/biz/ - Business & Finance

By 2023, Chainlink gets its act together and starts to deliver "CCIP" - a lot of the VCs just ignored it before as they never needed to pay attention to Oracles and Chainlink much, and when they did they just made half baked solutions to fill the hole like Pyth.
CCIP is obviously bullet proof. It becomes a very large elephant in the room among them. they know they cant really do anything about it other than slander at this point. a competitor just cant be made with their development and investment process - look how Synthetix self owned.

Then SWIFT dropped and the VC brigade start to really seethe. they know they simply cannot really ever make or do anything like that. the closest they can come to a SWIFT integration with something like CCIP is having one of their shell or parent companies write some blog posts about something they created. This is a pretty scary prospect for them - CCIP being integrated via SWIFT. it makes their "layer Zero" solutions just not really worth looking at by anyone - and they cannot possibly create a competitor.

So now that this elephant in the room exploded out of nowhere they only have one thing left to really do - slander and whine about it, try exclude it from crypto by their own definitions any way they can. its pretty futile in reality.

its actually kind of beautiful how Chainlink is single handedly putting the breaks and a end to this faggy VC era of crypto lol. All the silicon valley jeets and retards are getting shown up for what they are now.
Its been fucking painful holding this, and it highlighted a lot the sergey fucked up, but in the end, we have finally arrived. this point onward is what 2020 should have been, delayed by all the bullshit clownmarket

>>56054502
i think chainlink is a cool project

I think Chainlink is a based and redpilled project and yes I have taken my redpills.

>>56054508
While the VCs seethe they are making crypto look even worse in the eyes of outsiders - thus making it even worse for them and everyone in crypto. Hopefully the next wave of crypto apps will be as good as web2 so everyone will just forget the old clownmarket

>>56054546
>hopefully people will just forget!
you'd like that wouldn't you lil kike?

This all sounds well and good, just how relevant is this going to all be, I wonder? True events leading to the utilization of superior technology? Will this lead to appreciation of token price? How soon?

>>56054502
Scam token

>>56054546
VCs in crypto are stuck now and already have to go down the path of cannibalizing themselves. they are competing with each other for a smaller and smaller pool of their own ecosystems where they have to pay devs to build on their networks, create shell projects to provide infrastructure and services like Oracles to themselves(but not promote it as such), other layers in the same way, dapps which nobody uses, and a basically dead market where there just arent any retards left to bid up the projects any more.
combine this with the actually competent real free independent devs going straight for Chainlink or other legitimate services and layer 1 platforms,.

it is basically a splintered ecosystem where you now have the VC loop of crypto, and the legitimate real crypto(with scams and legit products - 2017-2020 kind of environment again).
The lines were really blurred for a few years and definitely even many devs got tangled in it, now its basically easier than ever to see these distinct different versions of crypto imo and Chainlink is the foundation. hey cant really do much about it but their same old tactics, and some desperate slander and blog articles.

>>56054566
two more weeks until the chainlink marketing campaign is THE gaslighting campaign of the century. Forget 42, Q, Trump, Freemasons, Rothschilds, Chainlink is the gaslighting campaign.

Inb4 what is gaslighting

>>56054577
Chainlink's marketing campaign? Or other parties anti-chainlink marketing campaigns?

>>56054580
Boy thats a tough one bro. I guess this is what happens when you antagonize autists with paper promises written on a Canadian Goose Shooting Facebook Group for years

>>56054595
I'm assuming the later, btw. Though a small part of me wonderings what if...

Will token go up? I don't want to wage

$800 daily revenues
Chart

>>56054606
Become a Chainlink avocado bro. You can do it, I believe in you

>>56054621
I dunno anymore

>>56054624
Fine, chop off your penis and join the ETH Foundation, you can do it bro I believe in you

>>56054631
Can the token just appreciate in price and enable me to aquire property and start a family?

>>56054569
/thread

I like chainlink

VC's are definitely throwing tantrums like children right now, but Sergey is moving too slowly with CCIP's "test partners" going on mainnet. He always moves too slowly and then complains that no one is using his products. Well, where are the products? Where are the partners? All I see are shit tier DeFi ponzi schemes and literal who's using this, where are the folks with actual money?

