062235
SN=SN
Verification not required.

>>56067920
MacAfee knew the NSA agent inventor of DLT was satoshi, keep coping faggots.

>>56064309
Oracles are based.
>> SupraOracles
>> DIA

>>56068534
He also claimed he had 100 million terabytes of incrimating evidence against politicians and that he would cut off his nuts and eat them on livestream if BTC didn't get to 100k during the 2017 bullrun
In the end he got nigger aids and died, SAD!
RIP -- thoughie.

send a very modest gift, nine blessings to you.

r3Gn7NfAL98JMBtAT1Yzsjw53g3G5YAsoJ

>>56070088
Kys