/biz/ - Business & Finance

B
Done

>>56026941
F: the device allows a reduction in potential work for white men, meeting ESG standards and allowing better financial opportunities to become available for investors.

>1 fud for the cattle to leave herd
>need 10 shills to get it back
Must be link

>>56026953
>B
Presumably this relies on the ranchers knowing exactly which of their cows are the leaders, right?

>>56027017
Yes but all the other answers are wrong so this is the only one left

>>56027017
It's more complicated that looking to see which cow is in front?

>>56026953
>>56027017
Correct, but what about this one?

>>56027047
A

What is this?

>>56027047
F: they'll just come back and bundle it in the fine print for another gibs package that you're racist for not supporting

>>56027056
LSAT logical reasoning questions, and yeah it’s A

>>56027077
Give it about 5-10 years and that will be severely dumbed down to accommodate non-Whites.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/nyc-bias-suit-black-hispanic-teachers-and-ex-teachers-rich/
Black, Hispanic NYers who failed teacher’s test strike $1.8B in NYC settlement

Roughly 5,200 black and Hispanic ex-Big Apple teachers and once-aspiring educators are expected to collect more than $1.8 billion in judgments after the city stopped fighting a nearly three-decade federal discrimination lawsuit that found a certification exam was biased.

>test is bias
>too hard for nigs
>gibs 1.8 billion

Court rulings found the exam violated civil-rights laws, allowing far more white candidates to pass.
Court rulings found the exam violated civil-rights laws, allowing far more white candidates to pass.
Court rulings found the exam violated civil-rights laws, allowing far more white candidates to pass.

>If more White people pass than blacks it violates civil-rights laws
There you have it law man, you know what that is as do I. Its a legal precedent. Go use it, sue sue sue, billions every test is illegal because Whites have higher IQs so they do better. Everything will be in violation of civil rights laws, including that intentionally difficult LSAT.

>>56027077
who would've thought LOGICAL REASONING meant that you'd need background knowledge on cattle grazing behavior???????????

LOL who made these questions?

This isn't cope, make it makes sense. I'm not accepting the answer that cattle grazing behavior is common sense.

>>56027047

This: >>56028732 is more fitting for >>56027047 i guess

>can /biz/ reply to my slide thread?
The answer is kill yourself

>>56028732
I think it's because its the only answer that makes sense if you assume none of the statements in the question are lies/irrational

>>56027047
c

>>56028732
damn you are retarded lmao

>>56028750
Answer A doesn't make sense because the question states 'at its current price'. Answer B is apparently correct. C&D are obviously dumb. Answer E could also be correct, as the price of the product will be the same (satisfying the question's 'at its current price'), but specific buyers who buy in large quantities will get a discount on the order. So, to a layman, the device will stay 'at its current price', but to bulk buyers, after buying the devices at their 'current price' they will have a discount on the order. Why would this not be acceptable? We don't know how much of a discount they would get, but we also don't know how much Answer B would cost either... We don't know what budget is acceptable. So both answers offer potentially cheaper alternatives and therefore should be acceptable.

>>56028784

have at it bro, please explain it to me, a retard >>56028801

>>56028805
IT SAYS "WHICH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, IF TRUE, DOES THE MOST TO SUPPORT THE PREDICTION"
you cant even read the question, much less answer it, thats how retarded you are

>>56028808
reply to me again and I will kill myself

>>56028817

>>56028819
you replied to the above in 61 seconds. I don't believe you had time to read what I wrote, ingest the information and then reply. Surprised a bot replied to me after I wrote that

>>56028732
You didn’t understand the prompt, dumbass

>>56028801
E is just as invalid as A because they aren't true statements in this scenario, hence the 'if true' disclaimer in the question.

They are both provably untrue statements in this scenario because the inventor predicts ranchers will buy at the CURRENT price (which negates the 'bulk discount').

>>56028808
The question is just worded very awkwardly.

>>56028839
yea thats a more likely explanation than you just being a fucking retard

>>56028834
Read my comment again. Buyers will buy at 'current price' but will have a discount on the bulk purchase. You can say well if you take the new price after the discount and divide by the total devices purchased, you can see you've bought the individual devices for a different price. But, I'll put to you, if you do bulk orders in real life, you buy the items at their current price, but on the invoice of the order, you will see a discount (a flat amount) taken off the total price of the order. So TECHNICALLY, you are buying each individual device for its 'current price' but then after buying getting money reimbursed!

>>56028808
>>56028832
You missed the point by the way... If you both accept E as plausible, this question then requires further background information about fucking cattle grazing behavior to deduce between 'does the most to support the prediction', because if you know B is true, then you can go ahead and pick B, EVEN THOUGH, E is also correct.

>>56028882
hey bud, that wasn't me. You sure you can read things (unique IDs) correctly?

>>56028883
there should be an LSAT for voting rights

>>56028888
or maybe its possible there is more than one retard ITT?
im leaving now to go ridicule PM boomers

>>56028889
this is a bot lol (lmao even), notice reply times. always ~1 minute after post, no matter the length/complexity of post

>>56028883
Read the question retard
>Which one of the following, if true, does the most to support the PREDICTION made by the device's makes?
The prediction is,
>that ranchers will purchase the device at its current price
You are only trying to figure why this is true
>A & E
Can be ruled out because they are selling at current price
>C
Nothing to do with the prediction
>D
Same same, that's not what's being predicted
That only leaves B, which makes sense as using the device on all animals would be more expensive then a fence

>>56028883
I've read your comment again, you just simply aren't reading the question or scenario correctly, sorry. Work on your reading comprehension.

>>56028959

Hey can you read this >>56028883 again? This time take notice of (context is answer E):
>Buyers will buy at 'current price' but will have a discount on the bulk purchase. You can say well if you take the new price after the discount and divide by the total devices purchased, you can see you've bought the individual devices for a different price. But, I'll put to you, if you do bulk orders in real life, you buy the items at their current price, but on the invoice of the order, you will see a discount (a flat amount) taken off the total price of the order. So TECHNICALLY, you are buying each individual device for its 'current price' but then after buying getting money reimbursed!

I will also use an analogy to help you understand! Say you buy a nice new car for your company. You pay for the car at its CURRENT PRICE. Later, you get a tax rebate on the car because you bought it for company needs... Guess what, you bought the car for its CURRENT PRICE but got reimbursed later.

Bulk buying is exactly the same. You buy items for their CURRENT PRICE. Then get reimbursed a flat amount after the purchase. Anybody whos bought in bulk in real life would know this :)

>>56028981
ah yes, the ol' "you're wrong just trust me" great rebuttal

>>56026941
Post more of those this is fun

>>56026941
i honestly thought B was talking about consumers (cattle) who will just buy the most expensive thing

Are there seriously people who can't figure this stuff out? Remember: These are the people offering you financial advice when you browse this board.