>>56057249
They are using the chain right now… all of crypto is a scam until banks get in which they are

>Check price
>6$

>>56057249
I'd rather he moves "too slowly" and continues Chainlink's clean record of breaches and exploits.

>>56054502
Well yeah… chainlink the company won. The only losers were the people holding the link token lmao

>>56057329
can u fags some up with some better FUD than the obviously wrong "token not needed" please

>$6
>down 90%
Cope baggie you lost

>>56054508
It will be nice to see the power of these VCs fade while Chainlink succeeds.
What's the next step with Swift?

Are we getting the adoption at the end of this year?

>>56057739
>end of this year?
they will release adoption v0.1 soon, which is chainlink employees manually sending each other transaction. this phase will last a year

>>56054502
When you got chain in the brain, you will feel pain

The whole point of crypto is move leave the banks, not help them. LINK has failed for this reason.

>>56054502
anyone who watched the whole fud campaign and never sold deserve to make it.

>>56054680
Yes, but not when you want so... go get the girl first, wage your way up into a nice savings and start small with an affordable rental or mortgage, then build family, they will eat up your time, youll forget link for a while then one day while pumping gas you see Sergey on the shell tv as they do a mini piece about links crazy run to 10k and you will stop the pump, mouth agape, and head home to sell one (1) suicide stack for 10 million pretax. You already made it with a happy home and family, you glorious bastard, but now youve double made it.

>>56057739
Sergeys most recent speech says 3 to 5 years for regulatory clarity allowing private and public chains to connect

>>56057977
I just didn’t sell cuz I got nothing else going on.

>>56058200
same
if the world was full of great shit i would have probably sold by now and blown it all

>>56054502
>>56054508
>copium rant #272827721

>>56058200
>>56058632
Same. I already have everything I need. I'm here to the bitter end, no one is getting my sui stack.

What's even more hilarious than VCs screeching into the void is BIS suddenly whipping up the most low effort 5 minute fiverr tier """report""" on how "CHAINLINK BAD" with the most inane points which even fudders themselves are ashamed of lmao

>>56059045
yeah what struck me about the BIS report was how dumb and pajeet tier it was lol

>>56057321
This.

I swear if investors were in charge, they'd collapse Chainlink. Zero fucking foresight with complaints of Chainlink "taking so long"

bumping a good thread

>>56057973
>The whole point of crypto is move leave the banks, not help them. LINK has failed for this reason.

You clearly weren't paying attention to what Chainlink is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvJxjth9vtU

Ok guys, how many of swifts 44.8 million daily messages do we think will be done on a chain using link? How many of dtccs 44t assets under custody and 1.8t under management will be tokenized and moved across chains? Exactly how much can i expect to napkin math for my 1/1000th of a percent of link network ownership to capture a portion of associated fees? What will a suicide stack conservatively and liberally net me for a year of staking at both entry level and full adoption levels?

>>56059641
Why would they let us buy… I still don’t understand

chainlink good, simple really

>>56054680
I've started a family. We're poor but happy, and my wife stays home and is a great mother. Unironically. Don't wait, you'll regret it, it's probably the only meaningful thing you'll ever do.

>>56059045
The release a whole report just to say:
>SHUT IT DOWN

What I don't understand about the "VCs hate it" narrative is...if they know it's over, why don't they just buy Link? LOL. like they have millions sitting around from dumping on retail, why don't they just pick up some link for $6.25 and not have to worry about it?

>>56059663
Nobody knows. But in time, 500 link will be enough to buy a house and live comfortably with minimal extra income. For me, I'm selling 10k when we hit 3 figs so I can be free from waging and get on with my life.

>>56059776
Because of pride. They’d rather try and scam more

>>56059782
What a sad way to live life.

>>56059776
Because it’s still new technology, a speculative asset. They have no functioning product. I legit told a finance bro to buy LINK in 2017 and his response was ”show me their working product.”

>>56059979
if it's so new and speculative it shouldn't scare them so much

>>56059670
They had no choice else it wouldn’t be a decentralized network. The Ethereum community would never accept a centralized bank controlled network.

>>56059776
/thread

>>56060189
It doesnt. Youve created that narrative in your head, along with your fellow culties

>>56059776
VCs want power and control first and foremost. They already have a shitload of money and of course they want even more money, but power and control is their number one priority.

And they have zero power or control over Chainlink

>>56057973
LINK has a greater destiny, to eat the banks

>>56054566
sergey himself expects there to be a great reset. watch his interviews from 2019.

the good news is that link will be ready whenever a great reset comes.

>>56059636
They dont have a track record because they dont produce anything of value
Muh price feeds muh swift. Biz cucks are paying for everything right now and sergey is pushing back mainnet ccip again per snx team

>>56061299
They are going to drag this out fir many years. Link proce is going to be worthless for a long time all while
The fat fuck travels to five star hotels on ur dime

>>56060889
Nice headcannon

>>56059776
Because the VC model is to create or get seed round investment and sell it for at least 100x but usually way more.
They also want a lot of control as shareholders and decision making power.

With LINK they did not get in on seed round, and they will have no decision making and control if they buy it. It just doesn’t fit their model even if they can make money buying it. They’d much rather try make some short sighted scam and dump the bags on retail for 100x

>>56054508
Any tradfi insitution assessing their options FAIRLY will see that Chainlink is the only choice and it's not even hard.
However, my fear is "what if tradfi gets infiltrated by VCs?". I don't mean that the VCs will literally take over the tradfi companies - they don't have enough money or power for that - however, what if they managed to bribe the right person at a company? All it takes is for one person at a company to negatively compare Chainlink to other oracle "solutions" (I say it sarcastically because other oracles are more like "problems" instead of "solutions"), much in the same way that the Pyth fags and crypto media and even BIS have been doing recently, and then he presents his "findings" to his bosses and his bosses give him the go ahead to use the other solutions instead.
How hard is that for VCs to achieve? Do these tradfi companies have adequate checks and balances to make sure that a rogue agent in their company can't do such a thing?

>>56058126
That's 3 to 5 years for tradi and defi to begin intersecting for real and sharing value amongst eachother.
However, tradfi is getting on-chain RIGHT NOW. It's still in the onboarding phase but they'll be on-chain sooner than 3 years.

>>56061375
i dont care, i invested into this shit at .23 cents

i havent been buying for literally years.

it was always 10k to make it.

>>56061409
based thread.

>>56059663
>how many of swifts 44.8 million daily messages do we think will be done on a chain using link?
In time, literally 100%.
Think about it. All the banks WILL be onchain. They'll each have their own chains.
What is SWIFT used for? Literally for inter-bank (ie. CROSS-CHAIN) communication. So all of SWIFT's 44.8 million messages are inter-bank aka cross-chain. Do you think they will use CCIP for maybe 30% of their cross-chain messages, and then another oracle for another 30%, and yet another oracle for the remaining 40%?
NO!
100% Chainlink, all 44.8 million messages, every day, paying LINK fees each time.

>>56059979
>his response was ”show me their working product.”
Well he's not in the wrong to have such a mindset; it's way too risky to invest when you've just read about a company's vision but haven't seen their product. However, if he's not buying now then yes he's retarded.
>>56061409
thanks for elucidating this.

>>56054502
Crazy how Framework is the largest non team token holder and has been since pre ico. VeNtUrE iS sEeThInG. No. They’re not. Framework. Is shoving chainlink down their portfolios throat. The other venture fags are shoving layer zero up their portfolios ass.

>>56054502
2018: $6
2023: $6

Just look into their eyes, that's all you have to do to decipher whether the long term intentions of one bend toward malice, or benevolence. Are these the eyes of someone who looks like trustworthy individual who has the entire worlds populists best interest at heart?

>>56061754
How can you not trust these guys?

>>56061466
Ch-checked

Why is it always jeets.
Jeets trying to do low effort shitcoin scams, and now jeets tying to do VC pump and dumb scams

>>56059776
if they cared, they already did, you are correct. sergey is burning through cash, he won't say no to them. tribalism needs bogeymen however, a (imagined) common enemy shifts focus away from the more pressing internal problems like glacial dev speed and missing focus (blockchain gaming anyone?). it's the same as bulgarians, whales dumping btc, random twitter bozos that exploit the tribe for views and attention etc.

>>56057739
If you watched chainlink youtube you will see Sergey said 3-5 more years because of regulation. I’m lazy to grab the link but at least you have brain

>>56059776
they probably do buy some but its very lucrative to scam retail and they don't want the party to end

>>56062504
feels like the party has been over for awhile now.

>>56059641
it annoys me the guy who reuploaded this gave it the wrong title

>>56057973
Crypto has had 15 years to pull its fucking finger out and produce something of value. It failed. Everything half decent since 2017 was either made by Chainlink, or enabled by Chainlink. Fuck crypto libertarian cypher punk trannies. BTC is dead. All L1s are irrelevant. It's OVER.

>>56057261
good for him, it will look good in his annual report. he did put out communications that makes the company look like they care about new technology with minimal investment, the raise is deserved

>>56061431
>>56058126
>>56062474
>5 more years for $10 muhreens!

>>56059776
Vcs dump on retail. Retail doesn't get to dump on vcs.

>>56063347
Do you plan on dying im 5 years? Are you overleveraged and about to lose your home to the bank? Unemployed and living a boring neet life? Spend 5 years lifting and youll be a rich chad.

>>56054502
2020 price was so beautiful
why did it have to fall so hard :(

Sers why won't vc's do the needful and pump link?

>>56059663
Nobody knows exactly. I have no idea why ppl keep asking the same questions over and over again.

>>56057973
What else should we focus on now that LINK has failed.

How do you swap LINK for a shitcoin, only a matter of time before the shitcoin dumps into oblivion. It would have been logical if he had decided to pick lowcaps like CYMI and TRIAS but he chose to go for dogbat

>>56062504
Bitcoin dominance is currently experiencing a breakout and has reached its highest point in the past two years. By the way, now is an opportune moment to explore potential airdrops. I highly recommend considering the SUPR airdrop, as the token holds genuine value.

>>56059663
I think Sergey used Linux as an example, where it consistently maintains around 60-80% of the market share. I think Chainlink being on the higher end of that estimate sounds about right.

>>56066212
linux is also fucking worthless it's literally free hahahaha

>>56065930
SUPRA, oracle is based.

>>56066220
yeah, you can even donate to the linux foundation. chainlink has a convoluted donation process where you have to buy a token, but the result is the same

Based bagholders coping. If you gry cucked, you win!
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55

>>56066413
Anon bot , today is 09/09

>>56061476
Framework was a small firm prior to LINK. They banked bigly on the success of Chainlink early on, one of only a few portcos, and grew a ton. You wouldn't even know their name. There really aren't any other publicly supportive VCs besides them, other literal who's, and some angels with interesting backgrounds. LINK's token allocation for the ICO was also way more simplistic, less VC scammery, and the ICO was at a time that every ICO under the sun was getting $. Not a lot of attention on Chainlink at the time at all, hence the literal who investors.

t. $0.14 average

>>56066682
Framework to the other VCs is the equivalent of me, a holder with an average of $0.14, laughing at you fuddies having to buy llink tokens at AT LEAST $5. In actuality, you will likely buy much higher. Sucks to be late!

>>56054502
VCs won
nastyslob lost and is obese
cope nigger

>>56066943
Sounds like you're coping about a coin that you hate on a Friday night. Have fun fudding the rest of your weekend.

>>56067001
>coper coping on a friday night
kek poorfag loser kys

>>56066425
Im not a bot, and thats cool ill wait u until updatoor anon updates it. Think of it as a monthly summary. Just doing my part to help linkers know their spot in the market :)

>>56068315
Maybe you could automatically update it using a chainlink oracle

>>56062507
Maybe for Chainlink but Oracles are still cool moron. Atleast projects are still using SupraOracles to provide fast feeds for their smart contracts.

chainlink partners with global financial system
price: -8.3%

HAHAHAHBAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHA this is your future

>>56072059
Still not selling and am laffin @ u
50k link staked n earnin link n build
Cope kek losa

>>56059776
They've literally never bought a token on the open market in their lives, let alone one that has already done multiples since launch.
I don't think you understand quiet how lucrative the VC gravy train has been. All they ever do is buy at seed, and dump for a 100x the moment the token launches to the public.
The idea of buying at the same time and price as the plebs is unconscionable. Especially when their technical understanding is so poor that they actually can't really tell the difference between Chainlink and other projects anyway. The SWIFT stuff gets their attention but for them that's just "a good partnership", and Polygon has lots of those, right? What's the big deal?

>>56072861
I think VC's know the tech and are 100x more knowledgeable than the people here. VCs have an average IQ of around 140 and know blockchain tech inside out.

>>56072946
nice b8, here's your (you)

>>56072946
i shall feedeth thee thine (you), for thouest hast earned it

>>56072968
>>56073067
not bait, but if you were as smart as VC's, then why aren't you one of them? Why aren't you as rich as them?

sorry buddy but you're only getting 1 (you) from me. don't get greedy now

>>56073111
Checked and trips of truth don’t have to acknowledge nepotism

Serious question for the actual linkies with brains that are ITT. Why aren't you building?
You've got a headstart on all the retards. You've got a better vision of what crypto should be than all the scammers, why not actually take part?
Build Chainlinked dApps, join BUILD, be open to tokenisation that doesn't live on any single chain.
If there really is 5 years until DeFi/Tradfi integration then that's a fucking long time even if you currently have zero coding skills. In one year you could be a decent coder and in 2 you could have something built, that integrates all of your meta understanding of this space and how much of a shitshow 99% of it is. Be the 1%.
It's more clear than ever that crypto is desperately short on "good guys". I honestly think that the quiet /biz/ autist is as close to a retail good guy as it gets. So why not actually take part?

>>56073395
You’re severely overrating the iq and motivation amongst those here.

>>56073395
i said im gonna make it by just holding and being lazy and by god i'm gonna do it

>>56073395
I've been doing some security studying this morning actually on ethernauts. But yeah, I quit my job to try and enter the Web3 field. That was 2020 and I still haven't gotten a job yet. Gotta keep pushing.

>>56073395
None of the useful shit can be built until Tradfi mainstreams it and bootstraps digital identities. Crypto as it stands is a heap of garbage.

>tfw you're literally at the part of your course that is about parsing JSON

>>56061277
checked and true

>>56064572
Do you seriously think 2x for five fucking years is worth waiting? I know boomer stocks that have way better returns than that

>>56074653
I dont seriously think. 2x will take 5 years. I think even in the most painful worst case scenarios we will be back around 20 in 1-2 years tops. I think in the most retarded hyperbullish scenario where we get full bank onboarding adoption as well as speculation we will see 1k. But realistically i think we will fall somewhere btwn 50 and 250 at thw height of links run in the coming bull. I will take profits and buy back probably btwn 5-15 depending on where it falls in the range. Thats what my gut says. If were still at or under 10 without breaking it 2 years from now all that means to me is I'll be able to afford that make it stack over the next 5 years before we rip.

>>56054502
I'm that guy from a year ago that said you're all retarded for still holding this shit.
Nice to see it's still tumbling down.

>>56074856
>that guy
You mean one of about 50 who say it all day, every day? Wow congrats

>>56074917
Damn what does that tell you about the project hmmm

>>56073648
This is accurate, but I should probably get started learning how to build in the first place. Just don't know where to start as a someone with no coding experience. Most I've done is use java script for some personal projects. Any anon care to help?

>>56075254
I'll give you the advice anon gave me about 6 weeks ago:
1) Do the Codecademy full stack course ($60 a month, takes 4-8 months but I'm 5 weeks in and 37% through)
2) Do PatrickAlphaC's 36 hour YouTube intro to blockchain course
The idea that you should just wait for tradfi to solve everything and then start learning is retarded. There is still so much time to be early.

>>56054508
>putting the breaks and a end to this faggy VC era of crypto lol
Absolutely delusional. You have ZERO idea what you are saying

>>56073395
cant even build a simple vrf app thats actually useful yet. lets wait 5 years and see if anything of this is left

>>56075442
I know exactly what im saying jeet. your tactics wont work soon enough.
VCs are already pushed into a corner of trying to invent their own solutions to their own problems within their own ecosystems.

visualise it like this:
>VC makes a cashgrab piece of shit Layer 1 nobody wants to use
>VC wants to MEV or inflate the token to make gains
>VC pays devs to make dead apps on their Layer 1
>VC makes a new company to build a solution for their devs on their layer 1 to prevent anyone using alternatives out of their control
>These solutions are always shit and prone to breaking but they don't care, its about the illusion of development
>VC makes yet another shell company to build a dapp using their other shell companies solution on their layer 1
>VC shills the fuck out of these and attacks any alternative via blogs and whining and their connections
>VC tries to buy out legit projects just seeking the best path(like synthetix) and makes them into their own shell company and forces development on their VC ecosystem to try increase that illusion of development.
>VC sees the legit free sector of crypto increasingly using services like LINK which serve their needs properly
>VC has to talk shit on it, try hide it, hyper promote their closed ecosystems and shell company solutions.

NONE of them play the long term gain. it is all short term.

Anyone with a brain recognised the above shift around 2020 when they arrived. that era is going to die off or evolve into something else soon enough, and tht evolution by nature will have to use the legit products and services.

They'll almost certainly have to pivot towards dapp development itself

i have literally never seen a vc complain about chainlink
but chainlink marines being complete normalfags and stealing narratives 3 years later has been a thing
in 2020, curve, yearn, fantom and so on rode this "fuck VCs" thing
so now we're 3 years later and the link normalfags parrot that too
maybe by 2028 you guys will pretend oracles are necessary for autonomous worlds or some shit
lmao

>i have literally never seen a vc complain about chainlink
You should check out Oracle-Free Summer bro it sounds right up your alley.

>>56075703
They’ll continue with the oracle free or Chainlink alternative services until they’ve absolutely bled retail dry. Then they’ll put profits into link.
They want big bags but don’t wanna spend their own $$$ on it

>>56057621
Half the “token not needed” stuff is from bored token holders who know that retail isn’t going to play a part in Link’s future success, so why not scare off a few dimwits who never had to hold through years of frustrating price action.

Hell, even I do it sometimes. It’s like there’s some ethereal force out there that makes my fingers type it even though I hold 20k link.

>>56054502
>>56054508
>>56054572
Can I 2023ify out the garish statements and repost this on Reddit? /Biz/ makes good points but the optics here just don't exist, I'll PC up the wording and put it somewhere where the light does shine.

>>56074732
This is retarded it could go to $12 in a few days. It wont, but it could if BTC pumped because 12 is so close its just not a big step for it. $20 would follow the week after. Its getting it above $50 and on to $200 - $2000 which is going to take a few years

>>56076521
lmao good bait

>>56073395
why don't you?

>>56076521
Do what you want with it. Op here(id might change as im phone posting outside now).
Anyone still doing le reddit campaign is a newfag from post 2019 anyway. I was fudding the fuxk out of them back in the day but stopped after coonbase listing because the mission was already accomplished(which was originally to stop the getting affordable stacks and make it stacks sub $2). Only people who carried on were normies whos cost basis was higher.

For what its worth, i think it’s pointless to try what you are doing but i’d love you to prove me wrong. Most faggot retards in this market includong VC fags and plebbitors will be incapable of acting on anything you give them let alone digesting it unless their favourite e-celebs all start talking about it too

Also on another note:
Anyone who has been around for a long time will have experienced a weird feeling in late 2020-early 2021.
You suddenly may have felt “out of the loop” on crypto.
All these nee projects and people who were apparently all so well established with history yet you never heard of them.
If you were mostly all in on LINK and DeFi, you probably scratched your head wondering if you had lost touch.

No. You had not. This was all the VC bullshit and fake backstory. Hbar, Avax, FTX, Sol, and countless more bullshit. It was all fake bullshit.

Now the hens have come home to roost. Its looking like pre 2020 again slowly.
You see even among these VC scams, the ones with some semblance of brains made their chains EVM based and compatible. I should not even have to explain why unless you are a brainless well funded VC retard.

The biggest VC niggers went full retard and made their chains completely not EVM at all. Think JUMP and the entire Solana “ecosystem”.
Hell why do you think Cardano is a dead chain? Its not EVM.

These retard VCs have no forward thought and they don’t give a shit about longevity. They are literally making it up as they go. The fact is now not being EVM is the nail in the coffin for them.
if CCIP or Link services ever get developed for Solana, it will just fuck them over even more as any legit devs who would want such a thing will quickly find the limitations of their piece of shit network and not bother doing anything on it - and the VC will lose control of that ecosystem if their own shell company in-house oracles and other services aren’t used there.

There really isnt any direction left for the to go now but slander and reeeing till the last moment. Try re-define what crypto is, exclude LINK and such services etc. its not going to work anyway. They are on borrowed time now.

the fact that you absolute mongoloids keep parroting the mantra of "VCs first appeared on this space in 2020" makes me instantly disregard every bullshit copium fairy tale you keep spouting in this echo chamber
what the fuck do you think Ethereum Enterprise Alliance was you retards?
what about muh Salsa Salami? what the fuck was he if not the definition of a VC?
how about all these groups pouring money into Bitcoin from at LEAST 2016
>muh VCs missed out on LINK and they hate us bros:'(
you are so out of touch it's not even funny anymore

>>56077353
You’re being disingenuous.
They appeared in current form in 2020.
Before that they were playing by a complete different game. It was almost entirely chink VCs(vehicles to get money out of chinkland), or much smaller time VCs just investing in a boring seed round and not doing much after other than dumping if it ever hit any exchanges at all and never looking again.

The current form is completely different and you know it you fucking faggot.

>>56077463
you're either retarded or new
before FTX fucking up shit and PnD'ing random shitcoins there was Bitfinex
and before that BTC-E
and before that MtGox
and guess what, ALL of them have been supported/aided/bailed out by your fabled "VC"s
>"mush smaller time VCs"
stop pretending that you know anything, retard

NEWSFLASH TO ALL THE NAIVE, RETARDED, DELUDED SNOWFLAKES ITT
you owe every single bullrun this market has seen to
>Willy the Bot
>Alexander Vinnik
>JL van der Velde
>Arthur Hayes
>Changpeng Zhao
>Sam Bankman-Fried
bow down to your literal gods, you cattle

>>56077536
It wasn’t the same back then and you know it. They played completely different as I already described. Stop being a faggot and admit you are wrong, stupid, a faggot, think you understand better than you do, suck dick, are poor, and the type of person who cant do anything except receive spoonfeeds and use all your few little IQ points to try convincing yourself you are above a spoonfeed in your stupid way like right here.

I was the Anon who started the VC narrative starting years ago at this point. Just because it became relevant to bring it up in the form it changed to doesnt make hour brainlet take right - it makes you a retard for being unable to understand that the way VCs operated back then made no difference to LINK and its adoption at all and now it does - hence me bringing it up now days.
If some anons listen and also mention it good for them. If some spam about it like retards I don’t care either.

Fucking idiot lol

>>56077683
>noooo it's different cause I said so, stfu and trust me dude lol
>you're a wrong stupid faggot suck dick blah blah you're poor blah blah
>listen up kiddo, I was THE ONE who started the "VC NARRATIVE"™ on 4chinz, so you oughta show me respect here, boy
what a massive, deluded, midwit, know-it-all obnoxious little fag you are
touch grass you pseud

>>56075398
Yeah, kinda realizing I've been wasting time lately so thanks for the info. I'll get started today. We need more competent builders that aren't VC cucks so I should do my part.

the chart

>>56077733
>brown fingers typed this

btw you reek of defeated little loser. You are certainly the type of person who copes with their life by doing nothing but picking on others attempts to improve or do things you know you should be but aren't.
You know, back seat driver vibes.
Person who cant do fuck all on their own but is very fast to tell others why their ideas or solution or method is not good.

thank god you are just a quiet invisible little dweeb in the real world with no effect on things

>>56054502
>>56054508
Thanks advocate, make sure to screencap this one as well to post on twitter.

>>56054580
>anti-chainlink marketing
There is no anti-chainlink marketing, just /biz being too successful in fudding their own bags. No one outside of this board even thinks about LINK as anything other than that 4chan meme token.